Skip to main content
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine logoLink to Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
. 2025 Sep 24;33:150. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01458-4

Continuous vital sign monitoring for predicting hospital length of stay: a feasibility study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic heart failure patients

Ivan Juez-Garcia 1,#, Iván D Benítez 2,1,#, Gerard Torres 1, Jessica González 1, Laia Utrillo 3, Anna Pérez 3, Natalia Varvará 1, Irene Cuadrat 3, Ferran Barbé 1, Jordi de Batlle 1,
PMCID: PMC12462186  PMID: 40993754

Abstract

Background

Vital signs monitoring provides clinicians with real-time information regarding patients’ current medical condition. We hypothesize that applying comprehensive analytical methods to underutilized, routinely collected vital signs data can yield valuable insights to support clinical decision-making. In this study, we present a novel approach for vital signs time series analysis applied to hospitalization length of stay (LOS) prediction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) patients.

Methods

Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were continuously monitored during the first 24 h of hospital admission in COPD and CHF patients admitted to general, non-ICU hospital wards. The resulting time series were submitted to a comprehensive analysis through a highly comparative, massive feature extraction. We identified key patterns associated with hospitalization length of stay (LOS). Finally, we developed a predictive model for hospitalization LOS combining predictive features from the three vital signs time series.

Results

A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study, 74 of whom were eligible for analysis (39 COPD and 35 CHF patients). Periodicity and self-correlation in HR and RR time series were associated to hospitalization LOS. In SpO2 time series, short-term fluctuations and local dynamics were associated to hospitalization LOS. The predictive model for hospitalization LOS was built using nineteen predictive features and achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.975, an accuracy of 0.944, a sensitivity of 0.979, and a specificity of 0.900 in 10-fold cross-validation.

Conclusion

Through a comprehensive feature-based analysis, we identified key patterns in HR, RR, and SpO₂ time series associated with hospitalization LOS in COPD and CHF patients and a compact set of features that can accurately predict LOS in COPD and CHF patients using only routinely collected data from the first 24 h of admission.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-025-01458-4.

Keywords: Vital signs; Length of stay; Monitoring, physiologic; Internal medicine

Background

Vital signs have been routinely monitored in hospital settings for over a century [1], as they provide clinicians with real-time information of their patients’ current medical condition [2]. Abnormal vital signs are known to be indicative of clinical deterioration and often precede adverse events [3, 4], enabling timely medical intervention [5]. Consequently, vital signs monitoring is part of the usual practice in high-risk environments like intensive care units (ICUs) [6]. In these settings, vital sign monitoring has been utilized for patient risk stratification [7], forecasting vital signs trends [8, 9] and predicting outcomes like sepsis [10, 11] and mortality [1214].

Although continuous monitoring improves vital signs control and patient management, its adoption in general wards has been traditionally hindered by technological limitations, substantial economic costs and negative implications in patient mobility and recovery [15, 16]. Nevertheless, the development of novel devices that overcome these challenges has allowed for transferring the tailored care of the ICUs to the general ward. In this regard, previous research has shown that continuous vital signs monitoring in general wards is not only feasible [17] but also improves patient outcomes [18]. Several studies have examined the relationship between continuous vital sign monitoring in general wards and various patient outcomes, with outcomes differing from those in ICUs due to the typically lower-risk profile of ward patients. Beyond in-hospital mortality [19] and clinical deterioration [20], unplanned ICU admissions [19, 21], length of stay (LOS) [22], rapid response team activations [21] and non-elective readmissions [23] have been assessed.

Considering the abovementioned evidence, we hypothesize that applying analytical procedures to already existing monitoring protocols may yield clinically relevant insights. In this regard, the capacity to predict hospitalization LOS during the initial hours following hospital admission would be of significant contribution in two key areas: hospital management and patient care. From a hospital management perspective, timely LOS prediction would allow for targeted interventions to streamline care and reduce unwarranted extended LOS [24], therefore optimizing resource allocation. From a patient care standpoint, short hospitalization LOS has been associated with favourable post-discharge outcomes such as lower early readmission and mortality rates [25], whereas prolonged LOS has been associated with increased risk of adverse events in ICUs [26], acute care wards [27] and general wards [28].

This work presents a protocol for the implementation of non-invasive, continuous vital signs monitoring in general wards, together with a comprehensive pipeline for massive feature extraction and analysis. Through this pipeline, our aim was (i) to collect and identify key features able to profile vital signs time series through their association with hospitalization LOS in COPD and CHF patients; and (ii) to build a predictive model capable of predicting hospitalization LOS in our cohort of COPD and CHF patients.

Materials and methods

Study design

This was a prospective observational study designed to implement an analysis protocol for clinical outcome prediction through vital signs time series in general wards.

Study population

The study population comprised all patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) who had hospital admissions to non-ICU hospital wards due to COPD exacerbations or CHF decompensations and were submitted to continuous vital signs monitoring in accordance with standard clinical practice at Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova and Hospital Universitario Santa Maria in Lleida, Spain, between January 2023 and February 2024.

Sample size

Our study was as designed a pilot study to assess the feasibility of employing vital signs continuous monitoring to predict hospitalization LOS. Given that COPD and CHF are known to be affected by seasonality, with a clear winter predominance [29, 30], we decided to recruit our cohort during an estimated one-year period. Moreover, we ensured that the resulting sample would suffice according to feasibility study guidelines [31].

