Abstract
Degenerative skeletal diseases, including osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and intervertebral disc degeneration, are prevalent age-related conditions characterized by progressive tissue degeneration and functional decline. Histone modifications are covalent modifications of histone residues, catalyzed by specific enzymes, that modulate chromatin architecture and transcriptional activity. Accumulating evidence highlights the critical involvement of histone modifications in orchestrating disease-associated transcriptional programs. In osteoporosis, histone modifications regulate osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation, thereby disrupting bone homeostasis. In osteoarthritis, they drive the expression of matrix-degrading enzymes in chondrocytes, contributing to cartilage degradation. In intervertebral disc degeneration, they are implicated in nucleus pulposus cell senescence, apoptosis, and extracellular matrix degradation. This review summarizes the distinct mechanistic roles of histone modifications across these conditions and explores the therapeutic potential of targeting histone-modifying enzymes, underscoring epigenetic regulation as a promising strategy for precision intervention in degenerative skeletal diseases.
The translational potential of this article: This review comprehensively explores the role of histone modifications in degenerative skeletal diseases and evaluates the potential of histone-modifying enzyme inhibitors as therapeutic targets. These insights provide new strategies and directions for the treatment of degenerative skeletal diseases.
Keywords: Epigenetics, Histone modifications, Degenerative skeletal diseases, Small molecule inhibitors, Epigenetic therapy
Graphical abstract
1. Introduction
A class of age-related disorders known as degenerative skeletal diseases, including osteoporosis (OP), osteoarthritis (OA), and intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), cause pain and motor difficulties as a result of persistent, long-term deterioration of bone and cartilage [[1], [2], [3]]. Statistics show that the global prevalence of OA increased from approximately 256 million cases in 1990 to 606.9 million cases in 2021, representing a 137 % rise [4]. In China, OA cases reached 152.85 million in 2021, representing a significant increase of approximately 186.5 % over the three decades since 1990 [5]. Low back pain (LBP), one of the leading causes of disability, affected over 619 million people globally and 78.49 million in China in 2021, with global prevalence projected to rise to 890 million by 2050 [6,7]. Degenerative skeletal diseases have become a leading cause of disability worldwide, posing a huge challenge to healthcare systems worldwide and placing a heavy burden on people's health and national economies [[8], [9], [10]]. However, its treatment is still mainly limited to conservative or surgical treatments for symptomatic relief [2]. Among them, conservative drug treatment may cause drug dependence and limited therapeutic effects, while surgical treatment may have serious complications [[11], [12], [13]]. Therefore, there is a lack of efficient therapeutic methods and medications to address the etiology. Insufficient comprehension of its pathogenesis is the primary cause of this. Consequently, it is crucial to investigate the pathophysiology of degenerative skeletal diseases and identify potential targets for treatment.
Epigenetic modifications refer to reversible and heritable covalent modifications of nucleic acids and histones that modulate gene expression without altering the DNA sequence [14]. They mostly consist of DNA methylation, histone modifications, RNA methylation, and non-coding RNA regulation [15]. Increasing evidence has suggested that these epigenetic layers do not function in isolation but rather engage in dynamic crosstalk. For instance, histone modifications can influence DNA methylation patterns, while non-coding RNAs can recruit or inhibit histone-modifying enzymes, thereby jointly regulating chromatin accessibility and gene transcription [16]. Such interactions collectively shape the epigenetic landscape of degenerative skeletal diseases [17]. Although various epigenetic processes contribute to disease progression, this review focuses on histone modifications.
Histones are abundant in positively charged basic amino acids and serve as the fundamental structural proteins of eukaryotic chromatin [18]. They constitute the core histone octamer, which interacts with DNA containing negatively charged phosphate groups to create nucleosomes, the chromatin's fundamental structural unit [19]. Various post-translational modifications of histone, mainly occurring on its terminal tails and globular core domains, including methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination [19,20]. By changing chromatin condition and affecting transcription factors' ability to bind to DNA promoters, these modifications have an impact on gene expression [21]. Numerous research has demonstrated the close relationship between histone modifications and the skeletal system, as well as their involvement in the regulation of various bone physiological processes, including osteogenesis, osteoclast differentiation, and chondrocyte function [[22], [23], [24]]. These findings implicate histone modifications in the development of various orthopedic disorders, particularly degenerative skeletal diseases. In addition, there is growing proof that histone modifications contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of degenerative skeletal diseases by regulating relevant gene expression [[25], [26], [27], [28], [29]]. Therefore, elucidating the molecular functions of histone modifications in degenerative skeletal diseases is essential for understanding their pathogenesis and identifying viable therapeutic targets. However, a comprehensive summary of this topic remains lacking.
This review attempts to broadly summarize the recent progress of histone modifications in degenerative skeletal diseases, mainly OP, OA, and IDD, and discuss its potential application value in clinical treatment. To ensure comprehensive and relevant coverage, we conducted a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases using keywords such as “histone modification,” “epigenetics,” “osteoporosis,” “osteoarthritis,” and “degenerative skeletal diseases.” The search covered publications from 2000 to 2025, and only peer-reviewed English-language studies were included.
2. Classification of histone modifications
Since the initial discovery of histone modifications, their diversity has expanded significantly. According to current literature, more than 20 distinct types of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) have been identified to date [19,30] (Table 1). In addition to the four classical modifications—acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination—numerous novel acylation marks have been characterized, such as lactylation, crotonylation, and succinylation [31,32]. Moreover, other modifications with limited investigation but experimental validation have also been reported, including citrullination, SUMOylation, ADP-ribosylation, and biotinylation [32] (Fig. 1). Among these, acetylation and methylation remain the most extensively studied, primarily due to their central roles in gene regulation. These modifications are dynamically regulated by three major classes of chromatin-associated proteins. Writers, such as histone acetyltransferases (HATs), histone methyltransferases (HMTs), serine/threonine kinases and E3 ubiquitin ligases, act as chromatin-modifying enzymes that catalyze the covalent addition of specific functional groups to histone tails. In contrast, Erasers, including histone deacetylases (HDACs), histone demethylases (HDMs), phosphatases and deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), remove those same marks to reverse epigenetic states [33]. Furthermore, Readers, which comprise non-catalytic recognition factors such as bromodomain-, chromodomain-, Tudor domain- or PHD finger-containing proteins, selectively bind to modified histones and recruit downstream effectors to execute a wide range of biological outcomes [34].
Table 1.
The overview of histone modifications.
| Histone PTMs | Discovery Year | Writers | Erasers | Readers | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acylations | Acetylation | 1964 | HATs(GNATs, MYSTs, P300/CBP) | HDACs(HDAC1–11, SIRT1–7) | Bromodomain protein(BRD4, PCAF) | [44,[47], [48], [49]] |
| Propionylation | 2007 | P300/CBP; GNATs; MYSTs | SIRT1-3 | Bromodomain; YEATS domain | [[67], [68], [69], [70]] | |
| Butyrylation | 2007 | P300/CBP; MYSTs | SIRT1-3 | Bromodomain (BRD4,BPTF); CECR 2; AF1 | [67,69,70] | |
| Formylation | 2008 | NA | NA | NA | [71] | |
| Crotonylation | 2011 | P300/CBP; GNATs; MYSTs | HDAC3; SIRT1-3 | YEATS domain (AF9; ENL) | [[72], [73], [74], [75]] | |
| Succinylation | 2012 | KAT2A; HAT1; P300/CBP | SIRT5; SIRT7 | NA | [[76], [77], [78]] | |
| Malonylation | 2012 | KAT2A | SIRT5 | NA | [[78], [79], [80]] | |
| β-hydroxyisobutyrylation | 2014 | P300/CBP; MYSTs | HDAC1-3; SIRT1-3 | NA | [[81], [82], [83]] | |
| β-hydroxybutyrylation | 2016 | P300/CBP | SIRT3; HDAC1-2 | NA | [84,85] | |
| Benzoylation | 2018 | NA | SIRT2 | YEATS domain (YEATS2; AF9) | [86,87] | |
| Glutarylation | 2019 | KAT2A | SIRT7 | NA | [88] | |
| Lactylation | 2019 | P300/CBP | HDAC1-3 | Brg1 | [57,60,89] | |
| Ubiquitin-like | Ubiquitination | 1980 | RNF20/40; PRC1(Ring1B); BRCA1/BARD1 | USP16, 22; PR-DUB(BAP1) | PRC2(Jarid2, AEBP2); RYBP; 53BP1; DNMT1 | [[90], [91], [92], [93]] |
| SUMOylation | 2003 | SAE1/SAE2, UBC9, PIAS | SENP1-3, 5–7; DeSI-1,2; USPL1 | NA | [[94], [95], [96]] | |
| Ufmylation | 2019 | UFL1 | UFSP2 | STK38 | [97,98] | |
| Others | Methylation | 1964 | SET domain (SUV39H1/2, SETDB1/2, EZH1/2, etc.); Non-SET (Dot1L) | FAD-dependent (LSD1/2); JmjC domain (KDM2-8) | Chromodomain; MBT and Tudor domain; PHD finger | [33,40,44,99] |
| Phosphorylation | 1966 | Kinases (MSK, AMPK, WSTF, CK2, etc.) | Phosphatase (PP1, PP2A, PP4, etc.) | MDC1, Survivin, 14-3-3 | [50,[100], [101], [102], [103]] | |
| ADP-ribosylation | 1977 | ARTDs (ARTD1-17); ARTCs (ARTC1-5); ADPRT1a; ADPRT2; Sirtuins | PARG; TARG1; ARH1; ARH3; MacroD1; MacroD2 | PBM; Macrodomain; WWE domain; PBZ domain | [[104], [105], [106]] | |
| O-GlcNAcylation | 1984 | OGT | OGA | NA | [[107], [108], [109]] | |
| Biotinylation | 2001 | HCS | NA | NA | [110,111] | |
| Citrullination | 2002 | PAD2; PAD4 | NA | NA | [75,112,113] | |
| Serotonylation | 2019 | TGM2 | TGM2 | WDR5 | [[114], [115], [116]] | |
| Dopaminylation | 2020 | TGM2 | NA | NA | [117] | |
Fig. 1.
The classification of histone modifications. Histone modifications are highly diverse, including a wide range of types such as methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and lactylation.
2.1. Histone methylation
The discovery of histone methylation dates back to the 1960s [35]. But it wasn't until 2000 that the first histone methyltransferase, SUV39H1, was identified [36]. It was announced in 2004 that LSD1, the first histone demethylase, exists [37].
Lysine (K) and arginine (R) residues are the primary sites of histone methylation, with the former undergoing mono-(me1), di-(me2), and trimethylation(me3), and the latter undergoing mono-(me1), symmetric-dimethylation(me2s), and asymmetric-dimethylation(me2a) [38]. Instead of changing the net charge, histone methylation increases hydrophobicity and alters intra- or intermolecular interactions to influence transcription [39]. In general, methylation of H3K4, H3K36, H3K79, and H3R17 is thought to promote transcription, whereas methylation of H3K9, H3K27, and H4K20 is thought to repress transcription [40].
HMTs catalyze the methylation of amino acid residues via S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) [41]. According to the catalytic domain sequence, lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) are divided into two groups: SET-containing and non-SET-containing; the former includes SUV, SET1, SET2, EZH, RIZ, and other protein families, while the latter is less common and mainly includes DOT1L [42,43].
HDMs are catalytic enzymes that mediate histone demethylation reactions. There are two kinds of lysine demethylases (KDMs): the lysine-specific demethylases (LSD) family, which mediate mono- and di-demethylation of lysine residues; and the Jumonji C (JmjC) domain-containing protein family, which mediate mono-, di-, or tri-demethylation of lysine residues [41].
2.2. Histone acetylation
The first evidence of the function of histone acetylation in the control of gene expression was shown in 1964 [44]. Subsequently, in 1996, the first histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase were identified [45].
Histone acetylation occurs mainly at the lysine residues in the N-terminal of histones. Histone acetylation often results in transcriptional activation because it neutralizes the positive charge of histones, which reduces the contact between DNA and histones and facilitates DNA binding to transcription factors [46].
HATs catalyze the transfer of acetyl groups from acetyl-CoA to histone lysine residues [47]. In humans, HATs are classified into three families: the p300/CBP family, the MYST family, and the GNAT family [48]. HDACs catalyze the deacetylation reaction by hydrolyzing acetyl groups on lysine residues. HDACs comprise four families: Classes I, II, and IV are Zn2+-dependent, while Class III/Sirtuins are NAD-dependent [49].
2.3. Other types of histone modifications
Histone phosphorylation is regulated by protein kinases and phosphatases through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of histone tails [50]. Similar to acetylation, histone phosphorylation acts by increasing the negative charge to neutralize the positive charge of histones, attenuating DNA-histone interactions and affecting chromatin structure [51]. However, unlike the previous two, histone phosphorylation participates in histone modification crosstalk by affecting the binding of modifier and effector proteins to histone modification sites [51,52].
Histone ubiquitination modification adds a small-molecule protein called ubiquitin (Ub), which comprises 76 amino acids and depends on E1 activating, E2 conjugating, and E3 ligase enzymes, to the lysine residues in histone H2A and H2B tails [53]. Its catabolic release is mediated by DUBs [53]. Since ubiquitin itself has seven lysine residue sites, it allows histone-linked monoubiquitin to be further modified to form polyubiquitin chains [54]. Mostly found in heterochromatin, H2A monoubiquitination is linked to transcriptional repression, while mostly found in euchromatin, H2B monoubiquitination is linked to transcriptional activation [55].
Histone lactylation has rapidly become a key focus in epigenetic research since its discovery in 2019 [56]. As a novel epigenetic modification, it reveals a direct link between cellular energy metabolism—glycolysis—and epigenetic regulation. Lactate, the end product of glycolysis, is the critical substrate for histone lactylation, and its concentration closely correlates with lactylation levels [57]. By adding lactyl groups to lysine residues on histones, histone lactylation primarily activates gene expression, likely by loosening chromatin structure to promote transcription [58]. Current research on the specific writers, erasers, and readers of histone lactylation remains quite limited, with existing evidence suggesting that CBP/p300, HDAC1-3, and SIRT1-3 play crucial roles in the addition and removal of histone lactyl groups [57,59,60]. Given the abnormal glycolytic activity in tumor cells, histone lactylation's role in tumorigenesis has drawn significant attention [[61], [62], [63], [64]]. While studies on histone lactylation in orthopedics are just beginning, early findings suggest it plays a regulatory role in disease development [65,66].
3. The roles of histone modifications in degenerative skeletal diseases
Degenerative skeletal diseases are a prevalent and serious group of conditions that impose a substantial burden on individual health and socioeconomic systems. Among these, OP, OA, and IDD are three representative diseases. Histone modifications are vital epigenetic mechanisms that influence gene expression, resulting in alterations to cellular functions. Detailed exploration of histone modifications in the context of each disease is presented in the following sections (Table 2) (Table 3).
Table 2.
The roles of histone modifications in degenerative skeletal diseases.
| Proteins | Histone modification | Target genes | Cells | Biological functions | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osteoporosis | LSD1↑ | H3K4me2↓ | Wnt7b, BMP2↓ | BMSCs | Inhibits osteogenic differentiation | [137] |
| GCN5↓ | H3K9ac↓ | Wnt1, 6, 10a, 10b↓ | [138] | |||
| SETDB1↓ | H3K9me3↓ | OTX2↑ | [139] | |||
| KDM3a↓ | H3K9me2↑ | Erk2↓ | [140] | |||
| HDAC8↑ | H3K9ac↓ | Runx2↓ | [129] | |||
| HDAC6↑ | H3K9/K14ac, H4K12ac↓ | Runx2↓ | [131] | |||
| NAP1L2↑ | H3K14ac↓ | osteogenic gene↓ | [132] | |||
| KDM6b↓ | H3K27me3↑ | Runx2↓ | [133] | |||
| PKM2↓ | H3K18la↓ | osteogenic genes↓ | [66] | |||
| CS↓ | H3K9ac↓ | Runx2↓ | [144] | |||
| EZH2↓ | H3K27me3↓ | P16↑ | [147,148] | |||
| SETD2↓ | H3K36me3↓ | Lbp↓ | BMSCs | Promotes adipogenic differentiation | [151] | |
| Ash1l↓ | H3K4me3↓ | Creb↓, PPARγ↑ | [152] | |||
| KDM7a↑ | H3K9me2, H3K27me2↓ | C/EBPα, Sfrp1↑ | [153] | |||
| KDM4a↑ | H3K9me3↓ | C/EBPα, Sfrp4↑ | [154] | |||
| BRD4↑ | H3K9ac↑ | Foxp1↑ | [155] | |||
| DOT1L↓, KAT2b↑ | H3K79me2↓, H3K27ac↑ | miR-181↓, SRSF1↑ | BMMs | Enhances osteoclast differentiation | [157] | |
| PCAF↑ | H3K27ac↑ | CXCL12↑ | [159] | |||
| RNF40↑ | H2BK120ub1↑ | TNFSF11/RANKL↑ | [160] | |||
| Osteoarthritis | HPIP↑ | H3K56ac↑ | Wnt target genes↑ | Human chondrocytes | Enhances catabolism | [173] |
| HOTAIR↑ | H3K27me3↑ | WIF-1↓ | SW1353 | [174] | ||
| DOT1L↓ | H3K79me2↓ | Wnt target genes↑ | Human chondrocytes | [175] | ||
| Brd3, Brd4↑ | H4K5/8/12ac↑ | Matrix-degrading enzyme genes↑ | SW1353 | [179] | ||
| JMJD3↑ | H3K27me3↓ | ZEB1↑ | Human chondrocytes | [180] | ||
| KAT6a↑ | H3K9ac↑ | IHH↑ | Human chondrocytes, SW1353, C28/I2 cells | [182] | ||
| ACLY↑ | H3K9/27ac↑ | iNOS, MMP3, MMP13↑ | Human and mouse chondrocytes | [183] | ||
| LDHA↑ | H3K18la↑ | TPI1↑ | Mouse chondrocytes | [65] | ||
| EZH2↑ | H3K27me3↑ | miR-138↓ | Human chondrocytes | [184] | ||
| / | H3K9me3↓ | SOX9,Col2a1↓ | ATDC5 cells | Inhibits anabolism | [187] | |
| UTX, PRC2↑ | H3K27me3↑ | Igf2↓ | Mouse chondrocytes | [188] | ||
| NSD1↓ | H3K36me2↓ | Osr2↓ | Mouse chondrocytes | [189] | ||
| JMJD3↑ | H3K27me3↓ | NR4A1↑ | Mouse chondrocytes | [190] | ||
| HDAC4↓ | H3K9ac↑ | ATF4↑ | Human chondrocytes | Promotes apoptosis | [196] | |
| EZH2↑ | H3K27me3↑ | miR-142-3p↓ | Human chondrocytes | Promotes pyroptosis | [201] | |
| NSD1↓ | H3K36me2↓ | SOX9↓ | Mouse chondrocytes | Promotes ferroptosis | [205] | |
| LDHB↑ | H3K18la↑ | ACSL4↑ | Mouse chondrocytes | [206] | ||
| Intervertebral disc degeneration | RREB1↓ | H3K4me2/3↑, H3K9/27me3↓ | ADAMTS-5↑ | Human NP cells | Mediates ECM degradation | [228] |
| SIRT6↓ | H3K9ac↑ | NF-κB target genes↑ | Human NP cells | [231] | ||
| KMT2D↑ | H3K4me1↑ | Mmp3/9/13↑ | Human NP cells | [234] | ||
| EZH2↑ | H3K27me3↑ | Sox-9↓ | Primary rat endplate chondrocytes | [265] | ||
| EZH2↑ | H3K27me3↑ | miR-129-5p↓ | Human NP cells | Mediates NPC senescence | [240] | |
| SIRT6↓ | H3K9ac↑ | p-NF-κB p65↑ | Human NP cells | [241] | ||
| EZH2↓ | H3K27me3↓ | NOX4↑ | Primary rat NP cells | [245] | ||
| KDM4a↑ | H3K9me3↓ | ALKBH5↑ | Human NP cells | [248] | ||
| KDM5a↓ | H3K4me3↑ | WTAP↑ | Human NP cells | [246] | ||
| KMT2D↑ | H3K4me2↑ | miR-133a-5p↑ | Primary mouse NP cells | Promotes apoptosis | [254] | |
| EZH2↑ | H3K27me3↑ | DKK1↓ | Primary rat NP cells | Promotes pyroptosis | [256] | |
| GLS1↓ | H3K9/K27ac↓ | NFS1↓ | Human NP cells | Promotes ferroptosis | [259] | |
| LDHA↑ | H3K18la↑ | ACSL4↑ | Human NP cells | [260] |
Table 3.
