Table 3.
Table of path coefficients
| Path | Non-standardized path | Standardized path | S.E | C.R | P | Conclusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LM | < –- | TQ | 0.544 | 0.645 | 0.052 | 10.410 | *** | Support |
| LM | < –- | EE | 0.349 | 0.449 | 0.039 | 8.874 | *** | Support |
| LA | < –- | LM | 0.895 | 0.822 | 0.078 | 11.459 | *** | Support |
| LS | < –- | LA | 0.584 | 0.530 | 0.120 | 4.884 | *** | Support |
| LS | < –- | LM | 0.420 | 0.350 | 0.125 | 3.363 | *** | Support |
| LE | < –- | LM | 0.272 | 0.249 | 0.128 | 2.124 | 0.034 | Support |
| LO | < –- | TQ | 0.118 | 0.128 | 0.055 | 2.149 | 0.032 | Support |
| LO | < –- | LA | 0.233 | 0.232 | 0.100 | 2.318 | 0.020 | Support |
| LO | < –- | LS | 0.377 | 0.415 | 0.083 | 4.534 | *** | Support |
| LO | < –- | EE | 0.085 | 0.101 | 0.040 | 2.134 | 0.033 | Support |
TQ, teaching quality; LM, learning motivation; LA, learning attitude; LS, learning satisfaction; EE, external environment; LO, learning outcomes
***At the 0.001 level (2 tailed), the correlation was significant