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for COPD patients included being aged ≥ 40 years at the time of admission, having a confirmed COPD diagnosis based on Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria as per medical records [32], undergoing continuous monitoring of vital signs during their hospital stay according to standard clinical practice, having no active cancer, tuberculosis, pneumoconiosis, pneumonectomy, moderate or severe cognitive decay (Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) ≥ 5) and accepting participation in the study by signing an informed consent. Inclusion criteria for CHF patients included being aged ≥ 45 years at the time of admission, having a confirmed CHF diagnosis based on European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines criteria as per medical records [33], undergoing continuous monitoring of vital signs during their hospital stay according to standard clinical practice and clinician decision, having no decompensation attributable to an identifiable cause unrelated to CHF, having no planned invasive cardiac medical intervention in the following three months, having no active cancer, advanced renal failure (Stage 5: glomerular filtration rate < 15 ml/min) or moderate or severe cognitive decay (GDS ≥ 5) and accepting participation in the study by signing an informed consent. These criteria ensured clinical relevance and population homogeneity. Cognitive impairment exclusion criteria were set to uphold ethical standards.

Patient recruitment

During their hospital stay, potentially eligible patients were visited by a member of the research team and a nurse, who informed them of the study and requested their participation. No specific or predefined criteria for patient monitoring were set before the study, as monitoring depended on monitoring devices’ availability. As a result, patient recruitment was non-consecutive. Vital signs monitoring started before the research team could contact eligible patients, and monitoring data was automatically transferred to hospital servers. Patients who were not monitored were neither contacted by the study team nor registered in any form. In cases where eligible patients signed the informed consent, their monitoring data were transferred to the research team. In the absence of consent, the monitoring data were deleted after hospital discharge. The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Arnau de Vilanova of Lleida (CEIC-2731).

Data collection

Continuously-monitored vital signs of eligible patients — specifically heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) — were extracted from EDAN IM60 multiparametric monitors (Edan Instruments, China). HR was monitored through 5-lead electrocardiogram, RR was monitored through impedance pneumography and SpO2 was monitored through SpO₂ pulse oximetry. Vital signs values were recorded every thirty seconds during the first 24 h of hospital admission and stored in the local monitoring centre of each nursery wing. The monitoring window was set at the first 24 h of hospital admission to ensure the capture of both daytime and nighttime physiological patterns and to enable early outcome prediction. The information stored in each monitoring centre was then processed using a healthcare-specific integration engine that transmitted all monitoring data through Health Level Seven messaging to the Hospital Arnau de Vilanova cloud server, operated by the hospital’s Information Technology department. This data was then integrated into a database containing eligible patient’s medical record number and their time-annotated vital sign measurements.

Vital signs analysis

Time series processing

Time series data corresponding to HR, RR and SpO2 were extracted from the continuous monitoring records of the study population. Patients whose monitoring did not commence within the first 24 h of hospital admission were excluded from further analyses. Subsequently, patients’ time series were trimmed to contain only the first 24 h of monitoring. Time series with less than twelve hours of recorded data or less than 75% of data completeness within this 24-hour period were also excluded.

Following the selection of the time series that met the required quality standards, we conducted an imputation process to account for any potential gap in our time series. In this regard, previous research has pointed out that vital signs’ trends are found to correlate [34, 35], especially during acute deterioration episodes, where vital signs can be used as adverse event predictors [36]. Thus, missing data in the selected patients were imputed using Self-Attention-based Imputation for Time Series (SAITS), a Python package specialised in multivariate time series imputation whose self-attention mechanism enabled the identification of potential relationships between the recorded vital signs [37].

Before training the imputation model, we individually scaled the three vital sign time series (RR, HR, and SpO2). The SAITS model utilizes artificially masked values as training data, employing a diagonally-masked self-attention mechanism to evaluate model performance on the masked data. Consequently, the complete scaled time series dataset was used for model training. Subsequently, the trained model was used to impute any individual time series that met the aforementioned criteria: timely monitoring, more than 12 h of recorded vital signs and over 75% data completeness. This procedure was performed using Python 3.12.6.

Feature extraction

Following imputation, each of the three vital signs time series extracted from each patient was subject to a comprehensive analysis. The selected framework for this procedure was highly comparative time-series analysis (hctsa), a MATLAB package designed for conducting highly comparative time-series analysis by massive feature extraction, computing over 7700 features for each time series [38, 39]. This method has been previously employed to discover signatures of fatal neonatal illness from vital signs [40] or predict post-cardiac arrest outcomes [41]. The analysis of the univariate time series from each of the three vital signs resulted in a single value for each of the 7700 features. This procedure was performed using MATLAB R2024b and hctsa 1.9.0.0.

Vital signs profiling

The extensive feature set derived from each vital signs time series was then processed through an individual feature selection procedure aimed at identifying the most interpretative features, that is, those most strongly associated with hospitalization LOS. This characterization of each vital sign’s time series was achieved using VSURF, an R package specifically designed for feature selection in high-dimensional settings [42]. The features were then ranked according to their permutation-based importance metric. For each of the three vital signs, the top fifty features with the highest value for importance were selected as interpretative variables.

Length of stay prediction

Previous research has demonstrated that dichotomized predictions of hospitalization LOS have more practical implications in clinical decision-making systems than continuous predictions [43, 44]. In this regard, Quintana et al. established a threshold of nine days to distinguish between short and prolonged stays when evaluating the performance of various LOS predictors in COPD exacerbations [45]. Accordingly, we adopted the same nine-day threshold for LOS, categorizing hospitalizations under nine days as “Short LOS” and hospitalizations equal to or exceeding nine days as “Prolonged LOS”.

The predictive features obtained from each of the three VSURF analyses were extracted and combined to create a prediction feature subset, merging the features derived from the three vital signs time series. The dichotomized LOS variable was then used as the response variable in a logistic regression model built using the predictive subset. The performance of the predictive model was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation.