Classification of histone modification-related proteins and metabolites in degenerative skeletal diseases.
| Category | Enzymes | Histone Modification | Target Genes | Diseases | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Writers | Histone acetyltransferases | GCN5 | H3K9ac | Wnt1, 6, 10a, 10b | Osteoporosis | [138] |
| KAT2b/PCAF | H3K27ac | SRSF1, CXCL12 | Osteoporosis | [157,159] | ||
| KAT6a | H3K9ac | IHH | Osteoarthritis | [182] | ||
| Histone methyltransferases | SETDB1 | H3K9me3 | OTX2 | Osteoporosis | [139] | |
| EZH2 | H3K27me3 | P16, miR-138, miR-142-3p, Sox-9, miR-129-5p, NOX4, DKK1 | Osteoarthritis/Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | [148,184,187,201,240,245,256,265] | ||
| SETD2 | H3K36me3 | Lbp | Osteoporosis | [151] | ||
| Ash1l | H3K4me3 | Creb, PPARγ | Osteoporosis | [152] | ||
| DOT1L | H3K79me2 | miR-181, Wnt target genes | Osteoporosis/Osteoarthritis | [157,175] | ||
| PRC2 | H3K27me3 | Igf2 | Osteoarthritis | [188] | ||
| NSD1 | H3K36me2 | Osr2, SOX9 | Osteoarthritis | [189,205] | ||
| KMT2D | H3K4me1/2 | Mmp3/9/13, miR-133a-5p | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | [234,254] | ||
| Erasers | Histone demethylases | LSD1 | H3K4me2 | Wnt7b, BMP2 | Osteoporosis | [137] |
| JMJD3 | H3K27me3 | ZEB1, NR4A1 | Osteoarthritis | [180,190] | ||
| UTX | H3K27me3 | Igf2 | Osteoarthritis | [188] | ||
| KDM3a | H3K9me2 | Erk2 | Osteoporosis | [140] | ||
| KDM4a | H3K9me3 | C/EBPα, Sfrp4, ALKBH5 | Osteoporosis/Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | [154,248] | ||
| KDM5a | H3K4me3 | WTAP | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | [246] | ||
| KDM6b | H3K27me3 | Runx2 | Osteoporosis | [133] | ||
| KDM7a | H3K9me2, H3K27me2 | C/EBPα, Sfrp1 | Osteoporosis | [153] | ||
| Histone deacetylases | HDAC4 | H3K9ac | ATF4 | Osteoarthritis | [196] | |
| HDAC6 | H3K9/K14ac, H4K12ac | Runx2 | Osteoporosis | [131] | ||
| HDAC8 | H3K9ac | Runx2 | Osteoporosis | [129] | ||
| SIRT6 | H3K9ac | NF-κB targets genes | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | [231,241] | ||
| Readers | Histone acetylation reader | BRD3 | H4K5/8/12ac | Matrix-degrading enzymes | Osteoarthritis | [155,179] |
| BRD4 | H3K9ac | Foxp1 | Osteoporosis | [179] | ||
| Metabolic precursors | Acetyl-CoA | CS | H3K9ac | Runx2 | Osteoporosis | [144] |
| ACLY | H3K9/27ac | iNOS, MMP3, MMP13 | Osteoarthritis | [183] | ||
| GLS1 | H3K9/K27ac | NFS1 | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | [259] | ||
| Lactate | PKM2 | H3K18la | Osteogenic genes | Osteoporosis | [66] | |
| LDHA | H3K18la | TPI1 | Osteoarthritis | [65,260] | ||
| LDHB | H3K18la | ACSL4 | Osteoarthritis/Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | [206] | ||
| Others | E3 ubiquitin ligase | RNF40 | H2BK120ub1 | TNFSF11/RANKL | Osteoporosis | [160] |
| Histone chaperone | NAP1L2 | H3K14ac | Osteogenic genes | Osteoporosis | [132] |
3.1. Histone modifications and osteoporosis
Osteoporosis, a degenerative metabolic bone disease, is characterized by low bone mass, increased bone fragility, and microstructural destruction of bone tissue, which greatly increases the incidence of fragility fracture and brings tremendous pressure on the healthcare system and economy [[118], [119], [120]]. An investigation conducted in 2019 found that OP affects as many as 6.46 % and 29.13 % of Chinese men and women 50 years of age and older [121]. It is predicted that 4.83 million occurrences of osteoporotic fractures will occur annually by 2035, costing 19.92 billion dollars [122].
Bone is in a continuous process of renewal and metabolism called bone remodeling [123]. During this process, osteoblast-mediated bone formation and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption play a dominant role [124]. Between them, a dynamic equilibrium known as bone homeostasis is maintained, maintaining the skeleton's integrity [125,126]. The majority of research now available indicates that one of the main pathways leading to osteoporosis is the imbalance of bone homeostasis caused by multiple pathogenic factors [118,126,127]. Through altering the expression of important genes during bone formation and resorption, histone modifications contribute to the disruption of bone homeostasis and hence play a role in the progression of OP (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Histone modifications-induced bone homeostasis dysregulation in OP pathogenesis. Histone modifications disrupt bone homeostasis and contribute to the occurrence and development of OP by inhibiting osteogenic differentiation, promoting adipogenic differentiation, and enhancing osteoclast differentiation.
3.1.1. Histone modifications inhibit osteogenic differentiation
3.1.1.1. Histone modifications mediate disruption of osteogenic regulatory networks
Runx2 is a major transcription factor during osteogenic differentiation and binds to cis-acting elements to transactivate major osteogenic matrix protein genes, which promote osteogenic differentiation and bone formation [128]. Several studies have demonstrated that Runx2 is regulated by histone acetylation, whereas multiple histone deacetylases, including HDAC4, 6, and 8, decrease histone acetylation level on the Runx2 promoter, inhibit its expression, limit BMSCs' capacity for osteogenic differentiation, and contribute to the development of OP [[129], [130], [131]].
Hu et al. found that elevated levels of the histone chaperone NAP1L2 suppressed osteogenic gene expression, including Runx2, by recruiting SIRT1 to decrease H3K14ac levels at their promoters, thereby inhibiting osteogenic differentiation [132]. According to Behera et al., histone methylation plays a part in the regulation of Runx2, which is connected to the mechanism via which senescence-associated mitochondrial dysfunction inhibits osteogenic differentiation [133]. They found that the release of mt-DNA from dysfunctional mitochondria in senescent BMSCs inhibited the production of the histone demethylase KDM6b, which resulted in the increased level of H3K27me3 in the Runx2 promoter region and the decreased expression of Runx2. These outcomes ultimately hindered BMSCs' capacity for osteogenic differentiation and reduced bone density [133].
The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is a pivotal regulator across multiple degenerative skeletal diseases, governing the fate and phenotype of bone-related cells, including bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and osteoclasts [[134], [135], [136]]. Wnt signaling is essential for bone homeostasis, promoting osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs while suppressing adipogenic and chondrogenic commitment [136]. Dysregulation of Wnt signaling leads to disrupted bone formation and OP, with histone modifications playing a critical role.
Sun et al. demonstrated that the histone demethylase LSD1 repressed BMSC osteogenic differentiation by reducing H3K4me2 levels at the promoters of Wnt7b and Bmp2, thereby downregulating their expression and bone formation [137]. Furthermore, Jing et al. discovered that the expression of histone acetyltransferase GCN5 was reduced in BMSCs from ovariectomy (OVX) rats. This resulted in a lower level of H3K9ac in the Wnt gene promoter region, which inhibited Wnt protein expression, prevented osteogenic differentiation, and reduced bone mass [138]. According to Hu et al., osteoporotic femoral tissues had downregulated expression of histone methyltransferase SETDB1, which had an impact on osteogenic differentiation [139]. Mechanistically, the OTX2 promoter region is modified by SETDB1 through H3K9me3, which inhibits OTX2 expression. This, in turn, promotes the BMP-Smad and Wnt/β-catenin pathways, facilitating osteogenic differentiation. Reduced expression of SETDB1 causes osteogenic differentiation to be inhibited and OP to develop [139]. Wu et al. found that in BMSCs from OVX rats, the H3K9me2 demethylase KDM3a was inhibited by increased miR-199a-3p, which resulted in elevated histone methylation levels and reduced Erk2 expression, inhibiting osteogenic differentiation and leading to OP [140].
3.1.1.2. Histone modifications mediate metabolism-associated osteogenic dysfunction
Recent research focuses on the crucial role of cellular metabolism in osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and osteoblasts [141,142]. Glucose metabolism participates in histone modifications by providing intermediates like SAM and acetyl-CoA, which serve as substrates for histone methylation and acetylation, thereby affecting gene expression during bone formation [143]. Da et al. found that BMSCs from OVX mice exhibit an abnormal tricarboxylic acid cycle in which citrate depletion impairs acetyl-CoA synthesis, reducing histone acetylation of osteogenic genes and suppressing their differentiation potential [144].
In addition to acetylation, histone lactylation, a novel modification derived from lactate produced during glycolysis, has emerged as an important epigenetic regulator. Increasing evidence indicates that lactate-induced histone lactylation enhances chromatin accessibility and activates the gene transcription [57]. Nian et al. and Minami et al. highlighted the regulatory potential of histone lactylation in osteoblast differentiation. They reported that LDHA-driven lactate production promotes H3K18 lactylation (H3K18la) and activates osteogenic gene transcription, thereby enhancing osteoblast differentiation and bone formation [145,146]. Wu et al. further demonstrated the involvement of histone lactylation in OP. They reported that serum lactate levels were reduced in patients with OP, and BMSCs isolated from these patients exhibited decreased H3K18la levels along with reduced expression of osteogenic genes [66]. They revealed that in OVX mice, reduced expression of vascular endothelium pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), a key glycolytic enzyme, lowered serum lactate levels and diminished H3K18la levels on osteogenic genes such as COL1A2, COMP, and ENPP1. This epigenetic alteration suppressed their transcription, impaired osteogenic differentiation, and ultimately accelerated OP progression [66].
In addition, by triggering the senescence signaling pathway, histone modification accelerates the cellular senescence of BMSCs, which decreases their osteogenic differentiation and proliferation abilities, promotes apoptosis, and disrupts bone homeostasis [147,148].
3.1.2. Histone modifications mediate osteogenic-adipogenic differentiation imbalance
Although BMSCs are multipotent stem cells with three-lineage differentiation potential of osteogenesis, adipogenesis, and chondrogenesis, many investigations have revealed that the differentiation of BMSCs into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages is negatively correlated [149]. Consequently, an imbalance in differentiation is one of the main factors contributing to OP, maintaining the osteogenic-adipogenic differentiation balance of BMSCs is crucial for bone homeostasis and remodeling [149,150]. Some studies have reported the regulatory mechanism of histone modifications in the imbalance of osteogenic-adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs.
Histone methyltransferases regulate osteogenic-adipogenic differentiation. Wang et al. found that lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (Lbp) regulated by SETD2-mediated H3K36me3, controlled the equilibrium between BMSCs' osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation [151]. The deficiency of SETD2 inhibits the expression of Lbp, which causes BMSCs to differentiate into adipocytes but not osteoblasts. Yin et al. discovered that histone methyltransferase Ash1l prevents bone mass loss and that it was dramatically downregulated in the bone tissue of OP model mice [152]. Further research revealed that Ash1l directly regulated the level of H3K4me3 of osteogenesis-related genes and, through modulating the repressor Creb, indirectly regulated the expression of PPARγ, an adipogenic transcription factor [152]. Therefore, down-regulating Ash1l expression promotes adipogenic differentiation while inhibiting osteogenic differentiation.
Histone demethylases regulate osteogenic-adipogenic differentiation. Wang et al. observed that by decreasing H3K9me2 and H3K27me2 levels at the promoters of C/EBPα and Sfrp1, KDM7a upregulated their expression. This, in turn, enhanced adipogenic differentiation and suppressed osteogenic differentiation by interacting with PPARγ and blocking Wnt signaling [153]. They also found a similar regulatory mechanism on KDM4a [154].
Lian et al. also reported a mechanism by which histone acetylation Readers regulate osteogenic-adipogenic differentiation. This study revealed that BMSCs from the glucocorticoid-induced OP model had an elevated expression of BRD4, a histone acetylation reader that promoted Foxp1 expression by binding to H3K9ac at the Foxp1 promoter. As a transcription factor, Foxp1 promotes the transcription of PPARγ2 and enhances adipogenic differentiation [155].
3.1.3. Histone modifications enhance osteoclast differentiation
The mechanism by which histone methylation regulates osteoclast differentiation has been reported in several studies [[156], [157], [158]]. Wang et al. reported the mechanism by which the DOT1L-miR-181-KAT2b-SRSF1 axis regulates osteoclast differentiation [157]. Low expression of histone methyltransferase DOT1L in OVX mice and OP patients reduces the level of H3K79me2 of the miR-181 promoter and its expression, which leads to high expression of KAT2b and SRSF1, which ultimately enhances osteoclast differentiation from bone marrow mononuclear macrophages (BMMs) and promotes OP progression [157]. The regulatory role of histone acetylation has also been reported. Lian et al. found that histone acetyltransferases PCAF-mediated H3K27ac regulate the osteoclast regulatory factor CXCL12, whereas the loss of estrogen reduces miR-29a inhibition of PCAF, which in turn leads to H3K27 hyperacetylation and up-regulation of CXCL12 expression and promotes osteoclast differentiation and OP development [159]. Najafova et al. also reported a mechanism by which H2B monoubiquitination regulates the TNFSF11 (encoding RANKL) gene to enhance osteoclast differentiation [160]. In response to stimulus factors, transcription factors (TF) are recruited to enhancers that recruit the H2B ubiquitin ligase RNF40 to target genes, thereby elevating H2BK120ub1 levels and promoting H3K4me3 levels near the transcription start site (TSS), which in turn promotes transcription of TNFSF11, elevates RANKL expression, and promotes osteoclast differentiation [160].
In conclusion, histone modifications lead to the imbalance of bone homeostasis by suppressing osteogenic differentiation, mediating the disproportion between osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, enhancing osteoclast differentiation, and ultimately promoting the progression of OP.
3.2. Histone modifications and osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease characterized by the gradual breakdown of articular cartilage, secondary synovitis, and bone remodeling [161,162]. Its prevalence and disability are rising annually, placing a significant financial burden and medical pressure on the affected population [9,163]. According to a growing body of research conducted in recent years, histone modifications have a significant impact on the progression of OA [24,164,165] (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Histone modifications disrupt chondrocyte function and contribute to OA development. They promote OA progression by enhancing catabolic processes, inhibiting anabolic activities, and inducing chondrocyte death.
3.2.1. Histone modifications regulate extracellular matrix
Articular cartilage mainly refers to hyaline cartilage, which consists of chondrocytes, extracellular matrix (ECM), and water, and is a non-vascularized tissue that enables joint movement by providing a smooth surface with minimal friction [166]. Cartilage homeostasis, is largely dependent on chondrocytes for the proper synthesis and breakdown of ECM components [167,168]. One of the important mechanisms in the development of OA is the ECM degradation and disrupted cartilage homeostasis caused by an imbalance between anabolic and catabolic gene expression in chondrocytes [169]. By modulating the balance between catabolic and anabolic processes at the gene level, histone modifications disrupt the integrity of ECM, thereby impairing cartilage homeostasis and facilitating the progression of OA.
3.2.1.1. Histone modifications enhance catabolism
Wnt signaling, which is epigenetically suppressed in OP to inhibit osteogenesis, is abnormally hyperactivated in OA, driving the expression of matrix-degrading enzymes and disrupting cartilage homeostasis [[170], [171], [172]]. Histone acetylation has been demonstrated by Ji et al. to regulate the Wnt pathway [173]. They found that Hematopoietic PBX-interacting protein (HPIP) was elevated in OA cartilage, and formed a complex with LEF1 to recruit histone acetyltransferase p300. This resulted in an increase in H3K56ac in the promoters of Wnt target genes, activated Wnt signaling, and induced the production of catabolic factors, all of which disrupted cartilage homeostasis and accelerated the progression of OA [173]. Histone methylation has also been demonstrated by Yang et al. to regulate the Wnt pathway [174]. They found that, induced by increased lncRNA HOTAIR in OA, histone methyltransferase PRC2 raised the level of H3K27me3 and reduced the expression of Wnt inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1), which activated the Wnt signaling pathway, increased the production of matrix-degrading proteins, and accelerated the progression of OA [174]. However, not all histone modifications positively regulate the Wnt pathway. Monteagudo's team reported the ability of histone methyltransferase DOT1L to block Wnt pathway overactivation to maintain cartilage homeostasis by inhibiting the function of SIRT1 after activation of Wnt signaling [175]. In contrast, decreased DOT1L activity in OA results in the loss of this inhibitory capacity, which leads to Wnt overactivation, inducing the expression of catabolic genes and accelerating OA progression [175,176].
It has been demonstrated that the development of OA is linked to persistent, low-grade inflammation. Inflammatory factors cause the production of catabolic factors MMPs and ADAMTS to be upregulated, which disturbs cartilage homeostasis and accelerates the progression of OA [177,178]. According to a study by Dai et al., the increased expression of catabolic genes induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines is mediated by histone acetylation [179]. Histone acetylation readers Brd3 and Brd4 are recruited to the MMP1, 3, 13, and ADAMTS4 promoters by IL-1β and TNF-α. They recognize histone acetylation modifications and mediate transcriptional elongation of DNA, thus facilitating the expression of these catabolic genes [179]. Histone modifications also mediate inflammatory damage in chondrocytes, a mechanism reported by Ai et al. [180]. IL-1β-induced upregulation of HMGA1 expression increases the expression of histone H3K27 demethylase JMJD3, which in turn mediates H3K27 demethylation of the ZEB1 promoter to promote ZEB1 transcription, exacerbating inflammatory damage and oxidative stress in chondrocytes [180].
Senescent chondrocytes secrete senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), including matrix-degrading protease MMPs, ADAMTSs, and inflammatory cytokines IL-1, TNF-α, which induce OA inflammation and ECM degradation, disrupt cartilage homeostasis, and ultimately result in the development of OA [181]. Ji et al. discovered the mechanism of histone modification to promote chondrocyte senescence and OA progression [182]. They found that lncRNA ELDR mediates the recruitment of KAT6a and hnRNPL to the IHH promoter, enhancing H3K9ac and H3K4me3 modifications. This chromatin remodeling facilitates the binding of the transcription factor NRF1 to the IHH promoter, which initiates IHH expression, triggers hedgehog signaling, and accelerates chondrocyte senescence [182]. As a result, there is increased expression of SASPs and catabolism, which promotes OA progression.
