Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 21;17:144006. doi: 10.52965/001c.144006

Table 2. List of papers reporting relevant outcomes for early revision.

Authors (publ year) year range Region/ registry (Patient volume) Early Rev cut-off overall Rev Rate Associations-indications,
Param. under study
Silijander et al (2020) 2015-2017 Michigan AR (5000 THA) 3 mo ant:0.9%
sup: 1.5%
post:0.4%
surgical approach vs age, BMI, sex, ASA, smoking, DM
rev. reason: fracture, instability, infection, loosening
Length of stay, readmission, home discharge, etc
Rhee et al (2017) 2000-2014 Nova scotia database (10000 THA) 3 mo,
1y
0.9% and 1.6% overall revision, death and infection rates vs DM, liver and hearth disease, age, blood transf.
Rhee et al (2017) 2000-2014 Nova scotia (17000 TKA) 3 mo
1y
0.5% and 1.4%
Ferguson et al (2019) 2008-16 1996-16 Geneva AR (5000)
Swedish AR (122k)
3 mo
5y
incidence of rev=0.6 to 2.3% Revision and re-operation vs. op. year, ASA score
indication: dislocation, infection, fracture, loosening
Cnudde et al. (1997) 1999-2012 Swedish AR SHAR (190k) 1 mo
3 mo
2y
2y Rev.Rate 3% to 1.5% decrease Early rev. vs. primary oper. year
Reoper., revision, mortality rate
Indication for operation;
Fixation, bearing, PROM, QoL, pain
De la Torre et al. (2020) 2005-2016 catalan AR (18000) 1y
5y
ca 2.5% revision risk vs. multiple comorbidity: obesity, liver disease, anemia, vascular disease, cancer psychoses.
De la Torre et al. (2020) 2005-2016 catalan AR (49000) 1y
5y
ca 3.6%
Singh et al (2016) 2005-2011 Winnipeg Reg. Health Authority CAN (12000) 2y
2-10y
>10y
4% (2005) to 2.1% (2011) ER vs. primary oper. year
infection, loosening, instability, fracture
Infection, instability, Stiffness, Patella maltracking
Singh et al (2016) 2005-2011 Winnipeg Reg. Health Authority CAN (18000) 2y
2-10y
>10y
3% (2005) to 1.3% (2011)
Kee et al. (2017) 2015-6 Arkansas (57000) 2y incidence of patol. >1 mod.RF=40% modifiable Risks factors for sept/asept Revision
BMI>40, smoking, dental health, HbA1c>8
Kee et al. (2017) 2015-6 Arkansas (71000) 2y incidence of patol. >1 mod.RF=44%
van Loon et al. (2021) 2007-19 LROI - netherl. Arthr Reg. (33000) 2y Rev risk for asept. loosening Bearing type CoC vs CoP
Wyles et al. (2014) >2000 metaanalysis 2y same short term rev. risk Bearing Type (CoC /CoP/ MoM/ MoP) Pat <65y old
Thien et al. (2014) 1995-2009 NARA Scandinavian Arthr. Reg. (300k cem
111k uncem stems)
6 mo (2y) RR uncem =0.42% - (0.47%)
RR cem.=0.04% - (0.07%)
cem vs uncem stems; age, sex, implant design, preop. diagnosis
ER vs. primary oper. year
Bottle et al (2019) 2009-14 UK nat. administr data (315k) 3y RR=2.1% -multiple emerg. admission,
-comorbidities
-resurfacing vs THA
Bottle et al (2019) 2009-14 UK nat. hosp. administr data (347k) 3y RR=2.2%
Roof et al (2022) 2014-2019 NYU Langone hospital (167k) 5y 33% potentially avoidable complications "avoidable" revisions: instability, intraop fracture, metal allergy, maltracking
Dy et al. (2013) 1997-2005 NY and CA statewide data (300k) 5y; 9y 4% and 8.9% hazard ratio vs sex, age, insurance type, education, pop. Density
Duman et al. (2021) 2005-2011 396 THA Revisions <2y, 2-5, 5-10y
Quinlan et al (2020) private insurance database US (ca 400 Pat. Peripr Joint infection) OR 5,6 for PJI in 1 y
OR 4,8 for PJI in 2y
Early aseptic Revision second hit facilitating Periprost. joint infection
Urish et al. (2020) 2020 nationwide readmission database up to 2013 (21000) 3 mo
1 y
Revision and reoperation
Periprost. joint infection 62% of revisions