Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2025 Aug 28;16(10):e01638-25. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25

Multiple long-range cis interactions generate CTCF insulator-dependent viral chromatin domains in quiescent HSV-1 genomes

Alyssa Richman 1, Sophie Kogut 1, Terri Edwards 2, Joseph Boyd 1, Princess Rodriguez 1, Michael Mariani 1, Mason A Shipley 3, Kayley A Manuel 3, Ziyun A Ye 3, David C Bloom 2, Seth Frietze 1,, Donna M Neumann 3,
Editor: Blossom Damania4
PMCID: PMC12506143  PMID: 40874617

ABSTRACT

In cellular genomes, CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) insulators impact transcription over small distances in a one-dimensional manner and over much longer distances in a three-dimensional manner by maintaining chromatin loops. We have previously shown that the latent HSV-1 genome contains CTCF insulators that function to regulate lytic transcription of adjacent genes in a one-dimensional manner. Here, we test the hypothesis that HSV-1 CTCF insulators nucleate chromatin loops to regulate the expression of distance-separated gene regions through three-dimensional organization of viral genomes. We used 4C-seq methods to identify multiple long-range cis interactions in HSV-1 genomes that generate viral chromatin domains, including those nucleated by the viral CTCF insulator CTRL2. Deletion of the CTRL2 insulator disrupted these viral chromatin domains. Loop-nucleating interactions were quantitated with a novel approach (UMI-4C-seq) that utilizes unique molecular identifiers to label and count chromatin interactions associated with specific viewpoint primers. Cis-interaction peaks across four different viewpoints were quantified. Viral genomes lacking CTRL2 displayed more cis-interaction peaks and wider ranges of interaction lengths compared to wt virus, suggesting altered chromatin organization. Furthermore, differential looping analysis showed that viral genomes lacking CTRL2 displayed a more transcriptionally permissive chromatin environment. Thus, the CTRL2 insulator functions as a critical regulator of long-range chromatin interactions, and its deletion reshapes the viral chromatin landscape, leading to a more accessible and dynamic regulatory environment that may influence HSV-1 transcriptional programs and latency-associated chromatin states.

IMPORTANCE

HSV-1 is a significant lifelong human pathogen that infects 70% of adults worldwide. The latent HSV-1 genome is chromatinized and maintained in distinct chromatin structures that silence the virus, while reactivation is facilitated by transient reversal of host factors that maintain those chromatin domains. Understanding how this happens is critical for the development of novel therapeutics. It is becoming clear that CTCF insulators play a key role in the reversal that leads to reactivation. CTCF insulators are essential regulators of chromatin structure and gene expression in mammalian cells and play vital regulatory roles in transcriptional control of DNA viruses by organizing chromatin architecture during both latent and lytic stages of virus lifecycles. Here, we present the first report that latent HSV-1 genomes are organized into 3D structures to support latency yet allow the viral genome to reactivate, opening the door for future therapeutic targets.

KEYWORDS: CCCTC, chromatin, insulator, CTCF, epigenetic, 4C-seq, HSV, latency, viral insulators

INTRODUCTION

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) establishes a lifelong infection in ~70% of adults and is a significant human pathogen with clinical manifestations that range from herpes labialis to keratitis and, in rare cases, death from HSV-1 induced encephalitis (13). Following the primary lytic infection, HSV-1 establishes latency in sensory neurons, where the viral genome is essentially silenced. HSV-1 periodically reactivates from latent reservoirs in response to various physiologic and environmental stressors, and repeated reactivation can result in ocular pathogenesis and corneal blindness over time (24). Currently, the therapeutics available to treat HSV-1 infections are limited to antivirals that target replicating virus, leaving the latent viral reservoirs untouched, largely because the mechanisms that govern the establishment, maintenance, and exit from latency remain under-defined.

HSV-1 genomes are organized into distinct chromatin domains where the immediate early (IE) lytic genes are maintained in transcriptionally repressed domains enriched in the heterochromatic H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 histone markers (512), while the non-coding RNA latency-associated transcript (LAT) is enriched in euchromatin H3K9K14 and H3K4me2/3 during latency (5, 1320). The segregation and maintenance of these distinctly different latent chromatin domains are maintained by functional insulator elements commonly known as CTCF insulators (21, 22). CTCF insulators consist of a conserved DNA binding motif to which CTCF proteins bind to elicit insulator function. In eukaryotic cells, CTCF insulators are considered “master regulators” of transcription (23, 24), controlling gene expression through a myriad of mechanisms, some of which include acting as enhancer-blockers that prevent inappropriate promoter activation or as barrier elements that prevent heterochromatin spread (2329). Using an algorithm against the HSV-1 sequence that recognized a conserved reiterated DNA motif that CTCF proteins bind to (CCCTC/CTCCC sequence motifs), we identified and then subsequently characterized seven CTCF insulators in latent HSV-1 genomes (21, 22, 30, 31). Interestingly, six of the seven CTCF insulators identified were in the repeat regions of HSV-1, and strikingly, they flanked not only the 5′ exon region of LAT, a region that contains the LAT promoter and enhancer elements that are required for efficient reactivation (32), but also the IE genes (21), suggesting that these insulators were key elements in maintaining gene silencing during the latent infection.

CTCF insulators also dimerize to form three-dimensional (3D) structures known as chromatin loops. These long-range cis interactions bring distance-separated enhancers and promoters together in close spatial proximity for transcriptional control (27, 3335). Chromatin loops are found in eukaryotic cells and beta and gamma herpesviruses. Further, these 3D loop structures are important for transcriptional control, as they regulate latency types in Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) or change/rearrange in response to reactivation in Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) (3640). Chromatin loops are anchored and stabilized by the cohesin protein complex (39, 4144), and our recent findings that showed HSV-1 encoded CTCF insulators also colocalized with cohesin complex proteins suggested that HSV-1 genomes were also organized into 3D chromatin loops during latency (45). To determine if these 3D chromatin structures were in HSV-1 genomes, we leveraged well-defined circular chromosome conformation capture assays combined with sequencing (4C-seq) that have been previously used to show chromatin loop organization of other DNA viruses (38, 4650).

Using Lund human mesencephalic (LUHMES) neuronal cells quiescently infected with wild-type (wt) HSV-1 strain 17Syn+, we identified multiple long-range cis interactions by 4C-seq methods (47, 48) in HSV-1 genomes that generate viral chromatin domains. To determine whether the 3D chromatin structure of the wt genome was dependent on individual virally encoded insulators, we leverage our well-characterized recombinant virus containing a small 135 bp deletion of the core binding domain of the CTRL2 insulator, a functional insulator downstream from the LAT enhancer element (ΔCTRL2) (31, 45, 51, 52). In LUHMES quiescently infected with the ΔCTRL2 recombinant, we showed that deletion of the CTRL2 insulator of HSV-1 resulted in the loss of a specific long-range cis interaction that mapped to the unique short (US) region of the viral genome near the US8 and US9 overlapping genes, two genes that are required for efficient anterograde axonal transport in reactivation. Taken together, these results suggest that the 3D chromatin structure of the latent viral genome is important for the virus’s ability to maintain latency and to reactivate.

