Skip to main content
Acta Medica Philippina logoLink to Acta Medica Philippina
editorial
. 2025 Jun 30;59(8):5–6. doi: 10.47895/amp.v59i8.13533

Genetic Counseling Facilitates Family Communication of Genetic Risks

Maria Melanie Liberty B Alcausin 1
PMCID: PMC12508906  PMID: 41080523

Genetic testing is becoming increasingly utilized as part of clinical practice guideline recommendations, especially in the fields of oncology and cardiology. Its critical role in diagnostic confirmation, risk stratification, refinement of prognosis, individualized patient management, selection of targeted therapeutics, even identification of asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic at-risk relatives, and reproductive planning is now more widely recognized.1-3 Genetic counseling is needed when availing this procedure to help patients who will undergo genetic testing understand the coverage and limitations of the test and to navigate the implications of the test and its results (pretest and posttest genetic counseling).

Genetic counseling is the process of helping people understand and adapt through the medical, psychological, and familial implications of genetic contributions to disease. It integrates 1) interpretation of the family and medical histories to assess the chance of disease occurrence and recurrence; 2) education about inheritance testing, management, prevention, resources, and research; 3) counseling to promote informed choices and adaptation to the risk or condition.4 An important part of genetic counseling is identifying other family members at risk for the condition being investigated which is achieved through detailed family history and accurate pedigree construction. In a scenario where an informative genetic result or a pathogenic variant is identified, aside from directing the management of the patient who underwent the test, impact on other family members needs to be discussed.5

An informative genetic result enables asymptomatic family members to make proactive decisions regarding their own risks – to undergo testing themselves (cascade testing), to access available screening and preventive interventions, to make informed reproductive decisions and other life planning choices.6,7 While the decision to whom and when the sharing of test results is usually left to the patient to preserve confidentiality, autonomy and respect privacy, the health practitioner has the responsibility to provide support to the patient to effectively communicate genetic risks to other family members.

The first step to support communication of genetic risks with family members is through genetic education. Genetic education helps a patient have a clear understanding that aside from the impact of the information at a personal level, a genetic diagnosis may increase the risks of other family members. This knowledge influences willingness to share the results to those at risk for the same condition. The desire to ensure family members are informed increases even more when there is clear evidence of medically beneficial interventions.8.9 Aside from helping the patient arrive at the decision of sharing the genetic information to other family members, understanding the implications of the inherited genetic condition equips patients to effectively communicate this information to them.10

Communicating genetic information to other family members is a complex process and health practitioners need to assist in identifying and managing factors that can influence the effectiveness of the communication process, including family dynamics and sociocultural factors.11 Family communication handouts or “family letters” can provide understandable information about the condition and details on how and where to access genetic services.12 Health practitioner-facilitated family meetings may also be helpful.10

Genetic literacy is the ability to understand and use genetic information for health-related decision-making.13,14 It has been shown to be higher among participants who had genetic counselling compared to those who did not, but knowledge gaps and misconceptions persist.15 To increase genetic literacy, easier access to genetic information among at-risk individuals and easier access to healthcare professionals equipped to help them understand complex genetic information are imperative.

The growing utilization of genetic testing demands concomitant increase in the number of health practitioners equipped to support families navigate genetic information. Although tempered by financial limitations and inadequacy of infrastructure, the increasing trend in utilization worldwide is similarly seen in the Philippines.16 The demand for provision of genetic counseling services, however, is currently not met with only 19 clinical geneticists and 10 genetic counselors serving a population of over 117 million.17 In addition, only one institution is offering formal training programs for both clinical genetics and genetic counseling, limiting the number of health practitioners in these fields. Well-planned and well-orchestrated efforts by public and private sectors, academe and government, are critical to bridge this wide gap between demand and service provision.

