Table 3.
Multiple Logistic Regression Model of Clinician Presence During Patient Self-Administration of Medical Aid in Dying Medication (N = 100)a
| Variable | AOR (95% CI) | SE | z | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.26 (0.08–0.86) | 0.16 | −2.21 | 0.03 |
| Professional characteristics | ||||
| Professional discipline | ||||
| Physician | 1 [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] |
| Nurse (RN/APRN) | 1.63 (0.28–9.46) | 1.46 | 0.55 | 0.58 |
| Social worker | 1.68 (0.46–6.20) | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.44 |
| Chaplain | 4.32 (1.22–15.38) | 2.80 | 2.26 | 0.02 |
| Organizational characteristics | ||||
| Policy on permitted MAID participation | ||||
| Partial | 1 [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] |
| Full | 4.50 (1.58–12.86) | 2.41 | 2.81 | 0.01 |
| MAID-specific characteristics | ||||
| Agreement with the principle that hospice care should not hasten death | ||||
| Agree | 1 [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] |
| Neither agree nor disagree | 1.14 (0.36–3.56) | 0.66 | 0.23 | 0.82 |
| Disagree | 2.44 (0.54–11.11) | 1.89 | 1.15 | 0.25 |
| General attitude toward MAID | ||||
| Support | 1 [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] |
| Neither support nor oppose | 0.33 (0.05–2.23) | 0.32 | −1.14 | 0.26 |
| Oppose | 1.07 (0.19–6.12) | 0.95 | 0.08 | 0.94 |
| Ever provided end-of-life care related to hospice patient’s use of MAID | ||||
| Yes | 1 [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] |
| No | 0.26 (0.07–0.98) | 0.18 | −1.99 | 0.05 |
| Hypothetical willingness to be present | ||||
| Yes | 1 [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] | [Reference] |
| No/unsure | 0.48 (0.11–2.12) | 0.36 | −0.98 | 0.33 |
Wald χ212 = 22.3, p = 0.01, Tjur R2 = 0.34. Due to concerns over small sample bias, we applied Firth’s50 penalized maximum likelihood estimator.
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.