Table 2.
Summary of RPAA-TAM factors and case evidence
| RPAA-TAM factors | Empirical evidence from the case |
|---|---|
| Perceived benefit (PB) | Robots replaced staff in high-risk wards → saved PPE, cut infection; public saw clear usefulness & ease of use (voice-interactive chatbots) |
| Public trust (PT) | Central & local government policy white papers endorsed the robots → raised public trust, boosting perceived benefits & lowering perceived risks |
| Social influence (SI) | Positive social media stories + neighbour testimonials amplified adoption |
| Outcome demonstration (OD) | Daily TV news showed robots disinfecting, delivering meds → tangible proof → higher PB |
| Facilitating conditions (FC) | Hospitals already had 5G & cloud infra; government fast-tracked robot deployment → smoother adoption |