Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2025 Oct 10;11(41):eadz1406. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adz1406

Unlocking nucleophilic reactivity in Co-MHAT catalysis: Stereospecific backside-backside displacement by anion-activated organocobalt

Bang-Sen Zhao 1, Yun-Nian Yin 1, Rong Zhu 1,*
PMCID: PMC12513460  PMID: 41071896

Abstract

The recent renaissance of olefin hydrofunctionalization based on cobalt-catalyzed hydrogen atom transfer (Co-MHAT) has primarily focused on two pathways: the homolytic cleavage of the alkyl–CoIII intermediate and its electrophilic reaction upon oxidation. In contrast, a third pathway, which leverages the two-electron nucleophilic potential of alkyl–CoIII, has remained unexplored because of the inherently low polarization of the C–Co bond. Here, we report an axial-coordination activation strategy to unlock this reactivity space in Co-MHAT catalysis. Through stoichiometric organometallic studies using well-defined alkyl–CoIII complexes, we demonstrate that an alkoxide ligand can render alkyl–CoIII sufficiently nucleophilic to displace a suitable leaving group, via a stereospecific backside-backside approach. This pathway is further applied in catalysis, enabling a diastereoselective redox neutral Co-MHAT cyclopropanation reaction.


Anion-activation unlocks reactivity and stereochemistry in MHAT.

INTRODUCTION

Metal hydride hydrogen atom transfer (MHAT) has emerged as a powerful tool for olefin hydrofunctionalization in modern organic synthesis (1). The cobalt salen-type frameworks (salen, salicylaldehyde-ethylenediamine–derived planar tetradentate ligands) are among the most widely used catalysts, partly owing to their ability to form well-defined and versatile alkyl–CoIII intermediates by MHAT (Co-MHAT; Fig. 1A) (25). Early investigations in this field primarily leveraged the homolytic cleavage of the labile alkyl–CoIII bond (type A) (618). Notably, alkyl group transfer to Ni or Cr enables reaction with an electrophile, as demonstrated by Shenvi (1921). Over the past decade, an alternative oxidative functionalization pathway has been identified involving [alkyl–CoIV]+ intermediates as carbocation surrogates (type B) (2233). In contrast to these well-established reactivities, the two-electron nucleophilic potential of alkyl–CoIII, i.e., directly displacing an alkyl halide, remains unexplored in Co-MHAT catalysis (type C).

Fig. 1. Exploring reactivity space in CoSalen-catalyzed MHAT reactions.

Fig. 1.

(A) Three possible functionalization pathways of the key organocobalt intermediate; (B) typical catalytic cyclopropanation using homoallylic/allylic electrophiles; (C) hypothesized redox neutral Co-MHAT cyclopropanation via intramolecular type C trapping, which could be enabled by axial coordination of a basic anion; and (D) this work, a demonstration of type C reactivity in Co-MHAT reactions, from stoichiometric organometallic studies to catalysis.

In search for this reactivity, we specifically targeted cyclopropanation reactions (3439). Cyclopropanes are prevalent in bioactive molecules and a privileged bioisostere motif in medicinal chemistry (40). A simplest approach for cyclopropanation involves cyclizations. For instance, anionic radical-polar crossover (4146) and metal-catalyzed alkylation chemistry (37, 47, 48) allow for mild and catalytic cyclopropanation from homoallylic and allylic electrophiles, respectively (Fig. 1B). However, anion-stabilizing substitutions, such as aryl, carbonyl, and trifluoromethyl groups on the olefin moiety, are usually necessary.

In this context, we envisioned that a redox-neutral type C Co-MHAT hydroalkylation could offer an alternative, enabling cyclopropanation of unactivated alkenes (Fig. 1C). A major challenge in this proposal lies in the minimal polarization of the C–CoIII bond, which reflects the intermediate’s innate reluctance to undergo polar reactions. For instance, alkylcobaloximes resist acid cleavage unless facilitated by a β-hydroxy group (4951). To address this, we took a strategy based on the trans influence (52, 53). We hypothesized that axial binding of a basic anion could enhance the nucleophilicity of the alkyl in the opposite position, thereby promoting the desired transformation. On the other hand, a potential complication could arise from base-mediated deprotonation of the putative cobalt hydride, which might disrupt the MHAT process (54, 55).

Here, we report the successful implementation of this design, first in stoichiometric experiments with well-defined cobalt complexes and then catalytic reactions (Fig. 1D). A Co-catalyzed redox-neutral MHAT hydroalkylation of unactivated homoallylic electrophiles is developed. Experimental evidence is found for the anion-enabled type C ring closure, more specifically, a stereospecific backside-backside coupling between the alkyl–CoIII and the alkyl electrophile. Good diastereoselectivity by 1,2-induction favoring the trans-1,2–disubstituted cyclopropanes is observed [diastereomeric ratio (d.r.) up to 17.2:1], whereas the stereoselectivity decreases for 1,3-induction. This work establishes a viable strategy to effect type C trapping in Co-MHAT catalysis, opening reactivity space with broad potential for synthetic method development.

RESULTS

Stoichiometric studies

We began our investigation by density function theory (DFT) analysis of organocobalt complex 1 bearing different axial ligands L (Fig. 2A). While natural population analysis (56) suggests that the CoIII–C bond in the parent complex is nearly nonpolar (−0.037 at Me), a buildup of negative charge becomes evident upon introduction of an increasingly basic ligand (−0.20 at Me for [1–OMe]). This effect is further corroborated by the energy decomposition analysis with the combination of natural orbital for chemical valence (57, 58) analysis of complex [1–OMe], which clearly depicts the electron flow from the methoxide to the methyl via the Co d(z2) orbital, supporting our hypothesis of enhanced alkyl nucleophilicity.

Fig. 2. Stoichiometric studies.

Fig. 2.

(A) DFT calculation reveals increasing nucleophilicity at the Me in complex 1 with a more basic anionic axial ligand L. Major natural orbital for chemical valence (NOCV) pair in the energy decomposition analysis–NOCV analysis of [1-OMe] describes the interaction between 1 and OMe. Charge flows from red to blue. The contour value is |Δρ| = 0.003 atomic unit (a.u.) DFT calculations computed at the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/6-311+G(d,p)//B3LYP-D3(BJ)/6-31+G(d), polarizable continuum model (PCM)(EtOH) level. (B) Synthesis of well-defined 2° alkyl–CoIII intermediates; (C) cyclic voltammetry in THF/MeOH with 0.10 M TBAPF6 at a scan rate of 0.1 V/s. To a solution of 2a (black line) was added 1.0 equiv Cs2CO3 (blue dots) and subsequently neutralized by adding 2.0 equiv acetic acid (red dash); (D) left: x-ray structure of anti-2b shown with 50% thermal ellipsoids; right: 2b undergoes stereospecific displacement in the presence of methoxide; DBU, 1,8-diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-ene.

Encouraged by the computational results, we set out to experimentally validate this trend using well-defined organocobalt complexes. Treatment of [Co-1]OTs with allylbenzene and phenylsilane in MeOH at room temperature afforded complex 2a in 51% yield (Fig. 2B). Cyclic voltammetry of 2a in tetrahydrofuran (THF)/MeOH revealed a reversible redox event at E1/2 ~ −0.25 V versus Fc+/Fc (Fig. 2C). Notably, addition of carbonate-induced irreversibility along with a cathodic shift, while subsequent neutralization essentially restored the original trace. Control experiments in anhydrous THF showed negligible potential changes, suggesting that the formation of a more electron-rich cobalt species requires both a carbonate base and a protic solvent (fig. S4) (59).

We then followed the same protocol and prepared complex 2b containing a γ-leaving group (Fig. 2B). 2b was isolated as a mixture of diastereomers (d.r. = 9.8:1), with the major isomer (anti-2b) unambiguously assigned by x-ray crystallography (Fig. 2D). 2b was found stable over more than a week at ambient temperature in MeOH. In contrast, addition of sodium carbonate powder triggered rapid cyclization within a few minutes, producing cyclopropane 4a (d.r. = 9.3:1) with an apparent stereochemical inversion at the nucleophilic carbon bound to CoIII. In THF, the same reaction occurred in the presence of sodium methoxide but not carbonate, implying methoxide’s pivotal role in activating the system. Further base screening in THF showed that only strong anionic bases yielded 4a, with methoxide being the most efficient. Collectively, our stoichiometric studies using well-defined organocobalt complexes suggest the possibility that a new CoIII–alkyl species could arise from methoxide coordination, presumably [2b–OMe], where the alkyl becomes a good nucleophile so that displacement of a suitable leaving group takes place in a stereospecific manner.

Catalytic reaction development

On the basis of the stoichiometric experiments, we proceeded to investigate the catalytic cyclopropanation reaction (Fig. 3). In a model reaction, homoallylic tosylate 3a was treated with a catalytic amount of [Co-1]OTs in EtOH at room temperature, in the presence of Ph2SiH2 and Na2CO3 (entry 1). The product 4a was obtained smoothly with a d.r. (12.2:1) that aligns with the results from the stoichiometric reactions. Control experiments confirmed the essential roles of the cobalt complex, silane, and base, respectively (entry 2). Performing the reaction open to air resulted in a substantially decreased yield due to competing Mukaiyama hydration (entry 3). Alternative Co complexes afforded lower yields, which could be attributable to the more dissociable C–CoIII bonds (entries 4 and 5) (60). A protic solvent was found necessary (entry 6).

Fig. 3. Catalytic reaction optimization.

Fig. 3.

0.10 mmol scale. Yield and d.r. were determined by analyzing the crude reaction mixture using gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. The major diastereomer (trans-) is shown. h, hours. r.t., room temperature.

A balanced solubility and basicity of the base was found critical (entries 7 to 9). For instance, using a less carbonate-solubilizing solvent (tBuOH, meanwhile affording a bulkier anion) or a weaker base (NaOAc) led in reduced yields, presumably due to insufficient axial-coordination activation. On the other hand, more soluble combinations involving either MeOH or Cs2CO3, although proved effective in stoichiometric reactions, completely suppressed the catalytic reaction. Similarly, an organic base, 1,8-diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-ene, was unsuitable. In these cases, little conversion was observed and no base-mediated elimination was detected. Instead, a substantial amount of the neutral complex Co-1 was spectroscopically detected (fig. S12). These results could be attributable to the deprotonation of the weakly acidic Co–H species to give Co(I) at high base concentrations (54, 55), which reduces Co(III) and leads to accumulation of inactive Co(II) species. Last, we introduced MgO and molecular sieves (MSs) to scavenge the potential acid byproduct, which substantially improved the yield (entry 10).

Reaction scope

With the optimized protocol in hand, we sought to investigate the scope and limitations of this cyclopropanation reaction (Fig. 4). We initially focused on 1,2-disubstituted cyclopropane synthesis. A variety of functional groups were found well tolerated (3a-h), for example. aryl halides and thioethers. The scope of the electrophiles was then studied. 1°/2° alkyl sulfonates and 2° benzyl chlorides were successfully used (3i-j, l-n), whereas 1° alkyl acetates and chlorides failed to cyclize (3 k/k′; other failed examples are shown in fig. S1). This leaving group preference well aligns with a polar SN2-like mechanism rather than SH2 (18). Cyclopropanation product can also be obtained from a homopropargylic tosylate, likely resulting from in situ terminal alkyne hydrogenation under the standard conditions (3m). As Co-MHAT is sterically sensitive, terminal alkenes can react selectively in the presence of an internal alkene (3o) (61). Regarding the stereoselectivity, 1,2-induction typically leads to high d.r. favoring the trans-diastereomers (3a-j), while 1,3-induction was found rather inefficient (3 l-o). In addition, monosubstituted cyclopropanes can be synthesized from internal olefins, albeit in low yields (3p-q). We note that a major competing reaction was the olefin hydrogenation, presumably via the protonation of the activated organocobalt with axial-anion coordination, which is difficult to eliminate at this stage as a protic solvent was found necessary (14).

Fig. 4. Evaluation of substrate scope.

Fig. 4.

Standard conditions: 3 (0.40 mmol), [Co-1]OTs (0.040 mmol), Na2CO3 (1.20 mmol), Ph2SiH2 (0.80 mmol), MgO (0.40 mmol), and 4-Å MS (100 mg) in 2.0 ml of EtOH at room temperature for 24 hours. Yields refer to isolated compounds. d.r. were determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture. n.d., not detected; n.a., not applicable.

Next, we turned to the synthesis of 1,2,3-trisubstituted cyclopropanes, whose stereochemistry can offer valuable mechanistic insight. Subjecting both syn- and anti-3r diastereomers to the standard conditions consistently afforded essentially a single diastereomer in each case. Analysis of nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) coupling constants reveals stereoinversion at the electrophilic carbon (C–OTs), reminiscent of a classic SN2-type process. Smaller allylic substituents in the substrate led to attenuated 1,2-induction and thus lower diastereoselectivity regarding the terminal methyl group (3s-u). Nonetheless, complete stereoinversion at the electrophilic site was consistently observed.

Mechanistic hypothesis

On the basis of the findings above, a plausible catalytic cycle is depicted (Fig. 5A). MHAT of a CoIII–H species to the homoallylic tosylate 3 followed by cage collapse generates an alkyl–CoIII complex 2, a process that is supported by both stoichiometric synthesis and deuterium-labeling study (Fig. 5B). Subsequently, this intermediate could be activated by axial coordination of an ethoxide anion to produce [2-OEt], where the CoIII–alkyl bond becomes highly nucleophilic. As a result, [2–OEt] undergoes type C cyclization to yield the cyclopropane product 4, releasing a CoIII–OEt complex, which reacts with the silane to regenerate the CoIII–H species. We reason that the judicious combination of EtOH and weakly soluble Na2CO3 produces a low yet steady concentration of ethoxide. This controlled release ensures that the ethoxide has higher chance to react with the more abundant species, specifically complex 2, rather than the transient CoIII–H species to disrupt MHAT.

Fig. 5. Working hypothesis and computational studies of the key cyclization step.

Fig. 5.

(A) A plausible catalytic cycle; (B) deuterium-labeling experiment and test of enantioselectivity using a chiral CoSalen catalyst; (C) DFT-calculated free energy profile of the cyclization step. [Co] = Co-1. (D) Intrinsic bond orbital (IBO) analysis of TS-4 showing the electron flow via the favored backside-backside orbital overlap. (E) Computed barriers for the formation of four- and five-membered rings. (F) Computed barriers for the cyclization of diastereomeric organocobalt complexes. At the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/6-311+G(d,p)//B3LYP-D3(BJ)/6-31+G(d), PCM(EtOH) level.

The stereospecificity of the key intramolecular displacement step is particular noteworthy. As mentioned above, experimental evidence suggests that this step proceeds with simultaneous stereoinversion at both the nucleophilic (CoIII–C) and the electrophilic (C–OTs) carbons. To shed light on the underlying mechanism, a model reaction was computationally evaluated (Fig. 5C). Axial ethoxide coordination of the alkyl–CoIII complex substantially reduces its activation barrier toward an SN2-type cyclization (Int-1 via TS-1/2 versus Int-2 via TS-3/4). The calculations demonstrated a pronounced preference (10.8 kcal/mol difference) for backside approaching of the electrophile relative to the CoIII–C bond (TS-4) over frontal attack (TS-3), providing quantitative support for the experimentally observed stereospecificity. As a visual illustration, the effective overlap between the backsides of the C–O σ* and CoIII–C σ orbitals in TS-4 can be clearly captured by intrinsic bond orbital analysis (Fig. 5D) (62). Although stereospecific backside displacement at CoIII–C σ bonds is uncommon in C–C coupling reactions, it finds analogy in SE2-type transmetallation processes between alkyl–CoIII complexes and HgII, TiIII, or PdII (6365). The anionic organocobalt is both sterically hindered and charge-delocalized, which, as concluded by Friedman (66, 67), would disfavor the formation of larger ring systems than cyclopropanes during intramolecular displacement. DFT calculations on reaction barriers support this trend (Fig. 5E). This likely accounts for our failed attempts of synthesizing four- and five-membered rings (fig. S1).

