Table 2.
Characteristics of study participants and bivariate analysis1 stratified by gender
| Characteristics | Total Sample | Hypertension | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | OR (95% CI) | ||
| TOTAL SAMPLE | ||||
| Individual | ||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 61.6 (9.1) | 63.3 (9.4) | 59.7 (8.4) | 1.04 (1.03–1.05)*** |
| Gender, % | ||||
| Men | 45.6 | 42.2 | 49.0 | 1.00 |
| Women | 54.4 | 57.8 | 51.0 | 1.28 (1.15–1.43)*** |
| Individual Education, % | ||||
| ≤ 4 years | 44.3 | 49.7 | 38.5 | 1.00 |
| 5 to 8 years | 23.3 | 22.6 | 24.0 | 0.74 (0.65–0.85)*** |
| ≥ 9 years | 32.4 | 27.7 | 37.5 | 0.58 (0.51–0.66)*** |
| Contextual | ||||
| Brazilian Deprivation Index, mean (SD) | - 1.21 (1.65) | - 1.16 (1.68) | - 1.25 (1.62) | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) |
| n (unweighted) | 6,767 | 3,581 | 3,186 | |
| WOMEN | ||||
| Individual | ||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 62.0 (9.5) | 63.9 (9.9) | 59.8 (8.5) | 1.05 (1.04–1.06)*** |
| Individual Education, % | ||||
| ≤ 4 years | 45.6 | 52.4 | 37.4 | 1.00 |
| 5 to 8 years | 22.5 | 22.1 | 23.1 | 0.71 (0.59–0.85)*** |
| ≥ 9 years | 31.9 | 25.5 | 39.5 | 0.48 (0.41–0.56)*** |
| Contextual | ||||
| Brazilian Deprivation Index, mean (SD) | - 1.20 (1.67) | - 1.10 (1.73) | - 1.31 (1.58) | 1.06 (1.02–1.10)** |
| n (unweighted) | 3,876 | 2,190 | 1,686 | |
| MEN | ||||
| Individual | ||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 61.1 (8.6) | 62.6 (8.5) | 59.7 (8.4) | 1.03 (1.02–1.04)*** |
| Individual Education, % | ||||
| ≤ 4 years | 42.7 | 46.1 | 39.6 | 1.00 |
| 5 to 8 years | 24.2 | 23.4 | 25.0 | 0.82 (0.67–1.01) |
| ≥ 9 years | 33.1 | 30.5 | 35.4 | 0.76 (0.62–0.92)** |
| Contextual | ||||
| Brazilian Deprivation Index, mean (SD) | - 1.21 (1.62) | - 1.23 (1.59) | - 1.19 (1.64) | 0.96 (0.92–1.01) |
| n (unweighted) | 2,891 | 1,391 | 1,500 | |
SD: standard deviation. OR: odds ratio. CI: confidence interval. Significance level: ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001
1The bivariate model between individual and contextual characteristics and arterial hypertension was carried out using multilevel analysis with a random effect at two levels: individual nested in the census tract
All estimates considered the sampling weights and the complex sample design