Emerging evidence suggests that metabolic reprogramming in OA not only affects energy supply but also shapes the epigenetic landscape of chondrocytes, thereby influencing gene expression and cartilage homeostasis. Chen et al. reported a mechanism by which altered glucose metabolism in OA affects histone modifications and thus regulates matrix metabolism [183]. They found that the action of ATP citrate lyase (ACLY) was enhanced in OA chondrocytes, leading to an increase in acetyl-CoA levels. This raised the level of H3K9ac and H3K27ac in the promoter regions of catabolic factors, thereby enhancing their expression and accelerating matrix degradation and OA [183]. Similarly, Xia et al. reported that OA mouse models exhibit abnormally elevated glycolysis and increased histone lactylation levels [65]. They further demonstrated that LDHA-induced H3K18 lactylation enhances TPI1 transcription, which upregulates catabolic factors such as MMP13, disrupting cartilage homeostasis and accelerating cartilage loss. These findings reveal a critical link between metabolic intermediates and chromatin regulation in OA pathogenesis. Wang et al. found that the upregulation of histone methyltransferase EZH2 was associated with OA, and that inhibiting EZH2 alleviated cartilage deterioration and OA symptoms [184]. Mechanistically, EZH2 suppresses miR-138 expression by elevating H3K27me3 levels in its promoter region, thereby upregulating its target gene SDC1, promoting the production of catabolic factors, and disrupting cartilage homeostasis [184].
3.2.1.2. Histone modifications inhibit anabolism
Major components of ECM include type II collagen and aggrecan, whose gene expression is controlled by transcription factor SOX9, a major cartilage regulatory factor [185]. Nham's team and UKITA's team have reported on the epigenetic modification mechanism by which histone modifications regulate the expression of ACAN, COL2A1, and SOX9, thereby affecting matrix synthesis. Nham et al. found that HDAC10 and sirtuin6 controlled the activity of E1 and E2 enhancers to regulate the expression of ACAN and COL2A1 [186]. UKITA et al. discovered that the levels of H3K9 methylation were decreased in OA cartilage, which decreased SOX9 and COL2A1 expression and negatively regulated cartilage homeostasis [187]. Lian et al. reported a non-classical mechanism for the regulation of anabolic genes through synergistic interactions between histone modifications [188]. It was discovered that OA chondrocytes had an abnormality of elevated levels of both H3K27me2/3 demethylase UTX expression and H3K27me3 modification. Furthermore, they observed that H3K27me3 enrichment at the Sox9 promoter was instead facilitated by enforced UTX expression [188]. Further exploration of the mechanism revealed that UTX targets H3K27me3 at the Eed and Suz12 promoters, the core components of histone methyltransferase PRC2, increasing their expression. The increased expression of PRC2 results in heightened H3K27me3 levels in the Igf2 promoter region, reduced Igf2 expression, leading to diminished ECM synthesis, and disrupted cartilage homeostasis, thereby promoting OA progression [188].
The dual regulatory impacts of histone methylation on anabolism and catabolism were described by Shao et al. and Jin et al. [189]. Shao et al. found that histone methyltransferase NSD1 expression was down-regulated in OA. Furthermore, in NSD1 knockout mice, the expression of SOX9 and COL2A1 was reduced, while the expression of MMP3, MMP13, and ADAMTS5 was elevated [189]. Mechanistically, down-regulation of NSD1 leads to decreased Osr2 H3K36 methylation levels and decreased Osr2 expression, which inhibits anabolism and enhances catabolism, disrupting cartilage homeostasis and facilitating OA progression [189]. Jin et al. observed an upregulation of histone demethylase JMJD3 in chondrocytes following the application of abnormal stress [190]. JMJD3 promotes NR4A1 expression by reducing H3K27me3 levels at its promoter. This results in the downregulation of COLII and SOX9, an increase in MMP13 and IL-1β expression, and subsequently promotes OA [190].
3.2.2. Histone modifications in other OA pathological processes
Beyond disrupted cartilage metabolism, OA involves chondrocyte death, synovial inflammation and subchondral bone formation [191]. While most studies on histone modifications mainly focus on cartilage homeostasis, current evidence for their roles in these additional processes is limited but gradually emerging.
3.2.2.1. Chondrocyte death
Chondrocyte death, including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis, is a hallmark of OA and accelerates cartilage degradation [192]. These processes amplify matrix breakdown and inflammatory responses, fueling disease progression [193]. Recent studies indicate that histone modifications regulate chondrocyte death pathways by controlling gene transcription, adding a novel epigenetic dimension to OA pathogenesis.
Apoptosis, the earliest recognized form of programmed cell death (PCD), is a tightly regulated, non-inflammatory process that eliminates damaged or dysfunctional cells [194]. Chondrocyte apoptosis, widely observed in OA patients and animal models, is closely associated with disease severity and contributes to extracellular matrix degradation and cartilage calcification [193]. Emerging evidence suggests that histone modifications influence key apoptotic signaling pathways. Studies have shown that HDACs play an important role in regulating chondrocyte apoptosis. Wang et al. found that HDAC2 lowers H3K27ac at the miR-503-5p promoter, thereby reducing its expression and increasing Caspase-3 and Bax, which promotes chondrocyte apoptosis [195]. Li et al. reported that HDAC4 is downregulated in human and rat OA cartilage. HDAC4 suppresses ATF4 and CHOP expression, reducing oxidative stress and inhibiting chondrocyte apoptosis [196]. Using the Acan-CreERT2; HDAC4fl/fl genetic mouse model, their team further confirmed this finding, highlighting the potential of HDAC4 as a therapeutic target for OA [197]. The role of JMJD3 in regulating chondrocyte apoptosis has also been revealed. Jin et al. found that JMJD3 promotes NR4A1 expression by H3K27me3 demethylation at its promoter, thereby influencing chondrocyte apoptosis and cartilage degeneration [190]. Similarly, Huang et al. reported that JMJD3 activates the NOTCH1 expression, which upregulates Bax and Caspase-3 while suppressing Bcl-2 expression, promoting IL-1β-induced chondrocyte apoptosis [198].
Pyroptosis is an inflammation-related PCD, triggered by the assembly of inflammasomes and activation of specific caspases, including caspase-1 and caspase-4/5/11 [199]. Research indicates that chondrocyte pyroptosis elevates the release of proteolytic enzymes and inflammatory cytokines, which in turn exacerbate inflammation and cartilage degradation in OA [200]. However, current research on the regulation of chondrocyte pyroptosis by histone modifications remains very limited. Chen et al. were the first to uncover the mechanism by which EZH2 regulates chondrocyte pyroptosis [201]. Their study showed that EZH2 expression positively correlates with the severity of pyroptosis and the progression of OA. EZH2 mediates epigenetic silencing of miR-142-3p through H3K27me3, resulting in increased HMGB1 expression, which aggravates endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced chondrocyte pyroptosis and accelerates OA development.
Ferroptosis, a newly identified PCD characterized by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, is driven by elevated intracellular free iron, glutathione depletion, and GPX4 inactivation, resulting in the membrane lipid peroxide accumulation and loss of cellular integrity [202]. Ferroptosis is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to OA pathogenesis. During disease progression, iron accumulates in cartilage while antioxidant defenses such as GPX4 and GSH decline, resulting in iron overload and redox imbalance [203]. This disruption induces chondrocyte ferroptosis, which enhances MMP13 expression, suppresses COL2, and ultimately accelerates cartilage degradation and OA progression [204]. Currently, increasing attention has been given to the role of histone modifications in regulating chondrocyte ferroptosis. Wang et al. reported that NSD1 promotes H3K36me2 modification and upregulates SOX9 expression. This suppresses ACSL4 transcription, inhibits chondrocyte ferroptosis, and contributes to cartilage integrity [205]. Zhang et al. reported that lactate dehydrogenase B (LDHB) and H3K18 lactylation increase during OA. LDHB elevates H3K18la and upregulates ACSL4 expression, leading to chondrocyte ferroptosis and accelerated OA progression [206].
3.2.2.2. Synovial inflammation and subchondral bone remodeling
Synovial inflammation is a key pathological feature in the development of OA. Although OA has traditionally been regarded as a cartilage degenerative disease, increasing evidence indicates that synovial inflammation contributes to OA onset and progression [207]. It is characterized by synovial hyperplasia, angiogenesis, and infiltration of immune cells such as macrophages, T cells, and B cells [208]. These cells release pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which amplify inflammation, induce MMPs and ADAMTS, and accelerate cartilage matrix degradation [209]. Evidence remains limited, but existing studies underscore the role and therapeutic potential of histone modifications in regulating synovial inflammation in OA. The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A was shown to reduce synovial inflammation and prevent cartilage damage in an arthritis model [210]. Lin et al. demonstrated that synovial macrophages in OA mice shift toward M1 polarization and promote cartilage degradation via exosome secretion. These exosomes transfer miR-350-3p to chondrocytes, suppressing NSD1 expression and reducing H3K36 methylation, which consequently elevates the expression of MMP13, P16, and P21 [211].
Subchondral bone remodeling imbalance is a key pathological feature of OA. During disease progression, the subchondral bone undergoes increased bone density, trabecular thickening, and osteophyte formation [212]. These alterations not only disrupt joint biomechanics but also accelerate cartilage degeneration through bone–cartilage crosstalk [213,214]. Recent studies suggest that histone modifications may play a role in subchondral bone remodeling, offering potential new targets for OA therapy. Animal studies have demonstrated that histone methylation significantly influences subchondral bone remodeling in OA. Intra-articular overexpression of KDM6A in mice led to pronounced osteophyte formation and increased osteophyte volume around the injured knee, whereas KDM6A knockout alleviated OA features, including cartilage loss, osteophyte development, and subchondral trabecular bone loss [188,215]. Likewise, curcumenol treatment upregulated KDM6B and reduced H3K27me3 levels, thereby improving cartilage integrity and preventing subchondral bone loss in knee OA models [216]. Lian et al. demonstrated that subchondral mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs) from OA knees possess higher osteogenic and chondrogenic potential than bone marrow–derived MSCs, contributing to subchondral bone over-mineralization and osteophyte formation. This mechanism is mediated by microRNA-29a-induced downregulation of HDAC4, underscoring the role of histone acetylation in subchondral bone remodeling during OA.
In summary, histone modifications play a central role in OA progression by enhancing catabolic activity, suppressing anabolic pathways, and disturbing cartilage homeostasis. Beyond these well-established mechanisms, emerging evidence suggests their involvement in chondrocyte death, synovial inflammation, and subchondral bone remodeling. However, research in these areas remains scarce, leaving their precise roles largely undefined. Future studies should aim to elucidate these mechanisms and explore the therapeutic potential of targeting histone modifications to develop epigenetic-based strategies for OA management.
3.3. Histone modifications and intervertebral disc degeneration
Intervertebral disc degeneration, a spinal degenerative disease characterized by progressive deterioration of the structure and function of the nucleus pulposus (NP), annulus fibrosus (AF), and cartilage endplate (CEP), is the leading cause of lower back pain (LBP), which leads to a serious disease burden worldwide [9,[217], [218], [219]]. Relevant research has demonstrated that histone modifications are crucial to the occurrence and development of IDD [220,221] (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Histone modifications contribute to nucleus pulposus and cartilage endplate degeneration in intervertebral disc disease. They accelerate ECM degradation, induce nucleus pulposus cell senescence and death, and promote cartilage endplate degeneration.
3.3.1. Histone modifications in extracellular matrix homeostasis
The extracellular matrix (ECM) refers to the non-cellular components within tissues, which offer structural support to cells and establish a microenvironment favorable for cell survival while regulating a range of cellular physiological functions [222]. The main components of the intervertebral disc's ECM include proteoglycans, collagen, and non-collagenous proteins, playing crucial roles in regulating cell phenotype, absorbing water, facilitating nutrient diffusion, and maintaining mechanical microenvironments [223]. Enhanced catabolism and suppressed anabolism lead to ECM degradation, which results in reduced hydration and elasticity of the nucleus pulposus, further leading to dehydration and fibrosis, and significantly disrupting the flexibility and load-bearing capacity of the intervertebral disc [224,225]. Moreover, alterations in ECM components induce changes in the mechanical microenvironment and disrupt cell–cell interactions, leading to phenotypic changes in nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) and impairing their normal functions [225]. Consequently, ECM degradation is closely associated with IDD. Furthermore, histone modification participates in ECM degradation and IDD processes by influencing gene expression connected to ECM synthesis and decomposition.
ADAMTS is one of the major ECM-degrading enzymes that recognize ECM components through its thrombospondin motifs [226]. It is a typical marker of catabolism, and its upregulation in expression and activity is often associated with ECM metabolism dysregulation [227]. Wang et al. discovered that histone methylation modifications directly regulate the expression of ADAMTS-5, mediating ECM degradation. They found a reduction in RREB1 expression in degenerated NPCs, resulting in increased levels of transcriptionally activating modifications H3K4me2 and H3K4me3 on the ADAMTS-5 promoter region, and decreased levels of inhibitory modifications H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, leading to increased expression of ADAMTS-5, ECM degradation, and promotion of IDD [228].
By increasing the synthesis of associated matrix-degrading enzymes, the NF-κB signaling pathway facilitates ECM degradation [229]. Related research has indicated that SIRT6 participates in ECM metabolism by regulating the NF-κB signaling pathway. It has been demonstrated that the histone deacetylase SIRT6 controls the expression of NF-κB related genes by mediating H3K9 deacetylation, which regulates the signal transmission of the NF-κB pathway at the gene level [230]. Kang et al. observed decreased SIRT6 expression in degenerated NP tissues and IL-1β-induced NPCs, and demonstrated that silencing SIRT6 induces ECM degradation in human NP cells [231]. Mechanistically, the downregulation of SIRT6 expression weakens its inhibitory effect on the NF-κB pathway, leading to increased production of MMP3 and MMP13, and decreased production of Collagen II and Aggrecan, thereby promoting ECM degradation and IDD [231].
Oxidative stress refers to cellular oxidative damage caused by the excessive production and insufficient clearance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [232]. Studies have demonstrated that excess ROS induces the upregulation of catabolism markers such as MMPs and ADAMTS through the initiation of related signaling pathways, such as MAPK and NF-κB pathway, while the expression of anabolism markers such as Coll Ⅱ and Aggrecan is downregulated, leading to extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation and promoting IDD [233]. Relevant research indicates the involvement of histone modifications in these molecular mechanisms. Xu et al. found that ROS induced by H2O2 activates the p38/MAPK pathway, promoting the phosphorylation of histone methyltransferase KMT2D and inhibiting its ubiquitination degradation, thereby increasing its expression [234]. Upregulated KMT2D subsequently increases the expression of degradation markers MMPs by enhancing the H3K4me1 levels in the enhancer regions of Mmp3, Mmp9, and Mmp13, thereby leading to ECM degradation and promoting IDD [234].
3.3.2. Histone modifications in nucleus pulposus cell senescence
Intervertebral disc degeneration, an age-related affliction, is intricately intertwined with cellular senescence. Senescent nucleus pulposus cells unleash SASPs, unleashing a cascade of inflammatory cytokines and degradation factors such as MMPs and ADAMTS, thereby fueling extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation and accelerating IDD progression [235]. Presently, related research underscores the close interplay between NPC senescence and alterations in histone modifications, revealing that these modifications serve as pivotal epigenetic regulators linking inflammation, oxidative stress, autophagy, and RNA methylation to NPC senescence.
During IDD, inflammation and NPC senescence of are highly intertwined. Chronic inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, activate inflammatory signaling pathways like NF-κB, inducing cell cycle arrest and the expression of SASPs, thereby promoting inflammatory senescence [236]. Inflammatory signaling pathways, particularly MAPK and NF-κB, exert pivotal roles in orchestrating NPC senescence within the inflammatory microenvironment [[237], [238], [239]]. Zhou et al. observed EZH2 promotes NPC senescence by enhancing MAPK-mediated inflammatory responses. Further, mechanistic insights reveal that EZH2 suppresses miR-129-5p expression by meditating H3K27me3, thereby alleviating its inhibitory effect on MAPK1 expression [240]. As discussed earlier, SIRT6 mitigates NF-κB target gene expression through histone deacetylation, effectively halting its signaling cascade [230]. Xie et al. documented a decline in SIRT6 protein expression and an increase in NF-κB p65 protein expression, accompanied by heightened H3K9ac levels in TNF-α-induced NPCs. SIRT6 downregulation activates the NF-κB pathway, culminating in NPC inflammatory senescence [241]. The cGAS/STING pathway mediates the inflammatory microenvironment by activating NF-κB signaling, driving local inflammation and SASPs secretion [242]. Zheng et al. reported that EZH2 regulates the cGAS/STING pathway via H3K27me3 and suppresses inflammatory senescence. In contrast, the downregulation of EZH2 in degenerated NP tissues may lift the transcriptional repression of STING, resulting in activation of the cGAS/STING signaling pathway and the induction of inflammatory responses [243].
NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4)-associated oxidative stress emerges as one of the driving factors of NPC senescence [244]. Liu et al. noted diminished EZH2 expression and heightened NOX4 expression in degenerated rat NP [245]. EZH2 downregulation precipitates NPC senescence, as reduced H3K27me3 levels in the NOX4 promoter region contribute to elevated NOX4 expression. Moreover, NOX4 overexpression suppresses EZH2 expression via Wnt/β-catenin, forming a positive feedback [245].
Emerging evidence underscores the role of a synergistic interplay between histone modifications and m6A methylation in driving NPC senescence and accelerating IDD. Li et al. and Wu et al. reported the synergistic interaction between m6A methyltransferases WTAP and METTL3 and histone methylation. Li et al. discovered that in TNF-α-induced senescent NP cells, the expression of lysine demethylase KDM5a markedly decreases, leading to heightened histone H3K4me3 epigenetic modification in the promoter region of m6A methyltransferase WTAP, thereby promoting its transcription [246]. The heightened expression of WTAP significantly boosts the m6A modification of lncRNA NORAD, amplifying its degradation. Furthermore, via the NORAD/PUMILIO/E2F3 axis, it reduces the expression of E2F3, thereby fostering NPC senescence and IDD [246]. Wu et al. demonstrated that KMT2A-mediated H3K4me3 upregulates METTL3, resulting in m6A methylation of ATG4a mRNA and decreased transcript stability. This impairs autophagy and triggers the GATA4-driven NPC senescence, accelerating IVDD progression [247]. Li et al. revealed an upregulation in m6A demethylase ALKBH5 expression in senescent NP cells induced by TNF-α [248]. Subsequent investigations unveiled that this alteration stemmed from heightened lysine demethylase KDM4a expression, resulting in diminished H3K9me3 levels in the ALKBH5 promoter region, thereby facilitating its expression. ALKBH5 boosts DNMT3B expression through its m6A demethylation function, subsequently leading to DNA methylation-mediated inhibition of E4F1 transcription, ultimately fostering NPC senescence and IDD [248].
3.3.3. Histone modifications in nucleus pulposus cell death
NPC death, including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis, plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of IDD [199]. Dysregulation of these pathways contributes to the depletion of disc cells, degradation of extracellular matrix components, and amplification of local inflammatory responses [249]. Notably, growing evidence suggests that histone modifications promote IDD by disturbing the homeostasis of programmed cell death in NPCs.
Apoptosis, a classic form of cell death, contributes to progressive cell loss, cytokine release, and ECM degradation in IDD, thereby accelerating structural deterioration and functional impairment of the intervertebral disc [249]. Recent studies have highlighted the critical role of histone modifications in modulating NPC apoptosis. Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) is a key apoptosis-related kinase that triggers apoptosis via activation of mitochondria-dependent caspases [250]. Recent studies indicate that ASK1 promotes nucleus pulposus cell apoptosis and contributes to IDD [251,252]. Lin et al. found that HDAC4 promotes the expression of ASK1 through KLF5, thereby exacerbating IDD [252]. In addition, Zheng et al. found that HDAC/H3K27ac-mediated transcriptional activation of NDUFA3 inhibits nucleus pulposus cell apoptosis, improves mitochondrial function, and protects against high glucose-induced damage [253]. While these studies highlight the significant roles of histone acetylation, Liu et al. found that KMT2D promotes the expression of miR-133a-5p through H3K4me2. This facilitates miR-133a-5p binding to PFKFB2, resulting in transcriptional repression of PFKFB2 and subsequently enhancing apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation of NPCs [254].
Pyroptosis, an inflammatory mode of cell death, is increasingly recognized as a key driver of IDD progression [255]. Pyroptosis of NPCs results not only in cell loss but also in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which promote ECM degradation and disrupt tissue homeostasis [255]. Yao et al. demonstrated that EZH2 mediates transcriptional repression of DKK1 via H3K27me3, which triggers NPCs pyroptosis through activation of NLRP3 and NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasomes, contributing to the progression of IDD [256].
Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death driven by lipid peroxidation, has recently attracted attention for its potential role in IDD. Iron overload and ferroptosis upregulate MMP3 and MMP13 while downregulating type II collagen, thereby accelerating ECM degradation and structural deterioration of the intervertebral disc [257,258]. Recent studies have shown that histone modifications within the altered metabolic microenvironment play a crucial role in regulating ferroptosis in NPCs during IDD. Wu et al. found that GLS1-mediated glutamine metabolism enhances acetyl-CoA production and increases H3K9ac and H3K27ac at the NFS1 promoter, leading to NFS1 upregulation. Elevated NFS1 levels preserve Fe2+ homeostasis and prevent oxidative stress–induced matrix degradation, ferroptosis, and senescence in NPCs [259]. Sun et al. reported that enhanced glycolysis and increased lactate production in degenerated discs induce ACSL4 expression by elevating H3K18 lactylation and promote ACSL4 protein lactylation. These metabolic and epigenetic alterations activate NPCs ferroptosis and accelerate IDD [260]. These findings highlight a mechanistic axis in which metabolic reprogramming shapes the epigenetic landscape to regulate iron-dependent cell death, revealing a critical link between altered energy metabolism, histone modification, and ferroptosis in the pathogenesis of IDD.
3.3.4. Histone modifications in cartilage endplate and annulus fibrosus degeneration
The cartilage endplate (CEP) is essential for intervertebral disc health, facilitating nutrient exchange and providing biomechanical support [261]. CEP degeneration disrupts nutrient supply, making the disc susceptible to stress and injury, and is often linked to the breakdown of ECM components [[262], [263], [264]]. Jiang et al. observed elevated expression of histone methyltransferase EZH2 in degenerated rat endplate chondrocytes (EPCs) and patients' CEP. Notably, EZH2 overexpression promotes ADTAMTS5 and MMP13 expression, and inhibits Coll Ⅱ and Aggrecan expression, consequently driving CEP and IDD [265]. Mechanistically, EZH2 suppresses Sox-9 transcription by inducing H3K27me3 modification at its promoter region, resulting in the downregulation of Sox-9 [265].
The annulus fibrosus (AF) is a critical component of the intervertebral disc, composed of concentric lamellae of collagen fibers that provide tensile strength and maintain disc integrity [217]. During IDD, AF undergoes structural and biochemical alterations, including disorganization of collagen fibers, decreased proteoglycan content, and increased cell apoptosis, which collectively compromise the mechanical properties and contribute to disc herniation and chronic low back pain [266]. Recent studies have revealed the crucial role of epigenetic regulation in AF degeneration. For instance, DNA methylation alterations have been identified in AF during IDD, while noncoding RNAs such as lncRNA GAS5 and miR-221-3p influence AF cell osteogenic differentiation and apoptosis [267,268]. In contrast, research on histone modifications in AF degeneration remains extremely scarce, and the underlying mechanisms are largely unexplored. Recently, Ramteke et al. reported that SIRT6 conditional knockout mice develop accelerated AF degeneration, characterized by the loss of the NP-AF boundary, formation of AF fissures, and degradation of organized collagen matrix, highlighting the potential role of histone modifications in AF pathology [269].
In summary, histone modifications are emerging as key regulators in IDD, influencing ECM degradation, NPC senescence, multiple forms of regulated cell death, and potentially cartilage endplate and annulus fibrosus degeneration. Nevertheless, current research on histone modifications remains largely focused on nucleus pulposus, with limited understanding of their roles in other disc components. Future studies should aim to comprehensively elucidate these mechanisms and explore histone-modifying enzymes as promising therapeutic targets for IDD.
4. Histone-modifying enzymes provide the potential therapeutic targets for degenerative skeletal diseases
In light of the crucial roles of histone modifications and their modifying enzymes in degenerative skeletal diseases, the exploration of small-molecule modulators including inhibitors and activators targeting these histone-modifying enzymes holds promise for treatment. Currently, small-molecule inhibitors targeting histone-modifying enzymes have made significant advances, especially in oncology, where they have shown promising therapeutic effects. However, their clinical application in degenerative skeletal diseases remains largely unexplored, with no clinical trials reported so far. Numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated their potential to slow disease progression, highlighting the urgent need for further translational research and early-phase clinical trials (Table 4).
Table 4.
Small-molecule modulators of histone modification and their effects on degenerative skeletal diseases.
| Classification | Small molecules | Targets | Diseases | Experimental model/subjects | Pharmacological functions | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMT inhibitors | Tazemetostat | EZH2 | osteoarthritis | IL-1β-induced chondrocytes; meniscectomy mice | reduces inflammation and catabolism; reduces cartilage degradation and joint pain | [274] |
| DZNep | EZH2 | osteoarthritis | IL-1β-induced chondrocytes | reduces MMPs expression | [275] | |
| HDM inhibitors | GSK2879552 | LSD1 | osteoporosis | RANKL-treated BMMs; OVX mice | inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation; prevents cortical bone loss | [278] |
| KDM5A-IN-1 | KDM5C | osteoporosis | RANKL-treated BMMs | inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation | [279] | |
| GSK-J4 | KDM6A | osteoarthritis | DMM mice | reduces articular cartilage loss and synovial hyperplasia | [215] | |
| GSK-J4 | JMJD3 | osteoarthritis | IL-1β-induced chondrocytes; DMM mice | inhibits inflammation and catabolism; prevents cartilage degradation | [280] | |
| Daminozide | KDM2/7 | osteoarthritis | C28/I2 cells; DMM mice | increases anabolism; reduces cartilage degradation and osteophyte formation |
[281] | |
| HAT inhibitors | A-485 | p300/CBP | osteoporosis | RANKL-treated BMMs; OVX mice | inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation; alleviates bone loss |
[285] |
| Salidroside | PCAF | osteoarthritis | TNF-α-induced chondrocytes; DMM mice | inhibits ECM degradation, inflammation, and apoptosis; alleviates cartilage destruction and synovitis | [286] | |
| HDAC inhibitors | Vorinostat | class I and II HDAC | osteoarthritis | IL-1β-induced chondrocytes | inhibits the expression of catabolic markers | [[290], [291], [292]] |
| Vorinostat | class I and II HDAC | osteoporosis | RANKL-treated BMMs; OVX mice | inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation; ameliorates bone loss |
[293] | |
| Panobinostat | HDAC | osteoarthritis | ACLT rats | attenuates subchondral bone remodeling, cartilage degradation, and articular cartilage hypertrophy; alleviates pain | [295] | |
| Panobinostat | HDAC | osteoarthritis | IL-1β-induced chondrocytes; DMM mice | inhibits catabolism; attenuates cartilage degradation, subchondral bone remodeling, and synovitis | [296] | |
| Chidamide | benzamide-type HDAC | osteoporosis | adipogenic medium-induced BM-MSCs | suppresses adipogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs | [298] | |
| Chidamide | benzamide-type HDAC | osteoarthritis | ACLT rats | reduces cartilage degradation, osteophyte formation, and pain | [314] | |
| Tubastatin A | HDAC6 | osteoarthritis | DMM mice | inhibits cartilage degradation and synovial tissue thickening; alleviates hyperalgesia | [299] | |
| Tubastatin A | HDAC6 | osteoarthritis | TBHP-induced chondrocytes; DMM mice | reduces apoptosis, oxidative stress, and ECM degradation, and enhances autophagy in chondrocytes; inhibits cartilage degradation and aberrance | [300] | |
| ACY-1215 | HDAC6 | osteoarthritis | IL-1β-induced chondrocytes | decreases the expression of catabolic markers and promotes the expression of COL2A1 | [301] | |
| SIRT1 activator | Resveratrol | SIRT1 | osteoporosis | H2O2-treated osteoblasts; OVX mice | enhances proliferation, differentiation, and suppresses apoptosis of H2O2-treated osteoblasts; ameliorates bone loss and promotes osteogenesis |
[327] |
| Resveratrol | SIRT1 | osteoporosis | postmenopausal women | slows bone loss in the lumbar spine and femoral neck | [328] | |
| Resveratrol | SIRT1 | osteoarthritis | DMM mice | inhibits cartilage degradation, subchondral bone remodeling | [330] | |
| Resveratrol | SIRT1 | osteoarthritis | postmenopausal women | reduce chronic pain in age-related osteoarthritis and improve menopause-related quality of life in postmenopausal women | [331] | |
| Resveratrol | SIRT1 | intervertebral disc degeneration | NPCs | inhibited NPCs apoptosis and promoted ECM synthesis | [333] |
Note: BMMs: bone marrow-derived macrophages; OVX: ovariectomy; DMM: destabilized medial meniscus; ACLT: anterior cruciate ligament transection.
4.1. HMT inhibitors
Numerous inhibitors targeting histone methyltransferases (HMTs) have been identified and developed, with EZH2 inhibitors demonstrating significant advancements in drug development. In particular, in January 2020, the FDA approved Tazemetostat, the first EZH2 inhibitor in the world that was co-developed by Epizyme and Eisai, for marketing to treat epithelioid sarcoma [270]. In addition, Valemetostat Tosilate, a dual EZH1/2 inhibitor, developed by Daiichi Sankyo Company in Japan, received marketing approval from the MHLW in September 2022 for addressing relapsed/refractory adult T-cell leukemia [271].
Multiple investigations have revealed elevated EZH2 expression levels in degenerative skeletal diseases (OP, OA, IDD), strongly associated with disease progression [265,272,273]. Utilizing siRNA or shRNA to knock down EZH2 has shown promising results in ameliorating tissue cell degeneration, impeding disease advancement, and exerting a protective effect [265,272,273]. This indicates that treating degenerative skeletal diseases with EZH2 inhibitors is feasible. Allas et al. conducted a preclinical study utilizing Tazemetostat to target EZH2 in OA treatment [274]. They observed that Tazemetostat application reduced the expression of catabolic genes in IL-1β-induced chondrocytes, decreased ECM degradation, attenuated cartilage degradation, and enhanced motor function in OA mice [274]. Aury-Landas et al. also reported that DZNep, an EZH2 inhibitor, exhibits chondroprotective effects by downregulating the expression of IL-1β-induced cartilage matrix degradation genes [275]. Extensive clinical studies are necessary to determine the safety and effectiveness of EZH2 inhibitors in the treatment of OA, despite the promising therapeutic utility of these in vivo and in vitro research.
4.2. HDM inhibitors
Histone demethylase (HDM) inhibitors can be categorized into two main groups: those aimed at LSD1/KDM1A and those targeting the JMJC subfamily. The former group of inhibitors has advanced more rapidly than the latter group, with numerous drugs currently progressing through clinical phases II and III, primarily for the treatment of hematological, lymphatic disorders, and neoplasms [276,277]. While clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of HDM inhibitors in treating degenerative skeletal diseases are yet to be conducted, a significant number of preclinical investigations have highlighted their promising therapeutic potential in this context.
GSK2879552, an LSD1 inhibitor, has demonstrated the efficacy of reducing RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation, while also exhibiting the capacity to partially ameliorate cortical bone loss induced by OVX in murine models of OP [278]. Liu et al. investigated the utilization of the pan-KDM5 inhibitor (KDM5A-IN-1), which acts by targeting KDM 5C, thus impairing energy metabolism and curtailing osteoclastogenesis in both murine and human subjects [279]. Additionally, GSK-J4, acting as an inhibitor of the KDM6 family, functions dually to inhibit UTX/KDM6A and JMJD3/KDM6B. Relevant studies have highlighted its prospective application in mitigating OA. Lian et al. administered intra-articular injections of GSK-J4 to inhibit KDM6A, observing significant attenuation of DMM-induced OA alterations, such as synovial hyperplasia and articular cartilage loss, in murine models [215]. Jun et al. noted upregulated JMJD3 expression in OA cartilage, and further demonstrated that GSK-J4 administration led to reduced production of catabolic enzymes, inhibited extracellular matrix degradation, and mitigated cartilage damage in murine models of OA [280]. Furthermore, Daminozide, a KDM2/7 subfamily inhibitor, has been reported to elevate H3K79 methylation and glycosaminoglycans levels in chondrocytes following intra-articular injection, thus conferring protective effects against cartilage damage in DMM mice [281]. Collectively, all of these investigations show that HDM inhibitors have the potential to be innovative treatment options for degenerative skeletal diseases.
4.3. HAT inhibitors
HAT inhibitors function by targeting the bromodomain and HAT domains of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) [282]. Their drug development is currently in the preclinical and clinical phase I/II stages [283]. CBP/p300 BRD inhibitors Inobrodib (CCS1477) and NEO2734 (EP31670) have progressed into Phase 1/2 clinical trials targeting tumor diseases, such as multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma [284]. Additionally, the KAT6 catalytic inhibitor PF-07248144 has progressed into Phase 1 clinical trials aimed at treating metastatic ER+/HER2– breast cancer and other cancers [284]. Relevant preclinical studies have indicated the potential of HAT inhibitors in the treatment of degenerative skeletal diseases.
CBP/p300 inhibitor A-485 has shown promise in protecting against OP. According to Huo et al., A-485 reduced OVX-induced bone loss in the mouse model in vivo and suppressed osteoclast-specific gene expression and osteoclast differentiation in vitro [285]. Salidroside has been demonstrated to inhibit histone acetylation against OA. Chen et al. discovered that Salidroside inhibited ECM degradation, inflammation, and apoptosis in OA chondrocytes and alleviated OA symptoms in the mouse DMM model by pharmacologically blocking PCAF [286]. These studies highlight the application prospects of HAT inhibitors in degenerative skeletal diseases.
4.4. HDAC inhibitors
Since the first HDAC inhibitor, trichostatin A, was discovered more than three decades ago, a great deal of progress has been achieved in the drug development of HDAC inhibitors [287]. Five representative HDAC inhibitors, Vorinostat, belinostat, panobinostat, romidepsin, and chidamide, have been permitted for therapies for hematologic malignancies, with several others undergoing clinical trials in phases II and III [288]. An increasing amount of preclinical research emphasizes the potential therapeutic utility of HDAC inhibitors in degenerative skeletal diseases.
The effectiveness of vorinostat, panobinostat, and chidamide in treating degenerative skeletal diseases has been substantiated by extensive preclinical research. Vorinostat, FDA-approved in 2006 for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treatment [289], has exhibited promising results in inhibiting degradation markers like MMP-13 in OA chondrocytes, while also reversing the downregulation of COL2A1 and ACAN expression [[290], [291], [292]]. Peng et al. evaluated Vorinostat's therapeutic effects on bone loss in OVX mice via intraperitoneal injection, finding reduced osteoclast count, alleviated estrogen deficiency-induced bone loss, and trabecular structural damage without notable toxicity [293]. Panobinostat, FDA-approved in February 2015 for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma [294], significantly downregulated RUNX2 and MMP13 expression in chondrocytes, mitigated chondrocyte hypertrophy, and alleviated joint inflammation and cartilage degeneration in ACLT-induced osteoarthritic rats, thus delaying OA progression [295]. Ohzono et al. reduced cartilage, synovium, and subchondral bone degeneration in osteoarthritic mice through intraperitoneal administration, improving pain behavior [296]. Independently developed by Chipscreen Biosciences, chidamide obtained CFDA approval in December 2014 for relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma treatment [297]. Zhang et al. highlighted chidamide's inhibitory effect on BMSC adipogenic differentiation, suggesting therapeutic potential [298]. Additionally, HDAC6, upregulated in OA, promotes ECM degradation, contributing to disease progression [299]. Its inhibitors, Tubastatin A and ACY-1215, reduce inflammatory factors and MMP expression, inhibit ECM degradation, improve cartilage degeneration, and halt OA progression [[299], [300], [301]].
These studies indicate that HDAC inhibitors exhibit tissue-protective effects, making them promising candidates for the treatment of degenerative skeletal diseases. Nevertheless, further clinical trials are necessary to confirm their efficacy and safety.
4.5. Translational potential and challenges of histone-targeted therapeutics
Epigenetic modulation through histone modification has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for degenerative skeletal diseases. As outlined above, small-molecule inhibitors targeting histone-modifying enzymes have demonstrated compelling preclinical efficacy. These small-molecule inhibitors have been demonstrated to regulate critical pathological processes underlying disease progression, including inflammation, extracellular matrix degradation, and apoptosis. Importantly, they have not only reversed disease phenotypes in vitro but also improved tissue integrity and function in relevant animal models, highlighting their therapeutic value. In addition, their extensive exploration and application in the oncology field have provided valuable insights for their potential translation to orthopedic disorders. Despite these encouraging preclinical findings, substantial challenges still hinder the clinical translation of histone-modifying enzyme inhibitors for degenerative skeletal diseases.
4.5.1. Challenges in clinical translation
Suboptimal pharmacokinetic characteristics remain a major obstacle to the clinical development of histone-modifying enzyme inhibitors. A substantial proportion of histone-modifying agents exhibit poor aqueous solubility, limited drug permeability, low oral bioavailability, rapid systemic clearance, and short plasma half-lives [302,303]. These limitations not only impair the attainment of therapeutic concentrations and reduce pharmacological efficacy, but also elevate the risk of dose-limiting toxicities, thereby representing a significant barrier to broader clinical application [302]. For instance, vorinostat, one of the most widely studied HDAC inhibitors, is classified as a Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) class IV drug owing to its poor aqueous solubility (0.2 mg/mL), low membrane permeability (log P = 1.9) and limited intestinal absorption (2 × 10−6 cm/s) [304]. Moreover, its rapid metabolic clearance further compromises systemic exposure and restricts tissue distribution [304]. Similarly, panobinostat exhibits low oral bioavailability (approximately 21.4 %) due to poor solubility and extensive first-pass metabolism [305,306]. It also shows considerable interindividual variability, with clearance varying by up to 74 % [305,306].
Moreover, side effects, toxicity, and resistance also limit the clinical application of histone-modifying enzyme inhibitors. Notably, HDAC inhibitors have been shown to induce a variety of adverse effects, including gastrointestinal reactions, myelosuppression, and cardiac toxicity [307,308]. These toxicities are primarily attributed to the lack of selectivity of most HDAC inhibitors, especially pan-HDAC inhibitors, which target multiple HDAC enzymes and modulate a broad spectrum of biological pathways [307]. Furthermore, the emergence of resistance is likely driven by the activation of alternative signaling pathways, such as the AKT and CDK pathways, which effectively negate the therapeutic efficacy [309].
To tackle the challenges outlined above, substantial efforts have been directed towards several critical areas.
4.5.2. Innovations in drug delivery systems
The development of innovative delivery approaches, including prodrugs, nanoparticle-based delivery systems, and proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), has garnered significant attention [302]. Prodrugs are inactive, bioreversible derivatives of active compounds that undergo enzymatic or chemical transformation to release the parent drug, including aqueous soluble, lipophilic, carrier-mediated, and dual function prodrug [310,311]. They are commonly employed to address the physicochemical limitations of drugs and improve their pharmacokinetic properties, including solubility, lipophilicity, bioavailability, half-life, release profiles, and targeted tissue delivery [311]. Du et al. designed and synthesized aqueous soluble prodrugs of SAHA and belinostat, which exhibited significantly enhanced water solubility (up to 600-fold higher than the parent compounds), while maintaining similar antiproliferative potency [312]. Additionally, the ester prodrug of butyric acid HDAC inhibitor (BA), AN-113, has been reported to show considerable improvements in physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic parameters, efficacy, and safety [313].
Epigenetic drug delivery systems utilizing nanoparticles have emerged as a prominent area of research. A diverse array of nanocarriers, including lipid-based, polymeric-based, protein-based, and inorganic-based nanocarriers, have been explored for their potential in drug development [303]. Ye et al. utilized PLGA microcapsules to encapsulate chidamide, facilitating gradual and uninterrupted release for uniform intra-articular dispersion and sustained therapeutic effects [314]. Intra-articular injection of HDACi Microspheres exhibited extended retention time and alleviated pain in ACLT rats, safeguarding articular cartilage and showing excellent biocompatibility [314]. Additionally, Liu et al. designed mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) loaded with 4-octyl itaconate (OI), which regulates epigenetic modifications such as histone acetylation and DNA demethylation [315]. This system effectively restored mitochondrial function and modulated the osteoimmune microenvironment, showing promising results in alleviating osteoporotic bone loss.
PROTACs are emerging as an innovative and promising strategy in drug development, particularly in regulating epigenetic processes. These bifunctional molecules induce selective degradation of target proteins by recruiting an E3 ubiquitin ligase and initiating ubiquitin proteasome system [316]. Compared to traditional inhibitors, PROTACs offer higher selectivity, minimize toxic side effects, and significantly reduce drug resistance by continuously degrading the target protein rather than merely inhibiting its activity [317]. For example, Suzuki et al. designed and synthesized a series of PROTAC compounds based on the HDAC8 inhibitor NCC-149-A, with pomalidomide as the E3 ligand, demonstrating excellent targeted degradation activity and pharmacological efficacy [318].
4.5.3. Development of isoform-selective small-molecule inhibitors
Given the toxic side effects associated with non-selective histone modification inhibitors, the development of isoform-selective inhibitors is critical for enhancing drug safety and facilitating their broader clinical application. Among these, the development of isoform-selective HDAC inhibitors has seen the most significant advancements. HDAC inhibitors are generally classified according to their selectivity for specific HDAC isoforms, such as HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3 [319,320]. These selective inhibitors offer the potential to precisely modulate distinct epigenetic pathways, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing off-target effects and associated adverse reactions [321]. For instance, Bresciani et al. reported selective class I HDAC inhibitors utilizing an ethylketone as the zinc-binding group (ZBG) [322]. They developed a novel series of HDAC3-selective inhibitors, among which compound 32 demonstrated potent and highly selective inhibition of HDAC3, exhibiting a 50-fold greater selectivity compared to the commonly used HDAC3 tool compound, RGFP9669. Furthermore, Sellmer et al. introduced Marbostat-100, a selective HDAC6 inhibitor derived from Tubastatin A, featuring a hydroxamic acid group linked to tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives [323]. Their research demonstrated that Marbostat-100 is a potent HDAC6 inhibitor with strong selectivity and exhibits anti-inflammatory effects in in in vivo models.
4.5.4. Advancements in dual-/multi-target small-molecule inhibitors
Due to the complexity of diseases, single-target therapies often exhibit limited efficacy, along with challenges such as drug resistance and toxicity [320]. Consequently, the development of dual- and multi-target agents, capable of synergistically modulating disease-related networks, has emerged as a promising avenue in drug development. Among the multi-target strategies, multi-target HDAC inhibitors have garnered significant attention. Recent studies have shown that these compounds enhance therapeutic efficacy, reduce adverse effects, and decrease drug resistance, positioning them as a promising class of drugs in the field of epigenetic-based therapy [309].
Currently, a diverse array of multi-target HDAC inhibitors has been designed. Dual or multi-target drugs that simultaneously target HDAC and transcription factors have shown enhanced therapeutic effects. Tilekar et al. designed and synthesized a series of novel TZD-based naphthylidene derivatives aimed at simultaneously targeting HDAC and PPARγ for cancer therapy [324]. Among these, compound 7i emerged as the most potent dual-targeting agent, showing selective inhibition of HDAC4 (IC50 = 1.1 μM) and partial activation of PPARγ (EC50 = 0.245 μM). This compound demonstrated significant antiproliferative effects, induced apoptosis, and exhibited in vivo tumor regression, thus proving the efficacy of multi-target HDAC inhibitors in combating cancer. In the development of multi-target HDAC inhibitors, protein kinases have emerged as critical therapeutic targets, enabling precise modulation of cellular signaling pathways and contributing to improved therapeutic outcomes. Cheng et al. successfully designed and synthesized a series of novel dual HDAC/CDK inhibitors. Representative compounds 7c and 14a exhibited potent antiproliferative activity across multiple human cancer cell lines, demonstrated nanomolar inhibitory potency against both HDACs and CDKs. In vivo, compound 7c showed favorable pharmacokinetic properties and significant antitumor efficacy in the HCT116 xenograft model (TGI = 51.0 %) [325].
4.5.5. Identification and development of natural epigenetic modulators
Natural compounds, particularly those derived from traditional Chinese medicine, have attracted increasing interest as potential epigenetic modulators for the treatment of skeletal disorders. Among them, resveratrol, a natural activator of SIRT1, has been identified to exert an osteoprotective role in various studies [326]. Jiang et al. found that resveratrol promoted osteogenesis by activating SIRT1/FoxO1 pathway and prevented OVX-induced bone loss in the mouse model [327]. In a clinical trial, postmenopausal women who regularly took 75 mg of resveratrol twice daily showed improvements in bone density in the lumbar spine and femoral neck as well as a decrease in the bone resorption marker CTX [328]. Furthermore, both preclinical and clinical trials have confirmed the protective effect of resveratrol on OA [329]. Zhou et al. observed that the application of resveratrol inhibited chondrocyte apoptosis, increased trabecular bone number of the subchondral bone, and elevated bone density by activating SIRT1 [330]. A clinical trial confirmed that persistent resveratrol administration reduced chronic pain in age-related OA of postmenopausal women [331]. In addition, resveratrol has shown promise in ameliorating the progression of IDD by preventing further degeneration of intervertebral disc cells [332]. Wu et al. found that the treatment of resveratrol inhibited NPCs apoptosis and promoted ECM synthesis, by suppressing IL‐6/JAK/STAT3 pathway [333].
Although preclinical studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of histone-modifying modulators in alleviating degenerative skeletal diseases, their clinical translation remains hindered by challenges such as suboptimal pharmacokinetics, systemic toxicity, adverse effects, and drug resistance. Future research should focus on improving drug delivery strategies, advancing the design of isoform-specific inhibitors, developing dual- or multi-target agents, and initiating early-phase clinical trials. Moreover, a deeper understanding of their molecular mechanisms and epigenetic context is essential for bridging the gap between experimental findings and clinical application.
5. Conclusion and prospects
In summary, histone modification contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of degenerative skeletal diseases. Abnormalities in histone modification induced by various pathogenic factors affect the normal physiological functions of cells by influencing crucial genes expression, promoting tissue degeneration, and leading to the onset and progression of diseases. In this paper, we reviewed the role of histone modification on major degenerative bone diseases (OP, OA, IDD), discussed the research progress of their related regulatory mechanisms, and provided some elaboration and prospects for the therapeutic role and application of histone modifying enzyme modulators in degenerative skeletal diseases.
Compared to existing reviews, such as Sun P et al. (2022) on OP and Ma Z et al. (2023) on EZH2 in musculoskeletal diseases, this review takes a more comprehensive approach. While Sun et al. focus on OP, our review also includes other degenerative skeletal diseases. Additionally, while Ma et al. focus on EZH2, we cover a variety of histone-modifying enzymes and their diverse roles in disease pathogenesis, offering new insights and therapeutic avenues. Another strength of our review is the in-depth discussion of histone-modifying enzyme inhibitors, highlighting their therapeutic potential and clinical translation challenges, such as pharmacokinetic issues, toxicity, and side effects. We also emphasize the gaps in clinical trial data for degenerative skeletal diseases, underscoring the need for further research to move from preclinical findings to clinical applications.
However, current research on histone modifications in degenerative skeletal diseases still faces several limitations. First, there is insufficient exploration of the cell-specific effects of histone modifications. While many studies focus on histone modifications in BMSCs, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes, research on other cell types, such as synovial cells, subchondral bone cells, cartilage endplate cells, and annulus fibrosus cells, remains relatively underexplored. This results in an incomplete understanding of histone modifications in different cell types, thereby hindering a comprehensive elucidation of their multifaceted regulatory roles in degenerative skeletal diseases. Second, there is an imbalance in the types of histone modifications studied, with a predominant emphasis on methylation and acetylation, while other modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and lactylation, have been less extensively investigated in the context of degenerative skeletal diseases. Third, research on the interactions between histone modifications and other disease pathways is limited. Most studies are confined to isolated signaling pathways or specific epigenetic modifications, neglecting the intricate interplay within broader disease networks. Fourth, there is a gap in the translation of basic research into clinical applications. Current studies on histone modifications in skeletal diseases are predominantly confined to cell and animal models, with limited clinical validation. Fifth, the development of pertinent therapeutic agents and their clinical applications remain fraught with challenges. Although numerous therapeutic agents have been developed, issues related to pharmacokinetics, toxicity, adverse effects, and drug resistance continue to curtail their clinical efficacy.
Consequently, future research should focus on several key areas. One important direction is comprehensive mechanistic exploration, which involves further investigation into the role of histone modifications across a broader spectrum of cell types and modification types. Emphasis should be placed on elucidating the intricate interactions within complex mechanisms to gain a more holistic understanding of their pathogenic role in degenerative skeletal diseases. Another critical area is translational research, including the initiation of further clinical trials to substantiate the clinical relevance of histone modifications and their potential therapeutic applications. Finally, innovative drug development should be prioritized, advancing the development of cutting-edge drug delivery systems, enhancing the selectivity of histone-modifying agents, and designing multi-target therapeutic strategies to address the complexity and heterogeneity of degenerative skeletal diseases.
In addition, the integration of emerging technologies such as single-cell sequencing and gene editing offers powerful tools to dissect histone modification patterns at single-cell resolution and functionally validate their roles in specific cellular subpopulations. These approaches are expected to provide deeper insights into the epigenetic landscape within the pathological microenvironment and facilitate the identification of novel, more precise therapeutic targets. Currently, single-cell RNA-seq studies have revealed distinct subpopulations of chondrocytes with unique transcriptional profiles in osteoarthritic cartilage, highlighting cell-specific pathogenic mechanisms [334,335]. Moreover, Bittner et al. constructed a comprehensive 3D chromatin conformation map of primary osteoarthritic chondrocytes. This work identified novel candidate effector genes regulated by chromatin interactions, offering valuable insights into epigenetic regulation in OA [336].
In conclusion, histone modification plays an important role in the regulation of degenerative skeletal diseases, and further exploration of the related pathogenesis and the development of related targeted drugs are of great significance for the treatment of diseases.
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Author contributions
Yao Zhang, Jiale Wang and Di Hua drafted the manuscript, designed, and developed the figures and tables; Dechun Geng, Xiexing Wu, and Haiqing Mao conceptualized and structured the article, polished the language of this manuscript, and supervised and revised the work critically for important intellectual content; Chunyang Fan selected the title, conducted a literature review, and proofread the first draft; Wei He, Yongkang Deng, Maoting Tang collected related papers and supervised this work. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript and agree to its publication in the journal.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972104, 82272547, 82572793), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project of China (2024M752336), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20220252, BK20241795), Suzhou Key Clinical Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Special Project (LCZX202203), Clinical Research Project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (BXLC017).
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Contributor Information
Dechun Geng, Email: szgengdc@suda.edu.cn.
Xiexing Wu, Email: wuxiexing@163.com.
Haiqing Mao, Email: maohq@suda.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Ikegawa S. In: Chakravarti A., Green E., editors. vol. 14. Annual Reviews; Palo Alto: 2013. The genetics of common degenerative skeletal disorders: osteoarthritis and degenerative disc disease; pp. 245–256. (Annual review of genomics and human genetics). 14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yin PB, Jiang YH, Fang X, Wang DF, Li Y, Chen M, et al. Cell-Based therapies for degenerative musculoskeletal diseases. Adv Sci. 2023;10(21) doi: 10.1002/advs.202207050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen YW, Huang JY, Tang CQ, Chen X, Yin Z, Heng BC, et al. Small molecule therapeutics for inflammation-associated chronic musculoskeletal degenerative diseases: past, present and future. Exp Cell Res. 2017;359(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li HZ, Liang XZ, Sun YQ, Jia HF, Li JC, Li G. Global, regional, and national burdens of osteoarthritis from 1990 to 2021: findings from the 2021 global burden of disease study. Front Med. 2024;11 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1476853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen S, Chen MJ, Chen C, Xie C, Yu YH, Shao ZW, et al. Epidemiological trends and characteristics of osteoarthritis in China during 1990-2021. J Orthop Translat. 2025;51:218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2025.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheng M, Xue YK, Cui M, Zeng XL, Yang C, Ding F, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021 and projections to 2050. Spine. 2025;50(7) doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005265. E128-e39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zheng XD, Han WJ, Liu M, Liu LJ, Ma MT, Ye ZL, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and disease burden of low back pain in China: data from the global burden of disease database. Front Public Health. 2025;13 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Briggs AM, Woolf AD, Dreinhofer K, Homb N, Hoy DG, Kopansky-Giles D, et al. Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(5):366–368. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.204891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Diseases GBD, Injuries C. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nguyen AT, Aris IM, Snyder BD, Harris MB, Kang JD, Murray M, et al. Musculoskeletal health: an ecological study assessing disease burden and research funding. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024;29 doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jiang H, Xing X, Zhu H, Dong T. Adverse effects of opioid analgesics in osteoarthritis treatment: a global meta-analysis, 2000-2022. China CDC Wkly. 2024;6(25):589–596. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2024.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang Z, Hu Z, Zhao D, Huang H, Liang Y, Mao B. Arthroscopic surgery is not superior to conservative treatment in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. BMC Muscoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07813-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhou Z, Jin MC, Jensen MR, Guinle MIB, Ren A, Agarwal AA, et al. Opioid usage in lumbar disc herniation patients with nonsurgical, early surgical, and late surgical treatments. World Neurosurg. 2023;173:e180–e188. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hogg SJ, Beavis PA, Dawson MA, Johnstone RW. Targeting the epigenetic regulation of antitumour immunity. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(11):776–800. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-0077-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu YL, Lin ZJ, Li CC, Lin X, Shan SK, Guo B, et al. Epigenetic regulation in metabolic diseases: mechanisms and advances in clinical study. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2023;8(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01333-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qiu YR, Xu Q, Xie PC, He CS, Li QC, Yao X, et al. Epigenetic modifications and emerging therapeutic targets in cardiovascular aging and diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2025;211 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sharma G, Sultana A, Abdullah KM, Pothuraju R, Nasser MW, Batra SK, et al. Epigenetic regulation of bone remodeling and bone metastasis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2024;154(Pt C):275–285. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Biterge B, Schneider R. Histone variants: key players of chromatin. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;356(3):457–466. doi: 10.1007/s00441-014-1862-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Millan-Zambrano G, Burton A, Bannister AJ, Schneider R. Histone post-translational modifications - cause and consequence of genome function. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(9):563–580. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00468-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang Y, Sun Z, Jia J, Du T, Zhang N, Tang Y, et al. Overview of histone modification. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1283:1–16. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-8104-5_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Venkatesh S, Workman JL. Histone exchange, chromatin structure and the regulation of transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(3):178–189. doi: 10.1038/nrm3941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Faulkner B, Astleford K, Mansky KC. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation and skeletal maintenance by histone deacetylases. Molecules. 2019;24(7) doi: 10.3390/molecules24071355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gordon JAR, Stein JL, Westendorf JJ, van Wijnen AJ. Chromatin modifiers and histone modifications in bone formation, regeneration, and therapeutic intervention for bone-related disease. Bone. 2015;81:739–745. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wan C, Zhang F, Yao H, Li H, Tuan RS. Histone modifications and chondrocyte fate: regulation and therapeutic implications. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.626708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun P, Huang T, Huang C, Wang Y, Tang D. Role of histone modification in the occurrence and development of osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.964103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Saul D, Kosinsky RL. Epigenetics of aging and aging-associated diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(1) doi: 10.3390/ijms22010401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li Y, Hu M, Xie J, Li S, Dai L. Dysregulation of histone modifications in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells during skeletal ageing: roles and therapeutic prospects. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03393-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.He J, Cao W, Azeem I, Shao Z. Epigenetics of osteoarthritis: histones and TGF-beta1. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;510:593–598. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kang L, Zhang H, Jia C, Zhang R, Shen C. Epigenetic modifications of inflammation in intervertebral disc degeneration. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;87 doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.101902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wu X, Xu M, Geng M, Chen S, Little PJ, Xu S, et al. Targeting protein modifications in metabolic diseases: molecular mechanisms and targeted therapies. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2023;8(1):220. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01439-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shang S, Liu J, Hua F. Protein acylation: mechanisms, biological functions and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2022;7(1):396. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01245-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yao W, Hu X, Wang X. Crossing epigenetic frontiers: the intersection of novel histone modifications and diseases. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2024;9(1):232. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01918-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hyun K, Jeon J, Park K, Kim J. Writing, erasing and reading histone lysine methylations. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49(4) doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang Y, Han Y, Fan E, Zhang K. Analytical strategies used to identify the readers of histone modifications: a review. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;891:32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Allfrey VG, Mirsky AE. Structural modifications of histones and their possible role in the regulation of RNA synthesis. Science. 1964;144(3618):559. doi: 10.1126/science.144.3618.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rea S, Eisenhaber F, O'Carroll D, Strahl BD, Sun ZW, Schmid M, et al. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature. 2000;406(6796):593–599. doi: 10.1038/35020506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shi Y, Lan F, Matson C, Mulligan P, Whetstine JR, Cole PA, et al. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell. 2004;119(7):941–953. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Greer EL, Shi Y. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(5):343–357. doi: 10.1038/nrg3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu C, Lu F, Cui X, Cao X. Histone methylation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:395–420. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.091939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Black JC, Van Rechem C, Whetstine JR. Histone lysine methylation dynamics: establishment, regulation, and biological impact. Mol Cell. 2012;48(4):491–507. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gong F, Miller KM. Histone methylation and the DNA damage response. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2019;780:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baumbusch LO, Thorstensen T, Krauss V, Fischer A, Naumann K, Assalkhou R, et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana genome contains at least 29 active genes encoding SET domain proteins that can be assigned to four evolutionarily conserved classes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(21):4319–4333. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.21.4319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kaniskan H, Martini ML, Jin J. Inhibitors of protein methyltransferases and demethylases. Chem Rev. 2018;118(3):989–1068. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Allfrey VG, Faulkner R, Mirsky AE. Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of rna synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964;51(5):786–794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.5.786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Verdin E, Ott M. 50 years of protein acetylation: from gene regulation to epigenetics, metabolism and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(4):258–264. doi: 10.1038/nrm3931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Onufriev AV, Schiessel H. The nucleosome: from structure to function through physics. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019;56:119–130. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guo P, Chen W, Li H, Li M, Li L. The histone acetylation modifications of breast cancer and their therapeutic implications. Pathol Oncol Res. 2018;24(4):807–813. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0433-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Marmorstein R, Zhou MM. Writers and readers of histone acetylation: structure, mechanism, and inhibition. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2014;6(7) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Seto E, Yoshida M. Erasers of histone acetylation: the histone deacetylase enzymes. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2014;6(4) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rossetto D, Avvakumov N, Côté J. Histone phosphorylation: a chromatin modification involved in diverse nuclear events. Epigenetics. 2012;7(10):1098–1108. doi: 10.4161/epi.21975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):381–395. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Komar D, Juszczynski P. Rebelled epigenome: histone H3S10 phosphorylation and H3S10 kinases in cancer biology and therapy. Clin Epigenet. 2020;12(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00941-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mattiroli F, Penengo L. Histone ubiquitination: an integrative signaling platform in genome stability. Trends Genet. 2021;37(6):566–581. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vaughan RM, Kupai A, Rothbart SB. Chromatin regulation through ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like histone modifications. Trends Biochem Sci. 2021;46(4):258–269. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lawrence M, Daujat S, Schneider R. Lateral thinking: how histone modifications regulate gene expression. Trends Genet. 2016;32(1):42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yu X, Yang J, Xu J, Pan H, Wang W, Yu X, et al. Histone lactylation: from tumor lactate metabolism to epigenetic regulation. Int J Biol Sci. 2024;20(5):1833–1854. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.91492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang D, Tang Z, Huang H, Zhou G, Cui C, Weng Y, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574(7779):575–580. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Xu K, Zhang K, Wang Y, Gu Y. Comprehensive review of histone lactylation: structure, function, and therapeutic targets. Biochem Pharmacol. 2024;225 doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fan Z, Liu Z, Zhang N, Wei W, Cheng K, Sun H, et al. Identification of SIRT3 as an eraser of H4K16la. iScience. 2023;26(10) doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Moreno-Yruela C, Zhang D, Wei W, Bæk M, Liu W, Gao J, et al. Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1-3) are histone lysine delactylases. Sci Adv. 2022;8(3) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi6696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yang D, Yin J, Shan L, Yi X, Zhang W, Ding Y. Identification of lysine-lactylated substrates in gastric cancer cells. iScience. 2022;25(7) doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yu J, Chai P, Xie M, Ge S, Ruan J, Fan X, et al. Histone lactylation drives oncogenesis by facilitating m(6)A reader protein YTHDF2 expression in ocular melanoma. Genome Biol. 2021;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02308-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yang J, Luo L, Zhao C, Li X, Wang Z, Zeng Z, et al. A positive feedback loop between inactive VHL-triggered histone lactylation and PDGFRβ signaling drives clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(8):3470–3483. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.73398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang Y, Song H, Li M, Lu P. Histone lactylation bridges metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic rewiring in driving carcinogenesis: Oncometabolite fuels oncogenic transcription. Clin Transl Med. 2024;14(3) doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xia J, Qiao Z, Hao X, Zhang Y. LDHA-induced histone lactylation mediates the development of osteoarthritis through regulating the transcription activity of TPI1 gene. Autoimmunity. 2024;57(1) doi: 10.1080/08916934.2024.2384889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wu J, Hu M, Jiang H, Ma J, Xie C, Zhang Z, et al. Endothelial cell-derived lactate Triggers bone mesenchymal stem cell histone lactylation to attenuate osteoporosis. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2023;10(31) doi: 10.1002/advs.202301300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chen Y, Sprung R, Tang Y, Ball H, Sangras B, Kim SC, et al. Lysine propionylation and butyrylation are novel post-translational modifications in histones. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007;6(5):812–819. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700021-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kebede AF, Nieborak A, Shahidian LZ, Le Gras S, Richter F, Gómez DA, et al. Histone propionylation is a mark of active chromatin. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24(12):1048–1056. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Vollmuth F, Geyer M. Interaction of propionylated and butyrylated histone H3 lysine marks with Brd4 bromodomains. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49(38):6768–6772. doi: 10.1002/anie.201002724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Xu Y, Shi Z, Bao L. An expanding Repertoire of protein acylations. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2022;21(3) doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2022.100193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Mann M. Nepsilon-formylation of lysine is a widespread post-translational modification of nuclear proteins occurring at residues involved in regulation of chromatin function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(2):570–577. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tan M, Luo H, Lee S, Jin F, Yang JS, Montellier E, et al. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell. 2011;146(6):1016–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sabari BR, Tang Z, Huang H, Yong-Gonzalez V, Molina H, Kong HE, et al. Intracellular crotonyl-CoA stimulates transcription through p300-catalyzed histone crotonylation. Mol Cell. 2015;58(2):203–215. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhang Q, Zeng L, Zhao C, Ju Y, Konuma T, Zhou MM. Structural insights into histone crotonyl-lysine recognition by the AF9 YEATS domain. Structure. 2016;24(9):1606–1612. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wang ZH, Liu ZW, Lv MX, Luan Z, Li T, Hu JH. Novel histone modifications and liver cancer: emerging frontiers in epigenetic regulation. Clin Epigenet. 2025;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01838-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhang Z, Tan M, Xie Z, Dai L, Chen Y, Zhao Y. Identification of lysine succinylation as a new post-translational modification. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(1):58–63. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Du J, Zhou Y, Su X, Yu JJ, Khan S, Jiang H, et al. Sirt5 is a NAD-dependent protein lysine demalonylase and desuccinylase. Science. 2011;334(6057):806–809. doi: 10.1126/science.1207861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zhang R, Bons J, Scheidemantle G, Liu X, Bielska O, Carrico C, et al. Histone malonylation is regulated by SIRT5 and KAT2A. iScience. 2023;26(3) doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Xie Z, Dai J, Dai L, Tan M, Cheng Z, Wu Y, et al. Lysine succinylation and lysine malonylation in histones. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(5):100–107. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Peng C, Lu Z, Xie Z, Cheng Z, Chen Y, Tan M, et al. The first identification of lysine malonylation substrates and its regulatory enzyme. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(12) doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.012658. M111.012658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dai L, Peng C, Montellier E, Lu Z, Chen Y, Ishii H, et al. Lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation is a widely distributed active histone mark. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(5):365–370. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Huang H, Tang S, Ji M, Tang Z, Shimada M, Liu X, et al. p300-Mediated lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation regulates Glycolysis. Mol Cell. 2018;70(5):984. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Huang H, Luo Z, Qi S, Huang J, Xu P, Wang X, et al. Landscape of the regulatory elements for lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation pathway. Cell Res. 2018;28(1):111–125. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Xie Z, Zhang D, Chung D, Tang Z, Huang H, Dai L, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lysine β-hydroxybutyrylation. Mol Cell. 2016;62(2):194–206. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Huang H, Zhang D, Weng Y, Delaney K, Tang Z, Yan C, et al. The regulatory enzymes and protein substrates for the lysine β-hydroxybutyrylation pathway. Sci Adv. 2021;7(9) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe2771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Huang H, Zhang D, Wang Y, Perez-Neut M, Han Z, Zheng YG, et al. Lysine benzoylation is a histone mark regulated by SIRT2. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3374. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05567-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ren X, Zhou Y, Xue Z, Hao N, Li Y, Guo X, et al. Histone benzoylation serves as an epigenetic mark for DPF and YEATS family proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(1):114–126. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Bao X, Liu Z, Zhang W, Gladysz K, Fung YME, Tian G, et al. Glutarylation of histone H4 lysine 91 regulates chromatin dynamics. Mol Cell. 2019;76(4) doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.018. 660-75.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hu X, Huang X, Yang Y, Sun Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Z, et al. Dux activates metabolism-lactylation-MET network during early iPSC reprogramming with Brg1 as the histone lactylation reader. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(10):5529–5548. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.West MH, Bonner WM. Histone 2B can be modified by the attachment of ubiquitin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8(20):4671–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.20.4671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chen JJ, Stermer D, Tanny JC. Decoding histone ubiquitylation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.968398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Uckelmann M, Densham RM, Baas R, Winterwerp HHK, Fish A, Sixma TK, et al. USP48 restrains resection by site-specific cleavage of the BRCA1 ubiquitin mark from H2A. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):229. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02653-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ge W, Yu C, Li J, Yu Z, Li X, Zhang Y, et al. Basis of the H2AK119 specificity of the Polycomb repressive deubiquitinase. Nature. 2023;616(7955):176–182. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05841-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Shiio Y, Eisenman RN. Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(23):13225–13230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1735528100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hickey CM, Wilson NR, Hochstrasser M. Function and regulation of SUMO proteases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(12):755–766. doi: 10.1038/nrm3478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ryu HY, Hochstrasser M. Histone sumoylation and chromatin dynamics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(11):6043–6052. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Qin B, Yu J, Nowsheen S, Wang M, Tu X, Liu T, et al. UFL1 promotes histone H4 ufmylation and ATM activation. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1242. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09175-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Qin B, Yu J, Nowsheen S, Zhao F, Wang L, Lou Z. STK38 promotes ATM activation by acting as a reader of histone H4 ufmylation. Sci Adv. 2020;6(23) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax8214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Park IG, Jeon M, Kim H, Lee JM. Coordinated methyl readers: functional communications in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;83:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Stevely WS, Stocken LA. Phosphorylation of rat-thymus histone. Biochem J. 1966;100(2) doi: 10.1042/bj1000020c. 20c-1c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Gong P, Guo ZH, Wang SP, Gao SF, Cao QH. Histone phosphorylation in DNA damage response. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(6) doi: 10.3390/ijms26062405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Stucki M, Clapperton JA, Mohammad D, Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ, Jackson SP. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell. 2005;123(7):1213–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kelly AE, Ghenoiu C, Xue JZ, Zierhut C, Kimura H, Funabiki H. Survivin reads phosphorylated histone H3 threonine 3 to activate the mitotic kinase Aurora B. Science. 2010;330(6001):235–239. doi: 10.1126/science.1189505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Stone PR, Lorimer WS, 3rd, Ranchalis J, Danley M, Kidwell WR. Effect of DNA on poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase and the degradation of histone H1-poly (ADP-ribose) complex from HeLa cell nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978;5(1):173–184. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.1.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zha JJ, Tang Y, Wang YL. Role of mono-ADP-ribosylation histone modification (Review) Exp Ther Med. 2021;21(6):577. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Li P, Lei Y, Qi J, Liu W, Yao K. Functional roles of ADP-ribosylation writers, readers and erasers. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.941356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Torres CR, Hart GW. Topography and polypeptide distribution of terminal N-acetylglucosamine residues on the surfaces of intact lymphocytes. Evidence for O-linkEvidence for O-linked GlcNAced GlcNAc. J Biol Chem. 1984;259(5):3308–3317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lewis BA, Hanover JA. O-GlcNAc and the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(50):34440–34448. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R114.595439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Ye L, Ding W, Xiao D, Jia Y, Zhao Z, Ao X, et al. O-GlcNAcylation: cellular physiology and therapeutic target for human diseases. MedComm. 2020;4(6) doi: 10.1002/mco2.456. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Stanley JS, Griffin JB, Zempleni J. Biotinylation of histones in human cells. Effects of cell proliferation. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268(20):5424–5429. doi: 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Kuroishi T, Rios-Avila L, Pestinger V, Wijeratne SS, Zempleni J. Biotinylation is a natural, albeit rare, modification of human histones. Mol Genet Metabol. 2011;104(4):537–545. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hagiwara T, Nakashima K, Hirano H, Senshu T, Yamada M. Deimination of arginine residues in nucleophosmin/B23 and histones in HL-60 granulocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;290(3):979–983. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Wang B, Li Z, Shi Y, Zhu Z, Fields L, Shelef MA, et al. Mass spectrometry-based precise identification of citrullinated histones via limited digestion and biotin derivative tag enrichment. Anal Chem. 2024;96(6):2309–2317. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Farrelly LA, Thompson RE, Zhao S, Lepack AE, Lyu Y, Bhanu NV, et al. Histone serotonylation is a permissive modification that enhances TFIID binding to H3K4me3. Nature. 2019;567(7749):535–539. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1024-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Zheng Q, Weekley BH, Vinson DA, Zhao S, Bastle RM, Thompson RE, et al. Bidirectional histone monoaminylation dynamics regulate neural rhythmicity. Nature. 2025;637(8047):974–982. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08371-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Zhao J, Chen W, Pan Y, Zhang Y, Sun H, Wang H, et al. Structural insights into the recognition of histone H3Q5 serotonylation by WDR5. Sci Adv. 2021;7(25) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf4291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Lepack AE, Werner CT, Stewart AF, Fulton SL, Zhong P, Farrelly LA, et al. Dopaminylation of histone H3 in ventral tegmental area regulates cocaine seeking. Science. 2020;368(6487):197–201. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Zhang L, Zheng YL, Wang R, Wang XQ, Zhang H. Exercise for osteoporosis: a literature review of pathology and mechanism. Front Immunol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1005665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Song S, Guo Y, Yang Y, Fu D. Advances in pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;237 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Li H, Xiao W, He Y, Wen Z, Cheng S, Zhang Y, et al. Novel insights into the multifaceted functions of RNA n(6)-methyladenosine modification in degenerative musculoskeletal diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.766020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Zeng Q, Li N, Wang Q, Feng J, Sun D, Zhang Q, et al. The prevalence of osteoporosis in China, a nationwide, multicenter DXA survey. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(10):1789–1797. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Si L, Winzenberg TM, Jiang Q, Chen M, Palmer AJ. Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China: 2010-2050. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(7):1929–1937. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3093-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Hadjidakis DJ, Androulakis II. Bone remodeling. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1092:385–396. doi: 10.1196/annals.1365.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Bone marrow, cytokines, and bone remodeling. Emerging insights into the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(5):305–311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199502023320506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Da W, Tao L, Zhu Y. The role of osteoclast energy metabolism in the occurrence and development of osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.675385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Yang TL, Shen H, Liu A, Dong SS, Zhang L, Deng FY, et al. A road map for understanding molecular and genetic determinants of osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16(2):91–103. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0282-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Föger-Samwald U, Dovjak P, Azizi-Semrad U, Kerschan-Schindl K, Pietschmann P. Osteoporosis: pathophysiology and therapeutic options. Excli J. 2020;19:1017–1037. doi: 10.17179/excli2020-2591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Chan WCW, Tan Z, To MKT, Chan D. Regulation and role of transcription factors in osteogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11) doi: 10.3390/ijms22115445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Fu Y, Zhang P, Ge J, Cheng J, Dong W, Yuan H, et al. Histone deacetylase 8 suppresses osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells by inhibiting histone H3K9 acetylation and RUNX2 activity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;54:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Abuna RPF, Almeida LO, Souza ATP, Fernandes RR, Sverzut TFV, Rosa AL, et al. Osteoporosis and osteoblasts cocultured with adipocytes inhibit osteoblast differentiation by downregulating histone acetylation. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(5):3906–3917. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Ma C, Gao J, Liang J, Dai W, Wang Z, Xia M, et al. HDAC6 inactivates Runx2 promoter to block osteogenesis of bone marrow stromal cells in age-related bone loss of mice. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02545-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Hu M, Xing L, Zhang L, Liu F, Wang S, Xie Y, et al. NAP1L2 drives mesenchymal stem cell senescence and suppresses osteogenic differentiation. Aging Cell. 2022;21(2) doi: 10.1111/acel.13551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Behera J, Ison J, Rai H, Tyagi N. Allyl sulfide promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone density via reducing mitochondrial DNA release mediated Kdm6b/H3K27me3 epigenetic mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;543:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Gao Y, Chen N, Fu Z, Zhang Q. Progress of Wnt signaling pathway in osteoporosis. Biomolecules. 2023;13(3) doi: 10.3390/biom13030483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Li X, Han Y, Li G, Zhang Y, Wang J, Feng C. Role of Wnt signaling pathway in joint development and cartilage degeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1181619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Hu L, Chen W, Qian A, Li YP. Wnt/β-catenin signaling components and mechanisms in bone formation, homeostasis, and disease. Bone Res. 2024;12(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s41413-024-00342-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Sun J, Ermann J, Niu N, Yan G, Yang Y, Shi Y, et al. Histone demethylase LSD1 regulates bone mass by controlling WNT7B and BMP2 signaling in osteoblasts. Bone Res. 2018;6:14. doi: 10.1038/s41413-018-0015-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Jing H, Su X, Gao B, Shuai Y, Chen J, Deng Z, et al. Epigenetic inhibition of Wnt pathway suppresses osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs during osteoporosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):176. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0231-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Hu L, Cheng Z, Wu L, Luo L, Pan P, Li S, et al. Histone methyltransferase SETDB1 promotes osteogenic differentiation in osteoporosis by activating OTX2-mediated BMP-Smad and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways. Hum Cell. 2023;36(4):1373–1388. doi: 10.1007/s13577-023-00902-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Wu JC, Sun J, Xu JC, Zhou ZY, Zhang YF. Down-regulated microRNA-199a-3p enhances osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by targeting Kdm3a in ovariectomized rats. Biochem J. 2021;478(4):721–734. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Lee WC, Guntur AR, Long F, Rosen CJ. Energy metabolism of the osteoblast: implications for osteoporosis. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(3):255–266. doi: 10.1210/er.2017-00064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Cipriani C, Colangelo L, Santori R, Renella M, Mastrantonio M, Minisola S, et al. The interplay between bone and glucose metabolism. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:122. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Ye J, Xiao J, Wang J, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, et al. The interaction between intracellular energy metabolism and signaling pathways during osteogenesis. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.807487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Da W, Jiang W, Tao L. ROS/MMP-9 mediated CS degradation in BMSC inhibits citric acid metabolism participating in the dual regulation of bone remodelling. Cell Death Discov. 2024;10(1):77. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-01835-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Nian F, Qian Y, Xu F, Yang M, Wang H, Zhang Z. LDHA promotes osteoblast differentiation through histone lactylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;615:31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Minami E, Sasa K, Yamada A, Kawai R, Yoshida H, Nakano H, et al. Lactate-induced histone lactylation by p300 promotes osteoblast differentiation. PLoS One. 2023;18(12) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Li C, Chai Y, Wang L, Gao B, Chen H, Gao P, et al. Programmed cell senescence in skeleton during late puberty. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1312. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01509-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Yang R, Chen J, Zhang J, Qin R, Wang R, Qiu Y, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D protects against age-related osteoporosis by a novel VDR-Ezh2-p16 signal axis. Aging Cell. 2020;19(2) doi: 10.1111/acel.13095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.James AW. Review of signaling pathways governing MSC osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Sci Tech Rep. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/684736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Bateman ME, Strong AL, McLachlan JA, Burow ME, Bunnell BA. The effects of endocrine disruptors on adipogenesis and osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells: a review. Front Endocrinol. 2016;7:171. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2016.00171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Wang L, Niu N, Li L, Shao R, Ouyang H, Zou W. H3K36 trimethylation mediated by SETD2 regulates the fate of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Yin B, Yu F, Wang C, Li B, Liu M, Ye L. Epigenetic control of mesenchymal stem cell fate decision via histone methyltransferase Ash1l. Stem Cell. 2019;37(1):115–127. doi: 10.1002/stem.2918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Yang X, Wang G, Wang Y, Zhou J, Yuan H, Li X, et al. Histone demethylase KDM7A reciprocally regulates adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation via regulation of C/EBPalpha and canonical Wnt signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(3):2149–2162. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Qi Q, Wang Y, Wang X, Yang J, Xie Y, Zhou J, et al. Histone demethylase KDM4A regulates adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation via epigenetic regulation of C/EBPalpha and canonical Wnt signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(12):2407–2421. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03289-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Wang FS, Chen YS, Ko JY, Kuo CW, Ke HJ, Hsieh CK, et al. Bromodomain protein BRD4 accelerates glucocorticoid dysregulation of bone mass and marrow adiposis by modulating H3K9 and Foxp1. Cells. 2020;9(6) doi: 10.3390/cells9061500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Gao Y, Ge W. The histone methyltransferase DOT1L inhibits osteoclastogenesis and protects against osteoporosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):33. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0040-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Wang C, Chen R, Zhu X, Zhang X, Lian N. DOT1L decelerates the development of osteoporosis by inhibiting SRSF1 transcriptional activity via microRNA-181-mediated KAT2B inhibition. Genomics. 2024;116(1) doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2023.110759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Caviness PC, Gai D, Lazarenko OP, Blackburn ML, Zhan F, Chen JR. Decreased bone resorption in Ezh2 myeloid cell conditional knockout mouse model. FASEB J. 2023;37(7) doi: 10.1096/fj.202201673RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Lian WS, Ko JY, Chen YS, Ke HJ, Hsieh CK, Kuo CW, et al. MicroRNA-29a represses osteoclast formation and protects against osteoporosis by regulating PCAF-mediated RANKL and CXCL12. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(10):705. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1942-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Najafova Z, Liu P, Wegwitz F, Ahmad M, Tamon L, Kosinsky RL, et al. RNF40 exerts stage-dependent functions in differentiating osteoblasts and is essential for bone cell crosstalk. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(2):700–714. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-00614-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Sacitharan PK. Ageing and osteoarthritis. Subcell Biochem. 2019;91:123–159. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3681-2_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Glyn-Jones S, Palmer AJ, Agricola R, Price AJ, Vincent TL, Weinans H, et al. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2015;386(9991):376–387. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60802-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Long H, Zeng X, Liu Q, Wang H, Vos T, Hou Y, et al. Burden of osteoarthritis in China, 1990-2017: findings from the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2(3):e164–e172. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30145-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Du X, Ouyang H. [Correlation between histone methylation level and pathological development of osteoarthritis] Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019;48(6):682–687. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.12.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Kiełbowski K, Herian M, Bakinowska E, Banach B, Sroczyński T, Pawlik A. The role of genetics and epigenetic regulation in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14) doi: 10.3390/ijms241411655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Krishnan Y, Grodzinsky AJ. Cartilage diseases. Matrix Biol. 2018;71-72:51–69. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Fujii Y, Liu L, Yagasaki L, Inotsume M, Chiba T, Asahara H. Cartilage homeostasis and osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11) doi: 10.3390/ijms23116316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Han S. Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: biology. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2022;30(12):1575–1582. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Chawla S, Mainardi A, Majumder N, Dönges L, Kumar B, Occhetta P, et al. Chondrocyte hypertrophy in osteoarthritis: mechanistic studies and models for the identification of new therapeutic strategies. Cells. 2022;11(24) doi: 10.3390/cells11244034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Yao Q, Wu X, Tao C, Gong W, Chen M, Qu M, et al. Osteoarthritis: pathogenic signaling pathways and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2023;8(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01330-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.van den Bosch MH, Blom AB, van de Loo FA, Koenders MI, Lafeber FP, van den Berg WB, et al. Brief report: induction of matrix metalloproteinase expression by synovial Wnt signaling and association with disease progression in early symptomatic osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(10):1978–1983. doi: 10.1002/art.40206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Li W, Xiong Y, Chen W, Wu L. Wnt/β-catenin signaling may induce senescence of chondrocytes in osteoarthritis. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(3):2631–2638. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Ji Q, Xu X, Kang L, Xu Y, Xiao J, Goodman SB, et al. Hematopoietic PBX-interacting protein mediates cartilage degeneration during the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):313. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08277-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Yang Y, Xing D, Wang Y, Jia H, Li B, Li JJ. A long non-coding RNA, HOTAIR, promotes cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis by inhibiting WIF-1 expression and activating Wnt pathway. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12860-020-00299-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Monteagudo S, Cornelis FMF, Aznar-Lopez C, Yibmantasiri P, Guns LA, Carmeliet P, et al. DOT1L safeguards cartilage homeostasis and protects against osteoarthritis. Nat Commun. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Cornelis FMF, de Roover A, Storms L, Hens A, Lories RJ, Monteagudo S. Increased susceptibility to develop spontaneous and post-traumatic osteoarthritis in Dot1l-deficient mice. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2019;27(3):513–525. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Shen J, Abu-Amer Y, O'Keefe RJ, McAlinden A. Inflammation and epigenetic regulation in osteoarthritis. Connect Tissue Res. 2017;58(1):49–63. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2016.1208655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Nedunchezhiyan U, Varughese I, Sun AR, Wu X, Crawford R, Prasadam I. Obesity, inflammation, and immune system in osteoarthritis. Front Immunol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.907750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Dai J, Zhou S, Ge Q, Qin J, Li J, Ju H, et al. Recruitment of Brd3 and Brd4 to acetylated chromatin is essential for proinflammatory cytokine-induced matrix-degrading enzyme expression. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1091-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Ai J, Zhao F, Zhou X. HMGA1 aggravates oxidative stress injury and inflammatory responses in IL-1β-induced primary chondrocytes through the JMJD3/ZEB1 Axis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2023;184(3):279–290. doi: 10.1159/000526680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Coryell PR, Diekman BO, Loeser RF. Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of cellular senescence in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(1):47–57. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00533-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Ji ML, Li Z, Hu XY, Zhang WT, Zhang HX, Lu J. Dynamic chromatin accessibility tuning by the long noncoding RNA ELDR accelerates chondrocyte senescence and osteoarthritis. Am J Hum Genet. 2023;110(4):606–624. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Chen LY, Lotz M, Terkeltaub R, Liu-Bryan R. Modulation of matrix metabolism by ATP-citrate lyase in articular chondrocytes. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(31):12259–12270. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Wang J, Wang X, Ding X, Huang T, Song D, Tao H. EZH2 is associated with cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis by promoting SDC1 expression via histone methylation of the microRNA-138 promoter. Lab Invest. 2021;101(5):600–611. doi: 10.1038/s41374-021-00532-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Akiyama H, Lefebvre V. Unraveling the transcriptional regulatory machinery in chondrogenesis. J Bone Miner Metabol. 2011;29(4):390–395. doi: 10.1007/s00774-011-0273-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Nham GTH, Zhang X, Asou Y, Shinomura T. Expression of type II collagen and aggrecan genes is regulated through distinct epigenetic modifications of their multiple enhancer elements. Gene. 2019;704:134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Ukita M, Matsushita K, Tamura M, Yamaguchi T. Histone H3K9 methylation is involved in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Med. 2020;45(2):607–614. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Lian WS, Wu RW, Ko JY, Chen YS, Wang SY, Yu CP, et al. Histone H3K27 demethylase UTX compromises articular chondrocyte anabolism and aggravates osteoarthritic degeneration. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(6):538. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04985-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Shao R, Suo J, Zhang Z, Kong M, Ma Y, Wen Y, et al. H3K36 methyltransferase NSD1 protects against osteoarthritis through regulating chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage homeostasis. Cell Death Differ. 2024;31(1):106–118. doi: 10.1038/s41418-023-01244-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Jin Y, Liu Z, Li Z, Li H, Zhu C, Li R, et al. Histone demethylase JMJD3 downregulation protects against aberrant force-induced osteoarthritis through epigenetic control of NR4A1. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41368-022-00190-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Szponder T, Latalski M, Danielewicz A, Krać K, Kozera A, Drzewiecka B, et al. Osteoarthritis: pathogenesis, animal models, and new regenerative therapies. J Clin Med. 2022;12(1) doi: 10.3390/jcm12010005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Chen B, Wang L, Xie D, Wang Y. Exploration and breakthrough in the mode of chondrocyte death - a potential new mechanism for osteoarthritis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;170 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Zhu R, Wang Y, Ouyang Z, Hao W, Zhou F, Lin Y, et al. Targeting regulated chondrocyte death in osteoarthritis therapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 2023;215 doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Ai Y, Meng Y, Yan B, Zhou Q, Wang X. The biochemical pathways of apoptotic, necroptotic, pyroptotic, and ferroptotic cell death. Mol Cell. 2024;84(1):170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Wang Z, Zhou N, Wang W, Yu Y, Xia L, Li N. HDAC2 interacts with microRNA-503-5p to regulate SGK1 in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02373-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Gu X, Li F, Che X, Wei X, Li P. HDAC4 represses ER stress induced chondrocyte apoptosis by inhibiting ATF4 and attenuates cartilage degeneration in an osteoarthritis rat model. BMC Muscoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07578-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Huang JR, Xu YK, Li YJ, Pang YM, Ding XT, Zhou RR, et al. HDAC4 regulates apoptosis in Acan-Cre(ERT2);HDAC4(d) (/d) mice with osteoarthritis by downregulating ATF4. FEBS Open Bio. 2025;15(5):726–737. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Huang Y, Pan W, Ma J. SKP2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of KLF11 promotes osteoarthritis via modulation of JMJD3/NOTCH1 pathway. FASEB J. 2024;38(9) doi: 10.1096/fj.202300664RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Zhang F, Zhao X, Shen H, Zhang C. Molecular mechanisms of cell death in intervertebral disc degeneration (Review) Int J Mol Med. 2016;37(6):1439–1448. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Lin MH, Zhang CX, Li HM, Li K, Gou SA, He X, et al. Pyroptosis for osteoarthritis treatment: insights into cellular and molecular interactions inflammatory. Front Immunol. 2025;16 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1556990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Chen Y, Dong SS, Zeng X, Xu Q, Liang MW, Liao GN, et al. EZH2/miR-142-3p/HMGB1 axis mediates chondrocyte pyroptosis by regulating endoplasmic reticulum stress in knee osteoarthritis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2025;138(1):79–92. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Chen J, Yang X, Feng Y, Li Q, Ma J, Wang L, et al. Targeting ferroptosis holds potential for intervertebral disc degeneration therapy. Cells. 2022;11(21) doi: 10.3390/cells11213508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Miao Y, Chen Y, Xue F, Liu K, Zhu B, Gao J, et al. Contribution of ferroptosis and GPX4's dual functions to osteoarthritis progression. EBioMedicine. 2022;76 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Yao X, Sun K, Yu S, Luo J, Guo J, Lin J, et al. Chondrocyte ferroptosis contribute to the progression of osteoarthritis. J Orthop Translat. 2021;27:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Wang R, Shi D, Pan XN, Ren AQ, Jiang K. Epigenetic mechanisms of Nsd1-mediated histone methylation modifications in chondrocyte ferroptosis in knee osteoarthritis. Biomol Biomed. 2025;25(4):894–904. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.10879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Zhang Y, Zhao CY, Zhou Z, Li CC, Wang Q. The effect of lactate dehydrogenase B and its mediated histone lactylation on chondrocyte ferroptosis during osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05894-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Mathiessen A, Conaghan PG. Synovitis in osteoarthritis: current understanding with therapeutic implications. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1229-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Zhao K, Ruan J, Nie L, Ye X, Li J. Effects of synovial macrophages in osteoarthritis. Front Immunol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1164137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Zhang H, Cai D, Bai X. Macrophages regulate the progression of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28(5):555–561. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Nasu Y, Nishida K, Miyazawa S, Komiyama T, Kadota Y, Abe N, et al. Trichostatin A, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, suppresses synovial inflammation and subsequent cartilage destruction in a collagen antibody-induced arthritis mouse model. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16(6):723–732. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Lin R, Yin J, Huang J, Zou L, Liu L, Tang W, et al. Macrophage-derived ectosomal miR-350-3p promotes osteoarthritis progression through downregulating chondrocyte H3K36 methyltransferase NSD1. Cell Death Discov. 2024;10(1):223. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-01986-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Hügle T, Geurts J. What drives osteoarthritis?-synovial versus subchondral bone pathology. Rheumatology. 2017;56(9):1461–1471. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Li X, Chen W, Liu D, Chen P, Wang S, Li F, et al. Pathological progression of osteoarthritis: a perspective on subchondral bone. Front Med. 2024;18(2):237–257. doi: 10.1007/s11684-024-1061-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Donell S. Subchondral bone remodelling in osteoarthritis. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(6):221–229. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Lian WS, Wu RW, Ko JY, Chen YS, Wang SY, Jahr H, et al. Inhibition of histone lysine demethylase 6A promotes chondrocytic activity and attenuates osteoarthritis development through repressing H3K27me3 enhancement of Wnt10a. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2023;158 doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2023.106394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Chen W, Xiao J, Zhou Y, Liu W, Jian J, Yang J, et al. Curcumenol regulates Histone H3K27me3 demethylases KDM6B affecting Succinic acid metabolism to alleviate cartilage degeneration in knee osteoarthritis. Phytomedicine. 2024;133 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Mohd Isa IL, Teoh SL, Mohd Nor NH, Mokhtar SA. Discogenic low back pain: anatomy, pathophysiology and treatments of intervertebral disc degeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;24(1) doi: 10.3390/ijms24010208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Benzakour T, Igoumenou V, Mavrogenis AF, Benzakour A. Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation. Int Orthop. 2019;43(4):841–851. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4247-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Bowles RD, Setton LA. Biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration and repair. Biomaterials. 2017;129:54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Zhang GZ, Deng YJ, Xie QQ, Ren EH, Ma ZJ, He XG, et al. Sirtuins and intervertebral disc degeneration: roles in inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;508:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Li G, Zhang W, Liang H, Yang C. Epigenetic regulation in intervertebral disc degeneration. Trends Mol Med. 2022;28(10):803–805. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Hynes RO, Naba A. Overview of the matrisome--an inventory of extracellular matrix constituents and functions. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. 2012;4(1) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Zhang S, Liu W, Chen S, Wang B, Wang P, Hu B, et al. Extracellular matrix in intervertebral disc: basic and translational implications. Cell Tissue Res. 2022;390(1):1–22. doi: 10.1007/s00441-022-03662-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Wang WJ, Yu XH, Wang C, Yang W, He WS, Zhang SJ, et al. MMPs and ADAMTSs in intervertebral disc degeneration. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;448:238–246. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Liang H, Luo R, Li G, Zhang W, Song Y, Yang C. The proteolysis of ECM in intervertebral disc degeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(3) doi: 10.3390/ijms23031715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Porter S, Clark IM, Kevorkian L, Edwards DR. The ADAMTS metalloproteinases. Biochem J. 2005;386(Pt 1):15–27. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Vo NV, Hartman RA, Yurube T, Jacobs LJ, Sowa GA, Kang JD. Expression and regulation of metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in intervertebral disc aging and degeneration. Spine J. 2013;13(3):331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.02.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Wang K, Song Y, Liu W, Wu X, Zhang Y, Li S, et al. The noncoding RNA linc-ADAMTS5 cooperates with RREB1 to protect from intervertebral disc degeneration through inhibiting ADAMTS5 expression. Clin Sci (Lond) 2017;131(10):965–979. doi: 10.1042/CS20160918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Zhongyi S, Sai Z, Chao L, Jiwei T. Effects of nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway in human intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 2015;40(4):224–232. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Kawahara TL, Michishita E, Adler AS, Damian M, Berber E, Lin M, et al. SIRT6 links histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylation to NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression and organismal life span. Cell. 2009;136(1):62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Kang L, Hu J, Weng Y, Jia J, Zhang Y. Sirtuin 6 prevents matrix degradation through inhibition of the NF-κB pathway in intervertebral disc degeneration. Exp Cell Res. 2017;352(2):322–332. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Rahal A, Kumar A, Singh V, Yadav B, Tiwari R, Chakraborty S, et al. Oxidative stress, prooxidants, and antioxidants: the interplay. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/761264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Li Y, Chen L, Gao Y, Zou X, Wei F. Oxidative stress and intervertebral disc degeneration: pathophysiology, signaling pathway, and therapy. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022 doi: 10.1155/2022/1984742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Xu W, Zhang X, Liu G, Zhu M, Wu Y, Jie Z, et al. Oxidative stress abrogates the degradation of KMT2D to promote degeneration in nucleus pulposus. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(10) doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Silwal P, Nguyen-Thai AM, Mohammad HA, Wang Y, Robbins PD, Lee JY, et al. Cellular senescence in intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic opportunities. Biomolecules. 2023;13(4) doi: 10.3390/biom13040686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Liu Y, Dou Y, Sun X, Yang Q. Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for senescence-associated secretory phenotype in the intervertebral disc degeneration microenvironment. J Orthop Translat. 2024;45:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Ge J, Zhou Q, Cheng X, Qian J, Yan Q, Wu C, et al. The protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Genistein, delays intervertebral disc degeneration in rats by inhibiting the p38 pathway-mediated inflammatory response. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12(3):2246–2260. doi: 10.18632/aging.102743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Zhang HJ, Liao HY, Bai DY, Wang ZQ, Xie XW. MAPK/ERK signaling pathway: a potential target for the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;143 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Zhang GZ, Liu MQ, Chen HW, Wu ZL, Gao YC, Ma ZJ, et al. NF-κB signalling pathways in nucleus pulposus cell function and intervertebral disc degeneration. Cell Prolif. 2021;54(7) doi: 10.1111/cpr.13057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Zhou M, He SJ, Liu W, Yang MJ, Hou ZY, Meng Q, et al. EZH2 upregulates the expression of MAPK1 to promote intervertebral disc degeneration via suppression of miR-129-5p. J Gene Med. 2022;24(3) doi: 10.1002/jgm.3395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Xie T, Yuan J, Mei L, Li P, Pan R. Luteolin suppresses TNF-alpha-induced inflammatory injury and senescence of nucleus pulposus cells via the Sirt6/NF-kappaB pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2022;24(1):469. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Hopfner KP, Hornung V. Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS-STING signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(9):501–521. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Zheng JR, Ma ZT, Liu P, Wei JW, Min SX, Shan Y, et al. EZH2 inhibits senescence-associated inflammation and attenuates intervertebral disc degeneration by regulating the cGAS/STING pathway via H3K27me3. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2025;33(5):548–559. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2025.02.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Feng C, Zhang Y, Yang M, Lan M, Liu H, Huang B, et al. Oxygen-sensing Nox4 generates genotoxic ROS to induce premature senescence of nucleus pulposus cells through MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/7426458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Liu C, Liu L, Yang M, Li B, Yi J, Ai X, et al. A positive feedback loop between EZH2 and NOX4 regulates nucleus pulposus cell senescence in age-related intervertebral disc degeneration. Cell Div. 2020;15:2. doi: 10.1186/s13008-020-0060-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Li G, Ma L, He S, Luo R, Wang B, Zhang W, et al. WTAP-mediated m(6)A modification of lncRNA NORAD promotes intervertebral disc degeneration. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1469. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28990-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Wu O, Jin Y, Zhang Z, Zhou H, Xu W, Chen L, et al. KMT2A regulates the autophagy-GATA4 axis through METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification of ATG4a to promote NPCs senescence and IVDD progression. Bone Res. 2024;12(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s41413-024-00373-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Li G, Luo R, Zhang W, He S, Wang B, Liang H, et al. m6A hypomethylation of DNMT3B regulated by ALKBH5 promotes intervertebral disc degeneration via E4F1 deficiency. Clin Transl Med. 2022;12(3) doi: 10.1002/ctm2.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Yang F, Liu W, Huang Y, Yang S, Shao Z, Cai X, et al. Regulated cell death: implications for intervertebral disc degeneration and therapy. J Orthop Translat. 2022;37:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Wang B, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Yin X. Therapeutic potential of ASK1 activators in cancer treatment: current insights and future directions. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;178 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Zou M, Chen W, Li J, Qi X, Wang X, Liu F, et al. Apoptosis signal-regulated kinase-1 promotes nucleus pulposus cell senescence and apoptosis to regulate intervertebral disc degeneration. Am J Pathol. 2024;194(9):1737–1751. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Xiao L, Gong D, Liang L, Liang A, Liang H, Xu X, et al. Inhibition of HDAC4 by GSK3β leads to downregulation of KLF5 and ASK1 and prevents the progression of intravertebral disc degeneration. Clin Epigenet. 2021;13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13148-021-01005-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Zheng C, Guo D, Zhang T, Hu W, Zhang B, Feng H, et al. HDAC/H3K27ac-mediated transcription of NDUFA3 exerts protective effects on high glucose-treated human nucleus pulposus cells through improving mitochondrial function. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71810-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Liu HJ, Liu HQ, Meng ZY, Zhang WS. Mechanism of KMT2D-mediated epigenetic modification in IL-1β-induced nucleus pulposus cell degeneration. Histol Histopathol. 2025;40(5):733–743. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Luo J, Yang Y, Wang X, Chang X, Fu S. Role of pyroptosis in intervertebral disc degeneration and its therapeutic implications. Biomolecules. 2022;12(12) doi: 10.3390/biom12121804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Yao QJ, Lei Y, Zhang YX, Chen HR, Dong XW, Ye ZQ, et al. EZH2-H3K27me3-Mediated epigenetic silencing of DKK1 induces nucleus pulposus cell pyroptosis in intervertebral disc degeneration by activating NLRP3 and NAIP/NLRC4. Inflammation. 2025;48(2):902–918. doi: 10.1007/s10753-024-02096-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Zhou LP, Zhang RJ, Jia CY, Kang L, Zhang ZG, Zhang HQ, et al. Ferroptosis: a potential target for the intervention of intervertebral disc degeneration. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1042060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Fan C, Chu G, Yu Z, Ji Z, Kong F, Yao L, et al. The role of ferroptosis in intervertebral disc degeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1219840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Wu JJ, Qin TY, Han WT, Zhang C, Zhang XH, Huang ZQ, et al. GLS1-mediated glutamine metabolism mitigates oxidative stress-induced matrix degradation, ferroptosis, and senescence in nucleus pulposus cells by modulating Fe(2+) homeostasis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2025;228:93–107. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Sun KQ, Shi YY, Yan C, Wang SM, Han LH, Li FD, et al. Glycolysis-Derived lactate induces ACSL4 expression and lactylation to activate ferroptosis during intervertebral disc degeneration. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2025;12(21) doi: 10.1002/advs.202416149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Raj PP. Intervertebral disc: anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment. Pain Pract. 2008;8(1):18–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Zhu Q, Gao X, Levene HB, Brown MD, Gu W. Influences of nutrition supply and pathways on the degenerative patterns in human intervertebral disc. Spine. 2016;41(7):568–576. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Grunhagen T, Shirazi-Adl A, Fairbank JC, Urban JP. Intervertebral disk nutrition: a review of factors influencing concentrations of nutrients and metabolites. Orthop Clin N Am. 2011;42(4):465–477. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2011.07.010. [vii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Newell N, Little JP, Christou A, Adams MA, Adam CJ, Masouros SD. Biomechanics of the human intervertebral disc: a review of testing techniques and results. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;69:420–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Jiang C, Guo Q, Jin Y, Xu JJ, Sun ZM, Zhu DC, et al. Inhibition of EZH2 ameliorates cartilage endplate degeneration and attenuates the progression of intervertebral disc degeneration via demethylation of Sox-9. EBioMedicine. 2019;48:619–629. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Torre OM, Mroz V, Bartelstein MK, Huang AH, Iatridis JC. Annulus fibrosus cell phenotypes in homeostasis and injury: implications for regenerative strategies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1442(1):61–78. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Hong JY, Kim H, Jeon WJ, Lee J, Yeo C, Lee YJ, et al. Epigenetic changes within the annulus fibrosus by DNA methylation in rat intervertebral disc degeneration model. Cells. 2022;11(22) doi: 10.3390/cells11223547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Liu Q, Luo J, Wang H, Zhang L, Guo J, Jin G. GAS5, a long noncoding RNA, contributes to annulus fibroblast osteogenic differentiation and apoptosis in intervertebral disk degeneration via the miR-221-3p/SOX11 axis. Aging (Albany NY) 2024;16(4):3896–3914. doi: 10.18632/aging.205567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Ramteke P, Watson B, Toci M, Tran VA, Johnston S, Tsingas M, et al. Sirt6 deficiency promotes senescence and age-associated intervertebral disc degeneration in mice. Bone Res. 2025;13(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s41413-025-00422-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Hoy SM. Tazemetostat: first approval. Drugs. 2020;80(5):513–521. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01288-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Keam SJ. Valemetostat tosilate: first approval. Drugs. 2022;82(16):1621–1627. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01800-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Chen L, Wu Y, Wu Y, Wang Y, Sun L, Li F. The inhibition of EZH2 ameliorates osteoarthritis development through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep29176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Jing H, Liao L, An Y, Su X, Liu S, Shuai Y, et al. Suppression of EZH2 prevents the shift of osteoporotic MSC fate to adipocyte and enhances bone formation during osteoporosis. Mol Ther. 2016;24(2):217–229. doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Allas L, Brochard S, Rochoux Q, Ribet J, Dujarrier C, Veyssiere A, et al. EZH2 inhibition reduces cartilage loss and functional impairment related to osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76724-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Aury-Landas J, Bazille C, Allas L, Bouhout S, Chesneau C, Leclercq S, et al. Anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects of the S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitor 3-Deazaneplanocin A, in human articular chondrocytes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06913-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Song YQ, Yang GJ, Ma DL, Wang W, Leung CH. The role and prospect of lysine-specific demethylases in cancer chemoresistance. Med Res Rev. 2023;43(5):1438–1469. doi: 10.1002/med.21955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Cao J, Yan Q. Lysine demethylation in pathogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1433:1–14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-38176-8_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Ding M, Chen Z, Cho E, Park SW, Lee TH. Crucial role of lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 in RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4) doi: 10.3390/ijms24043605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Liu H, Zhai L, Liu Y, Lu D, Vander Ark A, Yang T, et al. The histone demethylase KDM5C controls female bone mass by promoting energy metabolism in osteoclasts. Sci Adv. 2023;9(14) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg0731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Jun Z, Xinmeng J, Yue L, Zhi W, Yan Z, Tieyi Y, et al. Jumonji domain containing-3 (JMJD3) inhibition attenuates IL-1β-induced chondrocytes damage in vitro and protects osteoarthritis cartilage in vivo. Inflamm Res. 2020;69(7):657–666. doi: 10.1007/s00011-020-01356-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Assi R, Cherifi C, Cornelis FMF, Zhou Q, Storms L, Pazmino S, et al. Inhibition of KDM7A/B histone demethylases restores H3K79 methylation and protects against osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(7):963–973. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.He ZX, Wei BF, Zhang X, Gong YP, Ma LY, Zhao W. Current development of CBP/p300 inhibitors in the last decade. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;209 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Chen Q, Yang B, Liu X, Zhang XD, Zhang L, Liu T. Histone acetyltransferases CBP/p300 in tumorigenesis and CBP/p300 inhibitors as promising novel anticancer agents. Theranostics. 2022;12(11):4935–4948. doi: 10.7150/thno.73223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.White J, Derheimer FA, Jensen-Pergakes K, O'Connell S, Sharma S, Spiegel N, et al. Histone lysine acetyltransferase inhibitors: an emerging class of drugs for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2024;45(3):243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2024.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Huo S, Liu X, Zhang S, Lyu Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. p300/CBP inhibitor A-485 inhibits the differentiation of osteoclasts and protects against osteoporotic bone loss. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;94 doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Chen D, Lu D, Liu H, Xue E, Zhang Y, Shang P, et al. Pharmacological blockade of PCAF ameliorates osteoarthritis development via dual inhibition of TNF-α-driven inflammation and ER stress. EBioMedicine. 2019;50:395–407. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Yoshida M, Kijima M, Akita M, Beppu T. Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(28):17174–17179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Ho TCS, Chan AHY, Ganesan A. Thirty years of HDAC inhibitors: 2020 insight and hindsight. J Med Chem. 2020;63(21):12460–12484. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Vorinostat LiverTox: clinical and research information on drug-induced liver injury. Bethesda (MD): Nat Inst Diabetics Digestive Kidney Diseases. 2012 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Makki MS, Haqqi TM. Histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (SAHA) suppresses IL-1β-induced matrix metallopeptidase-13 expression by inhibiting IL-6 in osteoarthritis chondrocyte. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(10):2701–2708. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Miao X, Wu Y, Wang P, Zhang Q, Zhou C, Yu X, et al. Vorinostat ameliorates IL-1α-induced reduction of type II collagen by inhibiting the expression of ELF3 in chondrocytes. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2021;35(9) doi: 10.1002/jbt.22844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Makki MS, Haqqi TM. Histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683) perturb miR-9-MCPIP1 axis to block IL-1β-induced IL-6 expression in human OA chondrocytes. Connect Tissue Res. 2017;58(1):64–75. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2016.1211113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Peng X, Wang T, Wang Q, Zhao Y, Xu H, Yang H, et al. Pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat suppresses osteoclastic bone resorption through modulation of RANKL-evoked signaling and ameliorates ovariectomy-induced bone loss. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;22(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01525-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Garnock-Jones KP. Panobinostat: first global approval. Drugs. 2015;75(6):695–704. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0388-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Wen ZH, Huang JS, Lin YY, Yao ZK, Lai YC, Chen WF, et al. Chondroprotective effects of a histone deacetylase inhibitor, panobinostat, on pain behavior and cartilage degradation in anterior cruciate ligament transection-induced experimental osteoarthritic rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14) doi: 10.3390/ijms22147290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Ohzono H, Hu Y, Nagira K, Kanaya H, Okubo N, Olmer M, et al. Targeting FoxO transcription factors with HDAC inhibitors for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(2):262–271. doi: 10.1136/ard-2021-221269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Shi Y, Jia B, Xu W, Li W, Liu T, Liu P, et al. Chidamide in relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma: a multicenter real-world study in China. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0439-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Zhang X, Liu L, Liu X, Huang Q, Liu L, Liu H, et al. Chidamide suppresses adipogenic differentiation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells via increasing REEP2 expression. iScience. 2023;26(3) doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Zheng Y, Chen Y, Lu X, Weng Q, Dai G, Yu Y, et al. Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 by tubastatin A attenuates the progress of osteoarthritis via improving mitochondrial function. Am J Pathol. 2020;190(12):2376–2386. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Shen Z, Ji K, Cai Z, Huang C, He X, Xu H, et al. Inhibition of HDAC6 by Tubastatin A reduces chondrocyte oxidative stress in chondrocytes and ameliorates mouse osteoarthritis by activating autophagy. Aging (Albany NY) 2021;13(7):9820–9837. doi: 10.18632/aging.202736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Cheng C, Shan W, Huang W, Ding Z, Cui G, Liu F, et al. ACY-1215 exhibits anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects in human osteoarthritis chondrocytes via inhibition of STAT3 and NF-κB signaling pathways. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;109:2464–2471. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Suraweera A, O'Byrne KJ, Richard DJ. Epigenetic drugs in cancer therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2025;44(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s10555-025-10253-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Hafez DA, Hassanin IA, Teleb M, Khattab SN, Elkhodairy KA, Elzoghby AO. Recent advances in nanomedicine-based delivery of histone deacetylase inhibitors for cancer therapy. Nanomedicine. 2021;16(25):2305–2325. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2021-0196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Fraczek J, Vanhaecke T, Rogiers V. Toxicological and metabolic considerations for histone deacetylase inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2013;9(4):441–457. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2013.754011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Srinivas NR. Clinical pharmacokinetics of panobinostat, a novel histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor: review and perspectives. Xenobiotica. 2017;47(4):354–368. doi: 10.1080/00498254.2016.1184356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Van Veggel M, Westerman E, Hamberg P. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of panobinostat. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018;57(1):21–29. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0565-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Li W, Fu Y, Wang W. A real-world pharmacovigilance study investigating the toxicities of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Ann Hematol. 2024;103(8):3207–3217. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05691-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Bondarev AD, Attwood MM, Jonsson J, Chubarev VN, Tarasov VV, Schiöth HB. Recent developments of HDAC inhibitors: emerging indications and novel molecules. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(12):4577–4597. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Patel VK, Shirbhate E, Tiwari P, Kore R, Veerasamy R, Mishra A, et al. Multi-targeted HDAC inhibitors as anticancer agents: current status and future prospective. Curr Med Chem. 2023;30(24):2762–2795. doi: 10.2174/0929867329666220922105615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Fan W, Zhang L, Jiang Q, Song W, Yan F, Zhang L. Histone deacetylase inhibitor based prodrugs. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;203 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Rautio J, Meanwell NA, Di L, Hageman MJ. The expanding role of prodrugs in contemporary drug design and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17(8):559–587. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Li J, Zhu Y, Xie M, Zhang Q, Du W. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of target water-soluble hydroxamic acid-based HDACi derivatives as prodrugs. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2019;94(4):1760–1767. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Entin-Meer M, Rephaeli A, Yang X, Nudelman A, Nudelman A, Haas-Kogan DA. AN-113, a novel prodrug of 4-phenylbutyrate with increased anti-neoplastic activity in glioma cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2007;253(2):205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Ye J, Deng R, Wang X, Song S, Xu X, Zhang JY, et al. Intra-articular histone deacetylase inhibitor microcarrier delivery to reduce osteoarthritis. Nano Lett. 2023;23(23):10832–10840. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Liu Y, Xin L, Wang S, Tan J, Zhu X, Chen X, et al. Nanoparticles with reprogramming of mitochondrial respiratory chain complex and epigenetic modifications functions for osteoporosis treatment. Biomaterials. 2026;324 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Zhu YM, Dai Y, Tian YC. The peptide PROTAC modality: a new strategy for drug discovery. MedComm. 2020;6(4) doi: 10.1002/mco2.70133. 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Chen S, Zheng Y, Liang B, Yin Y, Yao J, Wang Q, et al. The application of PROTAC in HDAC. Eur J Med Chem. 2023;260 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Chotitumnavee J, Yamashita Y, Takahashi Y, Takada Y, Iida T, Oba M, et al. Selective degradation of histone deacetylase 8 mediated by a proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) Chem Commun. 2022;58(29):4635–4638. doi: 10.1039/d2cc00272h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Huang Z, Zeng L, Cheng B, Li D. Overview of class I HDAC modulators: inhibitors and degraders. Eur J Med Chem. 2024;276 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Su M, Gong X, Liu F. An update on the emerging approaches for histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor drug discovery and future perspectives. Expet Opin Drug Discov. 2021;16(7):745–761. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2021.1877656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Liang T, Wang F, Elhassan RM, Cheng Y, Tang X, Chen W, et al. Targeting histone deacetylases for cancer therapy: trends and challenges. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13(6):2425–2463. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Bresciani A, Ontoria JM, Biancofiore I, Cellucci A, Ciammaichella A, Di Marco A, et al. Improved selective class I HDAC and novel selective HDAC3 inhibitors: beyond hydroxamic acids and benzamides. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2019;10(4):481–486. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Sellmer A, Stangl H, Beyer M, Grünstein E, Leonhardt M, Pongratz H, et al. Marbostat-100 defines a new class of potent and selective antiinflammatory and antirheumatic histone deacetylase 6 inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2018;61(8):3454–3477. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.Tilekar K, Hess JD, Upadhyay N, Bianco AL, Schweipert M, Laghezza A, et al. Thiazolidinedione "Magic Bullets" simultaneously targeting PPARγ and HDACs: design, synthesis, and investigations of their in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects. J Med Chem. 2021;64(10):6949–6971. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Cheng C, Yun F, Ullah S, Yuan Q. Discovery of novel cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) dual inhibitors with potent in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;189 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Ahmad Hairi H, Jayusman PA, Shuid AN. Revisiting resveratrol as an osteoprotective agent: molecular evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies. Biomedicines. 2023;11(5) doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11051453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Jiang Y, Luo W, Wang B, Wang X, Gong P, Xiong Y. Resveratrol promotes osteogenesis via activating SIRT1/FoxO1 pathway in osteoporosis mice. Life Sci. 2020;246 doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Wong RH, Thaung Zaw JJ, Xian CJ, Howe PR. Regular supplementation with resveratrol improves bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35(11):2121–2131. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Yang S, Sun M, Zhang X. Protective effect of resveratrol on knee osteoarthritis and its molecular mechanisms: a recent review in preclinical and clinical trials. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.921003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Zhou Z, Deng Z, Liu Y, Zheng Y, Yang S, Lu W, et al. Protective effect of SIRT1 activator on the knee with osteoarthritis. Front Physiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.661852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Thaung Zaw JJ, Howe PRC, Wong RHX. Long-term resveratrol supplementation improves pain perception, menopausal symptoms, and overall well-being in postmenopausal women: findings from a 24-month randomized, controlled, crossover trial. Menopause. 2020;28(1):40–49. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Liu MY, Zhang L, Zang WD, Zhang KG, Li HJ, Gao YZ. Pharmacological effects of resveratrol in intervertebral disc degeneration: a literature review. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(12):3141–3149. doi: 10.1111/os.13560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Wu C, Ge J, Yang M, Yan Q, Wang Y, Yu H, et al. Resveratrol protects human nucleus pulposus cells from degeneration by blocking IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00555-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Ji Q, Zheng Y, Zhang G, Hu Y, Fan X, Hou Y, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals the progression of human osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(1):100–110. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Hu X, Li Z, Ji M, Lin Y, Chen Y, Lu J. Identification of cellular heterogeneity and immunogenicity of chondrocytes via single-cell RNA sequencing technique in human osteoarthritis. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1004766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Bittner N, Shi C, Zhao D, Ding J, Southam L, Swift D, et al. Primary osteoarthritis chondrocyte map of chromatin conformation reveals novel candidate effector genes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83(8):1048–1059. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.





