Table 5.
Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for the development of ERM following laser photocoagulation.
| RC | SE | Wald | P* | OR value (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.068 | 0.015 | 20.916 | <0.001 | 1.071 (1.040–1.102) |
| Lattice degeneration | 0.734 | 0.407 | 3.253 | 0.071 | 2.083 (0.938–4.622) |
| Number of laser spots | 0.003 | 0.001 | 6.365 | 0.012 | 1.003 (1.001–1.005) |
| Single-spot power | -0.001 | 0.001 | 0.392 | 0.531 | 0.999 (0.997–1.001) |
| Total energy | 0.033 | 0.019 | 2.924 | 0.087 | 1.033 (0.995–1.073) |
| Shortest distance between the laser and the fovea | -0.179 | 0.104 | 2.942 | 0.086 | 0.836 (0.682–1.026) |
| Laser coverage | 0.164 | 0.071 | 5.352 | 0.021 | 1.178 (1.025–1.354) |
Binary logistic regression analysis was used.
RC retrospective coefficient, SE standard error, Wald Wald coefficient, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval.
*P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.