Skip to main content
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies logoLink to Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
. 2025 Oct 15;33:45. doi: 10.1186/s12998-025-00609-9

Ten myths of back pain in older adults that can lead to ineffective and harmful care

Carlo Ammendolia 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12522943  PMID: 41094694

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most disabling conditions in older adults and among the costliest in terms of healthcare expenditures. Many factors contribute to the disability and high costs of LBP in older adults, but one of the most preventable is the spread of misinformation and unhelpful attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. These are often perpetuated by family, friends, social media, pharmaceutical companies, other industries, and healthcare providers. Myths about back pain foster false attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that lead to inappropriate, costly, and sometimes harmful treatments. Such myths can result in psychological consequences, including fear of movement, poor self-efficacy, low motivation, anxiety, stress, and depression- all of which further perpetuate disability. Injections, surgeries, and medications for non-specific LBP are usually ineffective and are associated with significant side effects in older adults. The purpose of this paper is to dispel ten common myths of LBP in older adults, with the goals of changing attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors to reflect a more positive and evidence-based approach among practitioners and public. The aim is also to motivate practitioners to educate their older patients based on the best available evidence. This can improve outcomes, reduce costs, reduce disability, and improve quality of life among older adults with back pain.

Keywords: Back pain, Older adults, Myths, Ineffective care, Harms

Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most disabling health conditions in older adults and one of the costliest in terms of healthcare expenditures [1, 2]. Many factors contribute to the disability and high costs of LBP in older adults, but one of the most preventable is misinformation and unhelpful attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors perpetuated by family, friends, social and traditional media, pharmaceutical companies, other industries, and healthcare providers [37]. Several papers and editorials have been written on the myths of back pain in the general population [68] but none focus specifically on older adults, usually defined as age 65 years or older [9]. Back pain in older adults is more complex and may therefore be more prone to misconception and misinformation, which can lead to inappropriate care [10]. The purpose of this paper is to dispel ten current common myths of LBP in older adults, with the goals of changing attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of healthcare practitioners to align with best- evidence care for this population. This can lead to reduced costs and improved patient outcomes [11].

Main text

Methods

This paper presents a clinical expert commentary grounded in the author's extensive experience in clinical practice and research related to low back pain in older adults. A targeted literature search was conducted to identify evidence supporting the author’s statements and recommendations. The search included peer-reviewed sources such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library covering publications to April 15th, 2025. Key search terms included "low back pain," "older adults," "myths," "misinformation," and "ineffective treatments".

Results

Myths of back pain in older adults. (See Table 1 for key messages).

Table 1.

Take Home messages for clinical practice

Myth Fact
1. Back pain is inevitable with aging Common but not inevitable; Prevalence levels off after age 60 [1214]
2. Back pain usually indicates serious disease in older adults Serious conditions < 5%; most cases are non-specific [1417]
3. Imaging is necessary in adults > 50 with LBP Imaging without red flags can cause more harm than good [15, 1822]
4. Let the pain guide you. Avoid lifting, twisting and bending with LBP Activity promotes recovery; inactivity worsens outcomes. Pain with activity does not usually cause harm [2328]
5. Bed rest is recommended for back pain in older adults Bed rest can cause more harm than good for back pain [23, 29]
6. Medication should be first-line treatment Non-pharmacological treatments recommended as first line treatment [25, 3035]
7. Surgery is effective for back dominant primary back pain Surgery not recommended for primary back-dominant pain and can cause more harm than good [29, 3642]
8. Chronic LBP in older adults is always due to structural damage Structural changes poorly corelates with presence of back pain. Psychosocial factors play major role [12, 14, 15, 26, 28, 4447]
9. Injections, ablation and nerve blocks are highly effective Benefits no better than sham treatment with increased adverse events in older adults [22, 4851]
10. Disc herniations commonly cause leg pain in older adults Less common; clinical signs more reliable than imaging [19, 52, 53]
  1. Myth: Back pain is inevitable as we age and is part of the normal aging process.