Given that the cyclization step is stereospecific, the product’s stereochemistry can either be controlled by MHAT or a Curtin-Hammett scenario during the final cyclization, depending on whether an effective equilibrium is established epimerizing the CoIII–C stereogenic center. We computationally evaluated the cyclization from epimers Int-5 and Int-6, respectively (Fig. 5F). The difference in transition state energies is consistent with the observed diastereoselectivity (ΔΔG = 1.7 kcal favoring the trans-isomer). Shigehisa suggested a radical chain process (SH2 at cobalt) accelerating the epimerization (68). However, we note that experimentally, the establishment of a Curtin-Hammett scenario may vary across different reactions. This corroborates with the observed low d.r. in the presence of dioxygen, which could inhibit such a radical chain (Fig. 3, entry 3). Last, we were able to obtain a low but detectable enantioselectivity (15% ee) by using a chiral cobalt complex in a preliminary attempt (Fig. 5B).

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, we disclose type C (nucleophilic) reactivity of the organocobalt intermediate in redox-neutral Co-MHAT catalysis. Key to this transformation is the anion activation strategy, which unlocks the nucleophilicity of the alkyl–CoIII complex without interfering with the MHAT process. As a demonstration, a diastereoselective cyclopropanation of homoallylic electrophiles is developed. Stoichiometric organometallic studies, catalytic reactions, and computation collectively establish that the organocobalt-mediated nucleophilic displacement proceeds via a stereospecific backside-backside trajectory. This study expands the fundamental reactivity landscape of CoSalen catalysis. We anticipate the development of exciting new transformations harnessing this nucleophilic alkyl–CoIII intermediate, either in MHAT or other catalytic scenarios.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Reagents were purchased at the highest commercial quality and used without further purification unless otherwise stated. 1-phenyl-2-propene (CAS # 300-57-2) and diphenylsilane (CAS # 775-12-2) were purchased from Innochem. Sodium carbonate (CAS # 497-19-8, powder) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Company. Cesium carbonate (CAS # 534-17-8), phenylsilane (CAS # 694-53-1), tert-butyl hydroperoxide (CAS # 75-91-2), and 4-Å MS (CAS # 70955-01-0) were purchased from Energy Chemical. Magnesium oxide (CAS # 1309-48-4) was purchased from Bidepharm. Sodium acetate (CAS # 127-09-3) was purchased from J&K Chemical. Triethylsilane (CAS # 617-86-7) was purchased from Heowns. MS (4 Å) was activated at 180°C under vacuum for 12 hours before use.

General procedure for the synthesis of 4 from 3

An oven-dried 25-ml resealable Schlenk tube equipped with a Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar was charged with [Co-1]OTs (30.8 mg, 0.040 mmol, 0.10 equiv.), Na2CO3 (127 mg, 1.2 mmol, 3.0 equiv.), MgO (16 mg, 0.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), and 4-Å MS (100 mg). The reaction vessel was then briefly evacuated and backfilled with nitrogen (this sequence was repeated a total of three times). 3 (0.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), anhydrous ethanol (2.0 ml), and diphenylsilane (147 mg, 0.80 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) were added to the reaction vessel via syringe sequentially. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The mixture was filtered through a short pad of silica gel with CH2Cl2 as an eluent. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the residue was purified by silica gel flash column chromatography to afford the corresponding product 4. d.r. of 4 was determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.

Acknowledgments

We thank H.-Y. Yue (PKU) for experimental assistance.

Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China 22222101 (R.Z.), Natural Science Foundation of China 22350006 (R.Z.), Natural Science Foundation of China 22171012 (R.Z.), Beijing Natural Science Foundation 2242006 (R.Z.), Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (R.Z.), and Beijing Natural Science Foundation QY23028 (B.-S.Z.).

Author contributions: Conceptualization: B.-S.Z. Investigation: B.-S.Z., Y.-N.Y., and R.Z. Writing—original draft: B.-S.Z. and R.Z. Writing—review and editing: B.-S.Z. and R.Z. Supervision: R.Z.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data and materials availability: Crystallographic data for anti-2b are available from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center under reference no. 2441492. All other data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S14

Tables S1 to S7

NMR Spectra

Cartesian Coordinates of DFT Optimized Structures

References

sciadv.adz1406_sm.pdf (7.8MB, pdf)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Shevick S. L., Wilson C. V., Kotesova S., Kim D., Holland P. L., Shenvi R. A., Catalytic hydrogen atom transfer to alkenes: A roadmap for metal hydrides and radicals. Chem. Sci. 11, 12401–12422 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li G., Estes D. P., Norton J. R., Ruccolo S., Sattler A., Sattler W., Dihydrogen activation by cobaloximes with various axial ligands. Inorg. Chem. 53, 10743–10747 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Demarteau J., Debuigne A., Detrembleur C., Organocobalt complexes as sources of carbon-centered radicals for organic and polymer chemistries. Chem. Rev. 119, 6906–6955 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Michiyuki T., Komeyama K., Recent advances in four-coordinated planar cobalt catalysis in organic synthesis. Asian J. Org. Chem. 9, 343–358 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ouyang D.-C., Zhu R., Wang J.-J., Yin Y.-N., Recent advances in CoSalen-catalyzed radical reactions. Sci. Sin. Chim. 50, 1217–1232 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Isayama S., Mukaiyama T., A new method for preparation of alcohols from olefins with molecular oxygen and phenylsilane by the use of bis(acetylacetonato)cobalt(II). Chem. Lett. 18, 1071–1074 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gaspar B., Carreira E. M., Mild cobalt-catalyzed hydrocyanation of olefins with tosyl cyanide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 4519–4522 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Crossley S. W., Barabe F., Shenvi R. A., Simple, chemoselective, catalytic olefin isomerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 16788–16791 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li G., Kuo J. L., Han A., Abuyuan J. M., Young L. C., Norton J. R., Palmer J. H., Radical isomerization and cycloisomerization initiated by H• Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 7698–7704 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ma X., Herzon S. B., Intermolecular hydropyridylation of unactivated alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8718–8721 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kamei Y., Seino Y., Yamaguchi Y., Yoshino T., Maeda S., Kojima M., Matsunaga S., Silane- and peroxide-free hydrogen atom transfer hydrogenation using ascorbic acid and cobalt-photoredox dual catalysis. Nat. Commun. 12, 966 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Occhialini G., Palani V., Wendlandt A. E., Catalytic, contra-thermodynamic positional alkene isomerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 145–152 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li N., Gui Y., Chu M., You M., Qiu X., Liu H., Wang S., Deng M., Ji B., Cobalt-catalyzed deprotection of allyl carboxylic esters induced by hydrogen atom transfer. Org. Lett. 23, 8460–8464 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gnaim S., Bauer A., Zhang H.-J., Chen L., Gannett C., Malapit C. A., Hill D. E., Vogt D., Tang T., Daley R. A., Hao W., Zeng R., Quertenmont M., Beck W. D., Kandahari E., Vantourout J. C., Echeverria P.-G., Abruna H. D., Blackmond D. G., Minteer S. D., Reisman S. E., Sigman M. S., Baran P. S., Cobalt-electrocatalytic HAT for functionalization of unsaturated C–C bonds. Nature 605, 687–695 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mayerhofer V. J., Lippolis M., Teskey C. J., Dual-catalysed intermolecular reductive coupling of dienes and ketones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 63, e202314870 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fang X., Zhang N., Chen S. C., Luo T., Scalable total synthesis of (−)-triptonide: Serendipitous discovery of a visible-light-promoted olefin coupling initiated by metal-catalyzed hydrogen atom transfer (MHAT). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 2292–2300 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jankins T. C., Blank P. M., Brugnetti A., Boehm P., Aouane F. A., Morandi B., Shuttle HAT for mild alkene transfer hydrofunctionalization. Nat. Commun. 15, 9397 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yamaguchi Y., Hirata Y., Higashida K., Yoshino T., Matsunaga S., Cobalt/photoredox dual-catalyzed cross-radical coupling of alkenes via hydrogen atom transfer and homolytic substitution. Org. Lett. 26, 4893–4897 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shevick S. L., Obradors C., Shenvi R. A., Mechanistic interrogation of Co/Ni-dual catalyzed hydroarylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 12056–12068 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Matos J. L. M., Vasquez-Cespedes S., Gu J., Oguma T., Shenvi R. A., Branch-selective addition of unactivated olefins into imines and aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 16976–16981 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.V. van der Puyl, R. A. Shenvi, “Manganese-, iron-, and cobalt-catalyzed radical alkene hydrofunctionalization,” in Base-Metal Catalysis 2 (Georg Thieme Verlag, ed. 1, 2023), chap. 2.14, vol. 2023/3.
  • 22.Shigehisa H., Aoki T., Yamaguchi S., Shimizu N., Hiroya K., Hydroalkoxylation of unactivated olefins with carbon radicals and carbocation species as key intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 10306–10309 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wilson C. V., Kim D., Sharma A., Hooper R. X., Poli R., Hoffman B. M., Holland P. L., Cobalt–carbon bonding in a salen-supported cobalt(IV) alkyl complex postulated in oxidative MHAT catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 10361–10367 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Touney E. E., Foy N. J., Pronin S. V., Catalytic radical-polar crossover reactions of allylic alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 16982–16987 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou X. L., Yang F., Sun H. L., Yin Y. N., Ye W. T., Zhu R., Cobalt-catalyzed intermolecular hydrofunctionalization of alkenes: Evidence for a bimetallic pathway. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7250–7255 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang F., Nie Y.-C., Liu H.-Y., Zhang L., Mo F., Zhu R., Electrocatalytic oxidative hydrofunctionalization reactions of alkenes via Co(II/III/IV) cycle. ACS Catal. 12, 2132–2137 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miao H., Meihui G., Xiong T., Zhang G., Zhang Q., Cobalt-catalyzed enantioselective hydroamination of arylalkenes with secondary amines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202213913 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nakagawa M., Matsuki Y., Nagao K., Ohmiya H., A triple photoredox/cobalt/brønsted acid catalysis enabling markovnikov hydroalkoxylation of unactivated alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 7953–7959 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shibutani S., Nagao K., Ohmiya H., A dual cobalt and photoredox catalysis for hydrohalogenation of alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 4375–4379 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu J., Rong J., Wood D. P., Wang Y., Liang S. H., Lin S., Co-catalyzed hydrofluorination of alkenes: Photocatalytic method development and electroanalytical mechanistic investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 4380–4392 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lindner H., Amberg W. M., Martini T., Fischer D. M., Moore E., Carreira E. M., Photo- and cobalt-catalyzed synthesis of heterocycles via cycloisomerization of unactivated olefins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 63, e202319515 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kalomenopoulos P. G., Emayavaramban B., Johnston C. P., Enantioselective synthesis of α-aryl ketones by a cobalt-catalyzed semipinacol rearrangement. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 63, e202414342 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Park S. H., Bae G., Choi A., Shin S., Shin K., Choi C. H., Kim H., Electrocatalytic access to azetidines via intramolecular allylic hydroamination: Scrutinizing key oxidation steps through electrochemical kinetic analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 15360–15369 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sansinenea E., Ortiz A., The chemistry of cyclopropanes and new insights into organocatalyzed asymmetric cyclopropanation. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, e202200210 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ke J., Lee W. C., Wang X., Wang Y., Wen X., Zhang X. P., Metalloradical activation of in situ-generated α-alkynyldiazomethanes for asymmetric radical cyclopropanation of alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 2368–2378 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mendel M., Karl T. M., Hamm J., Kaldas S. J., Sperger T., Mondal B., Schoenebeck F., Dynamic stereomutation of vinylcyclopropanes with metalloradicals. Nature 631, 80–86 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lonardi G., Franco S., Sartorello M., De Faveri C., Stivanello M., Licini G., Orlandi M., Enantioselective synthesis of cyclopropanes via CuH-catalyzed intramolecular hydroalkylation. ACS Catal. 14, 8730–8738 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Njue C. K., Nuthakki B., Vaze A., Bobbitt J. M., Rusling J. F., Vitamin B12-mediated electrochemical cyclopropanation of styrene. Electrochem. Commun. 3, 733–736 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sanford A. B., Thane T. A., McGinnis T. M., Chen P. P., Hong X., Jarvo E. R., Nickel-catalyzed alkyl-alkyl cross-electrophile coupling reaction of 1,3-dimesylates for the synthesis of alkylcyclopropanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 5017–5023 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Talele T. T., The “cyclopropyl fragment” is a versatile player that frequently appears in preclinical/clinical drug molecules. J. Med. Chem. 59, 8712–8756 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pitzer L., Schwarz J. L., Glorius F., Reductive radical-polar crossover: Traditional electrophiles in modern radical reactions. Chem Sci 10, 8285–8291 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Phelan J. P., Lang S. B., Compton J. S., Kelly C. B., Dykstra R., Gutierrez O., Molander G. A., Redox-neutral photocatalytic cyclopropanation via radical/polar crossover. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 8037–8047 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shu C., Mega R. S., Andreassen B. J., Noble A., Aggarwal V. K., Synthesis of functionalized cyclopropanes from carboxylic acids by a radical addition-polar cyclization cascade. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57, 15430–15434 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang Y., Deng J., Ressler A. J., Lin S., Electroreductive radical addition-polar cyclization cascade to access cycloalkanes. Org. Lett. 26, 116–121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang Z., Chen Y., Li J., Zhu C., Cyano migration-mediated radical-polar crossover cyclopropanation. Sci. Chin. Chem. 68, 241–248 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.S. Jana, D. Kusza, N. Vystavkin, D. Lunic, C. Teskey, Markovnikov Hydrocarboxylation Enabled by Reductive Cobalt Catalyzed Hydrogen-Atom-Transfer. ChemRxiv [Preprint] (2025); 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-5qlx0. [DOI]
  • 47.Ito H., Kosaka Y., Nonoyama K., Sasaki Y., Sawamura M., Synthesis of optically active boron–silicon bifunctional cyclopropane derivatives through enantioselective copper(I)-catalyzed reaction of allylic carbonates with a diboron derivative. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 7424–7427 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liu Y., Zhou Y., Li D., Chen H., Zhao J., Qu J., Iron-catalyzed boration of cinnamyl carbonates: A highly stereoselective approach to cyclopropylboronates. Org. Chem. Front. 6, 983–988 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Magnuson V. E., Weber J. H., Reactions of alkylcobalt complexes containing a tetradentate nitrogen-donating ligand. J. Organomet. Chem. 92, 233–243 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schrauzer G. N., Sibert J. W., Coenzyme B12 and coenzyme B12 model compounds in the catalysis of the dehydration of glycols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 1022–1030 (1970). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Brown K. L., Ramamurthy S., Marynick D. S., Mechanism of acid-induced decomposition of 2-hydroxyethyl- and 2-alkoxyethyl-cobaloximes. J. Organomet. Chem. 287, 377–394 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Espenson J. H., Wang D. M., Kinetic studies of the cleavage and rearrangement reactions of (β-hydroxyalkyl)cobaloximes in acid solution. Inorg. Chem. 18, 2853–2859 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bresciani-Pahor N., Forcolin M., Marzilli L. G., Randaccio L., Summers M. F., Toscano P. J., Organocobalt B12 models: Axial ligand effects on the structural and coordination chemistry of cobaloximes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 63, 1–125 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Estes D. P., Grills D. C., Norton J. R., The reaction of cobaloximes with hydrogen: Products and thermodynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 17362–17365 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ye K. Y., McCallum T., Lin S., Bimetallic radical redox-relay catalysis for the isomerization of epoxides to allylic alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 9548–9554 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Reed A. E., Weinstock R. B., Weinhold F., Natural population analysis. J. Chem. Phys. 83, 735–746 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mitoraj M. P., Michalak A., Ziegler T., A combined charge and energy decomposition scheme for bond analysis. J. Chem. Theo. Comput. 5, 962–975 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lu T., Chen F., Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kochem A., Kanso H., Baptiste B., Arora H., Philouze C., Jarjayes O., Vezin H., Luneau D., Orio M., Thomas F., Ligand contributions to the electronic structures of the oxidized cobalt(II) salen complexes. Inorg. Chem. 51, 10557–10571 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nie Y.-C., Yang F., Li Y.-H., Zhu R., Aldehydes as O-nucleophiles in cobalt hydride hydrogen atom transfer catalysis: Overriding the innate somophilicity. Org. Lett. 25, 889–894 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yin Y.-N., Zhao B.-S., Liu H.-Y., Sheng R.-Q., Ouyang D.-C., Zhu R., Modifying commodity-relevant unsaturated polymers via Co-catalyzed MHAT. Chem 10, 3088–3099 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Knizia G., Intrinsic atomic orbitals: An unbiased bridge between quantum theory and chemical concepts. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 4834–4843 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fritz H. L., Espenson J. H., Williams D. A., Molander G. A., Inversion at carbon in the cleavage of cobalt-carbon bonds by mercuric ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 2378–2381 (1974). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Abley P., Dockal E. R., Halpern J., Alkylation and arylation of mercury(II) and thallium(III) by organocobalt compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95, 3166–3170 (1973). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Scovell W. M., Kinetics and mechanism of methyl transfer from methylcobalamin to palladium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 96, 3451–3456 (1974). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gronert S., Azizian K., Friedman M. A., Cyclizations of 3-chlorocarbanions to cyclopropanes: “Strain-free” transition states for forming highly strained rings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 3220–3226 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Knipe A. C., Stirling C. J. M., Intramolecular reactions. Part VI. Rates of ring formation in reactions of ω-halogenoalkylmalonic esters with bases. J. Chem. Soc. B 1968, 67–71 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ebisawa K., Izumi K., Ooka Y., Kato H., Kanazawa S., Komatsu S., Nishi E., Shigehisa H., Catalyst- and silane-controlled enantioselective hydrofunctionalization of alkenes by cobalt-catalyzed hydrogen atom transfer and radical-polar crossover. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 13481–13490 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shaw M. H., McCreanor N. G., Whittingham W. G., Bower J. F., Reversible C–C bond activation enables stereocontrol in Rh-catalyzed carbonylative cycloadditions of aminocyclopropanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 463–468 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Quinn M. P., Yao M.-L., Yong L., Kabalka G. W., Boron trihalide mediated haloallylation of aryl aldehydes and its application to the preparation of (E)-1,3-dienes. Synthesis 2011, 3815–3820 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ihara M., Katsumata A., Setsu F., Tokunaga Y., Fukumoto K., Synthesis of six-membered compounds by environmentally friendly cyclization using indirect electrolysis. J. Org. Chem. 61, 677–684 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Holm K. H., Skatteboel L., Chemistry of gem-Dihalocyclopropanes. XX. The effect of methyl and phenyl substituents on the vinylcyclopropylidene--cyclopentenylidene Rearrangementr. Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B 38, 783–794 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shibayama A., Nakamura T., Asada T., Shintani T., Ukaji Y., Kinoshita H., Inomata K., “Syn-Effect” in the desulfonylation reaction of α,α-dialkylated (E)-allylic sulfones. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 70, 381–396 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Eisold M., Baumann A. N., Kiefl G. M., Emmerling S. T., Didier D., Unsaturated four-membered rings: Efficient strategies for the construction of cyclobutenes and alkylidenecyclobutanes. Chem. Eur. J. 23, 1634–1644 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yao M.-L., Borella S., Quick T., Kabalka G. W., Boron trihalide mediated haloallylation of aryl aldehydes: Reaction and mechanistic insight. Dalton Trans., 776–778 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jasti R., Rychnovsky S. D., Racemization in prins cyclization reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 13640–13648 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dennis F. M., Robertson C. C., Partridge B. M., Nickel-catalysed allylboration of aldehydes. Synthesis 52, 1903–1914 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ye W.-T., Zhu R., Dioxygen-promoted cobalt-catalyzed oxidative hydroamination using unactivated alkenes and free amines. Chem Catal. 2, 345–357 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Carral-Menoyo A., Misol A., Gómez-Redondo M., Sotomayor N., Lete E., Palladium(II)-catalyzed intramolecular C–H alkenylation for the synthesis of chromanes. J. Org. Chem. 84, 2048–2060 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Xing J., Zhu W., Ye B., Lu T., Hayashi T., Dou X., Rhodium-catalyzed diverse arylation of 2,5-dihydrofuran: Controllable divergent synthesis via four pathways. ACS Catal. 