Table 3. Responder analyses for primary analysis.
| Transition scales | re.flex group (3 months)a, n (%) |
Usual care group (3 months)a, n (%) |
OR (95% CI)b | P value | SRc | NNTd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overalle | 60 (61.2) | 22 (22.9) | 5.7 (2.9-11.0) | <.001 | 2.7 | 2.6 |
| Paine | 56 (57.1) | 26 (27.1) | 3.8 (2.0-7.2) | <.001 | 2.1 | 3.3 |
| Functione | 53 (54.1) | 24 (25) | 3.8 (2.0-7.1) | <.001 | 2.2 | 3.4 |
a
Only numbers for the category improved (somewhat better or much better).
b
OR: odds ratio.
c
SR: success ratio; quotient percentage of success in the re.flex group divided by percentage in the usual care group (“relative risk”).
d
NNT: Number needed to treat.
e
Subjective change in health status along the study period overall, for pain and walking (reflecting function) compared to 3 months ago was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale with options “much better,” “somewhat better,” “unchanged,” “somewhat worse,” “much worse”. Response scales were dichotomized into improved (somewhat better or much better) and not improved (unchanged, somewhat worse, or much worse).