Table 1.
Time-saving strategies for patient education in a digital information era.
| Identified issue and recommendations | Implementation | Examples of using the recommended approach | |
| No time to address patients’ questions | |||
|
|
Set a collaborative agenda at the beginning of a visit | Ask the patient about their agenda, establish the number of concerns that can be addressed, and collaborate on a plan for any remaining issues. | Collaborative agenda-setting did not increase visit length, but reduced the amount of “oh by the way” concerns that surfaced at the end of the visit [51]. |
|
|
Assess patients’ concerns and questions preemptively, prior to the visit | Assessing patients’ concerns could be completed either in paper-and-pencil format in a waiting room or via electronic check-in with artificial intelligence–powered chatbots and electronic visit planners. | Patients who used a visit planner in the waiting room were more prepared and began the visit by communicating their top concerns [52]. |
|
|
Diversify modes of communication | Telehealth visits, e-visits, or communication via a patient portal could be helpful to meet patients’ remaining needs after clinical encounters. | Asynchronous e-visits through a patient portal provided clinical outcomes that were comparable to those provided by in-person care [53]. |
| No time to ensure patient understanding of clinical information | |||
|
|
Educational sessions | Use follow-up visits or education in small groups to clarify diagnosis and treatment options. | A group session saved 111 hours of clinical time, with 92% of patients increasing confidence regarding critical concepts in oncology care [54]. |
|
|
Use educational materials about evidence-based treatment | Use standardized printed materials. | Patients who received printed chemotherapy information had almost 3 times greater odds of understanding their goals of care [18]. |
| No time to verify information that patients find on their own | |||
|
|
Direct patients to reliable digital resources | Preemptively advise patients on where to find high-quality resources for self-education, considering patients’ literacy, e-literacy, cultural background, and access to digital resources. | An example from a qualitative research, in which clinicians share their recommendations on how to help patients to stay informed: “...maybe suggest some more sites that will...have... more reputable information...direct them that way” [55]. |
|
|
Contribute to increasing patients’ digital literacy | Share tips with patients on how to identify reliable information and direct patients to resources that might help them learn about finding reliable information, including educational materials and workshops. | The National Cancer Institute provides resources for patients on how to identify reliable information online [56]. |
|
|
Engage other health care team members | Patients may address questions about information they find on their own to nurses, medical assistants, nutritionists, integrative specialists, physical therapists, and other experts in the health care system. | Nurse practitioners tend to adopt a patient-centered communication style while communicating about patients’ online health information–seeking [57]. |