Table 5.

Measures with sufficient evidence on psychometric properties and low risk of bias.^a

#	Measure	Disease group	Internal consistency	Reliability	Content validity	Structural validity	Hypothesis testing	Responsiveness	Cross cultural validity	Criterion validity	Measurement error
Quality of Life
1.	Cancer Module Adolescent Formb	Cancer	+25
2.	Generic Core Scales Adolescent Formb	Cancer, blood disorders	+25				+25
Care experience
1.	Care Evaluation Scale (CES), CES-10	Cancer		+21	+21
2.	Caring of the Dying Evaluation (CODE)	Generic	+21		+21
3.	Consumer Quality Index Palliative Care (CQ-Index-PC)	Generic			+21
4.	End-of-life in Dementia Scales—Satisfaction with Care (SWC-EOLD)	Dementia	+21
5.	Evaluating Care and Health Outcomes-for the Dying (ECHO-D)	Cancer			+21
6.	FATE-32	Generic			+21
7.	Family Perceptions of Care Scale (FPCS)	Generic			+21
8.	Health Competence Beliefs Inventory (HCBI)b	Cancer	+25
9.	Postmortem Questionnaire-Short Form (QPM-SF)	Cancer			+21
10.	Satisfaction Scale for Family members receiving Inpatient Palliative Care (SAT-Fam-IPC)	Generic			+21	+21
Quality of dying
1.	Good Death Inventory (GDI/GDI-sv)	Generic	+15				+15
2.	QODD- Korean	Generic	+15
	QODD -Chinese	Generic	+15			+15
Suffering
1.	Cancer Distress Scales for Adolescents and Young Adultb	Cancer						+25	+25
2.	The Suffering pictogram	Generic	+33		+33

Psychometric properties: sufficient ‘+’ See Table A3 for criteria interpretation.

^aThis table is based on information from only 4 reviews which reported both psychometric properties and risk of bias assessments. Risk of bias was classified as low if methodological quality was graded as excellent or good based on COSMIN 4-point checklist OR Very good or Adequate based on COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist.

^bYA (Young adults).