Table 2.
Performance comparison between MPCCI and compared methods on the BUSI and FJPH datasets for ultrasound images. The best and second best results are marked in bold and with underline respectively.
| Method | BUSI | FJPH | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACC (%) | P (%) | R (%) | F1(%) | ACC (%) | P (%) | R (%) | F1(%) | |
| TNTs*16 | 81.20 ± 3.20 | 76.30 ± 5.70 | 61.10 ± 10.40 | 67.9 ± 5.70 | - | - | - | - |
| BVA Net*46 | 84.3 | 88.3 | 75.1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| HoVer-Trans*35 | 85.50 ± 5.00 | 87.60 ± 6.20 | 86.70 ± 11.50 | 87.20 ± 8.00 | - | - | - | - |
| MIB Net*42 | 92.97 ± 1.11 | 93.21 ± 1.50 | 92.97 ± 1.10 | 92.85 ± 1.01 | - | - | - | - |
| ResNet1818 | 91.39 ± 2.48 | 91.76 ± 1.72 | 95.91 ± 1.82 | 93.75 ± 1.78 | 80.90 ± 1.12 | 80.31 ± 1.17 | 87.60 ± 4.40 | 83.74 ± 0.87 |
| Fishr39 | 93.04 ± 2.74 | 96.61 ± 1.34 | 93.18 ± 2.36 | 94.34 ± 1.23 | 84.26 ± 0.84 | 87.87 ± 2.91 | 74.35 ± 3.77 | 80.55 ± 2.45 |
| CABNet17 | 89.23 ± 5.37 | 95.12 ± 1.78 | 88.63 ± 3.63 | 91.76 ± 3.15 | 83.14 ± 1.49 | 83.33 ± 4.63 | 76.92 ± 9.92 | 80.00 ± 7.17 |
| MixupNet51 | 92.30 ± 2.69 | 95.34 ± 1.68 | 93.18 ± 2.51 | 94.25 ± 1.83 | 84.26 ± 2.34 | 79.06 ± 3.21 | 87.17 ± 2.95 | 82.92 ± 2.14 |
| MixStyleNet54 | 86.15 ± 5.04 | 90.69 ± 4.93 | 88.63 ± 6.42 | 89.65 ± 4.64 | 76.40 ± 1.18 | 76.47 ± 2.43 | 66.66 ± 3.88 | 71.23 ± 2.94 |
| VGG1640 | 93.12 ± 1.08 | 94.45 ± 1.26 | 94.45 ± 1.45 | 94.45 ± 1.31 | 82.47 ± 1.80 | 83.33 ± 0.98 | 85.60 ± 4.40 | 84.41 ± 0.74 |
| ViT9 | 90.76 ± 3.72 | 93.18 ± 3.55 | 93.18 ± 4.16 | 93.18 ± 3.77 | 74.83 ± 0.45 | 74.33 ± 0.67 | 84.40 ± 1.60 | 79.03 ± 0.21 |
| Mamba15 | 67.69 ± 0.00 | 67.69 ± 0.00 | 100.00 ± 0.00 | 80.73 ± 0.00 | 68.53 ± 0.00 | 68.33 ± 0.00 | 82.00 ± 0.00 | 74.54 ± 0.00 |
| MPCCI (Ours) | 93.23 ± 2.15 | 94.20 ± 1.36 | 95.91 ± 1.82 | 95.04 ± 1.59 | 85.62 ± 3.14 | 86.62 ± 5.05 | 88.80 ± 3.20 | 87.57 ± 2.23 |
*These results are directly cited from the original papers, as their source codes are not publicly accessible.