Table 3.

Study 2: IIP-32 scores between exploratory groups.

	Group Mean
	Victimization Only				Perpetration Only				Both				Non-Violence-Exposed Controls
	No CSA (n = 25)		+CSA (n = 11)		No CSA (n = 29)		+CSA (n = 6)		No CSA (n = 104)		+CSA (n = 35)		No CSA (n = 260)		+CSA (n = 15)
IIP-32 Scale	m	SD	m	SD	m	SD	m	SD	m	SD	m	SD	m	SD	m	SD	F (7, 478)	p	η2	d
Total	1.66	0.55	1.89	0.59	1.61	0.64	2.04	0.66	1.42	0.56	1.89	0.57	1.44	0.60	1.71	0.65	4.723	<.001*	.067	.536
	Both (+CSA) > Control (no CSA), p = .003*, d = .766; Both (+CSA) > Both (no CSA), p = .002*, d = .848
Hard to be assertive	1.16	0.99	1.48	0.80	1.24	0.95	1.46	1.04	0.98	0.82	1.75	0.83	1.17	0.90	1.37	0.89	3.082	.003*	.044	.429
	Both (+CSA) > Control (no CSA), p = .013*, d = .667; Both (+CSA) > Both (no CSA), p < .001*, d = .926
Hard to be sociable	1.42	0.95	1.39	0.90	1.29	0.96	2.13	0.96	0.89	0.83	1.66	0.76	1.11	0.91	1.38	0.82	4.737	<.001*	.067	.536
	Both (+CSA) > Control (no CSA), p = .008*, d = .656; Both (+CSA) > Both (no CSA), p < .001*, d = .969
Hard to be supportive	0.72	0.75	1.19	1.07	0.89	0.74	1.25	0.85	0.85	0.95	1.16	0.82	0.75	0.85	1.17	1.22	1.783	.089	.026	.327
Hard to be involved	1.27	1.03	1.64	0.97	1.32	0.92	1.88	0.96	1.19	0.95	1.60	0.79	1.08	0.97	1.30	0.92	2.329	.024*	.034	.375
	Both (+CSA) > Control (no CSA), p = .024*, d = .589
Too caring	2.39	0.88	2.68	0.91	2.07	0.95	2.46	0.66	2.04	1.20	2.31	1.00	1.94	0.84	2.20	0.97	2.145	.038*	.031	.358
	No significant differences detected between groups in follow-up analysis
Too dependent	2.28	0.78	2.61	1.15	2.35	0.95	2.38	0.88	2.00	0.77	2.52	0.71	2.05	0.86	2.50	0.92	3.091	.003*	.045	.434
	Both (+CSA) > Control (no CSA), p = .024*, d = .598; Both (+CSA) > Both (no CSA), p = .015*, d = .706
Too aggressive	2.22	1.02	2.43	1.27	2.12	0.99	2.67	0.86	1.89	0.77	2.13	0.81	1.78	0.79	1.93	0.76	3.294	.002*	.047	.444
	No significant differences detected between groups in follow-up analysis
Too open	1.89	0.96	2.27	0.95	2.33	0.66	2.46	0.46	2.16	0.71	2.31	0.84	2.06	0.75	2.35	0.64	1.654	.118	.024	.314