Fact Back pain is common as we age, but it is not inevitable. Once serious diseases such as cancer, infection, or fracture are ruled out, the prevalence of non-specific (also known as primary) back pain increases until about age 60, then levels off and can slightly decrease [12, 13]. Research suggests that working-age adults are most at risk for low back pain, which lessens in older post-retirement age groups [14]. However, the severity of back pain and risk of chronic LBP and disability increases with age [12]. This may be due to the increased prevalence of specific causes of back pain in older adults, such as osteoarthritis, spinal stenosis, and osteoporosis, which are associated with higher levels of chronic pain and disability [12]. Resources may be better spent on early identification and treatment of specific causes of LBP in older adults.

  • 2.

    Myth: Back pain in older adults is usually due to a serious medical problem.

Fact Although serious diseases such as cancer, fracture, and infection are more common causes of LBP in older adults, they represent less than 5% of all causes of LBP in this age group [14]. Primary (or non-specific) LBP is the most common type of LBP across all age groups, including older adults, accounting for approximately 90% of all cases [14, 15]. Other serious secondary causes of back pain include cauda equina syndrome (CES) and inflammatory back pain, neither of which are more common in older adults. The peak age for CES is between 30 and 40 years [16], and for inflammatory back pain, such as ankylosing spondylitis, onset usually occurs in late adolescence and early adulthood, with the most common onset before age 40 [17].

  • 3.

    Myth: People over the age of 50 who present with LBP should undergo imaging to rule out serious disease and identify the cause of their pain.

Fact In the absences of red flags suggestive of serious disease, imaging is not recommended [15]. While age over 50 has been listed as a red flag in some clinical practice guidelines for LBP, it is not intended to be used in isolation. Instead, it should be considered alongside other red flags, such as a previous history of cancer [18]. Routine imaging for LBP, including in older adults, is not advised. In most cases, LBP in older adults is classified as primary or non-specific, and imaging rarely identifies the source of pain [15]. Abnormal imaging findings are common in asymptomatic older adults, such as degenerative facet joints, thinning and bulging discs, narrowed central and lateral spinal canals, thickening of the ligamentum flavum, and neural compression [19]. Even among symptomatic individuals, the degree of degenerative changes typically does not correlate with the severity of symptoms. Imaging findings in older adults are rarely useful in predicting outcomes in primary back pain [20, 21]. Incidental findings on unnecessary imaging can lead to further unwarranted testing and specialist referrals, which may cause psychological stress and result in poorer outcomes [15, 22].

  • 4.

    Myth: Older adults with back pain and should avoid lifting heavy objects, twisting or bending activities. Let the pain guide them- if it hurts, don't do it.

Fact Older adults who present without red flags and have back-dominant primary LBP should be advised to continue with their normal activities despite the pain. There is no evidence that pain experienced during activity in cases of non-specific LBP causes damage to the lower back [23]. In fact, pain avoidance behaviors, including avoiding exercise, delays recovery [24]. This applies to degenerative or osteoarthritic related back pain where "motion is lotion" - activity can reduce back pain with no evidence that activity worsens the osteoarthritis [25]. Activities requiring lifting, twisting and bending are beneficial for maintaining a healthy back. Avoiding such movements can lead to increased pain, stiffness and physical deconditioning [26]. An older spine is not a contraindication to these activities and is not at greater injury risk compared to a younger spine [27]. Most back pain in older adults is not caused by injury [28]. Graduated lifting and progressive physical demands to the spine help build structural resilience and overall fitness [26]. Conversely, fear associated with such activities can lead to avoidance behaviours and reduced self-efficacy, increasing the risk for fear-related back disability [28].

  • 5.

    Myth: Bed rest is recommended for back pain among older adults.

Fact Bed rest is particularly discouraged for older adults with back pain. In addition to evidence showing that bed rest prolongs recovery [23], older adults are at higher risk of negative consequences of bed rest including increase joint stiffness, muscle wasting, loss of bone mineral density, pressure ulcers and venous thromboembolism [29]. Maintaining active lifestyle despite back pain will reduce risk of homeostenosis, which is defined as the progressive restriction of the ability to respond to stress with aging [29]. Staying physically active and incorporating regular aerobic and strength training exercises helps preserve muscle reserves needed to maintain function as we age [29].

  • 6.

    Myth: Medication should be the first-line treatment for older adults with LBP.

Fact First-line treatment for primary LBP should be non-pharmacological. Acetaminophen, a commonly prescribed drug, has been shown to be no better than placebo in high quality adult trials [25]. NSAIDS, also are commonly prescribed, offer only small benefits and should be avoided in older adults who are on blood thinners, have high blood pressure or at risk for gastric bleeding [25]. Muscle relaxants can cause light-headedness and should be avoided in older adults with balance issues [25]. Antiseizure drugs like pregabalin and gabapentin are often prescribed for neuropathic- related back pain but have been shown to be no better than placebo and associated with dizziness and cognitive impairment [3133], which can negatively impact older adults with risk of falls. While certain antidepressant may offer minimal pain relief for back pain in older adults, the benefits are generally modest and may not outweigh the risks, which include, cardiotoxicity, dizziness, weight gain, decrease bone density and increase risk of falls [34, 35]. There is also the risk of negative drug interaction among older adults taking multiple medications [35].

  • 7.

    Myth: Surgery is effective for back-dominant pain in older adults.

Fact Surgery for primary back-dominant pain (without lower extremity radicular symptoms) is not supportive by current evidence and potentially can cause more harm than good in older adults [3638]. Older adults often present with multiple comorbidities making them more susceptible to surgical complications [38]. Complication rates for spinal surgeries in older adults range from 3% to 29%, with higher risks associated with advanced age [39].

Despite the lack of evidence and increased risks, there has been a substantial rise in spine surgery for LBP in older adults [38, 40, 41]. A key factor driving this increase is the growing number of individuals over age 65 presenting with chronic LBP and degenerative findings on advanced imaging, who are subsequently referred for surgical consultations [29, 38]. However, degenerative imaging findings become more common with age and correlates poorly with presence of LBP [42].

There is evidence supporting back surgery for leg- dominant radicular symptoms, such as from a herniated disc or lumbar spinal stenosis [43]. Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common reason for spine surgery in individuals over age 65 [43]. However, even among patients who undergo surgery for radicular symptoms, including lumbar spinal stenosis, their LBP often does not improve [37].

  • 8.

    Myth: Chronic LBP in older adults is always due to structural damage.

Fact Almost all older adults have degenerative changes of the lumbar spine, yet only a small fraction experience chronic LBP, and even fewer are disabled by it [12, 14]. Searching for a physical cause of non-specific chronic LBP is rarely productive and often leads to expensive and unnecessary imaging, other tests and referrals, which can worsen pain and disability [15]. Primary, or non-specific, chronic LBP is a biopsychosocial condition. It may begin with a physical issue, but the pain persists beyond the usual healing time and in the absence of significant physical findings [44, 45]. The strongest predictors of chronic LBP in older adults are psychosocial factors, including fear avoidance behaviour, poor self-efficacy, low motivation and low mood [28, 46, 47]. There may be physical consequences in older adults with chronic LBP that are secondary to fear of movement, such as deconditioning, weight gain, bone loss, and sarcopenia. However, successful care of chronic LBP in older adults requires a multimodal approach focused on addressing psychosocial factors and maladaptive behaviours and beliefs [26, 45]

  • 9.

    Myth: Interventional procedures such as epidural injections, joint injections, nerve blocks or radiofrequency ablations are effective in older adults with chronic back pain.

Fact Recent evidence suggests that these interventional procedures are no better than sham procedures for back or radicular pain of more than three months [48, 49]. These procedures are commonly prescribed when conservative treatments have failed, and back pain persists. However, despite the lack of evidence of effectiveness supporting their effectiveness beyond placebo, the use of these procedures continues to grow and is associated with high costs [22, 49]. There is an increased risk of adverse events in older adults receiving these procedures, including hyperglycemia and bone mineral loss with steroid injections [50], and temporary motor weakness with nerve blocks [51]. These side effects can increase the risk of falls and fractures in this population [50].

  • 10.

    Myth: Disc herniations causing back- related leg pain and disability are very common in older adults

Fact The peak age for symptomatic disc herniations is between 30-50 years, and they become less likely to be a direct source of nerve compression causing leg pain with advancing age [52]. This is due to gradual disc desiccation, which leads to fluid loss and eventual stiffening or calcification of the disc [53]. Although, imaging in older adults can demonstrate herniated or bulging discs, these typically represent old and asymptomatic herniations or bulges that have calcified and become rigid and static. They typically do not displace with activities such as bending forward or sitting [19]. It is important to interpret imaging findings in older adults with caution and to rely more on clinical signs of nerve tension and neurological deficits as reliable indicators of radiculopathy across all age groups.

Clinical implications

The myths surrounding LBP in older adults contribute significantly to the perpetuation of ineffective and potentially harmful treatments. These misconceptions can lead to inappropriate clinical practices and exacerbate both the psychological and physical burden on older adults [10]. The consequences of these myths extend beyond clinical mismanagement. They can influence contemporary health policy, often leading to over-reliance on imaging, interventional procedures, surgical interventions, and pharmacologic treatments that lack evidence for efficacy in this population [11]. In care delivery, myths contribute to ageist assumptions, underutilization of conservative therapies, and fragmented interdisciplinary approaches [54]. Media and social media further amplify these myths, frequently portraying aging spines as inherently pathological and promoting fear-based narratives that reinforce avoidance behaviors and passive coping strategies [55].

To address these myths, a multi-pronged strategy is needed. First, educational campaigns and credible online resources should target both clinicians and the public, emphasizing evidence-based messages about aging and spinal health [56]. Institutions training health care practitioners who treat older adults with back pain should critically assess their curricula to ensure instruction is grounded in the best available evidence and free from myths and misinformation.

Second, clinical guidelines must be updated to reflect the nuanced presentation of LBP in older adults, discouraging interventions that are not supported by sound evidence. Guidelines should also provide clearer diagnostic frameworks that distinguish between age-related physiological changes and pathological conditions, reducing the risk of overmedicalization.

Finally, policy makers should be encouraged to fund and promote conservative models of care in older adults that prioritize function, patient engagement, and biopsychosocial approaches.

Future research should examine the impact of myth-driven care on functional outcomes and quality of life in older populations with LBP. Researchers should also investigate the role of digital media in shaping beliefs about spine health in older adults and develop tools to counter misinformation. Addressing these gaps will be essential for improving care and outcomes for this growing demographic.

A key limitation of this paper is its reliance on a single expert’s perspective and the selection of supporting evidence that may reflect the author’s bias. Despite this, the findings and recommendations in this paper align well with recent World Health Organization guidelines for LBP [15]. Another limitation is the lack of standardized definitions for "older adults" in the literature which may complicate the generalizability of findings.

Conclusions

The persistence of myths about LBP in older adults represents a critical barrier to effective, evidence-based care. These misconceptions distort clinical decision-making, public perception, policy development, and media narratives in ways that promote unnecessary and sometimes harmful interventions. There is a dire need to dispel these myths and to do so we need unified, coordinated and multipronged approaches across education, clinical practice, policy and research.

Author contributions

CA was involved in all aspects of this manuscript.

Funding

Supported by funding from the Sinai Health Foundation.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable as this was a commentary without human subjects’ participation.

Competing interests

The author declares that they are no competing interests.

Footnotes

This article has been updated to correct a citation error and the reference list.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

3/30/2026

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1186/s12998-026-00638-y

References

  • 1.Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dieleman JL, Cao J, Chapin A, Chen C, Li Z, Liu A, et al. US health care spending by payer and health condition, 1996-2016. JAMA. 2020;323(9):863–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Buchbinder R, van Tulder M, Öberg B, Costa LM, Woolf A, Schoene M, et al. Low back pain: a call for action. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2384–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. The Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deyo RA. Low-back pain. Sci Am. 1998;279(2):48–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.O'Sullivan PB, Caneiro JP, O'Sullivan K, Lin I, Bunzli S, Wernli K, et al. Back to basics: 10 facts every person should know about back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(12):698–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kripa S, Kadiresan M. Low back pain myths: a narrative review. Bull Fac Phys Therapy. 2024;29(1):62. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.National Institutes of Health (NIH). Age [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): NIH; [cited 2025 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.nih.gov/nih-style-guide/age
  • 10.Weiner DK, Marcum Z, Rodriguez E. Deconstructing chronic low back pain in older adults: Summary recommendations. Pain Med. 2016;17(12):2238–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Docking S, Sridhar S, Haas R, Mao K, Ramsay H, Buchbinder R, et al. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025;(3).
  • 12.Dionne CE, Dunn KM, Croft PR. Does back pain prevalence really decrease with increasing age? A systematic review. Age Ageing. 2006;35(3):229–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.De Souza IM, Sakaguchi TF, Yuan SL, Matsutani LA, do Espírito-Santo AD, de Braganca Pereira CA, et al. Prevalence of low back pain in the elderly population: a systematic review. Clinics. 2019;74:e789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Docking R, Fleming J, Brayne C, Zhao J, Macfarlane J, Jones T. Epidemiology of the back pain in older adults; prevalence and risk factors for back pain onset. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;Sep;50(9):1645-53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organization. WHO guideline for non-surgical management of chronic primary low back pain in adults in primary and community care settings. World Health Organization; 2023.
  • 16.Woodfield J, Lammy S, Jamjoom AA, Fadelalla MA, Copley PC, Arora M, et al. Demographics of cauda equina syndrome: a population-based incidence study. Neuroepidemiology. 2022;56(6):460–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lassiter W, Bhutta BS, Allam AE. Inflammatory back pain. InStatPearls [Internet] 2024; Statpearls Publishing.
  • 18.Koes BW, Van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Burton AK, Waddell G. Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine. 2001;26(22):2504–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(3):403–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Steffens D, Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Williams C, Jensen TS, Latimer J. Does magnetic resonance imaging predict future low back pain? A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2014;18(6):755–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maiers MJ, Sundin AR, Oster RJ, Kreul S, Malone Q, Passmore SR. Contextual factors related to aging determine force-based manipulation dosage: a prospective cross-sectional study. Chiropr Man Ther. 2025;33(1):20. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Powell AC, Rogstad TL, Elliott SW, Price SE, Long JW, Deshmukh UU, et al. Health care utilization and pain outcomes following early imaging for low back pain in older adults. J Am Board Family Med. 2019;32(6):773–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vadalà G, Russo F, De Salvatore S, Cortina G, Albo E, Papalia R, et al. Physical activity for the treatment of chronic low back pain in elderly patients: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Care & Research: Official J Am College Rheum. 2008;59(5):632-41. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cashin AG, Wand BM, O'Connell NE, Lee H, Rizzo RR, Bagg MK, et al. Pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;(4).
  • 26.O’Sullivan PB, Caneiro JP, O’Keeffe M, Smith A, Dankaerts W, Fersum K, et al. Cognitive functional therapy: an integrated behavioral approach for the targeted management of disabling low back pain. Phys Ther. 2018;98(5):408–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mauri Kallinen AM. Aging, physical activity and sports injuries. Sports Med. 1995;20(1):41–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wong AY, Karppinen J, Samartzis D. Low back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions. Scoliosis spinal disorders. 2017;12(1):14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weiner DK. Deconstructing chronic low back pain in the older adult: Shifting the paradigm from the spine to the person. Pain Med. 2015;16(5):881–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McCarberg BH. NSAIDs in the older patient: balancing benefits and harms. Pain Med. 2013;14(suppl1):S43–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Enke O, New HA, New CH, Mathieson S, McLachlan AJ, Latimer J, et al. Anticonvulsants in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar radicular pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2018;190(26):E786–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shanthanna H, Gilron I, Rajarathinam M, AlAmri R, Kamath S, Thabane L, et al. Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2017;14(8):e1002369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of P. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):514–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ferreira GE, McLachlan AJ, Lin CW, Zadro JR, Abdel-Shaheed C, O’Keeffe M, et al. Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for the treatment of back pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2021;372.
  • 35.Wilczyński K, Mazurski A, Kotucha K. Antidepressant efficacy in managing nonspecific chronic lower back pain among older adults: a review. J Pain Palliat Care Pharm. 2024;38(4):379–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Peul WC, Bredenoord AL, Jacobs WC. Avoid surgery as first line treatment for non-specific low back pain. BMJ. 2014;349.
  • 37.Cloyd JM, Acosta FL Jr, Ames CP. Complications and outcomes of lumbar spine surgery in elderly people: a review of the literature. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(7):1318–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Evans L, O'Donohoe T, Morokoff A, Drummond K. The role of spinal surgery in the treatment of low back pain. Med J Australia. 2023;218(1).
  • 39.Kim DW, Oh BH, Min KS, Lee MS, Lee JB. Complications Following Spinal Surgery in Patients Aged 85 Years and Older. Nerve. 2023;9(2):132–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Research®. 2006;443:139–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.O'Lynnger TM, Zuckerman SL, Morone PJ, Dewan MC, Vasquez-Castellanos RA, Cheng JS. Trends for spine surgery for the elderly: implications for access to healthcare in North America. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:S136–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hicks GE, Morone N, Weiner DK. Degenerative lumbar disc and facet disease in older adults: prevalence and clinical correlates. Spine. 2009;34(12):1301–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Katz JN, Harris MB. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):818–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017;389(10070):736–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Main CJ, George SZ. Psychosocial influences on low back pain: why should you care? Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):609–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Beales D, Smith A, O'Sullivan P, Hunter M, Straker L. Back pain beliefs are related to the impact of low back pain in baby boomers in the Busselton Healthy Aging Study. Phys Ther. 2015;95(2):180–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Makris UE, Abrams RC, Gurland B, Reid MC. Management of persistent pain in the older patient: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;312(8):825–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang X, Martin G, Sadeghirad B, Chang Y, Florez ID, Couban RJ, et al. Common interventional procedures for chronic non-cancer spine pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2025;388
  • 49.Busse JW, Genevay S, Agarwal A, Standaert CJ, Carneiro K, Friedrich J, et al. Commonly used interventional procedures for non-cancer chronic spine pain: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2025;388
  • 50.Yun H, Liu Y, Curtis JR, Saag K, D’Erasmo G, Haseltine K, et al. Epidural steroid injections and fracture incidence among older individuals with radiculopathy. J Bone Miner Res. 2025;40(2):176–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lo Bianco G, Tinnirello A, Papa A, Marchesini M, Day M, Palumbo GJ, et al. Interventional pain procedures: a narrative review focusing on safety and complications. PART 2 interventional procedures for back pain. J pain Res. 2023:761–72.
  • 52.Ma D, Liang Y, Wang D, Liu Z, Zhang W, Ma T, et al. Trend of the incidence of lumbar disc herniation: decreasing with aging in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2013:1047–50.
  • 53.Yong-Hing K, Kirkaldy-Willis WH. The pathophysiology of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Orthop Clin North Am. 1983;14(3):491–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Makris UE, Higashi RT, Marks EG, Fraenkel L, Sale JE, Gill TM, et al. Ageism, negative attitudes, and competing co-morbidities–why older adults may not seek care for restricting back pain: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15(1):39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Traeger AC, Underwood M, Ivers R, Buchbinder R. Low back pain in people aged 60 years and over. BMJ. 2022;376.
  • 56.Fuente-Hernández L, de la Fuente-Ruiz E, Gracia-García P, Serrano-García I, Álvarez-Mon MÁ, Molina-Ruiz RM. Using social media-based positive education to challenge negative stereotypes of aging: a quasi-experimental approach. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Chiropractic & Manual Therapies are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES