TABLE 6.
Comparison with existing methods.
| Dataset | Method | Dice (%) | |||
| WT | TC | ET | Average | ||
| BraTS2019 | Zhou, 2024 | 86.7 | 87.1 | 78.9 | 84.2 |
| Zhou and Zhu, 2023 | 86.5 | 87.0 | 79.4 | 84.3 | |
| Li et al., 2022 and Sobhaninia et al., 2023 | 89.3 | 82.3 | 78.8 | 83.5 | |
| Wang et al., 2021 | 90.0 | 81.9 | 78.9 | 83.6 | |
| Peng and Sun, 2023 | 90 | 81 | 76 | 82.3 | |
| Latif et al., 2021 | 87.4 | 75.8 | 74.1 | 79.1 | |
| Akbar et al., 2022 | 88.5 | 81.0 | 74.9 | 81.5 | |
| Huang et al., 2025 | 88.82 | 79.61 | 71.60 | 80.01 | |
| Huang et al., 2025 | 90.81 | 76.08 | 68.57 | 78.49 | |
| Ours | 91.2 | 84.0 | 78.4 | 84.5 | |
| BraTS2020 | Guan et al., 2022 | 85 | 69 | 67 | 73.7 |
| Wang et al., 2021 | 90.1 | 81.7 | 78.7 | 83.5 | |
| Peng and Sun, 2023 | 90 | 80 | 76 | 82 | |
| Ali et al., 2023 | 89.6 | 83.2 | 75.0 | 82.6 | |
| Qamar et al., 2021 | 87.5 | 83.7 | 79.5 | 83.6 | |
| Akbar et al., 2022 | 88.6 | 80.2 | 72.9 | 80.6 | |
| Ours | 90.1 | 84.2 | 77.2 | 83.8 | |