Skip to main content
. 1998 Jan;36(1):248–250. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.1.248-250.1998

TABLE 1.

DNA relatedness of E. persicinus strains examined in this study

Strain Source Sender % Relatedness of strain 9108-82T
At 60°C Da At 75°C
Erwinia persicinus CDC 9108-82T (ATCC 35998T, HK 204T) Tomato K. Komagata, Japan 100 0.0 100
E. persicinus CDC 9107-82 (HK 203) Tomato K. Komagata, Japan 100 1.5 98
E. persicinus CDC 9109-82 (HK 205) Tomato K. Komagata, Japan 97 1 91
E. persicinus CDC 9106-82 (HK 201) Cucumber K. Komagata, Japan 88 6.0 79
E. persicinus CDC 9105-82 (HK 200) Banana K. Komagata, Japan 81 5.0 76
E. persicinus CDC 4073-83 Urine Texas State Health Department 95 3.5 86
E. persicinus CDC 839-82 Tuna fish F. Untermann, Germany 93 3.5 87
E. rhapontici ATCC 29283T 62 10
E. rhapontici ER 106 50 10
P. agglomerans 5422-69 49 10.5
a

D, divergence, calculated to the nearest 0.5%.