Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 6;125(11):3259–3272. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05820-3

Table 3.

Differences in muscle electrical activity (EMG) in muscular endurance test among experimental conditions

MPLA MCAF EPLA ECAF ANOVA effects (partial η2)
Supplement Day Suplement by day
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Pectoralis major
 RMS (μV) 329 ± 100 255 ± 128 322 ± 105 322 ± 105 0.479 (0.057) 0.259 (0.139) 0.259 (0.139)
 MVC (N) 752 ± 320 630 ± 354 794 ± 272 794 ± 272 0.377 (0.087) 0.322 (0.109) 0.322 (0.109)
Triceps brachii
RMS (μV) 307 ± 92 287 ± 63 297 ± 97 324 ± 112 0.463 (0.061) 0.832 (0.050) 0.330 (0.105)
MVC (N) 895 ± 295 882 ± 300 887 ± 275 998 ± 459 0.168 (0.020) 0.426 (0.072) 0.401 (0.080)
Rectus femoris
RMS (μV) 207 ± 125 183 ± 127 202 ± 89 194 ± 96 0.929 (0.010) 0.397 (0.066) 0.663 (0.018)
MVC (N) 625 ± 354 659 ± 465 700 ± 309 668 ± 357 0.731 (0.011) 0.990 (< 0.001) 0.586 (0.028)
Vastus lateralis
RMS (μV) 189 ± 58 191 ± 60 154 ± 66 159 ± 59 0.430 (0.058) 0.363 (0.076) 0.349 (0.080)
MVC (N) 479 ± 145 507 ± 215 400 ± 164 503 ± 210 0.382 (0.070) 0.348 (0.080) 0.350 (0.080)

Values are means ± SD

RMS root mean square, MVC maximal voluntary contraction, MPLA morning trial ingesting placebo, MCAF morning trial ingesting caffeine, EPLA evening trial ingesting placebo, ECAF evening trial ingesting caffeine