Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2025 Oct 9;59(41):22074–22084. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c04928

Streamlining Quantification and Data Harmonization of Polychlorinated Alkanes Using a Platform-Independent Workflow

Idoia Beloki Ezker , Bo Yuan , Anders Røsrud Borgen §, Jiyan Liu ∥,, Yawei Wang , Thanh Wang †,#,*
PMCID: PMC12550811  PMID: 41065412

Abstract

Reliable quantification of polychlorinated alkanes (PCAs) remains a major challenge, hindering environmental research across diverse matrices. Each sample can contain over 500 homologue groups, collectively producing >1000 m/z ratios that require interference checks. High-resolution mass spectrometry methods vary in ionization signals and data formats and require specialized algorithms for quantification. CPxplorer streamlines data processing through the integration of three modules: (1) CPions generates target ion sets and isotopic thresholds for compound identification into the next module; (2) Skyline performs instrument-independent data integration, interference evaluation, and homologue profiling; and (3) CPquant deconvolves homologues and reports concentrations using reference standards and homologue profiles from Skyline. Evaluation of the workflow with NIST-SRM-2585 dust and ERM-CE100 fish tissue material yielded comparable results across raw data formats from different instruments. Further applications of CPxplorer across diverse matrices, including indoor dust, organic films, silicone wrist bands, and food samples, demonstrated the usefulness in biological and environmental monitoring. Compared to existing tools limited to qualitative detection, CPxplorer enables quantitative outputs, reduces processing time, and expands functionality to PCA-like substances (e.g., BCAs) and PCA degradation products (e.g., OH-PCAs). CPxplorer reduces learning barriers, empowers users to quantify PCAs across various analytical instruments, and contributes to generating comparable results in the field.

Keywords: polychlorinated alkanes, chlorinated paraffins, quantification, data harmonization, persistent organic pollutants, analytical method


graphic file with name es5c04928_0006.jpg


graphic file with name es5c04928_0005.jpg

1. Introduction

Polychlorinated alkanes (PCAs, C n H2n+2–x Cl x ) are the main component of chlorinated paraffins (CPs) technical mixtures. CPs have a wide range of applications as flame retardants and plasticizers, and their cumulative production has exceeded 33 million metric tons since the 1930s. Consequently, PCAs are ubiquitous in the outdoor and indoor environments, and humans are constantly exposed to this complex contaminant group. The short carbon chain homologue groups (C10–C13), also named short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs), have persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) properties, hence their production and use were banned by the Stockholm Convention on POPs (persistent organic pollutants) in 2017. Recently, MCCPs (medium- chain CPs, C14–C17) have also faced a ban, and LCCPs (long-chain CPs, C18–C30) are also suspected to be PBT but remain unregulated. This lack of regulation on CPs can be attributed to the limited toxicological and fate data, stemming from the complex nature of PCA analysis.

The complexity of PCA analysis is heightened by the large number of isomers, homologue groups (expressed commonly as PCAs-C x Cl y ), and chain length congener groups (PCAs-C x ) that chromatographic techniques lack the resolution to fully resolve. Consequently, the chromatographic signals result in broad “humps” that conventional data analysis software struggle to accurately identify. Additionally, the m/z values of these homologue groups significantly overlap, with the m/z ranges extending from 200 to 750, 250–800, and 450–950 for 34 PCAs-C10–13Cl3–13, 47 PCAs-C14–17Cl3–15, and 156 PCAs-C18–30Cl3–15 homologue groups, respectively. The isotopic patterns overlap and interfere with each other, complicating the PCA analysis when using low-resolution mass spectrometry (LRMS). , This highlights the necessity for high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) with a minimum of 20 000 resolving power to achieve more accurate results. However, the choice of HRMS instruments also impacts PCA homologue identification, as different chromatographic and ionization techniques tend to favor specific chlorination levels or carbon chain lengths. ,

Instrumental limitations in PCA analysis hamper the isomeric differentiation and complicate the quantification process as the accurate matching of standards and samples is impeded. In fact, existing standards do not reflect the true PCA distribution, , requiring mathematical tools for semiquantification. ,, This leads to varying data treatment methods across laboratories, complicating interlaboratory comparisons. , The most commonly applied method was described by Bogdal et al. and relies on a mathematical algorithm to deconvolute PCA patterns in a sample from combinations of different standards. However, setting up this method is tedious and challenging to comprehend, making it difficult for most laboratories to implement as no software currently automates the process.

