Table 3.
Comparison of moral sensitivity scores by dimension in the intervention and control groups before and after the intervention (intragroup comparison)
| Variables | Before | After | P-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Mean±SD | Paired T-Test Statistics | ||
|
Total Score of Moral
Sensitivity |
Intervention (n=22) | 5.16±61.72 | 63.54±5.54 |
P-value=0.279 t=-1.11 |
| Control (n=20) | 58.75±5.92 | 59.25±5.65 | 0.808 | |
|
Respecting Patients’
Autonomy |
Intervention (n=22) | 7.45±1.35 | 7.40±1.50 | 0.537 |
| Control (n=20) | 7.30±1.55 | 7.50±1.43 | 0.627 | |
|
Awareness of How to
Communicate with the Patient |
Intervention (n=22) | 15.27±2.64 | 14.27±1.48 |
P-value=0.167 t=1.43 |
| Control (n=20) | 14.25±1.99 | 15.00±2.29 |
P-value=0.270 t=-1.136 |
|
| Professional Knowledge | Intervention (n=22) | 3.36±1.55 | 3.81±1.65 |
P-value=0.389 t=-0.879 |
| Control (n=20) | 3.50±1.33 | 3.55±1.66 |
P-value=0.90 t=-0.127 |
|
|
Experience of Ethical
Problems and Conflicts |
Intervention (n=22) | 8.09±1.68 | 8.13±1.52 |
P-value=0.883 t=-0.149 |
| Control (n=20) | 6.95±2.28 | 7.00±2.00 |
P-value=0.959 t=-0.090 |
|
|
Implementation of
Ethical Concepts in Decision-Making |
Intervention (n=22) | 11.81±2.55 | 12.22±2.89 |
P-value=0.554 t=-0.604 |
| Control (n=20) | 12.15±2.27 | 11.35±1.98 |
P-value=0.107 t=1.69 |
|
|
Sincerity and
Benevolence |
Intervention (n=22) | 15.72±3.31 | 17.68±3.25 |
P-value=0.064 t=-1.95 |
| Control (n=20) | 14.60±2.68 | 14.85±3.15 |
P-value=0.731 t=-0.343 |
|