To further quantify both the abundance of and the changes in long-range interactions observed between the wt and ΔCTRL2 genomes, we then optimized unique molecular identifier 4C-sequencing (UMI-4C-seq) in our LUHMES model. UMI-4C-seq is a technique that provides a robust method of capturing and quantifying long-range interactions compared to traditional 4C-seq by incorporating UMIs that improve the precision and accuracy of detecting interactions in complex populations of cells. We quantitated changes in long-range interactions of the ΔCTRL2 virus compared to wt using viewpoint primers proximal to VP16, LAT, CTRL2, and ICP4 loci by UMI-4C. We showed that the deletion of the CTRL2 insulator resulted in significant and quantifiable changes to the 3D chromatin structure of viral genomes, where numerous novel interactions were gained and lost in the ΔCTRL2 recombinant. These findings reflect a disruption of local chromatin organization that is observed in wt genomes during HSV-1 quiescence. Combined, our data suggest that the 3D structure of HSV-1 genomes is important for regulated gene expression during latency and for organizing HSV-1 in a structural conformation that is favorable for reactivation from latency.

RESULTS

4C-seq analysis of HSV-1 identifies cis chromatin contacts in quiescently infected human neuronal cells

To elucidate the chromatin architecture of HSV-1 genomes in neurons quiescently infected with HSV-1, we performed 4C-seq experiments using human LUHMES cells infected with 17Syn+ (53, 54). 4C-seq viewpoint primer bait sequences were designed to detect the interaction frequencies between single viewpoint DNA fragments and cis-interactions with distal regions of the HSV-1 genome. We selected distinct 4C-seq viewpoints that mapped to either the unique long (UL) or the US regions of the HSV-1 genome (located at 28 and 133 kb, respectively) (Fig. 1). The baits targeting viewpoints 1 and 2 (VP1 and VP2, Fig. 1A and B) are proximal to the IE genes US1, encoding the ICP22 repressor, and the UL13 early gene encoding the protein kinase. RNA-sequencing analysis of HSV-1 infected cells has demonstrated that both ICP22 and UL13 are expressed during the replication cycle and are involved in viral gene expression and replication competence (55). The viewpoints were specific to HSV-1 infected cells and failed to amplify non-infected 4C templates (Fig. S1). Three independent 4C-seq experiments were conducted and sequenced to a depth of >1 million reads per 4C library. Peak calling analysis was performed to identify significant cis-chromatin contacts for each viewpoint (see methods). We identified 11 significant peaks (False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.1) corresponding to VP1 cis-contacts that spanned the length of the HSV-1 genome, including two clusters of regions at 80–90 and 130–140 kb distal to the VP1 region of US1 (Fig. 1A). We similarly identified 10 peaks with VP2 that showed clustering within the 80–130 kb region (Fig. 1B). Notably, the cis-contacts for both viewpoints showed a high degree of concordance (Fig. 1C), where >85% of peaks were shared between viewpoint baits, suggesting central chromatin domains are formed by HSV-1 (Table S1).

Fig 1.

Circos plots showing 4C-seq chromatin interactions in the HSV1 genome. VP1 (blue) and VP2 (purple) viewpoints reveal distinct cis-interaction patterns between genomic regions, with the merged plot demonstrating complementary contact networks.

4C-seq analysis of cis-chromatin contacts within the HSV-1 genome. 4C-seq viewpoint primers (VP1 and VP2) targeting genomic regions on the circularized 152 kb HSV-1 genome. (A) Circos plots showing viral open reading frames (ORFs) in sense (red) and antisense (blue) strands, significant cis-interactions (peaks) identified with VP1 bait regions. (B) Circos plots showing HSV-1 viral ORFs in sense (red) and antisense (blue) strands, significant cis-interactions (peaks) identified with VP2 bait regions. (C) Merged plots of both VP1 and VP2 in wt (17Syn+) genomes.

Long-range interactions in HSV-1 shift in the absence of CTRL2

CTCF and associated insulator elements regulate the formation of transcriptional chromatin domains. To determine potential changes in HSV-1 chromatin structure associated with the deletion of a viral CTCF insulator element, we leveraged our recombinant ΔCTRL2 virus, a mutant virus containing a 135 bp deletion of the core CTCF binding site known as CTRL2 downstream from the LAT 5′exon (51). We had previously shown that the CTRL2 insulator was required to maintain IE gene silencing during latency through the maintenance of heterochromatin on the HSV-1 genome (31, 51), suggesting that the viral insulator element was integral to the regulation of latent HSV-1 chromatin domains. Using 4C-seq on LUHMES cells quiescently infected with ΔCTRL2, we identified 12 and 14 significant peaks for VP1 and VP2, respectively, with ΔCTRL2 (Fig. 2). The interactions for VP1 and VP2 both showed near-complete overlap with those identified in LUHMES cells infected with wt virus. However, two additional cis-interactions with the distal region of the HSV-1 genome were identified with VP1 in ΔCTRL2 compared to wt samples (Fig. 2A; Table S1). Notably, VP1 interacted with a domain spanning 143–152kb in ΔCTRL2, which was absent in wt virus (Fig. 2B). In addition, one specific interaction was lost in ΔCTRL2 compared to wt virus (VP2 and 143 kb, corresponding to US8 and US9 overlapping regions [Fig. 2; see arrow]). These 4C-seq results indicate that HSV-1 transcriptional domains may shift in their composition in latent infections when insulator domains are deleted in a manner that would impact the ability to reactivate.

Fig 2.

4C-seq circular genome plots comparing HSV-1 chromatin architecture. ΔCTRL2 mutant (left) shows new interactions while losing specific contact with US genes region present in 17Syn+ wt (right). VP1/VP2 reveal altered genomic connections.

Cis-chromatin contacts of HSV-1 ΔCTRL2 strain lacking the functional viral CTRL2 insulator. (A) 4C-seq analysis using both viewpoint primers VP1 and VP2 comparing LUHMES cells quiescently infected with the HSV-1 ΔCTRL2 virus strain harboring a targeted deletion in the CTCF insulator domain. The area shaded in red indicates interactions gained in the recombinant virus compared to wt virus (shown in panel B). (B) The wt 17Syn+ HSV-1 strain is shown for comparison. Arrow points to the interaction that is lost upon deletion of the viral CTRL2 insulator. This interaction maps to anterograde transport genes US8 and the overlapping US (region of the HSV-1 genome). Shown in both graphs are all significant peaks for both VP1 and VP2 bait regions.