Currently, there are few open-access tools that offer data analysis of PCAs from mass spectrometric measurements, which complicates data collection for proper risk assessments, both in environmental contexts and in areas including food and feed safety. Available tools such as CP-Seeker offer a solution for automatizing the chromatographic peak integration, while CP-Hunter aids in exploring mass spectral interferences. However, no tool has yet integrated the quantification step into the workflow. Furthermore, the use of different tools and methods across laboratories can results in nonharmonized values, hindering the establishment of exposure reference values for PCAs. Moreover, assessing multiple human exposure pathways and the diversity of sample matrices presents additional challenges. The lack of suitable workflows to address these complexities further impedes the ability to accurately evaluate risks and exposure levels across various environmental contexts.

To address this, we have developed CPxplorer, an open-source solution that rapidly processes raw data and reliably quantifies a large number of samples, featuring detailed manuals and tutorials, and intuitive graphical user interfaces (GUIs) to support users of all experience levels. CPxplorer tackles mass spectral overlaps of PCAs and other byproducts in CP mixtures, offering a rapid data integration solution and comprehensive guidance on peak selection. It also provides quantified PCA levels by automating the script of Perkons et al., which applies the modified deconvolution method described by Bogdal et al. The method was evaluated by analyzing the NIST indoor dust reference sample (SRM 2585, National Institute of Standards and Technology) using various chromatographic and mass spectrometric techniques along with different standards, including standard mixtures, single-chain standards, and technical mixtures. To further confirm the method, CPxplorer was used to quantify PCAs-C10–13 and PCAs-C14–17 from the certified fish tissue material, ERM-CE100. CPxplorer was then applied to quantify PCA levels in matrices commonly used to assess human exposure, such as indoor dust, indoor organic film (IOF), silicone wristbands (SWBs), and food. Additionally, CPxplorer was used to investigate the presence of CP mixture byproducts, such as polychlorinated olefins (PCOs) and bromochloro alkanes (BCAs), as well as their transformation products. Overall, CPxplorer introduces a novel framework for automatizing PCA quantification and streamlining data harmonization with potential implications for enhanced risk assessment workflows.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. CPxplorer Overview

CPxplorer presents a complete solution for PCA analysis and quantification. The workflow that we developed contains three integrated modules, CPions, Skyline, and CPquant, which facilitate the quantification of large data sets in a short period of time. Depicted in Figure A, CPions is a tool for the exploration of the CP mixture mass spectral interferences and can generate a list of selected targeted ions, such as those that have noninterfering m/z values. This target ion list is then imported into Skyline (Figure B), which allows for the synchronized peak integration of large sample batches without the need for prior data conversion. Finally, the exported report from Skyline is directly uploaded into CPquant (Figure C), which provides the quantification results of PCAs by deconvoluting the contribution of the different homologue groups. ,

1.

1

Scheme of the CPxplorer workflow. From top to bottom, (A) CPions is an app for the generation of target ions list and investigates potential mass interferences. (B) Skyline is an openly available software for raw mass spectrometric data integration and operates on the target list created by CPions. (C) CPquant is an app that performs quantification of PCAs in the samples and blanks based on the integration results from Skyline. Detailed descriptions of each module can be found in Sections S8–S10. Note: “Molecule” the is the term used by Skyline, which refers to homologue group.