Results

Characteristics of the cohort

Out of all potentially eligible patients, a total of 101 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and were therefore enrolled in the study, and 74 were eligible for analysis as per signal quality requirements. The patient recruitment workflow can be seen in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Patient recruitment pipeline. The recruited patients refer to eligible patients who met inclusion criteria and were therefore enrolled in the study. As the study was conducted under real-life clinical conditions, the total number of potentially eligible patients cannot be calculated

The baseline characteristics of the Short Stay and Prolonged Stay groups can be seen in Table 1. Briefly, the study cohort had a median [p25;p75] age of 82.5 [75.0;89.0] years. 31 (41.9%) patients were female and 43 (58.1%) were male. 39 (52.7%) patients were admitted due to a COPD exacerbation and 35 (47.3%) were admitted due to a CHF decompensation.

Table 1.

Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics of the cohort

Short Stay Prolonged Stay p-value
N = 34 N = 40
n (%) or median [p25;p75] n (%) or median [p25;p75]
Sociodemographic and Anthropometric Characteristics
 Age (years) 79.5 [67.0;88.8] 85.0 [77.0;89.2] 0.114
 Sex 1.000
  Female 14 (45.2%) 17 (54.8%)
  Male 20 (46.5%) 23 (53.5%)
 Weight (kg) 73.2 [60.0;90.9] 73.1 [64.5;88.0] 0.741
 Height (m) 1.62 [1.56;1.70] 1.63 [1.55;1.68] 0.983
 BMI (kg/m2) 27.5 [22.7;32.1] 28.7 [25.6;31.6] 0.501
Habits
 Smoking Status 0.245
  Active Smoker 7 (70.0%) 3 (30.0%)
  Former Smoker 17 (47.2%) 19 (52.8%)
  Non smoker/Occasional Smoker 10 (37.0%) 17 (63.0%)
 Pack-Year Index 42.0 [23.0;64.0] 33.0 [21.8;54.5] 0.584
 Alcohol Consumption 0.716
  Active Drinker 8 (53.3%) 7 (46.7%)
  Former Drinker 6 (50.0%) 6 (50.0%)
  Never Drinker/Occasional Drinker 18 (40.9%) 26 (59.1%)
Comorbidities
 Diabetes 11 (44.0%) 14 (56.0%) 0.409
 Renal Disease 12 (54.5%) 10 (45.5%) 0.522
 Charlson Comorbidity Index 6.00 [4.00;7.00] 6.00 [6.00;8.00] 0.126
 Arterial Hypertension 24 (41.4%) 34 (58.6%) 0.223
 Atrial Fibrillation 11 (32.4%) 23 (67.6%) 0.041
 Hypercholesterolemia 7 (63.6%) 4 (36.4%) 0.367
 Asthma 2 (40.0%) 3 (60.0%) 1.000
Medical Consultations in the Previous 12 Months
 Total Medical Consultations 16.0 [8.00;28.0] 16.0 [11.0;24.0] 0.782
 Consultations for COPD or CHF 3.00 [2.00;9.00] 4.50 [2.00;9.00] 0.737
Laboratory Parameters at Hospital Admission
 Glucose (mg/dL) 115 [92.2;143] 122 [99.0;162] 0.318
 Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.89 [0.76;1.31] 1.12 [0.74;1.41] 0.337
 Sodium (mmol/L) 140 [137;141] 140 [138;141] 0.914
 Potassium (mmol/L) 3.95 [3.76;4.31] 4.16 [3.95;4.38] 0.409
 Haemoglobin (g/dL) 13.1 [11.5;14.3] 12.1 [10.6;14.0] 0.170
 Leukocyte count (x109/L) 8.82 [6.96;11.6] 9.22 [7.12;11.3] 0.733
 Platelet count (x109/L) 232 [175;301] 231 [172;298] 0.778
 Neutrophil count (x109/L) 6.60 [4.73;9.67] 7.49 [5.58;9.81] 0.432
 Lymphocyte count (x109/L) 1.07 [0.67;1.76] 0.86 [0.68;1.21] 0.206
 Monocyte count (x109/L) 0.56 [0.30;0.81] 0.63 [0.28;0.80] 0.931
 Eosinophil count (x109/L) 0.08 [0.00;0.16] 0.03 [0.00;0.09] 0.228
 Basophil count (x109/L) 0.03 [0.01;0.06] 0.03 [0.01;0.03] 0.263
Exacerbation Type 0.228
 COPD 21 (53.8%) 18 (46.2%)
 CHF 13 (37.1%) 22 (62.9%)

In continuous variables, p−values have been obtained through the the Kruskall−Wallis test. In categorical variables, p−values were calculated using the chi−square test, or the exact Fisher test when the expected frequencies were less than five

Vital signs analysis

Time series processing

A total of 1604.63 h of monitoring data were obtained from the 74 patients. The median number of monitoring hours per patient was 22.46 h [21.01;23.15].

Feature extraction

The hctsa feature generation process rendered a total of 7755 features per vital sign. After filtering erroneous or non-calculated features, 6404 features with adequate values in the three vital signs were scaled and selected for the following feature selection process.

Vital signs profiling

The HR time series (Fig. 2) is associated with hospitalization LOS through features capturing the auto-mutual information of its distribution (CO_HistogramAMI) and its self-correlation structure (CO_fzcglscf). Furthermore, the analysis of interpretative features showed a cluster of features indicating robust recurring patterns (SP_Summaries_pgram_hamm) and a cluster of features related to scaling properties of fluctuations in time series (SC_FluctAnal), which are commonly linked to self-similarity and long-range correlations of signals. Overall, the interpretative features found in HR suggest a strong degree of association between self-correlation and periodicity along the HR time series and hospitalization LOS. A summary of the top fifty interpretative features of the HR time series can be found in Table 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Variable importance (top) and Pearson correlation matrix (down) of the fifty selected interpretative features for HR

Table 2.

