Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 26;15:33286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18284-4

Table 1.

Performance comparison between LTCOP-LSTM model and other traffic flow prediction models.

Dataset Model Processing time (s) Resource utilization (%) Hyperparameters Training time (h) Regression loss Convergence speed (iterations)
METR-LA LTCOP-LSTM 25.34 78.4 8 15.5 0.0237 120
ARIMA 30.87 65.2 5 10.1 0.0453 150
RF 32.45 62.8 7 12.3 0.0379 140
PeMS LTCOP-LSTM 28.67 80.1 9 14.2 0.0195 110
ARIMA 35.29 70.5 6 11.9 0.0491 155
RF 36.10 68.3 8 12.5 0.0423 145
Taxi Trajectory LTCOP-LSTM 22.45 82.7 10 16.2 0.0188 105
ARIMA 29.15 66.1 5 10.7 0.0506 158
RF 31.97 63.7 7 11.8 0.0395 140
ULTRA LTCOP-LSTM 26.88 79.3 9 14.5 0.0214 115
ARIMA 33.61 71.8 6 12.0 0.0467 152
RF 34.75 69.5 8 12.9 0.0402 142