Table 1.
Comparison of the identified TflABH, MthABH, and OspAmd urethanases with the benchmark enzymes UMG‐SP‐1 and UMG‐SP‐2 with respect to specific activities, melting and optimal temperatures, and pH optima. All values were determined with 7‐carbethoxy‐4‐methylcoumarin (EMACC) in triplicates.
Enzyme | Specific Activity [μmol min−1 mg−1] | Optimal Temperature [°C] | Optimal pH | Melting Temperature [°C] |
---|---|---|---|---|
TflABH | 0.013 ± 0.0018 | 60.0 | 8.0 | 70.0 ± 0.0 |
MthABH | 0.0007 ± 0.00001 | 60.0 | 7.0 | 56.6 ± 0.0 |
OspAmd | 0.292 ± 0.015 | 55.5 | 9.5 | 57.9 ± 0.1 |
UMG‐SP‐1 | 0.199 ± 0.026 | 70a) | 10a) | 54.6 ± 0.0 |
UMG‐SP‐2 | 0.147 ± 0.021 | 70a) | 10a) | 47.2 ± 0.0 |
Reported by Branson et al.[ 33 ]