Skip to main content
. 2025 May 28;16(3):355–360. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.05.005

Table 3.

Joint associations of long working hours and night work at baseline with incident diabetes

Exposures New cases of diabetes at follow-up (n, %) Model I Model II Model III Model IV
Long working hours + Night work
 No + No 6.23% (70/1123) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Yes + No 8.39% (13/155) 1.43 (0.82, 2.50) 1.51 (0.87, 2.63) 1.43 (0.83, 2.45) 1.43 (0.83, 2.45)
 No + Yes 9.57% (11/115) 1.52 (0.83, 2.77) 1.64 (0.90, 2.98) 1.45 (0.80, 2.63) 1.45 (0.80, 2.63)
 Yes + Yes 14.75% (9/61) 2.88 (1.52, 5.46)∗∗ 3.36 (1.77, 6.38)∗∗∗ 3.02 (1.64, 5.57)∗∗∗ 3.02 (1.64, 5.58)∗∗∗
Synergy index 1.98 (0.45, 8.73) 2.05 (0.55, 7.61) 2.29 (0.53, 9.98) 2.30 (0.53, 9.98)

Poisson regression, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

Model I: adjusted for age and sex at baseline.

Model II: Model I + additionally adjusted for race, marital status, education, and household income at baseline.

Model III: Model II + additionally adjusted for smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, and body mass index at baseline.

Model IV: Model III + additionally adjusted for major depressive episode at baseline.