Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2025 Sep 16;16(10):e01381-25. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01381-25

mGem: How many fungal secondary metabolites are produced by filamentous fungi? Conservatively, at least 1.4 million

Olivia L Riedling 1,2, Antonis Rokas 1,2,
Editor: Marcio Rodrigues3
PMCID: PMC12506122  PMID: 40956095

ABSTRACT

The ~30,000 known fungal secondary metabolites (SMs) are a vital component of the bioeconomy. SMs are biosynthesized by biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), i.e., sets of genes in close physical proximity in the genome. The bulk of these SMs are produced by filamentous fungi in the Pezizomycotina subphylum (phylum Ascomycota). To gauge the magnitude of chemodiversity in this subphylum, we utilized data from the well-characterized genus Aspergillus and a previous Pezizomycotina genomic survey. With 30–50 BGCs per genome, our rarefaction analyses show that the ~85,000 known species in Pezizomycotina likely contain 1.4–4.3 million SMs from an estimated 870 thousand to 2.7 million gene cluster families. Considering that only 5% of fungal species have been described and that the actual number of Pezizomycotina species is likely closer to a million, the projected number of SMs is likely between ~16 and 50 million. These estimates suggest that most fungal SMs remain undiscovered.

KEYWORDS: Aspergillus, fungi, secondary metabolites, specialized metabolites, diversity, biosynthetic gene clusters, natural products, pezizomycotina

PERSPECTIVE

Since the discovery of penicillin in 1928, fungi have been at the forefront of natural product discovery (1, 2). To date, over 30,000 fungal secondary metabolites (SMs), small biologically active compounds, have been characterized (3). This set of known fungal SMs includes the biomedically important SMs lovastatin (4), a cholesterol-lowering drug; cyclosporine (5), and mycophenolic acid (6), which possess immunosuppressant properties; and penicillin (1), the world’s first antibiotic (Fig. 1). Fungal SMs also have a strong presence in the bioeconomy for natural food colorants (e.g., Monascus pigments like monascorubrine), cosmetics (lentinan, from Lentinula edodes, protects skin against environmental pollutants), and biocontrol agents (the strobilurin fungicides) (7). In addition to the biomedically relevant SMs, fungi are notorious producers of mycotoxins, which can result in mold toxicity, autoimmune diseases, and cancer (810), necessitating systematic efforts to monitor fungal plant diseases and fungal crop/grain contamination (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Chemical structures of eight fungal secondary metabolites showing medicinal compounds (lovastatin, penicillin G, griseofulvin, caspofungin, ergotamine, cyclosporine A) and harmful mycotoxins (aflatoxin G1, ochratoxin A) with their producing fungi.

SMs produced by filamentous fungi that are relevant to the bioeconomy. Fungal SMs play a crucial economic role, being harnessed in diverse industries while also posing potential health risks. In the pharmaceutical sector, they have been instrumental in developing life-saving drugs: for example, lovastatin produced by Aspergillus terreus is used as a cholesterol-lowering agent (11); antifungals like griseofulvin and caspofungin produced by Penicillium griseofulvum (12) and Glarea lozoyensis (13), respectively, are used to treat fungal infections; and the iconic antibiotic penicillin G isolated from P. rubens revolutionized bacterial infection management (2). Ergotamine, produced by Claviceps purpurea, is used to treat migraines and postpartum hemorrhages (14), while the immunosuppressant cyclosporine A produced by Tolypocladium inflatum is utilized in organ transplantation (15). While many fungal SMs are beneficial, the production of many others poses substantial human and animal health risks: for example, the potent carcinogens aflatoxin B1 from A. flavus (16) and ochratoxin A from A. ochraceus (17) are both commonly found in fungal-contaminated food products.

The fungal lineage responsible for most of the known SMs is the Pezizomycotina subphylum in the phylum Ascomycota. The subphylum contains about 85,000 described species, including species from well-studied genera that are iconic producers of SMs, such as Fusarium, Alternaria, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Cordyceps (18). The genes necessary for the biosynthesis of SMs are typically organized into biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) (19). BGCs are highly diverse in their gene content and organization and typically exhibit narrow taxonomic distributions (e.g., species- and genus-specific distributions of SMs are well known). The high interspecific diversity of BGCs, coupled with the ability of a single BGC to biosynthesize numerous SMs, suggests that the magnitude of fungal SM diversity (or chemodiversity) may be very large (20, 21).

To estimate the actual number of SMs produced by fungi across the Pezizomycotina subphylum, we utilized rarefaction analyses using data from the well-characterized fungal genus Aspergillus and from a previous genomic survey of Pezizomycotina (20) as guides. Our projections suggest there are at least 1.4 million SMs in the ~85,000 known species in the Pezizomycotina subphylum, which means that for every known SM (~30,000), there are potentially ~50–100 additional SMs that have yet to be unearthed. These estimates of SMs are likely on the low end, considering that only an estimated 3–8% of fungal species (including Pezizomycotina species) have been described and that numerous BGCs can produce multiple SMs. We conclude that the vast majority of fungal chemodiversity awaits discovery.

ASPERGILLUS LIKELY HARBORS ~18,000 SMs, A NUMBER ON PAR WITH THAT OF KNOWN FUNGAL SMs

The genus Aspergillus has ~450 described species and has been very well characterized with respect to its secondary metabolism (2226), genomics (2730), and taxonomy (3133). There are more than 100 Aspergillus species with publicly available genomes, and around 150 Aspergillus BGCs have been experimentally linked to their respective SMs (24). The availability of high-quality genomic, natural product, and taxonomic data makes Aspergillus an excellent model for estimating both the number of SMs produced by a typical filamentous fungal species and the number of BGCs present in its genome.

We used the antiSMASH (34) software to predict BGCs across 135 Aspergillus genomes and subsequently used the BiG-SCAPE (35) software to group putative BGCs into gene cluster families (GCFs). We identified a total of 6,972 putative BGCs after filtering (an average of 51.6 per Aspergillus species), which grouped into 4,463 GCFs. Conservation of BGCs across species was low; 3,607/4,463 (or ~80%) of GCFs were present in only one species, and just 34 families were present in 10 or more species. We further found that Aspergillus species generally produce diverse classes of SMs (Fig. 2).

Fig 2.

Phylogenetic tree of 135 Aspergillus species aligned with stacked bar chart showing biosynthetic gene cluster distribution. Tree reveals taxonomic relationships while bars quantify metabolite production capacity across evolutionary lineages.

Aspergillus species display diverse BGCs and classes of SMs. (A) Phylogenetic tree of genomic data from 135 Aspergillus species used in this study, which represent nearly a third of Aspergillus species diversity. The clade colors and labels correspond to the taxonomic section within the genus. (B) Putative number of BGCs per genome and their predicted classes. The X-axis displays the number of BGCs, and the Y-axis displays the species. The color corresponds to the putative class of the BGC.

To estimate the actual number of SMs likely to be produced by Aspergillus fungi, we used the BiG-SCAPE data and generated a rarefaction curve (36) based on the presence and absence of each GCF across the 135 Aspergillus species. Aligning our estimates with the current number of described Aspergillus species (450) suggests that the genus is estimated to contain ~11,500 GCFs (Fig. 3).

Fig 3.

Rarefaction curve showing discovery of unique GCFs in Aspergillus genomes. Current data reveals 4,463 GCFs from 135 species, with extrapolation projecting ~11,500 GCFs for all 450 described species. Curve shows diminishing returns with sampling.

The genomes of species in the genus Aspergillus are estimated to contain a great richness of BGCs. The X-axis displays the number of sampled Aspergillus genomes, and the Y-axis shows the number of unique GCFs. The solid purple line in the rarefaction curve based on the genomes of 135 Aspergillus species, the purple circle corresponds to the number of unique GCFs (4,463) in the sampled genomes of Aspergillus species (135), and the dashed line is the extrapolation of the number of unique GCFs as the number of sampled genomes increases. Shaded purple regions denote the 95% confidence intervals. The dashed black line indicates the estimated number of unique GCFs (~11,500) for the number of currently described Aspergillus species (450).

The Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster (MIBiG) database (24) contains 158 Aspergillus BGCs paired with their corresponding SM(s); across these 158 BGCs, we calculated the effective value of SMs per BGC by down-weighting shared SMs. We found the average effective number of SMs per BGC in Aspergillus was about 1.57. Using this value, we estimate that the ~11,500 GCFs likely present in the 450 known species of Aspergillus can potentially produce ~18,055 SMs. Given that many BGCs can yield numerous SMs like the aflatoxins (37), chaetoglobosins (38), fumiquinazolines (39), and azanigerones (40), the estimate of 1.57 SMs per BGC likely falls short of the true number of SMs produced by Pezizomycotina.

