Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 16;25:foaf052. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foaf052

Table 1.

Genetically modified strains for SA production (upper case letter, gene overexpression; lowercase letter, gene disruption; ALE, adaptative laboratory evolution; F, shake flask; B, batch bioreactor, FB, fed-batch bioreactor).

Strain Genotype Culture mode Carbon Source pH control SA titer (g/L) Yield (g/g) Productivity (g/(L.h)) Reference
Yarrowia lipolytica
Y-3314 sdh2Δ F Glycerol 6 45.5 N.R. 0.27 (Yuzbashev et al. 2010)
Y-4215 Chemical mutagenesis & ALE of Y-3314 FB Glucose 2.7b 50.2 0.43 0.93 (Yuzbashev et al. 2016)
H222-AZ2 Replacing the promoter of SDH2 FB Glycerol 5 25.1 0.26 0.15 (Jost et al. 2015)
PGC01003 sdh5Δ FB
FBf
Crude Glycerola 6 160.2
209.7
0.40
N.R.
0.40
0.65
(Gao et al. 2016), (Li et al. 2018b)
PSA02004 ALE of PGC01003 in glucose B
FB
FB
B
Glucose
FVWa
OFMSWa
SCBa
6
6
5.5–6
6
65.8
140.6
66.7
32.2
0.50
0.47
0.51
0.58
0.69
0.44
0.78
0.33
(Yang et al. 2017)
(Li et al. 2018d)
(Stylianou et al. 2023)
(Ong et al. 2019)
PGC52 sdh5Δ, ach1Δ F Glycerol 2.5–3.5b 12.05 0.29 0.13 (Cui et al. 2017)
PGC62 ScPCK
sdh5Δ, ach1Δ
F Glycerol 2.5–3.5b 30.15 0.50 0.31 (Cui et al. 2017)
PGC91 YlPYC in PGC52 F Glycerol 2.5–3.5b 26.16 0.41 0.27 (Cui et al. 2017)
PGC202 YlSCS2 in PGC62 FB
B
FBf
B
B
Bf
Glycerol
Glucose
MFWa
FVWa
AWa
Biochar-textilea
3.4b
5
2.8b
3.5b
3.5b
4.5b
110.7
53.6
71.6
32.6
40
28.8
0.53
0.61
N.R.
0.61
0.56
0.61
0.80
0.52
0.40
0.60
0.50
0.33
(Cui et al. 2017)
(Yu et al. 2018)
(Li et al. 2019a)
(Li et al. 2019a)
(Li et al. 2019a)
(Li et al. 2019b)
PSA3 ALE PSA02004 at low pH FB Glucose 3 76.8 0.20 0.24 (Li et al. 2018a)
ST8578 AsPCK, ICL, MLS, MDH, KGDH, SCS2, SpMAE1, ach1Δ, Downregulation of SDH1, ALE FB Glucose 5 35.3 0.26 0.61 (Babaei et al. 2019)
PSA02004PP XR, XDH and XK in PSA02004 FB
B
Xylose
SCBa
4b
4.5b
22.3
5.6
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.09
(Prabhu et al. 2020)
RIY420 GUT1 in PGC01003 FB Glycerol 6 178 0.46 0.44 (Ong et al. 2020)
PGC62-SYF TbFRD, YlSCS2, YlICL, YlMLS and YlYHM2 in PGC62 strain F Glucose N.R.b 21.6 0.61 0.30 (Jiang et al. 2021)
PGC62-SYF-Mae SpMAE in 1PGC62-SYF FB Glucose 5.5 101.4 0.37 0.70 (Jiang et al. 2021)
PSA02004PP-ACS 5.0 ALE and ACS in PSA02004PP B Acetate 6.8 5.1 0.23 0.05 (Narisetty et al. 2022b)
