Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 31;18(18):e202500662. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202500662

Table 1.

Comparison of the identified TflABH, MthABH, and OspAmd urethanases with the benchmark enzymes UMG‐SP‐1 and UMG‐SP‐2 with respect to specific activities, melting and optimal temperatures, and pH optima. All values were determined with 7‐carbethoxy‐4‐methylcoumarin (EMACC) in triplicates.

Enzyme Specific Activity [μmol min−1 mg−1] Optimal Temperature [°C] Optimal pH Melting Temperature [°C]
TflABH 0.013 ± 0.0018 60.0 8.0 70.0 ± 0.0
MthABH 0.0007 ± 0.00001 60.0 7.0 56.6 ± 0.0
OspAmd 0.292 ± 0.015 55.5 9.5 57.9 ± 0.1
UMG‐SP‐1 0.199 ± 0.026 70a) 10a) 54.6 ± 0.0
UMG‐SP‐2 0.147 ± 0.021 70a) 10a) 47.2 ± 0.0
a)

Reported by Branson et al.[ 33 ]