Top Fifty interpretative features of heart rate time series

Feature Type Feature Name (as per HCTSA) Nº of occurrences Feature Description
Correlation CO_fzcglscf 2 The first zero-crossing of the generalized self-correlation function
CO_HistogramAMI 5 The automutual information of the distribution using histograms
IN_AutoMutualInfoStats 1 Statistics on automutual information function of a time series
Distribution DN_RemovePoints 1 How time-series properties change as points are removed
DN_SimpleFit 1 Fit distributions or simple time-series models to the data
EN_DistributionEntropy 2 Estimates of entropy from the distribution of a data vector
Extreme Values EX_MovingThreshold 1 Moving threshold model for extreme events in a time series
Model Fitting MF_CompareTestSets 1 Robustness of test-set goodness of fit
MF_GP_LocalPrediction 1 Gaussian Process time-series model for local prediction
Non-Linear Analysis NL_TSTL_FractalDimensions 3 Fractal dimension spectrum of a time series
NL_TSTL_LargestLyap 1 Largest Lyapunov exponent of a time series
SC_FluctAnal 9 Implements fluctuation analysis by a variety of methods
Pre-Processing PP_Compare 5 Compare how time-series properties change after pre-processing
Symbolic Transformations SB_MotifThree 1 Motifs in a coarse-graining of a time series to a 3-letter alphabet
SB_TransitionMatrix 2 Transition probabilities between time-series states
Wavelet Transforms SP_Summaries 8 Statistics of the power spectrum of a time series
Basic Statistics ST_LocalExtrema 1 How local maximums and minimums vary across the time series
Stationarity and Step Detection SY_LocalGlobal 2 Compares local statistics to global statistics of a time series
SY_SpreadRandomLocal 1 Bootstrap-based stationarity measure
CP_l1pwc_sweep_lambda 1 Dependence of step detection on regularization parameter

The analysis of the interpretative features of RR associated with hospitalization LOS (Fig. 3) shows a more widespread distribution of features. The correlation matrix in Fig. 3 shows a small cluster of features related to autoregressive model fitting using autocovariance (MF_AR_arcov), as well as clusters relating to predictability (MF_steps_ahead) or fluctuation analysis (SC_FluctAnal). Overall, the interpretative features found in RR indicate a heterogeneous distribution of variance, with highlighted clusters suggesting an association between hospitalization LOS and a self-correlated, persistent temporal pattern in the RR signal. A summary of the top fifty interpretative features of the RR time series can be found in Table 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Variable importance (top) and Pearson correlation matrix (down) of the fifty selected interpretative features for RR

Table 3.

Top Fifty interpretative features of respiratory rate time series

Feature Type Feature Name (as per HCTSA) Nº of occurrences Feature Description
Correlation CO_Embed2_Basic 1 Point density statistics in a 2-d embedding space
CO_StickAngles 1 Analysis of line-of-sight angles between time-series data points
IN_AutoMutualInfoStats 1 Statistics on automutual information function for a time series.
ST_MomentCorr 1 Correlations between simple statistics in local windows of a time series.
Distribution DN_RemovePoints 1 How time-series properties change as points are removed
Entropy EN_DistributionEntropy 1 Estimates of entropy from the distribution of a data vector
EN_Randomize 4 How time-series properties change with increasing randomization
Model Fitting FC_LocalSimple 3 Simple local time-series forecasting
FC_Surprise 1 Quantifies measures of surprise given recent memory
MF_AR_arcov 3 Fits an AR model of a given order, p
MF_StateSpace_n4sid 3 State space time-series model fitting
MF_steps_ahead 5 Goodness of model predictions across prediction lengths
Non-Linear Analysis NL_crptool 1 Analyzes the false-nearest neighbors statistic
NL_MS_nlpe 1 Normalized drop-one-out constant interpolation nonlinear prediction error
NL_TSTL_LargestLyap 1 Largest Lyapunov exponent of a time series
SC_FluctAnal 6 Implements fluctuation analysis by a variety of methods
Visibility Graph NW_VisibilityGraph 3 Visibility graph analysis of a time series
Dynamical Modeling PH_ForcePotential 1 Couples the values of the time series to a dynamical system
Pre-processing PP_Compare 5 Compare how time-series properties change after pre-processing
PP_Iterate 2 How time-series properties change in response to iterative pre-processing
Wavelet Transforms SP_Summaries 1 Statistics of the power spectrum of a time series
Basic Statistics ST_LocalExtrema 1 How local maximums and minimums vary across the time series
Stationarity SY_DriftingMean 2 Mean and variance in local time-series subsegments
SY_SlidingWindow 1 Sliding window measures of stationarity

The analysis of the interpretative features of SpO2 associated with hospitalization LOS (Fig. 4) reveals a small cluster of wavelet-based transformation features (WL_cwt), related to long-term trends and short-term fluctuations. In addition, the analysis renders two clusters indicative of local patterns and anomalies as well as short term dynamics and fluctuations (SB_MotifThree). Overall, the highlighted clusters suggest that hospitalization LOS is associated to both stable trends and unpredictable local dynamics in the SpO2 signal. A summary of the top fifty interpretative features of the HR time series can be found in Table 4.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Variable importance (top) and Pearson Correlation Matrix (down) of the fifty selected interpretative features for SpO2

Table 4.

Top Fifty interpretative features of oxygen saturation time series

Feature Type Feature Name (as per HCTSA) Nº of occurrences Feature Description
Correlation CO_AddNoise 1 Changes in the automutual information with the addition of noise
IN_AutoMutualInfoStats 1 Statistics on automutual information function of a time series
Distribution DN_OutlierInclude 4 How statistics depend on distributional outliers
DN_RemovePoints 4 How time-series properties change as points are removed
DN_SimpleFit 1 Fit distributions or simple time-series models to the data.
Entropy EN_Randomize 4 How time-series properties change with increasing randomization
Model Fitting MF_arfit 1 Statistics of a fitted AR model to a time series.
MF_ExpSmoothing 3 Exponential smoothing time-series prediction model
MF_GP_hyperparameters 2 Gaussian Process time-series model parameters and goodness of fit.
MF_hmm 1 Hidden Markov Model (HMM) fitting to a time series
Dynamical Modeling PH_ForcePotential 1 Couples the values of the time series to a dynamical system
Pre-processing PP_Compare 4 Compare how time-series properties change after pre-processing
Symbolic Transformations SB_MotifThree 8 Motifs in a coarse-graining of a time series to a 3-letter alphabet
SB_TransitionMatrix 1 Transition probabilities between time-series states
Stationarity SY_RangeEvolve 2 How the time-series range changes across time
CP_ML_StepDetect 2 Analysis of discrete steps in a time series.
Non-Linear Analysis TSTL_localdensity 1 Local density estimates in the time-delay embedding space.
Wavelet Transforms WL_cwt 4 Continuous wavelet transform of a time series
SP_Summaries 5 Statistics of the power spectrum of a time series

Length of stay prediction

The complementary information captured by the predictive features of the three vital signs time series was integrated into a model to predict hospitalization LOS. The model was built with six predictive features from the HR time series, six predictive features from the RR time series and seven predictive features from the SpO2 time series. The selected predictive features, along with a brief description of their characteristics and functioning, are presented in Table 5.

Table 5.

Predictive features for hospitalization LOS included in the predictive model

Feature Name (as per hctsa) Feature Description
Heart Rate CO_HistogramAMI_even_2bin.ami1 Automutual information of the distribution using histograms
SC_FluctAnal_2_dfa_50_0_logi.ssr Fluctuation analysis by polynomial trends
SC_FluctAnal_2_range_50_logi.ssr Fluctuation analysis by range

NL_TSTL_FractalDimensions_2_100_02_1

_5_10_32_1_5.linfit_a

Fractal dimension spectrum of a time series
ST_LocalExtrema_n100.minmaxonminabsmin Variation of local maximums and minimums
SP_Summaries_pgram_hamm.logarea_4_4 Power spectrum statistics
Respiratory Rate PH_ForcePotential_dblwell_1_02_01.finaldev Couples the values of the time series to a dynamical system
SC_FluctAnal_2_range_50_logi.logtausplit Fluctuation analysis by range
SC_FluctAnal_sign_2_dfa_50_2_logi.resac1 Fluctuation analysis by polynomial trends
CO_StickAngles_y.q10_n Analysis of line-of-sight angles between time-series data points
EN_Randomize_dyndist.ac2fexprmse How time-series properties change with increasing randomization
MF_StateSpace_n4sid_3_05_1.A_9 State space time-series model fitting
Oxygen Saturation EN_Randomize_dyndist.statav5fexprmse How time-series properties change with increasing randomization
SP_Summaries_pgram_hamm.linfitloglog_hf_sigrat Power spectrum statistics
SB_MotifThree_quantile.abcc Motifs in a coarse-graining of a time series to a 3-letter alphabet
PP_Compare_sin1.swss5_1 Compare how time-series properties change after pre-processing
MF_ExpSmoothing_05_best.dwts Exponential smoothing time-series prediction model
WL_cwt_sym2_32.maxonmeanSC Continuous wavelet transform of a time series
PP_Compare_diff2.statav6 Compare how time-series properties change after pre-processing

The predictive model built with the combination of predictive features of the three vital signs achieved an AUC of 0.975, an accuracy of 0.944, a sensitivity of 0.979, and a specificity of 0.900 in 10-fold cross validation.

Discussion

Significance of results

The present study tried to assess the feasibility of using vital signs time series obtained in the first 24 h of hospital admission in the general ward to predict hospitalization LOS. Through a massive, feature-based comparative analysis, we were able to profile the variance found within the three vital signs time series and identify the most relevant patterns associated with hospitalization LOS in COPD and CHF patients. According to the interpretative feature clusters found in the time-series profiling, hospitalization LOS in COPD and CHF patients was associated to periodic and self-correlating patterns in HR and RR time series. In the case of SpO2 time-series, hospitalization LOS was associated to fluctuant, wavelet-based patterns. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have demonstrated an association between abnormalities or instability in vital signs and adverse clinical outcomes [3, 4].

Our findings indicate that a compact set of features derived from vital signs time series can accurately predict LOS in COPD and CHF patients using only routinely collected data from the first 24 h of admission. The predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.975 and an accuracy of 0.944 in 10-fold cross-validation, utilizing nineteen features. These results highlight the potential of early vital sign dynamics to inform LOS prediction and suggest the broader applicability of our protocol for anticipating different clinical outcomes.

Limitations

Our study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, it is important to note that our results are only applicable to COPD and CHF patients meeting inclusion criteria. In this regard, further studies should evaluate the generalizability of our results to other populations. However, it must be noticed that this is a feasibility study which purpose is not to export the obtained algorithms to other settings. Secondly, patient recruitment was not consecutive, as the study was conducted under real-life clinical conditions where vital signs monitoring depended on device availability, and this could cause some degree of selection bias.

Related works

The potential of vital signs monitoring in clinical practice, together with the need of further research, has long been acknowledged [46, 47]. Continuous monitoring of vital signs of inpatients is a common practice in ICUs and medium care settings, in contrast to general wards [5, 48], where cumbersome equipment constrained patient mobility and recovery [49]. However, the appearance of novel and easy-to-wear devices has increased the feasibility of a widespread, continuous monitoring of vital signs in general wards [50, 51]. In this sense, Leenen et al. provided a review of existing studies regarding wireless wearable devices for continuous vital signs measurement [5]. Although continuous monitoring intuitively appears more informative than intermittent monitoring, current evidence has shown mixed results. Bowles et al. found no significant improvements in clinical outcomes for patients in randomised controlled trials comparing continuous monitoring and usual care in general wards [52]. Similarly, Areia et al. reported no strong evidence suggesting that continuous monitoring through wearables is superior to standard care, though trends towards decreased ICU transfers, hospitalization LOS and hospital mortality were found [53]. These reviews, however, are limited to studies comparing patient outcomes between usual care and alarm-based continuous vital sign monitoring, with no further analysis whatsoever of the resulting monitoring data. This research gap underscores the importance of new studies to obtain novel insights from continuous vital sign monitoring data. This is, to our knowledge, the first study to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the characteristic features of vital signs time series in relation to clinical outcomes, in this case hospitalization LOS. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, studies addressing clinical outcome prediction through continuous vital signs monitoring are mainly restricted to ICUs [14] or high-risk settings [54]. Our study is, therefore, the first study to assess hospitalization LOS prediction in general ward patients using continuous vital signs monitoring data.

Lessons learned

From a technological perspective, the use of stationary monitoring devices limited the continuous collection of vital signs data. Whenever a patient left the hospital bed, for instance to go to the bathroom, they became disconnected, requiring nursing staff to manually reconnect them. This translated in monitoring gaps that needed to be addressed after data recollection. Consequently, the use of portable monitoring devices for further monitoring studies is heavily recommended. In this regard, Weenk et al. showcased the capabilities of continuous vital signs monitoring in the general ward through wearable technology [50, 55]. Continuous, non-invasive, wearable, wireless monitoring technology could streamline and improve the collection of vital signs data, while minimizing discomfort for patients.

From a managerial perspective, patient recruitment was largely influenced by the emergency room’s workload, as eligible patients were identified at this stage before being transferred to wards in Hospital Arnau de Vilanova or Santa Maria. Since the emergency room is shared between both hospitals, transfer times were often delayed, resulting in monitoring initiation deferral. Additionally, monitoring data was linked to the bed to which the monitoring device was associated, meaning that patients’ ID codes had to be manually linked to the monitored data.

Conclussions

Through a comprehensive feature-based analysis, we identified key patterns in HR, RR, and SpO₂ time series associated with hospitalization LOS in COPD and CHF patients. Our findings also indicate that a compact set of features derived from vital signs time series can accurately predict LOS in COPD and CHF patients using only routinely collected data from the first 24 h of admission.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the invaluable contributions of the following health professionals, whose support and expertise were instrumental to the successful completion of this study: Ricardo Pifarre Teixido, Maria Inmaculada Sala Peiro, Sabrina Abreu del Rosario, Mònica Pacheco Molina, Maria Carmen Alcolea Cantos, Francisco Javier Ribas Solis, María Zuil Moreno, Aida Monge Esque, Aurora López Fernández, Jeisson Castillo Chaux, Mireia Eroles Domingo, Núria Hill Ibáñez, Montse Molina Sebé, Rosa Maria Jimenez Saavedra, Miquel Mesas Julio, Yolanda Fauria Garcia, Maria Labrador Calucho, Joana Mora Pareja, Gabriela Mitu Anton, Adrià Castelló Tarruella, Petronela Totu, Maria Ungria Garrido, Selene Rodríguez Jiménez, Cristina Fontana Fortuny, Roser Benages Vila, Paula Velázquez Solana, Cristinne Monzon Reyes, Ana Perez Sainz.

Abbreviations

AUC

Area Under the Curve

CHF

Chronic Heart Failure

COPD

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

ESC

European Society of Cardiology

GDS

Global Deterioration Scale

GOLD

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

hctsa

Highly comparative time-series analysis

HR

Heart Rate

ICU

Intensive Care Unit

LOS

Length Of Stay

RR

Respiratory Rate

SAITS

Self-Attention-based Imputation for Time Series

SpO2

Peripheral Oxygen Saturation

Author contributions

Ivan Juez-Garcia and Iván D Benítez contributed equally and are co-first authors.I.J.-G.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing. I.D.B.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Writing - Review & Editing. G.T.: Conceptualization, Data Curation. J.G.: Supervision, Project administration. L.U.: Resources, Data Curation. A.P.: Resources, Data Curation. N.V.: Resources, Data Curation. I. C.: Resources, Data Curation. F.B.: Supervision, Project administration. J.dB.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing, Funding acquisition.

Funding

IJ-G was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through a predoctoral fellowship (PFIS: FI24/00084), co-funded by the European Union. JdB was supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII; Miguel Servet 2019: CP19/00108), co-funded by the European Social Fund (ESF). FB is supported by the ICREA Academia programme. This study has been funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project “PI21/00924”, co-funded by the European Union; beca SEPAR 2022 (proyecto 1253); and beca SOCAP 2023.

Data availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly to protect patient privacy. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ivan Juez-Garcia and Iván D Benítez are contributed equally and are co-first authors.

