Table 3.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis of profiles categories of CRF level in different groups.
| Variables | B | S. E | Wald | P | OR | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 VS C2 | ||||||
| PA–Index | − 0.072 | 0.034 | 4.453 | 0.035 | 0.930 | 0.870-0.995 |
| HHI | − 0.435 | 0.081 | 29.040 | 0.000 | 0.647 | 0.552-0.758 |
| GSES | − 0.134 | 0.050 | 7.175 | 0.007 | 0.874 | 0.793-0.965 |
| ISI | 0.261 | 0.045 | 33.104 | 0.000 | 1.299 | 1.188–1.419 |
| BMI | − 0.224 | 0.093 | 5.811 | 0.016 | 0.799 | 0.666-0.959 |
| Child–Pugh | ||||||
| Child-B/C | ||||||
| Child-A | −1.763 | 0.643 | 7.521 | 0.006 | 0.172 | 0.049-0.605 |
| C1 VS C3 | ||||||
| PA–Index | − 0.085 | 0.019 | 20.278 | 0.000 | 0.918 | 0.885-0.953 |
| ISI | 0.192 | 0.033 | 34.516 | 0.000 | 1.212 | 1.136–1.292 |
| Child–Pugh | ||||||
| Child-B/C | ||||||
| Child-A | −1.171 | 0.488 | 5.749 | 0.017 | 0.310 | 0.119-0.808 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Without spouse | ||||||
| Married | 1.643 | 0.556 | 8.733 | 0.003 | 5.171 | 1.739–15.377 |
| Economic burden | ||||||
| Commonly | ||||||
| Heavier | 0.079 | 0.389 | 0.042 | 0.838 | 1.083 | 0.505-2.322 |
| Very serious | 0.944 | 0.385 | 6.019 | 0.014 | 2.570 | 1.209–5.463 |
C1 = Physical balance - Low fatigue, C2 = Physical prominent -High fatigue, C3 = Physical imbalance - Low fatigue.
C1 was the reference group.
Child-Pugh, Grading criteria for the quantitative evaluation of liver reserve function in patients with liver cancer are commonly used in clinics. Grades A, B, and C indicated liver damage of varying severity (the higher the score, the worse the liver reserve function).
CRF, Cancer-related fatigue; HHI, Herth Hope Index; ISI, The Insomnia Severity Index; GSES, General self-efficacy; BMI, Body-mass index(kg/m2); ref., reference group; PNI, Prognostic Nutrition Index = serum albumin (g/L) + 5× lymphocyte count (×109/L).