UMI-4C-seq identified differential chromatin interactions in HSV-1 ΔCTRL2 compared to wt virus

To further analyze the changes in chromatin loops between wt and ΔCTRL2 viruses, we performed UMI-4C experiments. This technique combines chromosome conformation capture with UMIs to quantitatively compare the differential analysis of targeted HSV-1 cis-contact profiles (56). We designed primers targeting distinct HSV-1 bait regions proximal to the viral genes/loci including CTRL2, ICP4, LAT, and VP16. UMI-4C libraries were generated using independent LUHMES cultures quiescently infected with wt or ΔCTRL2. Viewpoint primers targeting distinct regions of the HSV-1 genome proximal to VP16, LAT, CTRL2, and ICP4 loci are shown in Table S2. Paired-end sequencing of multiplexed UMI-4C amplicons resulted in a similar number of reads with a relatively balanced distribution of UMIs and a high degree of consistency across replicates across each bait (Fig. S2A). UMI-4C analysis identified cis-interaction peaks across viewpoints with differences in frequency and length between wt and ΔCTRL2 genomes (Fig. 3A and B). For the VP16 viewpoint, the results show several new contacts in the ΔCTRL2 samples that are absent in the wt genomes, particularly in regions spanning 90–110 and 130–150 kb (Fig. 3F). This demonstrates that the deletion of the CTCF insulator element has a substantial impact on the chromatin interactions around the VP16 region. In the ΔCTRL2 samples, there is also an increase in contact frequencies at regions proximal to LAT, suggesting potential changes in chromatin architecture linked to the deletion of the CTCF insulator (Fig. S2B and C). The trend plot highlights these differential contact intensities, showing peaks that indicate higher interaction frequencies in the ΔCTRL2 samples compared to wt (Fig. 3C and D). Overall, ΔCTRL2 genomes exhibited more cis-interaction peaks at most viewpoints compared to wt (Fig. 3A). For instance, the ΔCTRL2 virus showed nearly twice as many significant interactions at LAT (19 vs. 10) and VP16 (7 vs. 3), whereas wt exhibited a higher number of peaks at CTRL2 (11 vs. 8). ΔCTRL2 interactions were generally longer on average across viewpoints, with notable differences at CTRL2 (3474 bp vs. 2101 bp) and LAT (3771 bp vs. 2744 bp) (Fig. 3B). The range of interaction lengths was consistently broader in ΔCTRL2 genomes, suggesting altered chromatin organization compared to wt genomes (Table S3).

Fig 3.

UMI-4C analysis showing HSV-1 genome architecture changes after CTRL2 deletion. Charts and arc plots reveal increased long-range cis-interactions in mutant genomes, particularly at LAT and VP16 viewpoints, with broader interaction domains.

UMI-4C-seq analysis reveals altered cis-chromatin architecture in latent HSV-1 genomes upon deletion of the CTRL2 insulator. (A) Number of significant cis-interactions (FDR < 0.1) identified at each UMI-4C viewpoint (CTRL2, ICP4, LAT, and VP16) in wt (purple) and CTRL2-deleted (ΔCTRL2; orange) HSV-1 genomes. ΔCTRL2 samples show an overall increase in the number of long-range interactions, particularly at LAT and VP16 viewpoints. (B) Distribution of interaction lengths (in base pairs) for each viewpoint in wt and ΔCTRL2. (C) UMI-normalized interaction frequency profiles across the HSV-1 genome for CTRL2. (D) UMI-normalized interaction frequency profiles across the HSV-1 genome VP16 (right) viewpoints in wt and ΔCTRL2-infected LUHMES cells. Increased interaction frequencies and broader interaction domains are observed in ΔCTRL2 genomes relative to wt. (E) Differential chromatin interaction arcs for CTRL2 viewpoints visualized as arc plots across the HSV-1 genome. Arcs represent statistically significant changes in cis-interaction peaks between ΔCTRL2 and wt genomes. Red arcs indicate increased interaction frequencies in ΔCTRL2 relative to wt (log₂ odds ratio > 1), while blue arcs indicate reduced interactions. HSV-1 genome coordinates and annotated ORFs are displayed below the arc plots. (F) Differential chromatin interaction arcs VP16 viewpoints visualized as arc plots across the HSV-1 genome. Arcs represent statistically significant changes in cis-interaction peaks between ΔCTRL2 and wt genomes. Red arcs indicate increased interaction frequencies in ΔCTRL2 relative to wt (log₂ odds ratio > 1), while blue arcs indicate reduced interactions. HSV-1 genome coordinates and annotated ORFs are displayed below the arc plots.

Differential looping analysis of UMI-4C data comparing the ΔCTRL2 recombinant to wt 17Syn+ genomes showed that ΔCTRL2 had significantly altered chromatin interactions across analyzed HSV-1 loci, including VP16 and CTRL2 (Fig. 3E and F). At the VP16 locus, ΔCTRL2 genomes exhibited increased distal interactions and broader cis-interactions compared to wt genomes, consistent with the loss of boundary constraints imposed by the CTRL2 element. Similarly, at the proximal CTRL2 locus, quiescent ΔCTRL2 genomes displayed an expansion of interaction domains and enhanced interaction frequencies flanking the locus, indicative of a more permissive chromatin environment. These changes reflect a disruption of local chromatin organization, potentially facilitating greater transcriptional accessibility and regulatory interplay. These findings are consistent with our previously published ChIP-seq work (51) showing that in the absence of the CTRL2 insulator, the latent viral genome is significantly less enriched in the heterochromatic marker H3K27me3 compared to wt virus. Further, these changes in histone marker composition functionally correlated to increased gene expression at viral loci, all supporting that the 3D chromatin architecture is altered in the absence of the CTRL2 insulator and that results in functional changes to lytic gene expression (51, 52).

Differential analysis across all loci showed that ΔCTRL2 genomes consistently exhibited more extensive and long-range interactions than wt, supporting the insulator role in preserving chromatin compartmentalization and stability (Fig. 3E and F). The cis-chromatin interactions at LAT and ICP4 loci also demonstrated genome-wide effects of CTRL2 deletion. At the LAT and ICP4 loci, wt genomes retained localized interactions, while ΔCTRL2 genomes displayed more distal and dispersed interactions, emphasizing the widespread impact of CTRL2 loss on chromatin looping and regulatory architecture (Fig. S2B and S2C). Together, these results reveal that CTRL2 functions as a critical regulator of both local and long-range chromatin interactions. Its deletion reshapes the viral chromatin landscape, leading to a more accessible and dynamic regulatory environment that may influence HSV-1 transcriptional programs and latency-associated chromatin states.

DISCUSSION

Virally encoded CTCF insulators are key regulatory elements in the HSV-1 genome, contributing to the maintenance of latency through gene silencing in neurons. Nonetheless, the presence of CTCF-nucleated long-range interactions either in cis or trans has not been characterized in latent HSV-1 genomes, likely due to experimental limitations associated with existing neuronal latency models. Because large numbers of HSV-1 infected neurons are required for 4C-seq applications, neither the in vivo models previously used to describe fundamentals of HSV-1 latent biology (57) nor the in vitro primary neuronal models generated from mouse ganglia (58) were options for these high-throughput analyses. However, recent advances in establishing HSV-1 quiescence and reliable reactivation in LUHMES cells have revolutionized our ability to perform these complex and high-throughput bioinformatic assays. LUHMES cells have been extensively characterized and used to explore human neurodegenerative diseases (59, 60). More recently, we showed that LUHMES establish HSV-1 quiescence and can be reliably reactivated with the addition of the PI3 kinase inhibitor wortmannin (54). Further, histone marker composition and miRNA expression are indistinguishable between LUHMES and in vivo models of HSV-1 infection, indicating that LUHMES are a reliable and complementary model to commonly used models of HSV-1 latency, reactivation, and chromatin organization (18, 54, 61).

Previous functional characterization of virally encoded CTCF insulators in latent HSV-1 genomes revealed that individual insulators display differential and site-specific insulator activity that includes enhancer-blocking, barrier, or silencer function (22, 30). We previously reported that deletion of the CTRL2 insulator of HSV-1 resulted in the dysregulation of chromatin domains and aberrant (increased) lytic gene expression during latency, suggesting that the insulator was required to maintain IE gene silencing through local control of chromatin compartmentalization around those genome loci (51, 52). We also showed that the ΔCTRL2 recombinant failed to reactivate in vivo and that at 5 days post-reactivation, the ΔCTRL2 recombinant displayed significantly attenuated US9 expression (31). US9 is a leaky-late gene that is required for anterograde axonal transport and reactivation from neurons (6264) and distance separated from the CTRL2 insulator by over 20 kb, and the apparent dependence of the CTRL2 insulator on its expression was intriguing and suggested that the latent HSV-1 genome might be ordered into higher-order 3D chromatin structures that would promote efficient gene expression under the right circumstances to allow for reactivation from latency.

Both 4C and UMI-4C-seq methods identified significant differences in the 3D architecture of the ΔCTRL2 recombinant compared to wt genomes, specifically around three genomic loci that are known to be required for reactivation (VP16, ICP4, and LAT) (32, 65). In the absence of the CTRL2 insulator, long-range interactions that map to US8 and US9 are lost, and local chromatin domains are disrupted around VP16, ICP4, and the LAT regions suggestive of dynamic regulatory environment that may influence HSV-1 transcriptional programs and latency-associated chromatin states. These findings are consistent with our published data that show that LAT, ICP4, and VP16 gene expressions are increased in the absence of the CTRL2 insulator, while the compacted heterochromatin domains that were bounded by the CTRL2 insulator in wt genomes were disrupted in the absence of CTRL2 (51). Interestingly, in previous studies where we compared wt and ΔCTRL2 recombinant, deletion of the CTRL2 insulator did not alter binding of the cohesin protein Rad21 to any of the known CTCF insulator loci, including the proximal sequences near the CTRL2 deletion site (45). These findings were somewhat surprising at first, because we expected that cohesin binding would be altered through loop extrusion (34, 42) in the absence of the CTRL2 insulator. However, in retrospect, the Rad21 enrichments were determined using conventional ChIP assays where the chromatin fragment sizes ranged between 400 and 1,000 bp. Considering this, it is possible that cohesin binding on a nearby CTCF insulator (or a previously unidentified CTCF insulator) was detected when assaying sequences proximal to the CTRL2 deletion site. Other intriguing findings from our UMI-4C data include the new long-range interactions made in the ΔCTRL2 recombinant. Most of these newly formed spatial interactions were with regions of the genome that were not previously associated with CTCF binding or had functional insulators mapped in them. These findings highlight two exciting possibilities: (i) that CTCF binding to unenriched putative insulator sites can be dramatically altered under different conditions and (ii) that additional chromatin organizers such as YY1 contribute to the latent HSV-1 genome 3D organization. For the former possibility, understanding how deletions of CTCF insulators affect chromatin architecture and, subsequently, the ability of viral genomes to reactivate as a consequence of those changes has implications in the development of novel therapies involving the use of Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors to deliver CRISPR/Cas molecules that could potentially edit latent viral genomes to prevent reactivation (66, 67). For the latter, it has been well established that YY1 and CTCF interact and contribute to 3D architecture in the context of eukaryotic cells and in other DNA viruses (6870). Further, while CTCF insulators establish larger chromatin loops, YY1 has been implicated in the formation of smaller chromatin loops that involve enhancer and promoter spatial orientations (70). Therefore, altering the chromatin landscape through insulator deletion could change CTCF-YY1 interactions and thus functionally alter gene expression. Considering that there are YY1 inhibitors available, this would be an intriguing avenue for therapeutic development. Future experiments using these high-throughput analyses outlined here yield exponential promise in both defining mechanisms that contribute to the maintenance of latency and to uncovering potential therapeutic targets.

Perhaps most intriguing, though, are the implications that the HSV-1 genome 3D architecture has on the ability of viral genomes to reactivate. We have previously reported that within 2 h of inducing reactivation in latently infected mice, CTCF was differentially evicted from viral genomes in a time frame that precedes the accumulation of lytic transcripts described for reactivation (22, 30). We also showed using rAAV8 delivery of a CTCF-targeting siRNA that depletion of the CTCF protein in neurons harboring latent HSV-1 resulted in shedding of infectious virus in the absence of other reactivation stressors (71), suggesting that CTCF occupancy was required to maintain genome silencing during latency and that CTCF eviction precedes lytic gene expression and is likely required for efficient reactivation, albeit through unknown mechanisms. Our findings here show that the deletion of the CTRL2 insulator of HSV-1 results in long-range and broad changes in chromatin looping that reshapes the viral chromatin landscape and shows that the 3D structures influence HSV-1 transcriptional programs.

Finally, it is also intriguing to speculate on how these interactions and the 3D organization of wt HSV-1 genomes could promote efficient reactivation. Considering the importance of the CTRL2 insulator in the genome organization of wt virus, we hypothesize that CTCF-nucleated chromatin loops or long-range interactions between the CTRL2 insulator and the previously characterized CTUS1 insulator that is flanking the anterograde transport genes US8 and US9 (21, 31) place the LAT and, specifically, the LAT enhancer elements into close spatial proximity to genes required for anterograde transport. During latency, these insulators are functional enhancer blockers and maintain CTCF binding. However, once reactivation is initiated, CTCF is rapidly evicted, and there is a loss of insulator function so that the LAT enhancer can now activate both IE genes and anterograde transport genes so that the coordinated expression of these genes would ensure that newly formed viral particles would be produced and transported to corneal epithelial cells (Fig. 4). More extensive mechanistic studies are currently underway to test this model in the context of reactivation in vivo.

Fig 4.

Schematic diagram illustrating HSV-1 latency and reactivation in neurons. Three stages show latency with CTCF bound to chromatin preventing enhancer access stimulus triggering CTCF eviction enhancer activation of late genes via 3D interactions.

