Table 3.
Antibody−conjugated nanospheres for brain cancer treatment
| Type of polymer used | Antibody conjugated + target receptor | Encapsulated Compound | Size | Surface charge | Outcomes (in vitro) | Outcomes (in vivo) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMLA and PEG | Transferrin (TfR) antibody targeting transferrin receptor on brain cancer cells and vascular endothelium | TMZ (TMZ) | 6.5 nm to 14.8 nm | -6.3 mV to -17.7 mV | -Lower potency on U87MG cells with nanoconjugates than with free TMZ |
-Increase in the half-life of conjugated TMZ (about 3–4 times) compared with free TMZ -In U87MG cells (TfR-expressing), free TMZ was more potent than nanoconjugate. The most potent nanoconjugate was P/PEG(2%)/LLL(40%)/TMZH(17%)/HuTfR mAb. -In MDA-M8-468 cells, nanoconjugates were more effective at reducing cancer cell viability than free TMZ |
[210] |
| PLA | Cetuximab inhibiting the PI3K pathway | Alpelisib and,1’-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiR) dye | 100 nm | - |
-Reduction in cell viability (73.8%) for antibody-conjugated nanoparticles compared with non-targeted nanoparticles (70.6%) when tested in SCC cell lines at 6 h -Improved cellular uptake by Cal33 cells with cetuximab-conjugated nanoparticle (more than 85% of cells after 6 h) than non-targeted nanoparticles, based on fluorescence studies |
-Improved tumor targeting with antibody-conjugated nanoparticles than without | [211] |
| Chitosan grafted with PEG | Transferrin (TfR) (CD71) antibody conjugation targeting transferrin receptors on brain cancer cells | Dil fluorescent dye | 284.1 nm | + 34.4. mV |
-Higher cytotoxicity in hCMEC/D3 cells with TfRmAB-conjugated nanoparticles (77.3% cell viability) than with non-targeted nanoparticles (92%) after 24 h incubation -Higher cellular uptake in hCMEC/D3 cells than non-targeted nanoparticle -Internalization of TfRmAb-conjugated nanoparticles inhibited by both amiloride and chlorpromazine (inhibition of macropinocytosis and transcytosis) |
[212] | |
| PLGA | Anti-EGFRvIII MAb targeting EGFR receptors on glioblastoma cell line (DKMG/EGFRvIII cells) | Curcumin | 249 nm to 280 nm | -13.1 mV to -1.4 mV |
-Cytotoxicity for nanoconjugates is dose-dependent -More significant cytotoxicity towards DKMG/EGFRvIII glioma cells with MAb-CUR-PLGA NPs compared with non-targeted nanoparticles (at 40 and 60 µM) -Higher internalization in DK-MGlow cells of MAb-CUR-PLGA NPs than non-targeted nanoparticles -No cytotoxicity effects seen in DKMG/EGFRvIII cells with CUR-PLGA NPs and MAb-CUR-PLGA NPs without irradiation |
[213] | |
| Poly (butyl cyanoacrylate) (PBCA) with PEGylation | Anti-endothelial growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies targeting EGFR expressed in glioblastoma cells | Carboplatin | 365 nm | -10.7 mV | -Higher stability of drug when encapsulated in antibody-conjugated nanoparticle |
-Higher survival times (23.5 days) in rats that were administered antibody-conjugated nanoparticles -Lower cytotoxicity to other tissues for antibody-conjugated nanoparticle than free carboplatin (40% higher) |
[214] |
| PMLA | Anti-mouse transferrin receptor antibody and anti-nucleosome antibody 2C5 targeting receptors on U87MG glioma cels | Polycefin variant | 20 nm to 30 nm | - |
-Higher cytotoxicity with antibody-conjugation than without -Highest U87MG cellular uptake of 2C5-conjugated nanoparticle after 1 h. No internalization without 2C5 antibody. |
-Higher drug accumulation in cultured human glioma cells and tumors in nude mice with induced glioblastoma with dual-targeted nanoparticle compared with nanoparticles only conjugated with anti-TfR or 2C5 antibody | [174] |
| Chitosan-PLGA | Cetaxizumab (CTX) antibody targeting different glioma cell lines (U251 and SW1088) | alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHC) | 213 to 875 nm | + 33.2to + 58.9 mV |
-Insignificant cell viability reduction when CHC is encapsulated in LGA/OCS NP, compared with PLGA/TMC NP -Higher cytotoxicity towards U251 and SW1088 glioma cells with antibody-conjugated nanoparticles compared to control (about 5% cell viability) -Enhanced antiangiogenic activity of conjugated nanoparticles compared to those without |
[215] | |
| PLGA-PEG | Anti-EGFRvIII MAb targeting EGFR receptors on glioblastoma cell line (U87MG vIII cells) | DOX | 196.5 nm | -5.05 mV |
-Higher cellular uptake was shown by MAb-DXR-PLGA NP -Enhanced sustained drug release at pH 7.4 by MAb-DXR-PLGA nanoparticles compared to without -Higher cytotoxicity towards U87MG vIII cell line shown by MAb-DXR-PLGA NP compared with unconjugated nanoparticle antibody conjugation |
[216] | |
| PMLA | Anti-TfR mAb targeting Transferrin receptors on glioma cells (T98G and RG62 cells) | Antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) | 2 nm | -5.2 mV |
-Different nanoparticle composition affects membrane-disruptive ability (P/LLL was pH independent while P/LOEt nanoparticle was pH-independent) -Higher cytotoxicity with P/LOEt nanoconjugates at 0.15 mg/mL but higher concentrations (0.5 mg/mL) caused cell shrinkage. This was not seen with P/LLL nanoconjugates |
-Higher tumor growth inhibition with LLL-nanoconjugate (about 2 times) than LOEt-nanoconjugate -No anti-tumor effect with nanoconjugates without AONs or anti-TfR mAbs -Reduction in brain vessel area with LOEt/AON/Hu/Ms and P/LLL/AON/Hu/Ms than in control group |
[180] |
| PLGA | Anti-OX40 mAb to enhance cytotoxic T-cell (CD4 and CD8) response against glioma cells | Anti-OX40 mAb | 86 nm | -12.8 mV |
-Higher sustained release of anti-OX40 mAb compared to control -Increased cytotoxic activity of cytotoxic T-cells with anti-OX40-PLGA-NP -Higher CTL proliferation with anti-OX40-PLGA-NP compared with anti-OX40 mAb and untargeted nanoparticle -No significant difference in T-cell proliferation between anti-OX40-PLGA-NP and immobilized anti-OX40 |
[217] |