Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 24;13:e73734. doi: 10.2196/73734

Table 5. Intention-to-treat analysis of latent growth curve modeling of social anxiety symptoms in the overall sample. The Gelman–Rubin statistics (rhat) for all coefficients was 1.0.

Intervention effect Baseline (Wave 1), mean (SD) Wave 2, mean (SD) Wave 3, mean (SD) Wave 4, mean (SD) SMDa
β 95% LLb 95% ULc Wald P value
Social anxiety symptoms in virtual communitiesd,e
  Experiment 0.666 –0.109 1.48 1.649 .099 28.95 (18.97) 31.89 (17.85) 31.87 (17.64) 31.96 (18.4) 0.11
  Waitlist f 28.39 (19.07) 31.12 (18.04) 30.79 (17.87) 29.79 (18.92)
Social anxiety symptoms in physical communitiesg
  Experiment 0.319 –0.534 1.095 0.771 .441 46.81 (23.49) 48.93 (21.21) 47.79 (20.41) 47.61 (20.53) 0.06
  Waitlist 45.66 (23.22) 46.24 (21.3) 46.07 (20.51) 45.54 (21.16)
a

SMD: Standardized Mean Difference.

b

LL: lower limit.

c

UL: upper limit.

d

Widely Applicable Bayesian Information Criterion (WAIC) -15995.2, leave-one-out (LOO) -16147.0.

e

LOO -16467.5.

f

Not applicable.

g

WAIC -16332.1.