Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 10;16:1622819. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1622819

Table 2.

The association between baseline Tyg level and the risk of unfavorable outcome.

The number of events (unfavorable outcome), n (%) Crude model Minimally adjusted model Fully adjusted model
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
All patients 103 2.690 (1.832–3.950) <0.001 3.445 (1.861–6.376) <0.001 3.474 (1.536–7.855) 0.002
Tyg tertiles
Q1 (<8.376) 13 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref) 1.0 (Ref)
Q2 (8.376–8.804) 22 1.984 (1.037–3.797) 0.039 2.589 (0.675–9.924) 0.165 2.125 (0.916–4.930) 0.265
Q3 (>8.804–9.268) 28 4.045 (2.169–7.543) <0.001 4.714 (1.396–15.924) 0.013 4.529 (1.076–19.069) 0.039
Q4 (>9.268) 40 6.860 (2.022–23.281) 0.002 6.777 (1.455–31.557) 0.015

Crude model: age, gender.

Minimally adjusted model: age, gender, Grabe, SEBES, IVH, GCS, WFNS, Hunt Hess score, loss of consciousness, treatment modality, hypertension, history of heart disease, hyperlipemia, body mass index, postoperative ventriculomegaly, abnormal liver function, anemia, pneumonia, and DVT.

Fully adjusted model: age, gender, Grabe, SEBES, IVH, GCS, WFNS, Hunt Hess score, loss of consciousness, treatment modality, hypertension, history of heart disease, hyperlipemia, body mass index, postoperative ventriculomegaly, abnormal liver function, anemia, pneumonia, DVT, max diameter of aneurysm, preoperative Glu, preoperative urea, preoperative eGFR, preoperative AST, preoperative ALB, preoperative CHO, preoperative CKMb, preoperative WBC, preoperative MONO, preoperative NEUT, and preoperative HGB.