Model for how 3D chromatin architecture contributes to efficient reactivation from latency in HSV-1 infected neurons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells and viruses

LUHMES cells were obtained from the ATCC (no. CRL-2927) and were cultured as described previously (54). All experiments performed in this study utilized LUHMES cells at passages 5 to 7 from the original ATCC stock. Briefly, LUHMES cells were cultured in dishes, on plates, and on glass coverslips, which were coated with poly-L-ornithine hydrobromide (no. P3655; Sigma) overnight at room temperature followed by fibronectin (no. F2006; Sigma) overnight at 37°C. Dishes, plates, and glass coverslips then were rinsed with sterile dH2O and allowed to dry overnight. For proliferation, LUHMES cells were propagated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/Ham’s F12 (DMEM/F12; no. 12–719F; Lonza) supplemented with 1 × N2 supplement (no. 10378016; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1% PSG (100 U penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, 0.292 mg/mL l-glutamine; no. SV30082.01; HyClone), and a 40 ng/mL final concentration of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor-basic (no. 100-18B; PeproTech) added fresh to medium before use at 10% CO2. Cells were switched to DMEM/F12 supplemented with 1 × N2 supplement (no. 10378016; Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1% PSG (100 U penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, 0.292 mg/mL l-glutamine; no. SV30082.01; HyClone), 1 µg/mL final concentration of tetracycline hydrochloride (no. T7660; Sigma), 1 mM final concentration N6,2′-O-dibutyryladenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate sodium salt (no. D0627; Sigma), and a 2 ng/mL final concentration recombinant human glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (no. 212-GD-010; R&D Systems) at 60%–70% confluence to induce differentiation as previously described (42). Original stocks of the wt HSV-1 strain, 17Syn+ (GenBank accession number NC_001806), and the recombinant ΔCTRL2 viruses were originally obtained from the Bloom Lab (University of Florida). For the ΔCTRL2 recombinant virus, 135 bp (nt 120,500–120,635) of CTRL2 insulator was deleted from the 17Syn+ parental wt. The recombinant virus was verified by sequence analyses, as previously described (51). Both virus stocks were propagated on Vero cells using a 0.01 Multiplicity of Infection (MOI). Cultures were supplemented with Eagle’s minimal essential medium with 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution at 37°C for 3–4 days, and viruses were harvested by centrifugation followed by two freeze-thaw cycles. The final supernatants were aliquoted and stored in −80℃ for further use. To determine viral titers, Vero cells were infected in triplicate with 10-fold serial dilutions in DMEM (1% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution) for 72 h, and plaques were stained by crystal violet and counted. For infections prior to downstream experiments, cells were seeded and grown in 6-well plates to confluency, unless otherwise noted. Monolayers of cells were inoculated with either 17Syn+ or the ΔCTRL2 recombinant in DMEM with 1% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution. Plates were rocked at 4°C for 1 h to allow for virus adsorption, followed by 30 min incubation at 37°C, 5% CO2. The virus-containing media was removed and replaced with fresh DMEM with 1% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution, and plates were incubated for the remainder of the indicated time point for cell harvesting.

LUHMES cell infections

LUHMES cells were grown and differentiated on poly-L-ornithine/fibronectin-coated coverslips (42). Briefly, LUHMES cells were plated at 25,000 cells per well (24-well plates/glass coverslips) or 3  ×  106 cells (15 cm dishes) and allowed to proliferate for a period of 2 to 3 days, followed by 5 days of differentiation. To establish a latent infection, the post-mitotic neurons were pretreated with 50 µM acyclovir (ACV) (Sigma, PHR1254) for 2 h and infected with HSV-1 viral strain 17syn+ or ΔCTRL2 recombinant at an MOI of 3 in the presence of 50 µM ACV. After 48 h, medium was removed and replaced with fresh differentiation medium that did not contain ACV. ACV is not included for the remainder of the experiment. Harvesting was performed at the latent time point 8 days post-infection for chromosome conformation capture and downstream sequencing (4C-seq).

4C-seq analysis

10 million LUHMES cells, latently infected with HSV-1 strains (wt or ΔCTRL2), were cross-linked using 2% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, followed by quenching with 0.125 M glycine and washing with cold phosphate buffered saline. Cell pellets were lysed in a buffer containing Tris-HCl, NaCl, NP-40, Triton X-100, EDTA, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and protease inhibitors and homogenized. Nuclei were isolated, pelleted, and resuspended in restriction enzyme buffer and SDS followed by incubation at 37°C. HindIII was used for the first digestion at 37°C for~16 h, and digested samples were inactivated at 65°C and ligated using T4 DNA ligase at 16°C overnight. Digestion and ligation efficiencies were validated with gel electrophoresis. Cross-links were reversed by adding Proteinase K at 65°C overnight, treatment with RNAse A, followed by phenol-chloroform extraction. Purified DNA was subjected to a second digestion with DpnII and ligated overnight at 16°C to generate circularized DNA fragments. The resulting 4C template was purified using magnetic bead-based cleanup. Inverse PCR was performed using primers designed to flank the restriction enzyme sites and amplify the circularized fragments ligated to the viewpoint. All primer sequences are listed in Table S2. PCR conditions included 30 cycles with a gradient of annealing temperatures to optimize specificity. Amplicons were purified using AMPure beads and quantified using Qubit. A second round of PCR added unique dual barcodes (i7/i5) to each sample for multiplex sequencing. PCR products were cleaned and pooled for Illumina sequencing using single-end 50 bp reads. Reads were demultiplexed and processed, and adapters and low-quality bases were trimmed using custom scripts. Trimmed reads were aligned to the HSV-1 reference genome (NC_001806.2) using Bowtie2, applying a minimum MAPQ filter of 10 to retain high-confidence alignments. 4C-seq cis-interactions were determined using the program peakC (72). To visualize interaction data, Circos plots were generated to depict cis-interactions within the HSV-1 genome across replicates and viewpoints. Statistical analysis included comparing multiple replicates for each condition and assessing differential interactions between the wt (17syn+) and mutant (ΔCTRL2) viruses. Unique peaks were identified in the mutant strain, highlighting potential differences in chromatin interactions between the two viral genotypes.

UMI-4C analysis

Approximately 6 million LUHMES cells latently infected were cross-linked as described above. Cell pellets were resuspended in a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 1% Triton X-100) supplemented with protease inhibitors. Chromatin was digested with DpnII (200 units, NEB) in three rounds at 37°C with shaking, and digestion efficiency was assessed via agarose gel electrophoresis. Digested chromatin was ligated overnight at 16°C using T4 DNA ligase. Ligation products were purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, followed by RNase A treatment and proteinase K digestion. Purified DNA was sonicated to 450–550 bp fragments using a Covaris system. Fragment size distribution was verified via BioAnalyzer. Sonicated DNA was end-repaired, A-tailed, and dephosphorylated before ligation to Illumina-compatible forked adapters. Ligated products were purified with 1 × AMPure XP beads and quantified using a Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity assay (Thermo Scientific). Two rounds of nested PCR were performed with bait-specific primers for each viewpoint, yielding libraries of approximately 500 bp. For each library, five to 10 PCR reactions (each with 200 ng of DNA template) were pooled to ensure sufficient complexity. Raw sequencing reads files were demultiplexed and aligned to the HSV-1 reference genome (NC_001806.2) using the UMI4Cats pipeline (73), followed by UMI collapsing to count unique interaction events and remove PCR duplicates. Interaction profiles were normalized to the group with the lowest UMI counts, excluding a 3 kb window surrounding the bait site. Interaction domains were visualized using adaptive smoothing and domainogram representations. Differential interactions were identified using variance stabilizing transformation (DESeq2) (74) and monotone smoothing, with comparisons performed using Wald test and Fisher’s exact test for low UMI regions. Differential peaks with a log2 odds ratio > 1 were visualized with the Plotgardener R package (75).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the grants NIH/NIAID R01AI134807 (D.M.N.), NIH/NEI 2T32EY027721 (M.A.S.), NIH/NIAID R01AI048633 (D.C.B.), the NSF GRFP 2137424 (K.A.M.), the Core Grant for Vision Research from the NIH to the University of Wisconsin-Madison (P30 EY016665), the McPherson Eye Research Institute Grant Summit Program, and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Seth Frietze, Email: seth.frietze@med.uvm.edu.

Donna M. Neumann, Email: dneumann3@wisc.edu.

Blossom Damania, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01638-25.

Figure S1. mbio.01638-25-s0001.pdf.

Validation of HSV-1-specific viewpoints for 4C-seq.

mbio.01638-25-s0001.pdf (964.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF1
Figure S2A. mbio.01638-25-s0002.pdf.

Paired-end sequencing of multiplexed UMI-4C amplicons.

mbio.01638-25-s0002.pdf (601.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF2
Figure S2B. mbio.01638-25-s0003.pdf.

UMI-normalized interaction frequency profiles.

mbio.01638-25-s0003.pdf (784.1KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF3
Figure S2C. mbio.01638-25-s0004.pdf.

Differential chromatin interaction arcs.

mbio.01638-25-s0004.pdf (706.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF4
Legends. mbio.01638-25-s0005.docx.

Supplemental figure legends.

mbio.01638-25-s0005.docx (17.2KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF5
Table S1. mbio.01638-25-s0006.docx.

4C-seq peaks coordinates.

mbio.01638-25-s0006.docx (19.7KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF6
Table S2. mbio.01638-25-s0007.docx.

Primer sequences.

mbio.01638-25-s0007.docx (15.2KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF7
Table S3. mbio.01638-25-s0008.docx.

UMI-4C peak coordinates.

mbio.01638-25-s0008.docx (33.9KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF8

