TABLE 2.
The Percent Standard Deviation Across the Calculated RBE Values as a Result of Statistically Varying Input Parameters by ± 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40% at the Levela
| Parameter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variation (%) | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 |
|
MKM (%) SMKM (%) |
1.7 1.7 |
3.4 3.5 |
6.9 7.1 |
14 14 |
0.6 0.6 |
1.1 1.2 |
2.5 2.6 |
7.1 7.4 |
0.7 0.7 |
1.3 1.4 |
2.7 2.8 |
5.3 5.5 |
0.7 0.7 |
1.3 1.4 |
2.9 3.0 |
9.1 9.5 |
3.7 3.7 |
8.1 7.9 |
19 20 |
79 62 |
2.2 2.3 |
4.4 4.5 |
8.8 9.1 |
18 19 |
| Parameter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Variation (%) | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 |
| RMF (%) | 2.2 | 4.2 | 8.8 | 18 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16 | 5.4 | 10 | 25 | 114 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 5.1 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Variation (%) | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ±5 | ±10 | ±20 | ±40 | ||||||||||||
| LEM (%) | 1.6 | 3.4 | 6.7 | 14 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 7.9 | 23 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 9.9 | ||||||||||||
Note. The results are presented for the SOBP region (>0.5 cm from the proximal or distal edge), where the physical dose is normalized to 2 Gy throughout.
The reference parameters are in white, whereas the carbon-specific parameters are shaded in gray. For each input parameter, the variation threshold that approximately represents uncertainty (estimated from the spread in literature-reported values) is shaded in yellow.