Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 25;18(5):553–559. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3127

Table 3:

Mean and within-subject effects comparison between mean values of baseline surface microhardness, baseline enamel surface microhardness of artificial lesion, and final surface microhardness values of group I, group II, group III, and group IV test specimens

Group VHN Mean SD N Source Type III sum of squares df Mean square F p-value
Group I SH0 322.8 13.0 10 Huynh–Feldt 490,252.066 1.052 465,849.530 1,779.042 0.0005
SH1 42.7 12.5 10
SH2 61.5 13.8 10
Group II SH0 320.9 11.1 10 Huynh–Feldt 404,739.653 1.019 397,104.291 1,837.920 0.0005
SH1 50.9 13.8 10
SH2 108.2 12.8 10
Group III SH0 336.2 14.2 10 Huynh–Feldt 468,269.858 1.212 386,432.638 1,689.973 0.0005
SH1 43.6 12.8 10
SH2 112.2 16.3 10
Group IV SH0 330.3 7.5 10 Sphericity assumed 469,214.402 2 234,607.201 6,017.653 0.0005
SH1 45.1 11.7 10
SH2 90.7 11.2 10