Yl-005 AOX, CAT, DAS, DAK, MgXR, MgXDH, MgXK, FBA2, TAL2, FBP1, HSP70
sdh5Δ
F Methanol N.R. 0.92 N.R. N.R. (Zhang et al. 2023)
Hi-SA2 EcFUM, SpMAE1, YlMDH2, TbFRD, YlMDH1 in PGC91
ALE
FB Glucose 2.5b 111.9 0.79 1.79 (Cui et al. 2023)
Hi-SA2YlGsh2 YlGSH2 in Hi-SA2 FB Corncoba 3.3b 45.3 0.71 1.42 (Zhong et al. 2024b)
E501 ALE Hi-SA2 in SA 50 g/L FB Glucose 2.5–3b 89.62 0.61 1.87 (Zhong et al. 2024a)
E501XF YlHXK1 and YlPFK1 in E501 FB Glucose 3.5 112.54 0.67 2.08 (Zhong et al. 2024a)
BDic5 YlXK, SsXR, SsXDH, ScPCK, YlSCS2, YlDIC
sdh5Δ, achΔ
FB Glucose-Xylose
Corn stovera
6.5 102.44
105.4
N.R.
0.35
0.39
0.53
(Ge et al. 2025)
ΔSDH5-A11 YALI0_A07997g
sdh5Δ
FB Glycerol 5.5 88.5 0.37 1.23 (Sun et al. 2025b)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
UBR2CBS-DHA-SA-AnDCT-02 (2)-PYC2oe PYC2 to UBR2CBS-DHA-SA-AnDCT-02 F Glycerol 5–6 35 0.60 0.36 (Malubhoy et al. 2022)
Issatchenkia orientalis
IoΔura3 + SA PYC, MDH, FUM, FRD F Glucose 5 11.63 0.12 0.11 (Xiao et al. 2014)
g3473∆/PaGDH-DAK/g3837Δ SpMAE1, PaGDH, DAK,
g3473Δ, g3837Δ, GpdΔ, PdcΔ in IoΔura3 + SA
FB Glucose, Glycerol 3 109.5 0.65 0.54 (Tran et al. 2023)
g3473Δ/PaGDH-DAK/ScSUC2 ScSUC2 in g3473∆/PaGDH-DAK FB Sugarcane juicea 3 104.6 0.63 1.25 (Tran et al. 2023)
Escherichia coli
AFP1111/pTrc99A—pyc PYC
pflΔ, ldhaΔ
mutation in PTSG  e
FBc Glucose 7 99.2 1.14d 1.3 (Vemuri et al. 2002)
KMG111 pflaΔ, ldhaΔ, ptsgΔ, MGTA  e FBc Corn stalka 7 129.2 0.86d 2.15d (Wang et al. 2014)
NZN111 pflBΔ,ldhAΔ FBc Cassava starcha 7 100.6 0.86 2.32d (Chen et al. 2014)
E. coli MLB/pTrc99a-pck ldhAΔ, pflBΔ, PCK FBc
FBc
Glycerol
Crude glycerola
7
7
72.7
66.8
1.13d
1.24d
0.70d
0.70d
(Li et al. 2018c)
JW1021 pflaΔ, ldhaΔ, ptsgΔ FBc Corn stalka 7 113.95 0.91d 3.25d (Wang et al. 2018)
a

Carbon source refers to hydrolysates from: FVW, Fruits and Vegetables waste; OFMSW, Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste; SCB, Sugarcane bagasse; MFW, Mix Food Waste; AW, Agricultural waste.

b

Cultures have been carried out without pH control. The value indicated the pH at the end of the fermentation.

c

Dual phase fermentation, aerobic growth and anaerobic production of SA.

d

The calculation is based on glucose consumed and SA produced during the anaerobic phase.

e

PFL, pyruvate formate lyase; LDHA, lactate dehydrogenase; PTSG, enzyme of the phosphotransferase system; MGTA, magnesium transporter.

f

n-situ fibrous bed bioreactor.