Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 19;9:e66156. doi: 10.2196/66156

Table 4. Comparative analysis of perception of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical education by gender, academic cycle, and familiarity with technology.

Question and response By gender, n (%)a P value By academic cycle, n (%)a P value By familiarity with technology, n (%)a P value
Female (n=363) Male (n=217) First (n=213) Second (n=228) Third (n=139) Knowledgeable (n=248) Not knowledgeable (n=332)
AI should be part of medical education. .39 .23 .16
 Yes 325 (62.0) 199 (38.0) 193 (35.8)

216 (40.1) 130 (24.1) 229 (43.7) 295 (56.3)
 No 38 (67.9)
18 (32.1) 20 (48.8)

12 (29.3) 9 (22.0) 19 (33.9) 37 (66.1)
AI education will benefit my career. .91 .04 b .26
 Yes 337 (62.5) 202 (37.5) 184 (35.1)

210 (40.1) 130 (24.8) 227 (42.1) 312 (57.9)
 No 26 (63.4) 15 (36.6) 29 (51.8)

18 (32.1) 9 (16.1) 21 (51.2)
20 (48.8)
AI will improve learning conditions. .64 .048 .85
 Yes 343 (62.8)
203 (37.2) 194 (35.5) 220 (40.3) 132 (24.2) 234 (42.9) 312 (57.1)
 No 20 (58.8) 14 (41.2) 19 (55.9) 8 (23.5) 7 (22.6) 14 (41.2) 20 (58.8)
I will be able to use AI tools in health care after graduation. .15 .03 <.001
 Yes 183 (65.6)
96 (34.4) 88 (31.5)

115 (41.2) 76 (27.2) 158 (56.6) 121 (43.4)
 No 180 (59.8) 121 (40.2) 125 (41.5)

113 (37.5) 63 (20.9) 90 (29.9) 211 (70.1)
a

Percentages are calculated based on the total number in each row per category.

b

Italicized values in the table indicate statistically significant differences between subgroups based on the corresponding P values (<.05).