2.2. Workflow Evaluation

The method was applied to the analysis of PCAs-C10–30 in the 2585 SRM from NIST. The SRM-2585 has been broadly used for the study of organic contaminants in house dust, including PCAs, whose measured values at average concentrations were 7.58 (±0.43) and 16.4 (±2.1) μg/g for ∑PCAs-C10–13 and ∑PCAs-C14–17, respectively. In order to provide a comprehensive evaluation of CPxplorer, different instrumental techniques and ionization modes were applied, including gas chromatography (GC)–negative chemical ionization (NCI)–quadrupole time-of-flight (qToF), GC-NCI-Orbitrap, liquid chromatography (LC)–electrospray ionization (ESI)–qToF, LC-ESI-Orbitrap, LC–atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI)–Orbitrap, and direct injection (DI)–APCI–Orbitrap. Additionally, the fish tissue ERM-CE100 was analyzed by GC-NCI-qToF and CPxplorer was applied for PCA data treatment and quantification. ERM-CE100 is a recently available certified material for PCAs-C10–13 (31 ± 9 and 23 ± 7 μg/kg, depending on the calibrant used) and PCAs-C14–17 (44 ± 17 μg/kg). Detailed information on NIST-SRM-2585 and ERM-CE100 can be found in Sections S1 and S2 and Table S1.

For the quantification of PCAs, different standard mixtures and several combinations were used to ensure an exhaustive evaluation of CPxplorer. The following single-chain standard mixtures were purchased from Chiron AS: C10 (52.5% and 58.4% Cl), C11 (52.3% and 57.7% Cl), C12 (53.8% and 57.3% Cl), C13 (45.9% and 60% Cl), and C14 (49.2% and 58.7% Cl), C15 (47.7% and 59.3% Cl), C16 (51.5% and 58.4% Cl), and C17 (56.3% Cl). PCA standard mixtures from Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Augsburg, Germany) containing PCAs-C10–13 with 51.5%, 55.5%, and 63.0% chlorine content, PCAs-C14–17 with 42%, 52%, and 57% chlorine content, and PCAs-C18–30 with 36% and 49% chlorine content were purchased. Complementarily, the technical mixtures Uniclor40 from Neville Chemical Co (USA), Paroil CW 40 from Dover Chemical Corporation (USA), Cloparin 49 from Caffaro (Italy), Hüls 70C and 40N from Hüls AG (Germany), Witaclor 149 and 549 from Dynamit Nobel AG (Germany), and Cereclor S52 from INEOS Chlor, Ltd. (UK) were used. The calibration curves were built at three to five concentration points of each standard mixture.

2.3. Environmental Samples

The applicability of CPxplorer was tested as a tool for the rapid assessment of human exposure to PCAs. Indoor dust and IOF samples were collected in parallel in a Swedish household in May 2023. Complementarily, a participant living in this household wore an SWB for over a week. Pooled vegetables and meat samples from a Swedish market basket study were also analyzed. These represented some of the most consumed items from the Swedish food market, with a consumption of 245 and 194 g/person/day per capita of vegetables and meat, respectively. All samples were analyzed by LC-ESI-qToF (Agilent 6546); detailed information on sample preparation can be found in Sections S3–S6.

In order to further understand the implications of human exposure to CPs and further extend the applications of CPxplorer, PCOs, Phase I degradation products of PCAs, and BCAs were also investigated. For PCA degradation products, rice plant roots (Oryza sativa Japonica cv. Nipponbare) previously exposed to 1,2,5,6,9,10-C10H16Cl6 were analyzed. The data were originally acquired by Chen et al. using LC-ESI-Orbitrap (Section S7). PCOs and BCAs were investigated in previously described NIST-SRM-2585 indoor dust.

2.4. Data Treatment Procedure

The first step of CPxplorer involves the creation of a target analyte list which compiles the nonconflictive m/z values. This is performed by the module CPions, an in-house developed graphical user interface app based on the Shiny framework in R. The source code is available at the GitHub repository (https://github.com/WBS-TW/CPxplorer). Briefly, in CPions the centroided m/z values corresponding to the ions are generated based on the EnviPat package. As depicted in Figure , the m/z values that are not expected to overlap at the applied mass resolving power are considered for the analyte target list. The app is flexible and enables the study of a large variety of adducts of PCAs, BCAs, PCOs, and degradation products. A visualization of the GUI of CPions can be seen in Figure S2, and a detailed description of CPions can be found in Section S8.

The m/z value list generated in CPions can then be imported to Skyline to generate the extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) from the raw data (Figure ). Skyline is an open-source software for quantitative analysis of mass spectrometric data, which supports .d, .wiff, .qgd, .raw, and .mzml file extensions from the major vendors Agilent and Bruker, Sciex, Shimadzu, Thermo, and Waters. Peak detection is performed within a user-defined mass error window. The integration criteria include matching isotopologue peak shapes, similar isotope abundance patterns, and retention time ranges between the standard and the sample, confirming Gaussian distribution of profile MS data and ensuring mass error is within acceptable ranges (Figure ). A visualization of the GUI of Skyline can be seen in Figure S3 together with a detailed description of the tool in Section S9.

Data integration reports from Skyline can be exported to a .csv or spreadsheet file, which can then be imported into CPquant for quantification. CPquant is another Shiny app in our CPxplorer package, which is mainly written by using the tidyverse grammar of the R programming language. The quantification values are obtained using the PCA homologue deconvolution method , (Figure C). Specifically, the CPquant approach builds upon the R script from Perkons et al., which performs the least-squares approximation by assuming two contributing standard mixtures and solving the best fit under a fixed total contribution. In contrast, our approach is based on the non-negative least-squares (nnls) R package and allows for the simultaneous use of all standards without imposing a fixed-sum constraint, enabling batch analysis rather than the single-sample quantification used in previous quantification schemes. This significantly enhances efficiency and scalability, making batch-scale quantification feasible; see details in Section S10. A visualization of the GUI of CPquant can be seen in Figure S4. Another advantage of CPquant is the output of QA/QC data to further ensure the reliability of the quantified results, such as the goodness of pattern fit (GoPF) of the deconvoluted patterns, signal normalization to an internal standard, blank subtraction, and graphical displays of the signal ratios between quantification and qualification ions.

3. Results and Discussion

CPxplorer greatly reduced data quantification time to process large data sets. CPquant offers automatization of the script from Perkons et al., for mass spectral deconvolution method. This advancement represents a major step forward in PCA analysis, which, to date, has been intricate and highly time-consuming. Additionally, CPquant allows for blank signal subtraction, a critical need in PCA analysis due to their ubiquitous presence and notably elevated levels in procedural blanks. Likewise, the use of CPxplorer for chromatographic peak integration poses a substantial improvement in data harmonization. To date, signal selection has relied on researcher-defined criteria. CPxplorer, however, introduces a streamlined and consistent approach for peak selection, delivering results comparable to previously published studies (e.g., NIST SRM-2585, Figure ). The module CPions provided a rapid and comprehensive understanding of the mass spectral interferences and generated a list of target compounds. This list ensured that the selected m/z values can be free from interference, providing additional confidence in peak selection and accurate identification of PCAs. The Skyline platform further enhanced this process with multivariable criteria, enabling simultaneous visualization of chromatograms, retention times, MS data, isotopic distributions, and mass errors. In addition, CPquant enhances data accuracy and consistency by automating and harmonizing quantification and QA/QC procedures. This comprehensive framework accelerated analysis while ensuring data quality and reliability in a few minutes.

2.

2

From top to bottom: ∑PCAs-C10–13, ∑PCAs-C14–17, and ∑PCAs-C18–30 levels (μg/g) in NIST-SRM-2585. The current study quantified the PCA levels by CPxplorer, displayed in light green of the online version. Note: [M + Cl] adducts of PCAs-Cl4–15 and [M – Cl] fragments of PCAs-Cl6–11 were detected when using LC-based techniques and GC-based techniques, respectively.

3.1. Evaluation of the CPxplorer Workflow

CPxplorer is presented as a standardized tool for PCA data quantification. To assess its suitability, data sets from a broad range of instruments were acquired and processed using the CPxplorer workflow. Given the diversity of instrumental capabilities across laboratories, a standardized tool must be capable of consistent performance across all data sets. However, full harmonization necessitates standardization at both the instrumental and data processing levels, with CPxplorer specifically addressing the latter. To support this, the influence of instrumentation on PCA responses was assessed, aiding in distinguishing the variability attributable to instrumentation from those introduced during data processing. Additionally, CPxplorer was further evaluated by comparing the performance of the current tool to established software, such as Trace Finder from Thermo Fisher and Mass Hunter from Agilent, as well as PCA-specific tools, including CP-Seeker, CP-Hunter, and the R-script published by Perkons et al.