Currently, there are 4,247 Aspergillus SMs in the Dictionary of Natural Products (41) and 3,100 SMs in the Natural Products Atlas (42). Our estimates of ~18,000 SMs imply that we have only characterized 10%–20% of Aspergillus SMs, suggesting that the known species in this genus alone harbor a large reservoir of undiscovered SMs.

MILLIONS OF FUNGAL SECONDARY METABOLITES AWAIT DISCOVERY

Building on our estimates of the diversity of BGCs and SMs in Aspergillus, we next projected the number of SMs across the Pezizomycotina subphylum. As the number of BGCs varies across genera and is not as well characterized as in Aspergillus, we used three BGC/species estimates: (i) a conservative estimate of 30 BGCs per species, (ii) a previously published estimate of 40 BGCs per species based on an analysis of 721 genomes from ~480 Pezizomycotina species (20), and (iii) an estimate of 50 BGCs per species based on our Aspergillus data; extrapolating to the 85,000 known species of Pezizomycotina, we infer that filamentous fungi contain between 2,550,000 and 4,250,000 BGCs.

To refine these projections, we next sought to estimate the proportion of BGCs that are the first occurrence of their respective GCF from the total number of Pezizomycotina BGCs (i.e., the GCF/BGC discovery ratio). In Aspergillus, the 6,972 total predicted BGCs were grouped into 4,463 GCFs, suggesting that there are roughly 1.5 times more clusters than cluster families (or, put differently, roughly two-thirds or 64% of BGCs are the first instance of their GCF). To supplement the estimate of GCFs based on Aspergillus, we also made estimates based on the 721 Pezizomycotina genomes used by Robey et al. (20). That study found on average 39.8 BGCs per genome and 9,808 GCFs in Pezizomycotina (i.e., approximately 28,696 BGCs), suggesting that there are three times more clusters (34.2%) than families across the genomes (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Data-rooted estimates of GCFs and SMs based on 135 Aspergillus genomes and 721 Pezizomycotina genomes

GCF/BGC discovery ratios No. of GCFs No. of SMs Reference
Low Avg High Low Avg High
64% (based on 135 Aspergillus genomes) 1,632,336 2,176,449 2,720,561 2,562,768 3,417,024 4,271,280 This study
34% (based on 721 Pezizomycotina genomes) 871,564 1,162,085 1,452,607 1,368,355 1,824,474 2,280,592 (20)

Applying the Pezizomycotina and Aspergillus GCF/BGC discovery ratios, we generated scaled estimates of GCFs from the average number of BGCs/species and then multiplied these values by the known number of Pezizomycotina species and by 1.57 SMs per BGC. From these calculations, we project that the ~85,000 species of Pezizomycotina harbor between ~871,564 and ~2,720,561 GCFs responsible for the biosynthesis of a potential ~1.4 million to ~4.3 million SMs (Table 1). These numbers highlight the immense and largely unexplored chemodiversity of even the known species of filamentous fungi, underscoring the vast potential for discovery.

THE UNTAPPED POTENTIAL OF SECONDARY METABOLITES ACROSS FILAMENTOUS FUNGI

Current estimates suggest we have characterized only about 3–8% of all fungal species (43). The Catalogue of Life lists ~156,000 fungal species, of which approximately 85,000 are within Pezizomycotina (44), which corresponds to ~54% of known species. Given that total fungal diversity is estimated to be between 2.2 and 3.8 million species (43), the true number of species in this subphylum likely exceeds the million species mark, in which case the projected number of fungal SMs could very well be in the dozens of millions range (based on our most conservative estimates, i.e., assuming 30 BGCs/species and a GCF/BGC discovery ratio of 34%, one million species may likely harbor more than 16 million SMs).

Finally, to gain insights into the chemical diversity of SMs, we analyzed the diversity of the chemical structures of SMs linked to all fungal BGCs in the MIBiG database (i.e., BGC-SM pairs from Aspergillus and approximately 100 other fungal genera). We calculated Tanimoto similarity based on the molecular fingerprints of each SM and a diversity (d) metric (1 – mean similarity across all compounds). Values of d near 0 indicate high similarity in chemical structures, whereas values of d near 1 indicate a high degree of diversity. We found that d = 0.88 for Aspergillus (n = 221) and d = 0.89 for Pezizomycotina (including Aspergillus, n = 785), respectively, suggesting that the millions of SMs across Pezizomycotina are likely to be highly diverse.