References

  • 1.Brekke IJ, Puntervoll LH, Pedersen PB, Kellett J, Brabrand M. The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review. PLoS One [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Jan 13];14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30645637/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Qi Mok W, Wang Assistant Professor WR, Ying Liaw Assistant Professor SR. Vital signs monitoring to detect patient deterioration: An integrative literature review. Int J Nurs Pract [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2025 Jan 13];21:91–8. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.12329 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Andersen LW, Kim WY, Chase M, Berg KM, Mortensen SJ, Moskowitz A et al. The Prevalence and Significance of Abnormal Vital Signs Prior to In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Resuscitation [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2025 Jan 9];98:112. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4715919/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Churpek MM, Adhikari R, Edelson DP. The value of vital sign trends for detecting clinical deterioration on the wards. Resuscitation [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Jan 9];102:1. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4834231/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Leenen JPL, Leerentveld C, van Dijk JD, van Westreenen HL, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 9];22:e18636. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7351263/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Romare C, Anderberg P, Sanmartin Berglund J, Skär L. Burden of care related to monitoring patient vital signs during intensive care; a descriptive retrospective database study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022;71:103213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alghatani K, Ammar N, Rezgui A, Shaban-Nejad A. Precision clinical medicine through machine learning: using high and low quantile ranges of vital signs for risk stratification of ICU patients. IEEE Access. 2022;10:52418–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Senthil Pandi S, Kumaragurubaran T, Vijay Raj SR, Vigneshwaran R. Predictive Modelling of Critical Vital Signs in ICU Patients by Machine Learning: An Early Warning System for Improved Patient Outcomes. 2024 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Technology, INOCON 2024. 2024.
  • 9.Chang D, Chang D, Pourhomayoun M. Risk prediction of critical vital signs for ICU patients using recurrent neural network. Proceedings – 6th Annual Conference on Computational Science and Computational, Intelligence. CSCI 2019. 2019;1003–6.
  • 10.Mao Q, Jay M, Hoffman JL, Calvert J, Barton C, Shimabukuro D, et al. Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e017833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bloch E, Rotem T, Cohen J, Singer P, Aperstein Y. Machine learning models for analysis of vital signs dynamics: A case for sepsis onset prediction. J Healthc Eng. 2019;2019:5930379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lehman LWH, Adams RP, Mayaud L, Moody GB, Malhotra A, Mark RG et al. A Physiological Time Series Dynamics-Based Approach to Patient Monitoring and Outcome Prediction. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Jan 14];19:1068. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4346516/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Baker S, Xiang W, Atkinson I. Continuous and automatic mortality risk prediction using vital signs in the intensive care unit: a hybrid neural network approach. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 16];10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33277530/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Wang S, Jiang Y, Li Q, Zhang W. Timely ICU outcome prediction utilizing stochastic signal analysis and machine learning techniques with readily available vital sign data. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2024. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Downey CL, Tahir W, Randell R, Brown JM, Jayne DG. Strengths and limitations of early warning scores: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;76:106–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Downey C, Randell R, Brown J, Jayne DG. Continuous Versus Intermittent Vital Signs Monitoring Using a Wearable, Wireless Patch in Patients Admitted to Surgical Wards: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Jan 9];20:e10802. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6305881/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Leenen JPL, Rasing HJM, Van Dijk JD, Kalkman CJ, Schoonhoven L, Patijn GA. Feasibility of wireless continuous monitoring of vital signs without using alarms on a general surgical ward: A mixed methods study. PLoS One [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jan 14];17. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35286354/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Downey CL, Chapman S, Randell R, Brown JM, Jayne DG. The impact of continuous versus intermittent vital signs monitoring in hospitals: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Jan 14];84:19–27. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29729558/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Rowland BA, Motamedi V, Michard F, Saha AK, Khanna AK. Impact of continuous and wireless monitoring of vital signs on clinical outcomes: a propensity-matched observational study of surgical ward patients. Br J Anaesth [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 3];132:519–27. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38135523/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Posthuma LM, Downey C, Visscher MJ, Ghazali DA, Joshi M, Ashrafian H et al. Remote wireless vital signs monitoring on the ward for early detection of deteriorating patients: A case series. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jan 14];104. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32105974/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Eddahchouri Y, Peelen RV, Koeneman M, Touw HRW, van Goor H, Bredie SJH. Effect of continuous wireless vital sign monitoring on unplanned ICU admissions and rapid response team calls: a before-and-after study. Br J Anaesth [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jan 14];128:857–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35282866/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Cardona-Morrell M, Prgomet M, Turner RM, Nicholson M, Hillman K. Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2016;70:806–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nguyen OK, Makam AN, Clark C, Zhang S, Xie B, Velasco F et al. Vital Signs Are Still Vital: Instability on Discharge and the Risk of Post-Discharge Adverse Outcomes. J Gen Intern Med [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2025 Jan 14];32:42–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27503438/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Gokhale S, Taylor D, Gill J, Hu Y, Zeps N, Lequertier V et al. Hospital length of stay prediction tools for all hospital admissions and general medicine populations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Feb 3];10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37663657/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Han TS, Murray P, Robin J, Wilkinson P, Fluck D, Fry CH. Evaluation of the association of length of stay in hospital and outcomes. International Journal for Quality in Health Care [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 16];2022:1–9. Available from: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Trivedi V, Bleeker H, Kantor N, Visintini S, McIsaac DI, McDonald B, Survival. Quality of Life, and Functional Status Following Prolonged ICU Stay in Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Jan 16];47:E52–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30398978/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Barba R, Marco J, Canora J, Plaza S, Juncos SN, Hinojosa J, et al. Prolonged length of stay in hospitalized internal medicine patients. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26:772–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rosman M, Rachminov O, Segal O, Segal G. Prolonged patients’ In-Hospital Waiting Period after discharge eligibility is associated with increased risk of infection, morbidity and mortality: A retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2025 Feb 3];15:1–5. Available from: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-015-0929-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Lopez PD, Cativo-Calderon EH, Otero D, Rashid M, Atlas S, Rosendorff C. The impact of environmental factors on the mortality of patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2021;146:48–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jenkins CR, Celli B, Anderson JA, Ferguson GT, Jones PW, Vestbo J, et al. Seasonality and determinants of moderate and severe COPD exacerbations in the TORCH study. Eur Respir J. 2012;39:38–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Teresi JA, Yu X, Stewart AL, Hays RD. Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies. Med Care [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 12];60:95. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8849521/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.GLOBAL INITIATIVE FOR CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT, AND PREVENTION OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (2023 REPORT). 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 3]; Available from: www.goldcopd.org.
  • 33.McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Oct 28];42:3599–726. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34447992/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 34.Forkan ARM, Khalil I, Atiquzzaman M, ViSiBiD. A learning model for early discovery and real-time prediction of severe clinical events using vital signs as big data. Comput Netw. 2017;113:244–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Forkan ARM, Khalil I. A probabilistic model for early prediction of abnormal clinical events using vital sign correlations in home-based monitoring. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, PerCom. 2016. 2016.
  • 36.Fairchild KD, Lake DE, Kattwinkel J, Randall Moorman J, Bateman DA, Grieve PG et al. Vital signs and their cross-correlation in sepsis and NEC: a study of 1,065 very-low-birth-weight infants in two nicus. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Du W, Côté D, Liu Y, SAITS. Self-attention-based imputation for time series. Expert Syst Appl. 2023;219:119619. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fulcher BD, Little MA, Jones NS. Highly comparative time-series analysis: the empirical structure of time series and their methods. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10:20130048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fulcher BD, Jones NS. Hctsa: A computational framework for automated Time-Series phenotyping using massive feature extraction. Cell Syst. 2017;5:527–e5313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Niestroy JC, Moorman JR, Levinson MA, Manir S, Al, Clark TW, Fairchild KD et al. Discovery of signatures of fatal neonatal illness in vital signs using highly comparative time-series analysis. npj Digital Medicine 2022 5:1 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Feb 6];5:1–10. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-021-00551-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Kim HB, Nguyen HT, Jin Q, Tamby S, Gelaf Romer T, Sung E, et al. Computational signatures for post-cardiac arrest trajectory prediction: importance of early physiological time series. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2022;41:101015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Genuer R, Poggi J-M, Tuleau-Malot C. VSURF: An R Package for Variable Selection Using Random Forests. [cited 2025 Jan 13]; Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=VSURF
  • 43.Whellan DJ, Zhao X, Hernandez AF, Liang L, Peterson ED, Bhatt DL et al. Predictors of hospital length of stay in heart failure: findings from Get With the Guidelines. J Card Fail [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2025 Jan 13];17:649–56. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21807326/ [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 44.Li Y, Wang H, Luo Y. Improving Fairness in the Prediction of Heart Failure Length-of-Stay and Mortality by Integrating Social Determinants of Health. Circ Heart Fail [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jan 13];15:e009473. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9673161/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Quintana JM, Unzurrunzaga A, Garcia-Gutierrez S, Gonzalez N, Lafuente I, Bare M, et al. Predictors of hospital length of stay in patients with exacerbations of COPD: A cohort study. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:824–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Evans D, Hodgkinson B, Berry J. Vital signs in hospital patients: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38:643–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Storm-Versloot MN, Verweij L, Lucas C, Ludikhuize J, Goslings JC, Legemate DA et al. Clinical Relevance of Routinely Measured Vital Signs in Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Feb 6];46:39–49. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jnu.12048 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 48.Guidelines for. ICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage. 1999.
  • 49.Downey CL, Brown JM, Jayne DG, Randell R. Patient attitudes towards remote continuous vital signs monitoring on general surgery wards: an interview study. Int J Med Inf. 2018;114:52–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Weenk M, Koeneman M, van de Belt TH, Engelen LJLPG, van Goor H, Bredie SJH. Wireless and continuous monitoring of vital signs in patients at the general ward. Resuscitation. 2019;136:47–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Leenen JPL, Dijkman EM, Van Dijk JD, Van Westreenen HL, Kalkman C, Schoonhoven L et al. Feasibility of continuous monitoring of vital signs in surgical patients on a general ward: an observational cohort study. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Feb 7];11:e042735. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7893648/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.Bowles T, Trentino KM, Lloyd A, Trentino L, Jones G, Murray K et al. Outcomes in patients receiving continuous monitoring of vital signs on general wards: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Digit Health [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Feb 6];10. Available from: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Areia C, Biggs C, Santos M, Thurley N, Gerry S, Tarassenko L et al. The impact of wearable continuous vital sign monitoring on deterioration detection and clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Feb 6];25:351. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8477465/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 54.Kristinsson ÆÖ, Gu Y, Rasmussen SM, Mølgaard J, Haahr-Raunkjær C, Meyhoff CS, et al. Prediction of serious outcomes based on continuous vital sign monitoring of high-risk patients. Comput Biol Med. 2022;147:105559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Weenk M, van Goor H, Frietman B, Engelen LJLPG, van Laarhoven CJHM, Smit J et al. Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs Using Wearable Devices on the General Ward: Pilot Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2025 Jan 14];5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28679490/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly to protect patient privacy. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Articles from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES