Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 15;20(4):355–366. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2025.2047720.3391

Table 3.

Characteristics and outcomes of clinical trials evaluated the effects of mobile apps in MASLD.

APP Author Study duration Participants (n) Used app (n) Comparator arm (n) Strategy used for treatment Effect Ref
SMART-Liver Kwon et al. 26-Week Patients with NAFLD (111) SMART-Liver (51) Standard care (60) Self-tracking, education, coaching and SMS text messages Weight reduction (P<0.001)
BMI Reduction (P<0.001)
liver fat score reduction (P=0.01)
AST reduction (P=0.03)
ALT reduction (P=0.002)
ɣ-GT reduction (P=0.04)
Self-regulation improvement (P<0.001)
Depression improvement (P=0.003)
Fatigue improvement (P=0.005)
Quality of life scores improvement (P<0.001)
(23)
Noom Weight Jonathan et al. 16-Week Patients with NASH and a smartphone (40) Noom Weight (20) Standard care (20) Self- tracking, feedback, education and motivation Weight reduction (P = 0.008)
BMI reduction (P = 0.037)
AST reduction (P = 0.310)
ALT reduction (P = 0.547)
ALPs reduction (P = 0.838)
NFS improvement (P = 0.444)
FIB-4 improvement (P = 0.733)
(24)
NASH app Sato et al. 48-Week Patients with NASH or NAFLD (20) NASH app (20) _ Advice, education, and counseling sessions NASa reduction (P < 0.001)
Weight reduction (P < 0.001)
AST reduction (P = 0.001)
ALT reduction (P < 0.001)
ɣ-GT reduction (P = 0.02)
ALPs reduction (P < 0.001)
TG reduction (P = 0.01)
Improvement in parameters related to insulin resistance (P > 0.05)
(25)
Better Therapeutics app Alkhouri et al. 90-Day Patients with MASLD or MASH (22) Better Therapeutics app (22) - Digital therapeutic delivery, CBT, standardized lessons, personalized goal-setting, and self-monitoring Weight reduction (P = 0.008)
ALT reduction (P = 0.007)
FIB-4 improvement (P = 0.045)
(21)

a. NAS: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score.