To contextualize our structural diversity estimates (d = 0.88 for Aspergillus and d = 0.89 for Pezizomycotina fungi), we calculated comparable diversity values for bacterial SMs curated in the MIBiG database. We found that bacterial SMs exhibited a structural diversity of d = 0.89 (n = 2,741), a value identical to that observed for Pezizomycotina SMs. Thus, SMs produced by Aspergillus and by Pezizomycotina fungi appear to be as structurally diverse as those of bacterial producers.

The similar structural diversity values between Aspergillus and the broader Pezizomycotina may suggest that Aspergillus SMs are as diverse as the rest of the sampled structural diversity observed in the subphylum. One explanation is that the similarity of values stems from sampling artifacts or biases. Aspergillus SMs account for 28% of Pezizomycotina SMs, so the observed similarity could simply be a sampling artifact. However, the diversity metric for all Pezizomycotina SMs in MIBiG, if one excludes Aspergillus, remains 0.89, suggesting that this explanation is unlikely. Nevertheless, these estimates are derived from manually curated BGC-SM pairs in the MIBiG database, which are likely to introduce detection biases. MIBiG is enriched for SMs that are bioactive, experimentally tractable, and pharmacologically relevant and may underrepresent rare, lineage-specific, or ecologically specialized SMs. This curation bias could compress observable diversity differences between lineages and potentially underestimate the true diversity within less-studied clades.

Another possibility is that biosynthetic space in Pezizomycotina is nearing saturation (i.e., new species contribute fewer novel scaffolds as more are sampled); this is supported by the finding that inclusion of Aspergillus SMs did not increase the structural diversity of Pezizomycotina. Furthermore, Aspergillus is an ancient and ecologically highly diverse genus that contains many prolific SM producers (23, 45). Evolutionary pressures such as balancing or diversifying selection may favor the maintenance or generation of multiple chemically distinct SMs across lineages, often because different compounds confer advantages in distinct ecological contexts and help maintain high SM diversity within Aspergillus.

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

We estimate that the known species of filamentous fungi in the Pezizomycotina subphylum may collectively produce at least 1.4 million SMs, which represents an immense reservoir of unexplored chemical diversity. Considering that we have only characterized ~30,000 fungal SMs to date, most SMs, even in well-studied genera such as Aspergillus, remain uncharacterized. These estimates depict the large opportunity for discovery of novel bioactive compounds that may have applications in medicine, agriculture, and industry.

While we focused our efforts to estimate SM diversity in Pezizomycotina, SMs are also biosynthesized by many other groups of fungi (20). For example, the red pigment pulcherrimin chelates iron and immobilizes it in the environment, inhibiting the growth of species such as Botrytis cinerea, and is produced from several different species of Saccharomycotina yeasts in the phylum Ascomycota (46, 47), whereas the well-known neuroactive compound psilocybin is produced by species of Psilocybe gilled mushrooms (48) and the lethal amatoxins are produced by the death cap mushroom Amanita phalloides (49), both of which are in the Basidiomycota phylum. SMs are also produced by fungi outside of the sub-kingdom Dikarya (Ascomycota and Basidiomycota). For example, certain Zoopagomycota fungi produce indole alkaloids that inhibit the growth of oomycete phytopathogens, whereas many Mucoromycota fungi produce carotenoid pigments, especially β-carotene, which protects fungal cells from free radicals, preventing oxidative stress damage, and are also commercially important colorants for food products and cosmetics (5053). Therefore, the diversity of fungal SMs is likely even larger than our estimates.

Many fungal BGCs are transcriptionally silent under standard laboratory conditions, making discovery through expression-based approaches more challenging (54). As a result, genome mining has become central to exploring fungal chemodiversity. Tools such as antiSMASH, CASSIS (55), and DeepBGC (56) have expanded BGC detection by leveraging conserved domain architectures, promoter motif analysis, and machine learning, respectively. Integrative approaches that combine genomic predictions with chemical similarity data have further improved BGC-SM associations, enabling the prioritization of candidate clusters for novel scaffolds (57).

Despite the advances in bioinformatics and genome mining tools, many BGCs remain undetected due to enzymatic novelty or atypical genomic organization. For example, the isocyanide synthase gene cluster was identified through comparative genomics and experimental validation and only later incorporated into antiSMASH (58). Additionally, due to the set of strict rules antiSMASH employs, it also fails to detect many types of fungal ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides, beyond a few well-characterized groups, as their precursor and tailoring enzyme can be dispersed or arranged atypically in the genome (59). Similarly, in A. niger, a silent azaphilone BGC was only characterized after promoter exchange enabled expression and metabolite identification (40). These cases highlight both the power and limitations of current genome mining frameworks. While bioinformatic tools have dramatically expanded our ability to explore fungal biosynthetic potential, a substantial portion of SM diversity likely remains hidden without complementary comparative, integrative, or experimental strategies.

In an era where high-throughput, systematic collection of genomic and metabolomic data is increasingly feasible, we are in the opportune position to dramatically expand the frontiers of fungal SM discovery. The increasing availability of integrative approaches that combine genomic sequencing and metabolomics will not only aid in characterizing novel SMs and the breadth of fungal chemodiversity but also link chemotype (SMs) with genotype (their BGCs), a major unresolved challenge (54). As saturation trends in BGC discovery likely differ by biosynthetic class (e.g., non-ribosomal peptide synthetases [NRPS], polyketide synthases [PKS], terpene) and taxonomic lineage, class- and clade-specific rarefaction analyses may provide more accurate estimates of undiscovered diversity and guide prioritization for targeted discovery efforts.

Our estimate is intended as a conservative lower bound based on currently available genomic and chemical data from a highly studied genus and existing literature. Because genome mining tools like antiSMASH define BGCs based on domain-level signatures, they can miss atypical clusters or combine functionally distinct pathways. We minimized overestimation by focusing on GCFs rather than individual BGCs and used a conservative SM-per-BGC ratio derived from curated BGC-SM pairs. Additionally, processes such as horizontal gene transfer and gene duplication (19, 60), which can significantly expand biosynthetic potential, were not included in our modeling and may further increase the true diversity. While the full scope of fungal SM diversity remains unknown, our framework provides a baseline for quantifying and comparing biosynthetic potential across fungal lineages. If our estimates are in the right ballpark, it appears that for every SM we currently know, there are ~50–100 additional SMs that are waiting for discovery. Thus, fungal SMs are a potential goldmine in our quest for new drugs, biotechnological advancements, and ecological insights into the fascinating biology of fungal organisms.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. 2444112 to O.L.R. and DEB-2110404 to A.R.), the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI153356 to A.R.), and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund (to A.R.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Antonis Rokas, Email: antonis.rokas@vanderbilt.edu.

Marcio Rodrigues, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Curitiba, Brazil.

DATA AVAILABILITY

All supplemental methods, genome accession numbers, and data files required to replicate these analyses have been deposited to the figshare repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29900843).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Flemming A. 1929. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a Penicillium, with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenzæ. Br J Exp Pathol 10:226–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Houbraken J, Frisvad JC, Samson RA. 2011. Fleming’s penicillin producing strain is not Penicillium chrysogenum but P. rubens. IMA Fungus 2:87–95. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bérdy J. 2012. Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: where we are now and where we are heading. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 65:385–395. doi: 10.1038/ja.2012.27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hajjaj H, Niederberger P, Duboc P. 2001. Lovastatin biosynthesis by Aspergillus terreus in a chemically defined medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2596–2602. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2596-2602.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Falah F, Samie A, Mortazavi SA, Danesh A, Yazdi FT, Ramezani M. 2024. Bio-synthesis, purification and structural analysis of cyclosporine-A produced by Tolypocladium inflatum with valorization of agro-industrial wastes. Sci Rep 14:12540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63110-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang W, Du L, Qu Z, Zhang X, Li F, Li Z, Qi F, Wang X, Jiang Y, Men P, Sun J, Cao S, Geng C, Qi F, Wan X, Liu C, Li S. 2019. Compartmentalized biosynthesis of mycophenolic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:13305–13310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821932116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Niego AGT, Lambert C, Mortimer P, Thongklang N, Rapior S, Grosse M, Schrey H, Charria-Girón E, Walker A, Hyde KD, Stadler M. 2023. The contribution of fungi to the global economy. Fungal Divers 121:95–137. doi: 10.1007/s13225-023-00520-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Khan R, Anwar F, Ghazali FM. 2024. A comprehensive review of mycotoxins: toxicology, detection, and effective mitigation approaches. Heliyon 10:e28361. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Andersen B, Phippen C, Frisvad JC, Emery S, Eustace RA. 2020. Fungal and chemical diversity in hay and wrapped haylage for equine feed. Mycotoxin Res 36:159–172. doi: 10.1007/s12550-019-00377-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Eskola M, Kos G, Elliott CT, Hajšlová J, Mayar S, Krska R. 2020. Worldwide contamination of food-crops with mycotoxins: validity of the widely cited “FAO estimate” of 25. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 60:2773–2789. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1658570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hajjaj H, Niederberger P, Duboc P. 2001. Lovastatin biosynthesis by Aspergillus terreus in a chemically defined medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2596–2602. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2596-2602.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Aris P, Wei Y, Mohamadzadeh M, Xia X. 2022. Griseofulvin: an updated overview of old and current knowledge. Molecules 27:7034. doi: 10.3390/molecules27207034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Letscher-Bru V, Herbrecht R. 2003. Caspofungin: the first representative of a new antifungal class. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:513–521. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tfelt-Hansen P, Saxena PR, Dahlöf C, Pascual J, Láinez M, Henry P, Diener H, Schoenen J, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ. 2000. Ergotamine in the acute treatment of migraine: a review and European consensus. Brain (Bacau) 123:9–18. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.1.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yang X, Feng P, Yin Y, Bushley K, Spatafora JW, Wang C. 2018. Cyclosporine biosynthesis in Tolypocladium inflatum benefits fungal adaptation to the environment. mBio 9:e01211-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01211-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Pickova D, Ostry V, Toman J, Malir F. 2021. Aflatoxins: history, significant milestones, recent data on their toxicity and ways to mitigation. Toxins (Basel) 13:399. doi: 10.3390/toxins13060399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Malir F, Ostry V, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, Malir J, Toman J. 2016. Ochratoxin A: 50 years of research. Toxins (Basel) 8:191. doi: 10.3390/toxins8070191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. James TY, Stajich JE, Hittinger CT, Rokas A. 2020. Toward a fully resolved fungal tree of life. Annu Rev Microbiol 74:291–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-022020-051835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rokas A, Mead ME, Steenwyk JL, Raja HA, Oberlies NH. 2020. Biosynthetic gene clusters and the evolution of fungal chemodiversity. Nat Prod Rep 37:868–878. doi: 10.1039/c9np00045c [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Robey MT, Caesar LK, Drott MT, Keller NP, Kelleher NL. 2021. An interpreted atlas of biosynthetic gene clusters from 1,000 fungal genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2020230118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020230118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zhang S, Shi G, Xu X, Guo X, Li S, Li Z, Wu Q, Yin W-B. 2024. Global analysis of natural products biosynthetic diversity encoded in fungal genomes. J Fungi 10:653. doi: 10.3390/jof10090653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Siddiquee S. 2018. Recent advancements on the role of biologically active secondary metabolites from Aspergillus, p 69–94. In Gupta VK, Rodriguez-Couto S (ed), New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780444635013000041. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Vadlapudi V, Borah N, Yellusani KR, Gade S, Reddy P, Rajamanikyam M, Vempati LNS, Gubbala SP, Chopra P, Upadhyayula SM, Amanchy R. 2017. Aspergillus secondary metabolite database, a resource to understand the secondary metabolome of Aspergillus genus. Sci Rep 7:7325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07436-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zdouc MM, Blin K, Louwen NLL, Navarro J, Loureiro C, Bader CD, Bailey CB, Barra L, Booth TJ, Bozhüyük KAJ, et al. 2025. MIBiG 4.0: advancing biosynthetic gene cluster curation through global collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res 53:D678–D690. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wang X, Jarmusch SA, Frisvad JC, Larsen TO. 2023. Current status of secondary metabolite pathways linked to their related biosynthetic gene clusters in Aspergillus section Nigri. Nat Prod Rep 40:237–274. doi: 10.1039/d1np00074h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lei Y, Pu N, Zhang H. 2025. Aspergillus genus as a prolific source of bioactive metabolites for agricultural applications, p 199–216. In Poveda J, Santamaría Ó, Martín-García J (ed), Fungal metabolites for agricultural applications: biostimulation and crop protection by fungal biotechnology [Internet]. Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rinker DC, Sauters TJC, Steffen K, Gumilang A, Raja HA, Rangel-Grimaldo M, Pinzan CF, de Castro PA, Dos Reis TF, Delbaje E, Houbraken J, Goldman GH, Oberlies NH, Rokas A. 2024. Strain heterogeneity in a non-pathogenic Aspergillus fungus highlights factors associated with virulence. Commun Biol 7:1082. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06756-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kjærbølling I, Vesth T, Frisvad JC, Nybo JL, Theobald S, Kildgaard S, Petersen TI, Kuo A, Sato A, Lyhne EK, et al. 2020. A comparative genomics study of 23 Aspergillus species from section Flavi. Nat Commun 11:1106. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14051-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Theobald S, Vesth T, Nybo JL, Frisvad JC, Kjærbølling I, Mondo S, LaButti K, Haridas S, Riley R, Kuo AA, et al. 2025. Comparative genomics of Aspergillus nidulans and section nidulantes. Curr Res Microb Sci 8:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Steenwyk JL, Balamurugan C, Raja HA, Gonçalves C, Li N, Martin F, Berman J, Oberlies NH, Gibbons JG, Goldman GH, Geiser DM, Houbraken J, Hibbett DS, Rokas A. 2024. Phylogenomics reveals extensive misidentification of fungal strains from the genus Aspergillus Microbiol Spectr 12:e03980-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03980-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Samson RA, Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Hong S-B, Hubka V, Klaassen CHW, Perrone G, Seifert KA, Susca A, Tanney JB, Varga J, Kocsubé S, Szigeti G, Yaguchi T, Frisvad JC. 2014. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Stud Mycol 78:141–173. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Houbraken J, Kocsubé S, Visagie CM, Yilmaz N, Wang X-C, Meijer M, Kraak B, Hubka V, Bensch K, Samson RA, Frisvad JC. 2020. Classification of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and related genera (Eurotiales): an overview of families, genera, subgenera, sections, series and species. Stud Mycol 95:5–169. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Visagie CM, Yilmaz N, Kocsubé S, Frisvad JC, Hubka V, Samson RA, et al. 2024. A review of recently introduced Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and other Eurotiales species. Stud Mycol 107:1–66. doi: 10.3114/sim.2024.107.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, Alanjary M, Fetter A, Terlouw BR, Metcalf WW, Helfrich EJN, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, Weber T. 2023. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W46–W50. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Navarro-Muñoz JC, Selem-Mojica N, Mullowney MW, Kautsar SA, Tryon JH, Parkinson EI, De Los Santos ELC, Yeong M, Cruz-Morales P, Abubucker S, Roeters A, Lokhorst W, Fernandez-Guerra A, Cappelini LTD, Goering AW, Thomson RJ, Metcalf WW, Kelleher NL, Barona-Gomez F, Medema MH. 2020. A computational framework to explore large-scale biosynthetic diversity. Nat Chem Biol 16:60–68. doi: 10.1038/s41589-019-0400-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. 2015. Internet. iNEXT: interpolation and extrapolation for species diversity. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=iNEXT
  • 37. Ehrlich KC, Chang PK, Yu J, Cotty PJ. 2004. Aflatoxin biosynthesis cluster gene cypA is required for G aflatoxin formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6518–6524. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6518-6524.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Schümann J, Hertweck C. 2007. Molecular basis of cytochalasan biosynthesis in fungi: gene cluster analysis and evidence for the involvement of a PKS-NRPS hybrid synthase by RNA silencing. J Am Chem Soc 129:9564–9565. doi: 10.1021/ja072884t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ames BD, Haynes SW, Gao X, Evans BS, Kelleher NL, Tang Y, Walsh CT. 2011. Complexity generation in fungal peptidyl alkaloid biosynthesis: oxidation of fumiquinazoline A to the heptacyclic hemiaminal fumiquinazoline C by the flavoenzyme Af12070 from Aspergillus fumigatus. Biochemistry 50:8756–8769. doi: 10.1021/bi201302w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zabala AO, Xu W, Chooi YH, Tang Y. 2012. Characterization of a silent azaphilone gene cluster from Aspergillus niger ATCC 1015 reveals a hydroxylation-mediated pyran-ring formation. Chem Biol 19:1049–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. ChemNETbase . 2025. Dictionary of natural products 33.2. Available from: https://dnp.chemnetbase.com. Retrieved 26 Apr 2025.
  • 42. Poynton EF, van Santen JA, Pin M, Contreras MM, McMann E, Parra J, Showalter B, Zaroubi L, Duncan KR, Linington RG. 2025. The natural products atlas 3.0: extending the database of microbially derived natural products. Nucleic Acids Res 53:D691–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hawksworth DL, Lücking R. 2017. Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million species. Microbiol Spectr 5. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0052-2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Bánki O, Roskov Y, Döring M, Ower G, Hernández Robles DR, Plata Corredor CA, et al. 2024. Catalogue of life (or catalogue of life foundation). Catalogue of life checklist (version 2024-03-26). doi: 10.48580/dgsv8 [DOI]
  • 45. Riedling OL, David KT, Rokas A. 2025. Global patterns of diversity and distribution in Aspergillus fungi are driven by human and environmental influences. Curr Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.07.081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Krause DJ, Kominek J, Opulente DA, Shen X-X, Zhou X, Langdon QK, DeVirgilio J, Hulfachor AB, Kurtzman CP, Rokas A, Hittinger CT. 2018. Functional and evolutionary characterization of a secondary metabolite gene cluster in budding yeasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:11030–11035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806268115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Sipiczki M. 2006. Metschnikowia strains isolated from botrytized grapes antagonize fungal and bacterial growth by iron depletion. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6716–6724. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01275-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Van Court RC, Wiseman MS, Meyer KW, Ballhorn DJ, Amses KR, Slot JC, Dentinger BTM, Garibay-Orijel R, Uehling JK. 2022. Diversity, biology, and history of psilocybin-containing fungi: suggestions for research and technological development. Fungal Biol 126:308–319. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2022.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Garcia J, Costa VM, Carvalho A, Baptista P, de Pinho PG, de Lourdes Bastos M, Carvalho F. 2015. Amanita phalloides poisoning: mechanisms of toxicity and treatment. Food Chem Toxicol 86:41–55. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Voigt K, Wolf T, Ochsenreiter K, Nagy G, Kaerger K, Shelest E, et al. 2016. 15 Genetic and metabolic aspects of primary and secondary metabolism of the Zygomycetes, p 361–385. In Hoffmeister D (ed), Biochemistry and molecular biology. The mycota, vol. III. Springer International Publishing, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Tabima JF, Trautman IA, Chang Y, Wang Y, Mondo S, Kuo A, Salamov A, Grigoriev IV, Stajich JE, Spatafora JW. 2020. Phylogenomic analyses of non-dikarya fungi supports horizontal gene transfer driving diversification of secondary metabolism in the amphibian gastrointestinal symbiont, Basidiobolus G3 (Bethesda) 10:3417–3433. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Rassbach J, Hilsberg N, Haensch VG, Dörner S, Gressler J, Sonnabend R, Semm C, Voigt K, Hertweck C, Gressler M. 2023. Non-canonical two-step biosynthesis of anti-oomycete indole alkaloids in Kickxellales. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 10:19. doi: 10.1186/s40694-023-00166-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Dzurendova S, Losada CB, Dupuy-Galet BX, Fjær K, Shapaval V. 2022. Mucoromycota fungi as powerful cell factories for modern biorefinery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106:101–115. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11720-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Caesar LK, Butun FA, Robey MT, Ayon NJ, Gupta R, Dainko D, Bok JW, Nickles G, Stankey RJ, Johnson D, Mead D, Cank KB, Earp CE, Raja HA, Oberlies NH, Keller NP, Kelleher NL. 2023. Correlative metabologenomics of 110 fungi reveals metabolite-gene cluster pairs. Nat Chem Biol 19:846–854. doi: 10.1038/s41589-023-01276-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Wolf T, Shelest V, Nath N, Shelest E. 2016. CASSIS and SMIPS: promoter-based prediction of secondary metabolite gene clusters in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 32:1138–1143. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Hannigan GD, Prihoda D, Palicka A, Soukup J, Klempir O, Rampula L, Durcak J, Wurst M, Kotowski J, Chang D, Wang R, Piizzi G, Temesi G, Hazuda DJ, Woelk CH, Bitton DA. 2019. A deep learning genome-mining strategy for biosynthetic gene cluster prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 47:e110–e110. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Steffen K, Rangel-Grimaldo M, Sauters TJC, Rinker DC, Raja HA, Graf TN, Gumilang A, Riedling OL, Goldman GH, Oberlies NH, Rokas A. 2025. An integrative genomic and chemical similarity approach linking fungal secondary metabolites and biosynthetic gene clusters. bioRxiv:2025.05.08.652894. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.08.652894 [DOI]
  • 58. Nickles GR, Oestereicher B, Keller NP, Drott MT. 2023. Mining for a new class of fungal natural products: the evolution, diversity, and distribution of isocyanide synthase biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res 51:7220–7235. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Kessler SC, Chooi YH. 2022. Out for a RiPP: challenges and advances in genome mining of ribosomal peptides from fungi. Nat Prod Rep 39:222–230. doi: 10.1039/d1np00048a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Wisecaver JH, Rokas A. 2015. Fungal metabolic gene clusters—caravans traveling across genomes and environments. Front. Microbiol. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All supplemental methods, genome accession numbers, and data files required to replicate these analyses have been deposited to the figshare repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29900843).


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES