Skip to main content
. 2022 May 19;10:623. Originally published 2021 Jul 21. [Version 3] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.54887.3

Table 4. Effect of areca nut and chrysanthemum oral gel on the area of ulcer and body weight changes in rats on the 2nd and 7th experimental days (n = 60).

Groups Clinical evaluation
Area of ulcer changes (mm 2) Body weight changes (g)
2 nd day 7 th day 95% CI p 2 nd day 7 th day 95% CI p
Negative control 9.34 ± 0.69 5.24 ± 8.89 6.34, 6.84 0.000 118.58 ± 5.29 117.25 ± 6.19 −1.31, 3.97 0.291
Positive control 10.10 ± 0.17 0.03 ± 0,01 9.96, 10.19 0.000 109.58 ± 6.89 117.17 ± 7.50 −12.31, −2.84 0.005
F1 10.04 ± 0.18 2.84 ± 0.44 6.89, 7.52 0.000 119.17 ± 13.27 115.33 ± 14.46 2.12, 5.54 0.000
F2 10.08 ± 0.16 0.11 ± 0.07 9.86, 10.08 0.000 116.83 ± 4.41 121.58 ± 4.87 −8.10, −1.39 0.010
F3 10.08 ± 0.18 1.81 ± 0.71 6.25, 7.59 0.000 120.50 ± 4.32 117.75 ± 6.82 0.35, 5.14 0.028

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD, 95% CI, p < 0.05 dependent t-test, Results are representative of three independent experiments. Negative control: base gel treatment group; Positive control: triamcinolone acetonide treatment; F1: 20% areca nut:80% chrysanthemum; F2: 50% areca nut:50% chrysanthemum; F3: 80% areca nut:20% chrysanthemum.