Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 19;99(16):10771–10776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132272299

Table 2.

Summary of incremental changes in CMRO2 and ν relative to baseline I

CMRO2 ν
Baseline I 1.00  ± 0.19 1.00  ± 0.25
Stimulation I 1.40  ± 0.46 1.29  ± 0.58
Baseline II 0.68  ± 0.17 0.71  ± 0.27
Stimulation II 1.38  ± 0.30 1.44  ± 0.44

The stimulation induced similar averaged increases in CMRO2 (relative) and ν (relative) for conditions I (≈40% and ≈30%, respectively) and II (≈100% and ≈100%, respectively), where the larger incremental change from condition II (in comparison to condition I) was observed because of the lowered starting baseline value (by ≈30%). Because absolute values of CMRO2 were not measured directly by the calibrated BOLD method (8), the changes in CMRO2 (as shown here) reflect relative changes when the values obtained in the baseline period of condition I is used for normalization. Although absolute values of ν were measured in all conditions, the changes in ν (as shown here) are normalized to the baseline period of condition I.

*

The final CMRO2 values were insignificantly different (P > 0.36) on stimulation from baseline conditions I and II (see Fig. 2).

The final ν values were insignificantly different (P > 0.25) on stimulation from baseline conditions I and II (see Fig. 2).