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kaufman HE. 2004. Does everyone have herpes? Cornea 23:111–112. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200403000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Toma HS, Murina AT, Areaux RG, Neumann DM, Bhattacharjee PS, Foster TP, Kaufman HE, Hill JM. 2008. Ocular HSV-1 latency, reactivation and recurrent disease. Semin Ophthalmol 23:249–273. doi: 10.1080/08820530802111085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Austin A, Lietman T, Rose-Nussbaumer J. 2017. Update on the management of infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology 124:1678–1689. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. McCormick I, James C, Welton NJ, Mayaud P, Turner KME, Gottlieb SL, Foster A, Looker KJ. 2022. Incidence of herpes simplex virus keratitis and other ocular disease: global review and estimates. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 29:353–362. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1962919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Knipe DM, Cliffe A. 2008. Chromatin control of herpes simplex virus lytic and latent infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:211–221. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cliffe AR, Coen DM, Knipe DM. 2013. Kinetics of facultative heterochromatin and polycomb group protein association with the herpes simplex viral genome during establishment of latent infection. mBio 4:e00590-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00590-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cliffe AR, Garber DA, Knipe DM. 2009. Transcription of the herpes simplex virus latency-associated transcript promotes the formation of facultative heterochromatin on lytic promoters. J Virol 83:8182–8190. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00712-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kristie TM. 2016. Chromatin modulation of herpesvirus lytic gene expression: managing nucleosome density and heterochromatic histone modifications. mBio 7:e00098-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00098-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Knipe DM, Lieberman PM, Jung JU, McBride AA, Morris KV, Ott M, Margolis D, Nieto A, Nevels M, Parks RJ, Kristie TM. 2013. Snapshots: chromatin control of viral infection. Virology (Auckl) 435:141–156. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.09.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Knipe DM, Raja P, Lee J. 2017. Viral gene products actively promote latent infection by epigenetic silencing mechanisms. Curr Opin Virol 23:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Whitlow Z, Kristie TM. 2009. Recruitment of the transcriptional coactivator HCF-1 to viral immediate-early promoters during initiation of reactivation from latency of herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol 83:9591–9595. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01115-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kwiatkowski DL, Thompson HW, Bloom DC. 2009. The polycomb group protein Bmi1 binds to the herpes simplex virus 1 latent genome and maintains repressive histone marks during latency. J Virol 83:8173–8181. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00686-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kristie TM. 2015. Dynamic modulation of HSV chromatin drives initiation of infection and provides targets for epigenetic therapies. Virology (Auckl) 479–480:555–561. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.01.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bloom DC. 2016. Alphaherpesvirus latency: a dynamic state of transcription and reactivation. Adv Virus Res 94:53–80. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2015.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Amelio AL, Giordani NV, Kubat NJ, O’neil JE, Bloom DC. 2006. Deacetylation of the herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated transcript (LAT) enhancer and a decrease in LAT abundance precede an increase in ICP0 transcriptional permissiveness at early times postexplant. J Virol 80:2063–2068. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.4.2063-2068.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bloom DC, Giordani NV, Kwiatkowski DL. 2010. Epigenetic regulation of latent HSV-1 gene expression. Biochim Biophys Acta 1799:246–256. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kubat NJ, Amelio AL, Giordani NV, Bloom DC. 2004. The herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated transcript (LAT) enhancer/rcr is hyperacetylated during latency independently of LAT transcription. J Virol 78:12508–12518. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.22.12508-12518.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Grams TR, Edwards TG, Bloom DC. 2023. HSV-1 LAT promoter deletion viruses exhibit strain-specific and LAT-dependent epigenetic regulation of latent viral genomes in human neurons. J Virol 97:e0193522. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01935-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kubat NJ, Tran RK, McAnany P, Bloom DC. 2004. Specific histone tail modification and not DNA methylation is a determinant of herpes simplex virus type 1 latent gene expression. J Virol 78:1139–1149. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.3.1139-1149.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Neumann DM, Bhattacharjee PS, Giordani NV, Bloom DC, Hill JM. 2007. In vivo changes in the patterns of chromatin structure associated with the latent herpes simplex virus type 1 genome in mouse trigeminal ganglia can be detected at early times after butyrate treatment. J Virol 81:13248–13253. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01569-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Amelio AL, McAnany PK, Bloom DC. 2006. A chromatin insulator-like element in the herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated transcript region binds CCCTC-binding factor and displays enhancer-blocking and silencing activities. J Virol 80:2358–2368. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.5.2358-2368.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ertel MK, Cammarata AL, Hron RJ, Neumann DM. 2012. CTCF occupation of the herpes simplex virus 1 genome is disrupted at early times postreactivation in a transcription-dependent manner. J Virol 86:12741–12759. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01655-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. West AG, Gaszner M, Felsenfeld G. 2002. Insulators: many functions, many mechanisms. Genes Dev 16:271–288. doi: 10.1101/gad.954702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bell AC, West AG, Felsenfeld G. 1999. The protein CTCF is required for the enhancer blocking activity of vertebrate insulators. Cell 98:387–396. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81967-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kurukuti S, Tiwari VK, Tavoosidana G, Pugacheva E, Murrell A, Zhao Z, Lobanenkov V, Reik W, Ohlsson R. 2006. CTCF binding at the H19 imprinting control region mediates maternally inherited higher-order chromatin conformation to restrict enhancer access to Igf2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10684–10689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600326103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ohlsson R, Renkawitz R, Lobanenkov V. 2001. CTCF is a uniquely versatile transcription regulator linked to epigenetics and disease. Trends Genet 17:520–527. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02366-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ghirlando R, Felsenfeld G. 2016. CTCF: making the right connections. Genes Dev 30:881–891. doi: 10.1101/gad.277863.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Phillips JE, Corces VG. 2009. CTCF: master weaver of the genome. Cell 137:1194–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ohlsson R, Lobanenkov V, Klenova E. 2010. Does CTCF mediate between nuclear organization and gene expression? Bioessays 32:37–50. doi: 10.1002/bies.200900118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Washington SD, Musarrat F, Ertel MK, Backes GL, Neumann DM. 2018. CTCF binding sites in the herpes simplex virus 1 genome display site-specific CTCF occupation, protein recruitment, and insulator function. J Virol 92:e00156-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00156-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Singh P, Collins MF, Johns RN, Manuel KA, Ye ZA, Bloom DC, Neumann DM. 2022. Deletion of the CTRL2 insulator in HSV-1 results in the decreased expression of genes involved in axonal transport and attenuates reactivation in vivo Viruses 14:909. doi: 10.3390/v14050909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bloom DC, Hill JM, Devi-Rao G, Wagner EK, Feldman LT, Stevens JG. 1996. A 348-base-pair region in the latency-associated transcript facilitates herpes simplex virus type 1 reactivation. J Virol 70:2449–2459. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.4.2449-2459.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, Sanborn AL, Machol I, Omer AD, Lander ES, Aiden EL. 2014. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159:1665–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hansen AS, Cattoglio C, Darzacq X, Tjian R. 2018. Recent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures. Nucleus 9:20–32. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2017.1389365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wang DC, Wang W, Zhang L, Wang X. 2019. A tour of 3D genome with a focus on CTCF. Semin Cell Dev Biol 90:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tempera I, Klichinsky M, Lieberman PM. 2011. EBV latency types adopt alternative chromatin conformations. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002180. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Caruso LB, Maestri D, Tempera I. 2023. Three-dimensional chromatin structure of the EBV genome: a crucial factor in viral infection. Viruses 15:1088. doi: 10.3390/v15051088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Maestri D, Napoletani G, Kossenkov A, Preston-Alp S, Caruso LB, Tempera I. 2023. The three-dimensional structure of the EBV genome plays a crucial role in regulating viral gene expression in EBVaGC. Nucleic Acids Res 51:12092–12110. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Stedman W, Kang H, Lin S, Kissil JL, Bartolomei MS, Lieberman PM. 2008. Cohesins localize with CTCF at the KSHV latency control region and at cellular c-myc and H19/Igf2 insulators. EMBO J 27:654–666. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kang H, Wiedmer A, Yuan Y, Robertson E, Lieberman PM. 2011. Coordination of KSHV latent and lytic gene control by CTCF-cohesin mediated chromosome conformation. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002140. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kang H, Lieberman PM. 2009. Cell cycle control of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus latency transcription by CTCF-cohesin interactions. J Virol 83:6199–6210. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00052-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Haarhuis JHI, van der Weide RH, Blomen VA, Yáñez-Cuna JO, Amendola M, van Ruiten MS, Krijger PHL, Teunissen H, Medema RH, van Steensel B, Brummelkamp TR, de Wit E, Rowland BD. 2017. The cohesin release factor WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension. Cell 169:693–707. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kojic A, Cuadrado A, De Koninck M, Giménez-Llorente D, Rodríguez-Corsino M, Gómez-López G, Le Dily F, Marti-Renom MA, Losada A. 2018. Distinct roles of cohesin-SA1 and cohesin-SA2 in 3D chromosome organization. Nat Struct Mol Biol 25:496–504. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0070-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chung IM, Ketharnathan S, Kim SH, Thiruvengadam M, Rani MK, Rajakumar G. 2016. Making sense of the tangle: insights into chromatin folding and gene regulation. Genes (Basel) 7:71. doi: 10.3390/genes7100071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Singh P, Neumann DM. 2021. Cohesin subunit Rad21 binds to the HSV-1 genome near CTCF insulator sites during latency in vivo J Virol 95:e00364-21. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00364-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Groves IJ, Matthews SM, O’Connor CM. 2024. Host-encoded CTCF regulates human cytomegalovirus latency via chromatin looping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 121:e2315860121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315860121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mariani M, Zimmerman C, Rodriguez P, Hasenohr E, Aimola G, Gerrard DL, Richman A, Dest A, Flamand L, Kaufer B, Frietze S. 2021. Higher-order chromatin structures of chromosomally integrated HHV-6A predict integration sites. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:612656. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.612656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Brouwer RWW, van den Hout MCGN, van IJcken WFJ, Soler E, Stadhouders R. 2017. Unbiased interrogation of 3D genome topology using chromosome conformation capture coupled to high-throughput sequencing (4C-Seq). Methods Mol Biol 1507:199–220. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6518-2_15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kim KD, Lieberman PM. 2023. 4C analysis of EBV-host DNA interactome. Methods Mol Biol 2610:99–107. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2895-9_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Campos-León K, Ferguson J, Günther T, Wood CD, Wingett SW, Pekel S, Varghese CS, Jones LS, Stockton JD, Várnai C, West MJ, Beggs A, Grundhoff A, Noyvert B, Roberts S, Parish JL. 2025. Repression of CADM1 transcription by HPV type 18 is mediated by three-dimensional rearrangement of promoter-enhancer interactions. PLoS Pathog 21:e1012506. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Washington SD, Singh P, Johns RN, Edwards TG, Mariani M, Frietze S, Bloom DC, Neumann DM. 2019. The CCCTC binding factor, CTRL2, modulates heterochromatin deposition and the establishment of herpes simplex virus 1 latency in vivo J Virol 93:e00415-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00415-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Singh P, Zhu L, Shipley MA, Ye ZA, Neumann DM. 2024. The HSV-1 encoded CCCTC-binding factor, CTRL2, impacts the nature of viral chromatin during HSV-1 lytic infection. PLoS Pathog 20:e1012621. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Grams TR, Edwards TG, Bloom DC. 2020. Herpes simplex virus 1 strains 17syn+ and KOS(M) differ greatly in their ability to reactivate from human neurons in vitro. J Virol 94. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00796-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Edwards TG, Bloom DC. 2019. Lund human mesencephalic (LUHMES) neuronal cell line supports herpes simplex virus 1 latency in vitro J Virol 93:e02210-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02210-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Djakovic L, Hennig T, Reinisch K, Milić A, Whisnant AW, Wolf K, Weiß E, Haas T, Grothey A, Jürges CS, Kluge M, Wolf E, Erhard F, Friedel CC, Dölken L. 2023. The HSV-1 ICP22 protein selectively impairs histone repositioning upon Pol II transcription downstream of genes. Nat Commun 14:4591. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40217-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Schwartzman O, Mukamel Z, Oded-Elkayam N, Olivares-Chauvet P, Lubling Y, Landan G, Izraeli S, Tanay A. 2016. UMI-4C for quantitative and targeted chromosomal contact profiling. Nat Methods 13:685–691. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Canova PN, Charron AJ, Leib DA. 2024. Models of herpes simplex virus latency. Viruses 16:747. doi: 10.3390/v16050747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Kobayashi M, Kim JY, Camarena V, Roehm PC, Chao MV, Wilson AC, Mohr I. 2012. A primary neuron culture system for the study of herpes simplex virus latency and reactivation. J Vis Exp 62:3823. doi: 10.3791/3823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Lauter G, Coschiera A, Yoshihara M, Sugiaman-Trapman D, Ezer S, Sethurathinam S, Katayama S, Kere J, Swoboda P. 2020. Differentiation of ciliated human midbrain-derived LUHMES neurons. J Cell Sci 133:jcs249789. doi: 10.1242/jcs.249789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Schildknecht S, Karreman C, Pöltl D, Efrémova L, Kullmann C, Gutbier S, Krug A, Scholz D, Gerding HR, Leist M. 2013. Generation of genetically-modified human differentiated cells for toxicological tests and the study of neurodegenerative diseases. ALTEX 30:427–444. doi: 10.14573/altex.2013.4.427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Barrozo ER, Nakayama S, Singh P, Neumann DM, Bloom DC. 2021. Herpes simplex virus 1 microRNA miR-H8 is dispensable for latency and reactivation in vivo. J Virol 95. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02179-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. DuRaine G, Johnson DC. 2021. Anterograde transport of α-herpesviruses in neuronal axons. Virology (Auckl) 559:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2021.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. DuRaine G, Wisner TW, Johnson DC. 2020. Characterization of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) tegument proteins that bind to gE/gI and US9, which promote assembly of HSV and transport into neuronal axons. J Virol 94:e01113-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01113-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. DuRaine G, Wisner TW, Howard P, Williams M, Johnson DC. 2017. Herpes simplex virus gE/gI and US9 promote both envelopment and sorting of virus particles in the cytoplasm of neurons, two processes that precede anterograde transport in axons. J Virol 91:e00050-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00050-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Sawtell NM, Thompson RL. 2016. De novo herpes simplex virus VP16 expression gates a dynamic programmatic transition and sets the latent/lytic balance during acute infection in trigeminal ganglia. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005877. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Watson ZL, Ertel MK, Lewin AS, Tuli SS, Schultz GS, Neumann DM, Bloom DC. 2016. Adeno-associated virus vectors efficiently transduce mouse and rabbit sensory neurons coinfected with herpes simplex virus 1 following peripheral inoculation. J Virol 90:7894–7901. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01028-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Amrani N, Luk K, Singh P, Shipley M, Isik M, Donadoni M, Bellizzi A, Khalili K, Sariyer IK, Neumann D, Gordon J, Ruan GX. 2024. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing delivered by a single AAV9 vector inhibits HSV-1 reactivation in a latent rabbit keratitis model. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 32:101303. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Pentland I, Campos-León K, Cotic M, Davies KJ, Wood CD, Groves IJ, Burley M, Coleman N, Stockton JD, Noyvert B, Beggs AD, West MJ, Roberts S, Parish JL. 2018. Disruption of CTCF-YY1-dependent looping of the human papillomavirus genome activates differentiation-induced viral oncogene transcription. PLoS Biol 16:e2005752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Beagan JA, Duong MT, Titus KR, Zhou L, Cao Z, Ma J, Lachanski CV, Gillis DR, Phillips-Cremins JE. 2017. YY1 and CTCF orchestrate a 3D chromatin looping switch during early neural lineage commitment. Genome Res 27:1139–1152. doi: 10.1101/gr.215160.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Weintraub AS, Li CH, Zamudio AV, Sigova AA, Hannett NM, Day DS, Abraham BJ, Cohen MA, Nabet B, Buckley DL, Guo YE, Hnisz D, Jaenisch R, Bradner JE, Gray NS, Young RA. 2017. YY1 Is a Structural Regulator of Enhancer-Promoter Loops. Cell 171:1573–1588. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Washington SD, Edenfield SI, Lieux C, Watson ZL, Taasan SM, Dhummakupt A, Bloom DC, Neumann DM. 2018. Depletion of the insulator protein CTCF results in HSV-1 reactivation in vivo. J Virol. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00173-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Geeven G, Teunissen H, de Laat W, de Wit E. 2018. peakC: a flexible, non-parametric peak calling package for 4C and Capture-C data. Nucleic Acids Res 46:e91. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Ramos-Rodríguez M, Subirana-Granés M, Pasquali L. 2021. UMI4Cats: an R package to analyze chromatin contact profiles obtained by UMI-4C. Bioinformatics 37:4240–4242. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Kramer NE, Davis ES, Wenger CD, Deoudes EM, Parker SM, Love MI, Phanstiel DH. 2022. Plotgardener: cultivating precise multi-panel figures in R. Bioinformatics 38:2042–2045. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. mbio.01638-25-s0001.pdf.

Validation of HSV-1-specific viewpoints for 4C-seq.

mbio.01638-25-s0001.pdf (964.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF1
Figure S2A. mbio.01638-25-s0002.pdf.

Paired-end sequencing of multiplexed UMI-4C amplicons.

mbio.01638-25-s0002.pdf (601.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF2
Figure S2B. mbio.01638-25-s0003.pdf.

UMI-normalized interaction frequency profiles.

mbio.01638-25-s0003.pdf (784.1KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF3
Figure S2C. mbio.01638-25-s0004.pdf.

Differential chromatin interaction arcs.

mbio.01638-25-s0004.pdf (706.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF4
Legends. mbio.01638-25-s0005.docx.

Supplemental figure legends.

mbio.01638-25-s0005.docx (17.2KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF5
Table S1. mbio.01638-25-s0006.docx.

4C-seq peaks coordinates.

mbio.01638-25-s0006.docx (19.7KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF6
Table S2. mbio.01638-25-s0007.docx.

Primer sequences.

mbio.01638-25-s0007.docx (15.2KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF7
Table S3. mbio.01638-25-s0008.docx.

UMI-4C peak coordinates.

mbio.01638-25-s0008.docx (33.9KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01638-25.SuF8

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES