Skip to main content
. 2025 Oct 8;15:35151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-19135-y

Table 2.

A univariate analysis of potential categories of CRF (n = 220).

Variables Total (n = 220) Physical balance –
Low fatigue (n = 43)
Physical prominent –
High fatigue (n = 22)
Physical imbalance -Moderate fatigue (n = 155) Statistic P
Gender, n (%) χ²=5.43 0.066
Male 174 (79.09) 38 (88.37) 14 (63.64) 122 (78.71)
Female 46 (20.91) 5 (11.63) 8 (36.36) 33 (21.29)
Age (years), n (%) χ²=3.86 0.426
≤ 50 64 (29.09) 17 (39.53) 4 (18.18) 43 (27.74)
51–64 117 (53.18) 19 (44.19) 13 (59.09) 85 (54.84)
≥ 65 39 (17.73) 7 (16.28) 5 (22.73) 27 (17.42)
Marital status, n (%) - 0.037
Married 200 (90.91) 35 (81.40) 22 (100.00) 143 (92.26)
Without spouse 20 (9.09) 8 (18.60) 0 (0.00) 12 (7.74)
Education level, n (%) χ²=2.23 0.328
≤Junior high school 148 (67.27) 26 (60.47) 13 (59.09) 109 (70.32)
≥ high school 72 (32.73) 17 (39.53) 9 (40.91) 46 (29.68)
Economic burden, n (%) χ²=15.96 0.003
Very serious 97 (44.09) 10 (23.26) 13 (59.09) 74 (47.74)
Heavier 66 (30.00) 13 (30.23) 7 (31.82) 46 (29.68)
Commonly 57 (25.91) 20 (46.51) 2 (9.09) 35 (22.58)
Cancer type, n (%) χ²=1.44 0.486
Primary 167 (75.91) 35 (81.40) 15 (68.18) 117 (75.48)
Metastatic 53 (24.09) 8 (18.60) 7 (31.82) 38 (24.52)
Child–Pugh, n (%) χ²=16.97 < 0.001
Child-A 162 (73.64) 38 (88.37) 9 (40.91) 115 (74.19)
Child-B/C 58 (26.36) 5 (11.63) 13 (59.09) 40 (25.81)
Time from diagnosis(years), n (%) - 0.757
< 1 142 (64.55) 30 (69.77) 12 (54.55) 100 (64.52)
1–2 44 (20.00) 8 (18.60) 4 (18.18) 32 (20.65)
2–3 16 (7.27) 2 (4.65) 3 (13.64) 11 (7.10)
> 3 18 (8.18) 3 (6.98) 3 (13.64) 12 (7.74)
Cancer staging (BCLC), n (%) - 0.012
Missing 3 (2.3) 2 (4.65) 0 (0.00) 1 (0.65)
B 57 (25.9) 18 (41.86) 3 (13.64) 36 (23.53)
C 158 (71.8) 23 (53.49) 19 (86.36) 116 (75.82)
Anemia (HB, g/L), n (%) - 0.057
No(≥ 120) 181 (82.34) 39 (90.70) 13 (61.90) 129 (83.23)
Mild (90–119) 28 (12.79) 2 (4.65) 7 (33.33) 19 (12.26)
Moderate (60–89) 9 (4.11) 2 (4.65) 1 (4.76) 6 (3.87)
Heavy (< 60) 1 (0.46) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 1 (0.65)
Treatment, n (%) χ²=11.38 0.077
Untreated 52 (23.64) 16 (37.21) 5 (22.73) 31 (20.00)
Interventional therapy 51 (23.18) 12 (27.91) 5 (22.73) 34 (21.94)
Targeted/immune therapy 20 (9.09) 2 (4.65) 0 (0.00) 18 (11.61)
Interventional + targeted/immunotherapy 97 (44.09) 13 (30.23) 12 (54.55) 72 (46.45)
Comorbidities, n (%) χ²=2.99 0.225
No 133 (60.45) 30 (69.77) 15 (68.18) 88 (56.77)
Yes 87 (39.55) 13 (30.23) 7 (31.82) 67 (43.23)
Pain, n (%) - 0.002
0 138 (62.73) 36 (83.72) 11 (50.00) 91 (58.71)
1–2 60 (27.27) 5 (11.63) 5 (22.73) 50 (32.26)
≥3 22 (10.00) 2 (4.65) 6 (27.27) 14 (9.03)
Social support, M (Q₁, Q₃) 2.00 (1.00, 5.00) 3.00 (1.00,7.00) 1.50 (0.00,3.50) 2.00 (1.00,4.00) χ²=5.44# 0.066
PA–Index, M (Q₁, Q₃) 9.00 (0.00, 15.00) 15.00 (9.00,21.00) 0.00 (0.00,2.25) 9.00 (1.50,15.00) χ²=29.09# < 0.001
HHI, M (Q₁, Q₃) 34.00 (31.00, 36.00) 37.00 (34.00,41.00) 26.50 (24.25,30.00) 34.00 (32.00,36.00) χ²=42.52# < 0.001
GSES, M (Q₁, Q₃) 30.00 (23.00, 31.25) 31.00 (29.00,38.00) 23.50 (20.25,30.00) 29.00 (23.00,30.00) χ²=24.72# < 0.001
ISI, M (Q₁, Q₃) 11.00 (7.00, 16.00) 6.00 (3.00,8.00) 17.00 (10.50,20.75) 13.00 (7.00,16.00) χ²=34.39# < 0.001
BMI, M (Q₁, Q₃) 22.48 (20.55, 24.80) 24.44 (22.36,25.45) 20.88 (19.25,22.48) 22.22 (20.60,24.61) χ²=21.38# < 0.001
PNI, M (Q₁, Q₃) 45.25 (39.68, 49.95) 42.20 (32.50,48.25) 45.17 (42.14,49.29) 46.10 (40.53,50.12) χ²=7.10# 0.029

#: Kruskal-waills H test, χ²: Chi-square test, -: Fisher exact M: Median, Q₁: 1 st Quartile, Q₃: 3 st Quartile.

Without spouse, Unmarried/divorced/widowed.

Comorbidities, Include high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, respiratory diseases.

Child-Pugh, Grading criteria for the quantitative evaluation of liver reserve function in patients with liver cancer are commonly used in clinics. Grades A, B, and C indicated liver damage of varying severity (the higher the score, the worse the liver reserve function).

BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, a clinical staging system for liver cancer. A (early), B (middle), and C (late). CRF, Cancer-related fatigue; HHI, Herth Hope Index; ISI, The Insomnia Severity Index; GSES, General self-efficacy; BMI, Body-mass index(kg/m2); ref., reference group; PNI, Prognostic Nutrition Index = serum albumin (g/L) + 5× lymphocyte count (×109/L).