ABSTRACT
Rabies is a fatal viral disease affecting the central nervous system of warm‐blooded animals including humans; rabies remains a significant global health threat, with over 99% of human cases transmitted through, resulting in approximately 55,000 deaths annually, mainly in Africa and Asia. Rabies manifests in two forms: one characterized by agitation and hydrophobia, and the other, paralytic, marked by muscle weakness and paralysis. The article stresses on the effectiveness of control strategies, including the One Health approach, mass dog vaccination and oral vaccination in line with the ‘Zero by 30’ initiative, which seeks to eliminate dog‐mediated rabies deaths by 2030. However, enforcement, access to post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP), poor dog population management and weak surveillance continue to impede progress, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries. Strengthening collaboration across policymakers, health professionals, public health sectors and environmental health sectors is crucial to reducing the rabies burden and achieving global health objectives. This article aims to explore the global strategies and challenges in controlling and preventing rabies.
Keywords: control strategies, public health, rabies, vaccination, zoonotic diseases
Rabies causes 55,000 deaths annually, mainly in Africa and Asia, despite being preventable. Global strategies such as the One Health approach, mass dog vaccination and PEP aim to eliminate dog‐mediated human rabies by 2030. Gaps in enforcement, dog population control and surveillance hinder progress, especially in low‐resource settings.

1. Introduction
Rabies is an infectious viral disease associated with inflammation of the central nervous system; it affects all mammals including humans (PAHO/WHO 2024). It is one of the potentially underrated zoonotic diseases causing global health threat. More than 99% of all human rabies cases are transmitted by dog bites, whereby every year 55,000 humans and countless dogs die from rabies, mostly in Africa and Asia (PAHO/WHO 2024). Besides rabies being preventable before and after exposure, the strategies have not been effective in most of the developing countries. In addition, even in countries that have claimed to eliminate the disease, its success can be fragile since the interventions are regularly either weakened or stopped (Fahrion et al. 2023).
Rabies presents in two forms: encephalitic and paralytic rabies. Encephalitic rabies presents with agitation, confusion and hydrophobia (PAHO/WHO 2024). Paralytic rabies presents with muscle weakness, paralysis and coma. The most complications caused by rabies are due to involvement of the central nervous system after infection with the virus and eventually lead to death in nearly 100% of patients (Jin 2023).
2. Interventions and Preventions
Rabies is a significant public health concern, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries, where the burden of the disease is disproportionately high. The One Health approach, which integrates human, animal and environmental health, has been recognized as a pragmatic and equitable strategy to address global health challenges (Shafaati et al. 2023). The strategy has been proposed to be cost‐effective in rabies control, aiming to reduce the high number of annual rabies deaths. This approach aligns the needs of disadvantaged communities with global health goals, contributing to sustainable development and global health security (Cleaveland et al. 2017). The practical application of the One Health approach has been emphasized by various organizations, leading to the establishment of expert panels to address zoonotic diseases like rabies (Tidman 2022). Successful interventions, such as the elimination of rabies virus variants in wildlife through oral vaccination (oral baiting), demonstrate the potential for controlling rabies in animal reservoirs (Slate et al. 2009).
Furthermore, the implementation of national rabies control strategies, aligned with the ‘Zero by 30’ global goal to end dog‐mediated human rabies deaths by 2030, exemplifies the commitment to combat rabies at a global level (Athingo et al. 2020). Vaccination plays a crucial role in rabies control, with studies highlighting the induction of protective antibodies following oral immunization in wildlife (Moore et al. 2017). In addition, scoping reviews emphasize the effectiveness of control interventions, including mass dog vaccination, to achieve the goal of zero canine‐mediated human rabies deaths by 2030 (Safii and Abdul Taib 2020). Understanding the contact network structures of dog populations is essential for designing effective mass vaccination strategies to prevent rabies transmission (Laager et al. 2018). Achieving herd immunity is central to rabies elimination. Evidence consistently shows that vaccinating at least 70% of the dog population interrupts rabies transmission and provides community‐wide protection (Lugelo et al. 2022). This threshold is globally recognized as the cornerstone of canine rabies control (Coleman and Dye 1996). In general, awareness and education are vital components of rabies prevention, as evidenced by studies focusing on rural communities and school students to improve protective behaviours and healthcare utilization following animal bites (Sikana et al. 2021). However, Community risk perception greatly influences rabies prevention and control. Misconceptions about dog bites, cultural practices surrounding traditional healers and low awareness of PEP often delay treatment‐seeking behaviours (Rana et al. 2021). Enhancing community knowledge and perception of rabies risk is essential to improving compliance with PEP and vaccination (Santhaseelan et al. 2024). Geographic access to care and the provisioning of PEP are critical factors in shaping the disease burden and preventing human rabies deaths (Rajeev et al. 2021).
2.1. Surveillance Systems
Effective rabies control requires robust surveillance systems to monitor the disease and guide targeted interventions (WHO–Eastern Mediterranean Regional n.d.). Surveillance enables identification of high‐risk areas, helps in quantification of the disease burden and so informing on intervention to be employed (Shah and Househ 2024). Passive surveillance, which relies on reports from healthcare or veterinary facilities, helps in detecting trends but often misses some information due to underreporting (Murray and Cohen 2016). In contrast, active surveillance involves field investigation, sample collection from suspected rabid animals and laboratory confirmation, hence providing more accurate epidemiological data (Murray and Cohen 2016). Integration of both forms is essential in ensuring timely detection, resource allocation and evaluation of interventions.
2.2. Limitations of Current Strategies
Despite the current efforts made to mitigate the burden of rabies in the world, there remain gaps in making the efforts effective. In most countries, the effectiveness of vaccination is weak due to failure to enforce vaccination consistently and poor implementation of policies, leaving many individuals susceptible to contracting rabies (Haselbeck et al. 2021). Also, due to insufficient resources allocated in the fight against the disease, it becomes very challenging to implement comprehensive control strategies, especially in resource‐limited settings (Taylor and Partners for Rabies Prevention 2013).
Also, unavailability and unaffordability of PEP in most communities, especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries, have led to increasing mortality due to rabies. Also, due to a lack of clear guidelines for PEP administration, there is vaccination of people with no risk, leaving people with risk contacts without vaccination (Changalucha et al. 2019).
Furthermore, the failure to control the disease in free‐roaming dogs is another significant issue, which tends to increase the burden of the disease. Improper dog population management and weak surveillance have also contributed to the persistence of rabies (Tiwari et al. 2021). Also, the lack of good collaboration between human, animal and environmental health specialties can also impede the effectiveness of the applied control strategies, since the One Health approach has shown significant effectiveness in some countries (Haselbeck et al. 2021). Most of the current strategies rely on human and animal components, neglecting the role of environmental management in rabies prevention. Poor waste management contributes to sustaining free‐roaming dog population, while human encroachment on wildlife habitats increases the risk of spillover at human–animal interface (Aga et al. 2016). Strengthening environmental management alongside vaccination and surveillance is therefore essential within the One Health framework (Acharya et al. 2020).
2.3. Stakeholders’ Involvement
Multisectoral stakeholder involvement is necessary to ensure effective designing and sustaining effective control programs (Taylor and Partners for Rabies Prevention 2013). The One Health framework has demonstrated the effectiveness of the program, where the convergence of human, animal and environmental health priorities has increased program impact and resource efficiency (CDC 2025). Engaging stakeholders not only improves policies and public compliance but also ensures sustainability of the programs (Nel 2018).
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, the exploration of global strategies to combat rabies involves a multidisciplinary approach, integrating interventions in animal reservoirs, dog mass vaccination, awareness campaigns and improved access to healthcare services. These efforts could align with the ‘Zero by 30’ global campaign and demonstrate the potential to significantly reduce the burden of rabies, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries.
Author Contributions
Jennifer F. Lyabangi: conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation. Elton M. Mahulu: investigation, validation, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Josiah I. Sandetwa: investigation, validation, formal analysis, resources. Witness A. John: formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration. Philbert B. Madoshi: writing – review and editing, supervision, formal analysis.
Ethics Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Peer Review
The peer review history for this article is available at https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer‐review/10.1002/vms3.70669.
Acknowledgements
The authors have nothing to report.
Lyabangi, J. F. , Mahulu E. M., Sandetwa J., John W. A., and Madoshi P. B.. 2025. “Exploring Global Strategies to Combat Rabies: Addressing Limitations and Enhancing Effectiveness.” Veterinary Medicine and Science 11, no. 6: e70669. 10.1002/vms3.70669
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Data Availability Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
References
- Acharya, K. P. , Acharya N., Phuyal S., Upadhyaya M., and Lasee S.. 2020. “One‐Health Approach: A Best Possible Way to Control Rabies.” One Health 10: 100161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aga, A. M. , Hurisa B., and Urga K.. 2016. “Current Situation of Rabies Prevention and Control in Developing Countries: Ethiopia Perspective.” Journal of Infectious Diseases & Preventive Medicine 4, no. 1: 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Athingo, R. , Tenzin T., Shilongo A., et al., 2020. “Fighting Dog‐Mediated Rabies in Namibia—Implementation of a Rabies Elimination Program in the Northern Communal Areas.” Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 5, no. 1: 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CDC . n.d. “One Health.” accessed July 2, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/one‐health/about/index.html.
- Changalucha, J. , Steenson R., Grieve E., et al. 2019. “The Need to Improve Access to Rabies Post‐Exposure Vaccines: Lessons From Tanzania.” Vaccine 37: A45–A53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cleaveland, S. , Sharp J., Abela‐Ridder B., et al. 2017. “One Health Contributions Towards More Effective and Equitable Approaches to Health in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372, no. 1725: 20160168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coleman, P. G , and Dye C.. 1996. “Immunization Coverage Required to Prevent Outbreaks of Dog Rabies.” Vaccine 14, no. 3: 185–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fahrion, A. S. , Freuling C. M., Léchenne M., et al., 2023. “Editorial: Rabies, a Long‐Standing One Health Example—Progress, Challenges, Lessons and Visions on the Way to 0 by 30.” Frontiers in Veterinary Scince 10: 1220327. 10.3389/fvets.2023.1220327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haselbeck, A. H. , Rietmann S., Tadesse B. T., et al. 2021. “Challenges to the Fight Against Rabies—The Landscape of Policy and Prevention Strategies in Africa.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 4: 1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin, J. 2023. “Rabies.” JAMA 329, no. 4: 350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laager, M. , Mbilo C., Madaye E. A., et al., 2018. “The Importance of Dog Population Contact Network Structures in Rabies Transmission.” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 12, no. 8: e0006680. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lugelo, A. , Hampson K., Ferguson E. A., et al. 2022. “Development of Dog Vaccination Strategies to Maintain Herd Immunity Against Rabies.” Viruses 14, no. 4: 830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore, S. M., Gilbet A., Vos A., et al., 2017. “Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife.” Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 2, no. 3: 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray, J. , and Cohen A. L.. 2016. “Infectious Disease Surveillance.” In International Encyclopedia of Public Health. 2nd ed., edited by Quah S. R., 222–229. Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Nel, L. H. 2018. “The Role of Non‐Governmental Organisations in Controlling Rabies: The Global Alliance for Rabies Control.” Revue Scientifique Et Technique 37, no. 2: 751–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PAHO/WHO . “Rabies.” 2024. https://www.paho.org/en/topics/rabies.
- Rajeev, M. , Guis H., Edosoa G. T., et al. 2021. “How Geographic Access to Care Shapes Disease Burden: The Current Impact of Post‐Exposure Prophylaxis and Potential for Expanded Access to Prevent Human Rabies Deaths in Madagascar.” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15, no. 4: e0008821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rana, M. S. , Jahan A. A., Kaisar S. M. G., et al. 2021. “Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions About Rabies Among the People in the Community, Healthcare Professionals and Veterinary Practitioners in Bangladesh.” One Health 13: 100308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Safii, R. , and Abdul Taib N. A.. 2020. “A Scoping Review of the Effectiveness of Control Interventions of Human and Canine Rabies in an Effort to Rationalise the One Health Approach.” Borneo Epidemiology Journal 1, no. 1: 16–34. [Google Scholar]
- Santhaseelan, A. , Dhasaram P., Ganesh K., and Krishnamoorthy K.. 2024. “Community Perception on Rabies Prevention and Control Among the General Population in Puducherry: A Cross‐Sectional Study.” Journal of Medical Science 2, no. 10: 998–1005. [Google Scholar]
- Shafaati, M. , Akbarpour S., Priyanka, A. A. Saied, and Choudhary O. P.. 2023. “Tackling Rabies by One Health Approach: Pitfalls on the Road to Global Eradication.” New Microbes New Infections 52: 101098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah, H. A. , and Househ M.. 2024. “Purpose‐Oriented Review of Public Health Surveillance Systems: Use of Surveillance Systems and Recent Advances.” BMJ Public Health 2, no. 1: e000374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sikana, L. , Lembo T., Hampson K., et al. 2021. “Dog Ownership Practices and Responsibilities for Children's Health in Terms of Rabies Control and Prevention in Rural Communities in Tanzania.” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15, no. 3: e0009220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slate, D. , Algeo T. P., Nelson K. M., et al. 2009. “Oral Rabies Vaccination in North America: Opportunities, Complexities, and Challenges.” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3, no. 12: e549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, L. and Partners for Rabies Prevention . 2013. “Eliminating Canine Rabies: The Role of Public–Private Partnerships.” Antiviral Research 98, no. 2: 314–318. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tidman, R. , Thumbi S. M., Wallace R., et al., 2022. “United Against Rabies Forum: The One Health Concept at Work.” Frontiers in Public Health 10: 854419. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.854419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari, H. K. , Gogoi‐Tiwari J., and Robertson I. D.. 2021. “Eliminating Dog‐Mediated Rabies: Challenges and Strategies.” Animal Diseases 1, no. 1: 19. [Google Scholar]
- WHO–Eastern Mediterranean Regional . n. d. “Importance of Surveillance in Preventing and Controlling Noncommunicable Diseases.” http://www.emro.who.int/noncommunicable‐diseases/publications/questions‐and‐answers‐on‐importance‐of‐surveillance‐in‐preventing‐and‐controlling‐noncommunicable‐diseases.html.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