10, 2958–2963 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Zhang L., Zhao L., Zhu Y., Wang C., Quinolinamide-enabled nickel-catalyzed regio- and diastereoselective γ,δ-arylalkylation of nonactivated alkenes. Synlett 35, 1121–1126 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shi Y., Hoveyda A. H., Catalytic SN2′- and enantioselective allylic substitution with a diborylmethane reagent and application in synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 3455–3458 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Janza B., Studer A., Stereoselective cyclization reactions of ibx-generated alkoxyamidyl radicals. J. Org. Chem. 70, 6991–6994 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Grünanger C. U., Breit B., Branched-regioselective hydroformylation with catalytic amounts of a reversibly bound directing group. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 7346–7349 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sato T., Otera J., Mechanistic insight into the cinnamylmetal-thioacetal reaction employing 2-acetoxy-2-phenylacetaldehyde monothioacetal. J. Organomet. Chem. 473, 55–62 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Obora Y., Sawaguchi T., Tsubakimoto K., Yoshida H., Ogawa S., Hatanaka S., Iridium-catalyzed synthesis of ω-hydroxy homoallylic alcohols. Synthesis 45, 2115–2119 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kobayashi S., Nishio K., Facile and highly stereoselective synthesis of homoallylic alcohols using organosilicon intermediates. J. Org. Chem. 59, 6620–6628 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Su W., Wang T.-T., Tian X., Han J.-R., Zhen X.-L., Fan S.-M., You Y.-X., Zhang Y.-K., Qiao R.-X., Cheng Q., Liu S., Stereoselective dehydroxyboration of allylic alcohols to access (E)-allylboronates by a combination of C–OH cleavage and boron transfer under iron catalysis. Org. Lett. 23, 9094–9099 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.H. Ahlbrecht, G. Bringmann, J. M. Brown, H. Duddeck, P. Duhamel, C. J. Elsevier, P. Fey, G. Fráter, H. J. Gais, J. Gawronski, W. Hartwig, G. Helmchen, H. E. Högberg, L. S. Liebeskind, W. Lindner, G. Maas, D. S. Matteson, J. S. McCallum, J. Mulzer, T. Norin, V. Schurig, G. Solladié, D. F. Taber, G. Uray, P. Welzel, “4. Determination of absolute and relative configuration: 4.1. Determination of relative configuration by nuclear magnetic resonance methods (III),” in Stereoselective Synthesis (Georg Thieme Verlag, ed. 4, 1995), vol. E 21 a, pp. 346–347.
  • 90.Cheng D., Huang D., Shi Y., Synergistic effect of additives on cyclopropanation of olefins. Org. Biomol. Chem. 11, 5588–5591 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Newcomb M., Choi S.-Y., Toy P. H., Picosecond radical kinetics. Rate constants for ring openings of 2-aryl-substituted cyclopropylcarbinyl radicals. Can. J. Chem. 77, 1123–1135 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Brookhart M., Studabaker W. B., Humphrey M. B., Husk G. R., Synthesis and spectral characterization of a series of iron and ruthenium benzylidene complexes, Cp(CO)(L)M=CH(C6H4R)+ (M = Fe, Ru; L = CO, PPh3; R = p-H, p-F, p-CH3, p-OCH3). Barriers to aryl rotation and benzylidene transfer reactions. Organometallics 8, 132–140 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 93.del Hoyo A. M., Herraiz A. G., Suero M. G., A Stereoconvergent cyclopropanation reaction of styrenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 56, 1610–1613 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Shono T., Matsumura Y., Organic synthesis by electrolysis. VI. Anodic oxidation of arylcyclopropanes. J. Org. Chem. 35, 4157–4160 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Gandon V., Szymoniak J., A one-pot access to cyclopropanes from allylic ethers via hydrozirconation–deoxygenative ring formation. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1308–1309 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lu Y.-C., West J. G., Chemoselective decarboxylative protonation enabled by cooperative earth-abundant element catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202213055 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rrapi M., Batsika C. S., Nikitas N. F., Tappin N. D. C., Triandafillidi I., Renaud P., Kokotos C. G., Photochemical synthesis of lactones, cyclopropanes and ATRA products: Revealing the role of sodium ascorbate. Chemistry 30, e202400253 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, X. Li, M. Caricato, A. V. Marenich, J. Bloino, B. G. Janesko, R. Gomperts, B. Mennucci, H. P. Hratchian, J. V. Ortiz, A. F. Izmaylov, J. L. Sonnenberg, D. Williams-Young, F. Ding, F. Lipparini, F. Egidi, J. Goings, B. Peng, A. Petrone, T. Henderson, D. Ranasinghe, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. Gao, N. Rega, G. Zheng, W. Liang, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, K. Throssell, J. A. Montgomery, Jr. J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. J. Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. N. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N. Staroverov, T. A. Keith, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. P. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, J. M. Millam, M. Klene, C. Adamo, R. Cammi, J. W. Ochterski, R. L. Martin, K. Morokuma, O. Farkas, J. B. Foresman, D. J. Fox, Gaussian 16, Revision C.01 (Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2016).
  • 99.Mennucci B., Tomasi J., Cammi R., Cheeseman J. R., Frisch M. J., Devlin F. J., Gabriel S., Stephens P. J., Polarizable continuum model (PCM) calculations of solvent effects on optical rotations of chiral molecules. J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 6102–6113 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Becke A., Density functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lee C., Yang W., Parr R. G., Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 37, 785–789 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Grimme S., Antony J., Ehrlich S., Krieg H., A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Weigend F., Ahlrichs R., Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297–3305 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Legault, C. Y. CYLview, 1.0b, Universite de Sherbrooke (2009); http://cylview.org.
  • 105.Knizia G., Klein J. E. M. N., Electron flow in reaction mechanisms—Revealed from first principles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 5518–5522 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K., VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Farrugia L. J., WinGX and ORTEP for Windows: An Update. J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854 (2012). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S14

Tables S1 to S7

NMR Spectra

Cartesian Coordinates of DFT Optimized Structures

References

sciadv.adz1406_sm.pdf (7.8MB, pdf)

Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES