Table 5.
Diagnostic accuracy of predictors for Pih
| Variable | AUC | OR (95% C.I) | Cut-offs | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Diagnostic accuracy (%) | LR (+) | LR (-) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAPSE | 0.584 | 0.061 (0.497–0.672) | 17.6 | 85.15 | 29.58 | 63.24 | 58.33 | 53.3% | 1.23 | 0.48 |
This model shows a TAPSE Cut-off of 17.6 mm, chosen by Youden’s index (maximizing sensitivity + specificity − 1)
AUC Area under curve, OR Odds ratio, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value, LR + Positive likelihood ratio, LR- Negative predictive value