Introduction
Vaccine hesitancy is a major challenge in global public health, influencing both the success of immunization programs and the control of preventable diseases. In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic has shown how quickly public trust can shift and how political, cultural, and social factors influence vaccine attitudes.1,2
To build confidence in vaccines, it is important to understand the root causes of hesitancy, engage communities in meaningful ways, equip healthcare professionals with effective communication tools, and develop innovative messaging strategies. This collection of 15 original articles provides new insights and evidence-based approaches to guide vaccine communication and strengthen public trust.
Understanding vaccine hesitancy: context and determinants
Vaccine hesitancy arises from a complex interplay of factors, including individual beliefs, cultural norms, and political influences.3–5 Several studies in this collection highlight the importance of understanding these factors to create effective and context-sensitive vaccine messages.
Ward et al.6 provided an overview of social sciences research on vaccination and emphasized the importance of considering national and local contexts when studying vaccine attitudes. The COVID-19 pandemic made this particularly evident, as strategies that proved effective in some countries or communities failed in others, underscoring that tailoring strategies to context is essential for relevance and impact. Paschoalotto et al.7 illustrated this point in their study conducted in Brazil, which showed how confidence in COVID-19 vaccines was shaped by local political dynamics. Ittefaq et al.8 offered a broad perspective on the factors shaping COVID-19 vaccine attitudes in the United States by analyzing over 1,400 survey questions from 19 national polls. Their study shows how public concerns about vaccine safety, efficacy, and trust in authorities shifted over the course of the pandemic. Together, these findings underscore the importance of tailoring vaccination and communication strategies to the political and cultural realities of specific contexts, rather than relying on uniform, “one-size-fits-all” approaches.
Complementing these insights, Vigezzi et al.9 proposed integrating health management principles with Immunization Information Systems to identify under-vaccinated populations and guide targeted intervention in Italy. In Australia, Kaufman et al.10 developed the Vaccine Barriers Assessment Tool (VBAT) to capture acceptance and access barriers among parents of young children, thereby helping to identify groups at risk of under-vaccination. Together, these studies offer practical approaches for designing effective, context-sensitive vaccination strategies and communication efforts.
Engaging communities: trust, equity, and co-design
Building trust in vaccines requires genuine engagement with communities and recognition of their unique perspectives. Sommers et al.11 demonstrated that equity-focused, community-driven programs can increase trust and participation in vaccine efforts. Karras et al.12 examining Sydney’s ethnic minority communities, showed that incorporating local voices makes public health messages more relevant and impactful. In Ghana, Cook et al.13 adapted the “Cranky Uncle Vaccine” digital game through a co-design process to address common vaccine misconceptions, showing how participatory approaches can both educate and empower communities to fight misinformation. Together, these studies underscore that when communities are actively involved in designing and delivering vaccine messages, both trust and vaccine uptake can significantly improve.
Healthcare professionals and communication strategies
Healthcare professionals play a pivotal role in influencing vaccine decisions and their success depends on clear, empathetic communication.
Marhánková et al.14 identified strategies that help clinicians to build and maintain trustful dialogs with vaccine-hesitant parents. Gagneur et al.15 developed a practical four-step guide that enables healthcare providers to turn hesitancy into motivation through personalized, patient-centered conversations. White et al.’s16 systematic review showed that medical education programs teaching these communication skills increase students’ confidence in addressing vaccine hesitancy in clinical settings. Together, these studies demonstrate that structured training and evidence-based communication strategies can empower healthcare professionals to be stronger advocates for vaccination.
Innovative messaging approaches: narratives, media, and digital tools
Innovative communication approaches can complement traditional messaging by engaging emotions, values, and social norms. Dubé et al.17 showed that using stories can effectively change parents’ attitudes toward childhood vaccines by creating emotional connections and trust. Sun et al.18 analyzed Canadian media coverage of HPV vaccination and religion, highlighting how media framing affects public perception and the importance of understanding theses narratives in shaping vaccine discourse. Fritz and Smith19 studied anti-vaccine content on the social media platform Gab, revealing widespread misinformation and distrust that make public health efforts harder. Finally, Parsons Leigh et al.20 found that inconsistent messages during the COVID-19 pandemic undermined people’s trust in booster and bivalent vaccines. Together, these studies highlight the importance of using stories, media analysis, and digital tools to fight misinformation and help people make informed decisions about vaccines.
Conclusion
Enhancing vaccine confidence requires a shift from fragmented, reactive approaches toward tailored strategies that build trust and engagement. As the studies in this collection show, effective vaccine communication emerges when public health efforts are tailored to national and local contexts, when healthcare professionals are supported with evidence-based tools and approaches, when innovative strategies are used strategically, and when communities are directly engaged in shaping messages. Taken together, these insights chart a path toward vaccine messaging systems that build lasting confidence, increase vaccine uptake, and protect against preventable diseases.
References
- 1.MacDonald NE, Dubé È, Graham JE.. Political vaccine hesitancy: not new but growing problem. Vaccine. 2025;63:127643. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Milkoreit M, Smith EK. Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States. Public Underst Sci. 2025;34(5):616–3. doi: 10.1177/09636625241302970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.MacDonald NE. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015;33(34):4161–4164. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wiley KE, Levy D, Shapiro GK, Dube E, SteelFisher GK, Sevdalis N, Ganter-Restrepo F, Menning L, Leask J. A user-centered approach to developing a new tool measuring the behavioural and social drivers of vaccination. Vaccine. 2021;39(42):6283–6290. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.World Health Organization WER . Understanding the behavioural and social drivers of vaccine uptake – WHO position paper - May 2022. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2022;97:209–224. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ward JK, Peretti-Watel P, Dubé E, Verger P, Attwell K. Context matters: how to research vaccine attitudes and uptake after the COVID-19 crisis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2367268. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2367268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paschoalotto MAC, Cima J, Costa E, Valente de Almeida S, Gomes da Costa J, Santos JV, Passador CS, Passador JL, Barros PP. Politics and confidence toward the COVID-19 vaccination: a Brazilian cross-sectional study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2318139. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2318139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ittefaq M, Vu HT, Zain A, Ramazan T, Kreps GL. Analysis of public opinion polls about COVID-19 vaccines: theoretical and policy implications for vaccine communication and campaigns to address vaccine hesitancy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2437921. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2437921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vigezzi GP, Maggioni E, Bert F, de Vito C, Siliquini R, Odone A. Who is (not) vaccinated? A proposal for a comprehensive immunization information system. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2386739. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2386739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kaufman J, Tuckerman J, Bonner C, Durrheim DN, Costa DSJ, Trevena L, Henseler J, Danchin M. Development and validation of the vaccine barriers assessment tool for identifying drivers of under-vaccination in children under five years in Australia. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2359623. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2359623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sommers T, Dockery M, Burke N, D’Souza S, Troupe B, Agbonyinma T, Raghuram H, Hopkins KL, Kohlway E, Stojicic P, et al. Building trust and equity in vaccine communication through community engagement. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025;21(1):2518636. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2518636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Karras J, Harrison M, Petrakis D, Gore E, Seale H. “I’d just love to hear what the community has to say”: exploring the potential of community-driven vaccine messaging amongst ethnic minority communities. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2423469. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2423469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cook J, Lepage C, Hopkins KL, Cook W, Kolog EA, Thomson A, Iddrisu I, Burnette S. Co-designing and pilot testing a digital game to improve vaccine attitudes and misinformation resistance in Ghana. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2407204. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2407204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Marhánková JH, Kotherová Z, Numerato D. Navigating vaccine hesitancy: strategies and dynamics in healthcare professional-parent communication. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2361943. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2361943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gagneur A, Gutnick D, Berthiaume P, Diana A, Rollnick S, Saha P. From vaccine hesitancy to vaccine motivation: a motivational interviewing based approach to vaccine counselling. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2391625. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2391625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.White P, Alberti H, Rowlands G, Tang E, Gagnon D, Dubé È. Vaccine hesitancy educational interventions for medical students: a systematic narrative review in Western countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2397875. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2397875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dube E, Trottier ME, Greyson D, MacDonald NE, Meyer SB, MacDonald SE, Driedger SM, Witteman HO, Ouakki M, Gagnon D. Use of narratives to enhance childhood vaccine acceptance: results of an online experiment among Canadian parents. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024;20(1):2379093. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2379093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sun X, Sun T, Lau SCL, McArthur A, Nath I, Shapiro GK. A content analysis of religion and HPV vaccine news coverage in Canada. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025;21(1):2530290. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2530290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fritz AM, Smith AM. Poison, lies, war: a mixed methods content analysis of posts about COVID-19 vaccination on Gab Social. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025;21(1):2443999. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2443999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parsons Leigh J, Moss SJ, MacDonald J, Cherak MS, Stelfox HT, Dubé È, Fiest KM, Halperin DM, Ahmed SB, MacDonald SE, et al. Considering the impact of vaccine communication in the COVID-19 pandemic among adults in Canada: a qualitative study of lessons learned for future vaccine campaigns. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025;21(1):2448052. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2448052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
