Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep 30;113(1):36–42. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7317

Table 7.

Summary of selected publicationsa that have evaluated lead measure associations with uric acid.

Study No. Mean age (years) Mean blood or bone leadb Association p-Value of lead measure Covariates controlled for Comments
Wang et al. 2002 229 65% 67.7 μg/dL, males 10 μg/dL increase in blood lead associated with a 0.085 mg/dL increase in uric acid 0.02 Sex and body weight Alcohol apparently not significant
< 40 48.6 μg/dL, females
Ehrlich et al. 1998 382 41 53.5 μg/dL Current and historical blood lead in quintiles associated with uric acid ≤0.01 for trend Age, height, and weight Tibia lead measured on a random sample of 40 participants
69.7 μg/g
Roels et al. 1994 76c 44 43.0 μg/dL; 66 μg/g Continuous lead measures (workers plus controls) with uric acid NS Not reported
68d 43 14.1 μg/dL; 21 μg/g
Baker et al. 1981 318 36e 22.4 μg/dLe Continuous blood lead with uric acid NS Age
37f 24.0 μg/dLf
Smith et al. 1995 691 48 7.8 μg/dL Continuous blood lead with uric acid NS Age, alcohol, ALAD
Shadick et al. 2000 777 67 5.9 μg/dL Blood lead and uric acid 0.1 Age, BMI, diastolic blood pressure, alcohol, serum creatinine Normative Aging Study
30.2 μg/g patella Patella lead and uric acid 0.02
20.8 μg/g tibia Tibia lead and uric acid 0.06

Abbreviations: ALAD, δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydrase; NS, not significant.

a

Based on sample size and extent of statistical analysis.

b

μg/g indicates tibia lead per bone mineral unless noted as patella.

c

Lead workers.

d

Controls.

e

Rural residence.

f

Urban residence.