Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 12;16:1616826. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1616826

FIGURE 2.

Bar charts A, B, C, and D compare the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) measured in dollars per quality-adjusted life year ($/QALY) for various factors. Each chart lists factors such as utility of PFS, patient weight, cost of ramucirumab, and risks of neutropenia. The expected value (EV) is displayed: 373,219.84 for A, 266,259.94 for B, 1,193,220.74 for C, and 835,740.90 for D. Bars are color-coded, with blue and orange representing different groups or factors.

Tornado diagram of one-way sensitivity analysis of switch maintenance group versus control group. (A) Overall population from Chinese perspective, (B) PD-L1 CPS ⩾5 population from Chinese perspective, (C) Overall population from United States perspective, (D) PD-L1 CPS ⩾5 population from United States perspective. ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; PD, progressive disease; PFS, Progression-free survival.