Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 30;18:183. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00987-0

Table 5.

Diagnostic accuracy of predictors for Pih

Variable AUC OR (95% C.I) Cut-offs Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Diagnostic accuracy (%) LR (+) LR (-)
TAPSE 0.584 0.061 (0.497–0.672) 17.6 85.15 29.58 63.24 58.33 53.3% 1.23 0.48

This model shows a TAPSE Cut-off of 17.6 mm, chosen by Youden’s index (maximizing sensitivity + specificity − 1)

AUC Area under curve, OR Odds ratio, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value, LR + Positive likelihood ratio, LR- Negative predictive value