Maria Melanie Liberty B. Alcausin, MD
Director, Institute of Human Genetics
National Institutes of Health
University of the Philippines Manila

REFERENCES

  • 1.Makhnoon S, Yu R, Cunningham SA, Peterson SK, Shete S. Factors Influencing Discussion of Cancer Genetic Testing with Health-Care Providers in a Population-Based Survey. Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(3-4):160-170. doi: 10.1159/000515465. Epub 2021 Apr 22. PMID: 33887738; PMCID: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Longoni M, Bhasin K, Ward A, Lee D, Nisson M, Bhatt S, et al. (2023). Real-world utilization of guideline-directed genetic testing in inherited cardiovascular diseases. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10:1272433. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1272433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burns C, James C, Ingles J. Communication of genetic information to families with inherited rhythm disorders. Heart Rhythm. 2018. May;15(5):780-786. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Nov 23. PMID: 29175646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Resta R, Biesecker BB, Bennett RL, Blum S, Estabrooks Hahn S, Strecker MN, et al. (2006). A New Definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ Task Force Report. J Genet Counsel, 15: 77-83. 10.1007/s10897-005-9014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mendes A, Paneque M, Sequeiros J. Disclosure of genetic risk to family members: A qualitative study on healthcare professionals’ perceived roles and responsibilities, European Journal of Medical Genetics, Volume 68, 2024, 104931, ISSN . 10.1016/j.ejmg.2024.104931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Forrest LE, Delatycki MB, Skene L, Aitken M. Communicating genetic information in families - A review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007. Jun;15(6):612-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201822. PMID: 17392704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hodgson J, Spriggs M. A practical account of autonomy: why genetic counseling is especially well suited to the facilitation of informed autonomous decision making. J Genet Couns. 2005. Apr;14(2):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-4067-x. PMID: 15959640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hodgson J, Gaff C. Enhancing Family Communication About Genetics: Ethical and Professional Dilemmas. J Genet Counsel (2013) 22:16–21. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9514-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lenin C, Lim PXH, Nastar A, et al. Facilitators and Barriers to Uptake of Genetic and Cascade Testing in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Behav. Med. (2025). 10.1007/s12529-025-10357-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McAllister M, McLeod R, Metcalfe A. Chapter 9: Supporting family communication about genetic conditions. In: Leroy BS, Veach PM, Callanan MP, eds. Genetic Counseling Practice. 2nd ed John Wiley Blackwell; 2021:177-188. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abad PB. “Family communication of genetic risk: What is it and why does it matter?” Acta Med Philipp. 2025;59(8):7-15. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.van der Roest WP, Pennings JM, Bakker M, van den Berg MP, van Tintelen JP. 2009. Family letters are an effective way to inform relatives about inherited cardiac disease. Am J Med Genet Part A 149A: 357–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hurle B, Citrin T, Jenkins JF, Kaphingst KA, Lamb N, Roseman JE, et al. What does it mean to be genomically literate? National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report. Genet. Med. 2013, 15, 658–663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Boerwinkel DJ, Yarden A, Waarlo AJ. Reaching a Consensus on the Definition of Genetic Literacy that Is Required from a Twenty-First Century Citizen. Sci. Educ. 2017, 26, 1087–1114. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pedrazzani C, Ming C, Bürki N, Caiata-Zufferey M, Chappuis PO, Duquette D, et al. Genetic Literacy and Communication of Genetic Information in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Cross-Study Comparison in Two Countries and within a Timeframe of More Than 10 Years. Cancers (Basel). 2021. Dec 13;13(24):6254. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246254. PMID: 34944873; PMCID: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abad PJ, Tumulak MJ, Guerbo R, de Castro-Hamoy L, Bautista NG, Nuique R, et al. Landscape of genetic counseling in the Philippines. J Genet Couns. 2024. Oct;33(5):934-942. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1804. Epub 2023 Oct 25. PMID: 37877196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Padilla CD, Abadingo ME, Maceda EBG, Alcausin MMLB. Integrating genetic services in the Philippine public health delivery system: the value of networks. Genes 2024. Jun 13;15(6):780. doi: 10.3390/genes15060780. PMID: 38927716; PMCID: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Medica Philippina are provided here courtesy of University of the Philippines Manila

RESOURCES