Table 8.
Pros and cons of expanded hepatitis B treatment in different regions of the world
|
Region/Country
|
Pros of expanded HBV treatment
|
Cons of expanded HBV treatment
|
Ref.
|
| United States and Western Europe | Reduces liver cancer (HCC) and cirrhosis risk significantly. Cost-effective long-term due to lower healthcare costs of managing advanced liver disease. High-quality healthcare infrastructure for treatment. National vaccination programs decrease new infections | High upfront costs of expanding treatment programs. A complex treatment regimen requires continuous monitoring. Antiviral drug resistance can develop. Socioeconomic disparities affect access to treatment | [83,84] |
| Sub-Saharan Africa | Potential to reduce high hepatitis B prevalence (8%-12% in some regions). Cost-effective in preventing liver disease. Availability of generic drugs makes treatment affordable. Could prevent mother-to-child transmission | Limited healthcare infrastructure. Poor access to diagnostic tools. Healthcare worker shortages. High upfront costs for government to scale up treatment | [85-87] |
| China | A large reduction in liver cancer cases due to high HBV burden. Government-subsidized treatments improve access. An effective nationwide vaccination program | High cost of treating millions of chronic HBV patients. Disparities between urban and rural healthcare access. Drug adherence and monitoring are challenging in rural areas | [88,89] |
| India | Reduces HBV-related mortality in a country with significant disease burden. Affordable generic antivirals are available. National initiatives to improve vaccination rates and awareness | Limited healthcare infrastructure in rural areas. Low awareness about the need for regular treatment. Cultural stigma around liver disease may hinder uptake | [51] |
| South-East Asia (Vietnam, Thailand) | High impact due to large HBV burden in the region. Government-funded programs and access to generics lower costs. Reduction in liver cancer and other liver-related mortality | Treatment access is limited in rural and underserved areas - Monitoring and follow-up systems are underdeveloped. High costs of diagnostic tests in some areas | [90] |
| Eastern Europe and Russia | Potential to reduce the growing HBV burden. Generic antivirals are available at lower costs. Could lower healthcare costs related to advanced liver disease | Insufficient healthcare infrastructure in rural areas. Limited access to quality diagnostic and monitoring tools. Economic constraints hinder government spending on healthcare | [91] |
| Latin America (Brazil, Argentina) | Moderate HBV prevalence with opportunity for significant impact through expanded treatment. National vaccination programs are already in place. Availability of affordable drugs | Poor healthcare infrastructure in rural areas. Budgetary constraints limit widespread access to treatment. Socioeconomic disparities affect access | [92] |
| Middle East (Egypt, Iran) | High impact potential due to significant HBV burden. Availability of affordable generic treatments. Could reduce complications related to liver disease | Limited diagnostic infrastructure in rural regions. Cultural and religious beliefs may affect treatment adherence. Healthcare costs are a significant burden on government budgets | [93] |
HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; HBV: Hepatitis B virus.