Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 18;2025:5363346. doi: 10.1155/ijod/5363346

Table 2.

Relationship of condylar changes with all variables.

Variables No change Osteofit, flattening, sclerosis, erosion p-Value
Age (years)b 50.5 (30–69) 42 (30–74) NS
Sex: men 13 (20.3) 20 (31.3) 0.039 (Pearson's chi-square)
Sex: women 5 (7.8) 26 (40.6) —
Number of remaining teethb 27.5 (5–32) 27.5 (0–32) NS
Posterior tooth loss ≥3 teeth 13 (20.3) 33 (51.6) NS
Posterior tooth loss <3 teeth 5 (7.8) 13 (20.3) —
Condylar length (mm)b 8.3 (5.5–9.3) 7.9 (4.5–10) NS
Condylar height (mm)a 22.34 ± 3.2 20.49 ± 2.5 0.017 (independent samples test)
Condylar width (mm)a 19.78 ± 1.8 19.04 ± 2.8 NS
CMC class 2 8 7 0.021 (Fisher's exact test)
CMC class 0 and 1 10 (15.6) 39 —
Condyle shape right: flat 2 (3.1) 14 (21.9) NS
Condyle shape right: convex 10 (15.6) 24 (37.5) —
Condyle shape right: angled 3 (4.7) 2 (3.1) —
Condyle shape right: round 3 (4.7) 6 (9.4) —
Condyle shape left: flat 3 (4.7) 15 (23.4) NS
Condyle shape left: convex 11 (17.2) 20 (31.3) —
Condyle shape left: angled 2 (3.1) 5 (7.8) —
Condyle shape left: round 2 (3.1) 6 (9.4) —

aMean ± standard deviation.

bMedian (minimum–maximum).