3.1.1. Performance of CPxplorer with Diverse Instrumental Data

As depicted in Figure , CPxplorer provided quantified PCA levels for NIST-SRM-2585 comparable to those reported by previous studies. ,− These results provided an open-access and more accurate solution for PCA analysis, significantly reducing the data processing time. The data were obtained by GC, LC, and DI coupled to ESI, APCI, and NCI-Orbitrap and qToF, showing also the usefulness of CPxplorer among different instruments and vendor file formats. This versatility of CPxplorer is particularly important in risk assessment, as the PCA pattern observed in the samples depends on the instrumental method used and may affect which homologues are identified as key drivers of toxicity. , Furthermore, this flexibility is highly significant as it will enable the workflow to be implemented across a wide range of laboratories.

The GoPF (indicated by R2-values) of the PCA pattern in NIST-SRM-2585 calculated by CPquant and the measured signals ranged from 0.78 to 0.95, with 1.00 being a perfect match (Table S2). The quantified levels of ∑PCAs-C10–13 ranged from 6.1 ± 0.2 to 11 ± 1 μg/g; all results are compiled in Table S2. LC-based techniques, including LC-ESI-qToF and LC-APCI-Orbitrap, quantified slightly higher levels of ∑PCAs-C10–13, which may be attributed to the absence of blank subtraction in the data set. However, due to the lack of access to blank data from the different works, this possibility could not be further examined in the present study. The quantified levels of ∑PCAs-C14–17 resulted in 7-fold lower levels for GC-based (GC-NCI-Orbitrap, 2.5 ± 0.6 μg/g, and GC-ECNI-qToF, 3.1 ± 0.2 μg/g) compared to LC-based instruments (24 ± 2 and 18 ± 4 μg/g for LC-APCI-Orbitrap and LC-ESI-qToF, respectively), a difference that may also be explained by the blanks. This suggests that PCA-Cl≤5 homologues, which are not detected by GC-NCI techniques, may predominantly originate from blank contamination within the batch. Thus, the blanks may account for the higher levels of PCAs-C14–17 observed with LC-based techniques compared to GC-based techniques. See Figures S5A and S6A for the PCA-C14–17 patterns in NIST-SRM-2585 measured by LC and GC instrumentations.

CPions also illustrated the variability between instruments in ion interference analysis, where differences in targeted adducts further influence mass spectral overlap. When analyzing PCAs using GC-based techniques [PCA – Cl] fragments are commonly targeted, while with LC-based instrumentations [PCA + Cl] adducts are typically monitored. , For instance, calculating at a resolution power of 20,000 and a relative abundance threshold above 50%, the [PCA – 35Cl] and [PCO – 37Cl] ions of the parent formulas C12H19Cl7 and C12H17Cl7, respectively, were found to overlap, while [PCA + 35Cl] and [PCO + 37Cl] were not. This mismatch in the target ion selection between techniques might have contributed to the disparity in the final quantified results due to the different ionization efficiencies. In addition, unresolved mass spectral signals can appear as a single peak in the chromatogram, as PCA peaks often span several minutes and lack distinct Gaussian shapes. This overlap can lead to over- or underestimation of concentration and reduce quantification accuracy.

PCA patterns in NIST-SRM-2585 dust were also influenced by instrumentation at the congener and homologue levels. The LC-based techniques showed the highest relative abundance for the PCA-C14 congeners, while the results obtained when using GC separation were dominated by the shorter chain congeners, PCAs-C12. However, adduct formation was not found to be the only factor driving the discrepancy between instruments. The higher volatile character of short-chain compared to the medium- or long-chain PCAs makes the GC more sensitive to PCAs-C10–13. The results acquired by the GC-NCI-Orbitrap described a PCA homologue pattern comparable to the one reported by Spaan et al., where PCAs-C12 were the most abundant congeners. Contrarily, when using GC-NCI-qToF the PCA-C10 congeners were identified as the dominant chain length group. A closer examination of homologue patterns reveals that the results acquired by the qToF exhibited the highest relative abundance at a lower degree of chlorination compared to the Orbitrap data, typically Cl6 for qToF and Cl7 for Orbitrap. These discrepancies may also be influenced by the different GC and MS method parameters, as well as the use of standards. Homologue pattern variability was observed in LC-based techniques as well, where APCI demonstrated greater sensitivity to lower chlorinated homologues compared to ESI. The discrepancy in results depicts the impact of ionization techniques and instrumental methodologies on PCA pattern measurements. , Still, CPxplorer was proven to be consistent at reproducing patterns aligned with prior studies while remaining sensitive to instrument-specific homologue distributions.

Due to their low vapor pressure, PCAs-C18–30 are analyzed exclusively using LC-based instruments. The results obtained were comparable to those previously reported. The same PCA-C18–30 homologue pattern was observed across all instruments studied, with PCAs-C22–24 being the most abundant homologue group. The reconstituted PCA-C18–30 patterns were constructed by using PCA standard mixtures from Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Augsburg, Germany) along with several technical CP mixtures. However, the Dr. Ehrenstorfer standard mixtures were largely dominated by PCAs-C18–20, leading to reconstituted patterns primarily dominated by the CP technical mixtures Paroil CW 40, Witaclor 549, Uniclor40, and Hüls 40N. Indeed, the GoPF for the PCAs-C18–30 was very low when only the PCA mixtures from Dr. Ehrenstorfer were considered for deconvolution. When the technical mixtures Paroil CW 40 and Unichlor 40 were applied for quantification, the GoPF was 0.87 ± 0.02 for three replicates. CP technical mixtures are not composed purely of PCAs, which adds complexity to PCA analysis, since some interferences will not be resolved, mainly when using LRMS. This highlights the urgent need for longer-chain PCA standards, as currently no single chain congener standards are available for PCAs-C≥18.

Standards for PCAs-C10–17 at carbon chain length congener level are available, such as PCAs-C10 52.5% Cl from Chiron. CPxplorer was also evaluated for PCA quantification using single-chain standards; see Figure for the results acquired by GC-NCI-qToF. Additionally, PCAs-C10–17 in fish tissue material, ERM-CE100, were quantified using both PCA standard mixtures from Dr. Ehrenstorfer and the single-chain standards from Chiron. The deconvoluted pattern for PCAs-C10–13 was dominated by PCAs-C13, followed by PCAs-C11, PCAs-C12, and PCAs-C10 congeners, matching the pattern described by Ricci et al. Accordingly, 50.23% Cl for PCAs-C13 was the standard that contributed most to the CPquant reconstituted PCAs-C10–13 pattern. Overall, the GoPF between the deconvoluted and measured patterns matched >0.85 for all replicates. CPquant quantified the PCAs-C10–13 levels at 51 ± 9 μg/g and PCAs-C14–17 at 37 ± 9 μg/g, aligning with the certified values that were set at 22–40 and 27–61 μg/kg for PCAs-C10–13 and PCAs-C14–17, respectively. The measured concentration of PCAs-C10–13 was slightly higher than the certified range, but this deviation was considered acceptable in the context of known analytical variability and matrix complexity.

On the whole, CPxplorer was validated across a wide range of instruments, data formats, and standard mixtures, demonstrating its suitability for PCA data analysis and quantification. It was also shown to be a fast tool for exploring PCA congener and homologue patterns as well as a valuable resource for understanding the influence of instrumentation on PCA quantification.

3.1.2. Results Comparability

The results obtained by CPxplorer were reproducible to those samples acquired with other mass spectral data treatment tools. For this, the potential mass spectral interferences of PCAs identified by CPions were further confirmed by CP-Hunter. CP-Hunter is a web-based platform that facilitates the data evaluation and assessment of single isotope clusters. CPions spotted the clusters of PCA and PCO homologues with the same carbon chain and chlorine atoms to interfere at resolution powers under 20,000, aligning with results obtained by CP-Hunter, and prior studies. ,

CPions also identified potential interferences of BCAs and PCAs, which required a minimum resolution power of 20,000 to clarify the mass spectral signals matching the recommendation from Chibwe et al. To overcome this overlapping issue, McGrath et al. suggested the use of CP-seeker for the comparison of complete isotopologue pattern and m/z values of targeted ions with exact theoretical values. Here, CPxplorer described the same PCA and BCA patterns as CP-seeker for the same sample by applying a 20,000 mass resolution in CPions and excluding lower-intensity ions. It is crucial to emphasize that any exclusion of ions must strictly comply with all of the outlined criteria for data integration in Skyline.

The use of Skyline and the proposed criteria for peak selection were further validated by the comparability of the results obtained by CPxplorer to those acquired by the vendor software MassHunter and TraceFinder (Table and Figure S5). All tools generated comparable integration results, with ∑PCAs-C10–13 levels consistent with those reported in previous studies for NIST-SRM-2585, ,− Table . This suggests that the proposed data integration criteria are valid for PCA identification and quantification, representing a significant step toward harmonizing data processing and enhancing comparability across studies.

1. Average Values of ∑PCAs-C10‑13 in μg/g in Two Replicates of NIST-2585 Dust .
instrument and ionization technique software ∑PCAs-C10–13 (μg/g) by R script from Perkons et al. standard deviation time spent for data processing
GC-NCI-Orbitrap Trace Finder 5.20 3% 6 h
Skyline 5.46 10 min
LC-ESI-qToF Masshunter 9.32 0% 4 h
Skyline 9.27 10 min
a

The analysis was performed using GC-NCI-Orbitrap and LC-ESI-qToF, and the data were treated by TraceFinder/Skyline and MassHunter/Skyline, respectively. The quantification results were calculated using the script from Perkons et al. The time spent refers to the data treatment duration once the method was developed.

The peak integration data acquired from different software were quantified by the R script from Perkons et al. (see Table ). These values were comparable to the quantification results obtained by CPquant for the same data: 6.3 and 8.8 μg/g for ∑PCAs-C10–13 when using GC-NCI-Orbitrap and LC-ESI-qToF, respectively. The small variation between the script from Perkons et al. and CPquant can be explained by the fact that the script from Perkons et al. performs deconvolution using the response from two standard mixtures at a time, while CPquant operates on the nnls package from R, which provides functions for the solution of linear systems by non-negative least-squares using all the standard mixtures available in the data set.

3.2. Application of CPxplorer in Environmental Analysis

To evaluate the robustness of CPxplorer in addressing matrix complexities, the performance of CPxplorer was tested across a range of environmental and biological matrices with varying degrees of complexity. These matrices were selected not only to reflect realistic analytical scenarios but also for their relevance to human exposure assessment, a particularly important aspect given the current lack of exposure limits and comprehensive risk assessments for PCAs. While CPxplorer is not limited to these types of samples, this evaluation aims to demonstrate its potential as a reliable tool in reducing interference-related challenges and contributing to the broader goal of improving exposure and risk assessment of PCAs. Moreover, a comprehensive understanding of human exposure to CP mixtures requires evaluating other halogenated compounds present alongside PCAs in technical mixtures, an aspect that was also assessed by using CPxplorer.

3.2.1. Matrices Relevant for Human Exposure to PCAs: IOF, Indoor Dust, SWB, and Food

The current findings identified PCAs-C14–17 as the PCA group posing the highest exposure levels in the studied Swedish household, with ∑PCAs-C14–17 reaching 268.2 ng/m2 and 22.3 μg/g in IOF and indoor dust, respectively. Bai et al. also described an IOF pattern where PCAs-C14–17 were the most abundant PCA group, while Wong et al. measured higher levels of PCAs-C14–17 over PCAs-C10–13 in indoor Swedish dust as well. This PCA pattern dominated by PCAs-C14–17 was also seen in the SWB that was used to investigate the inhalation and dermal exposure to PCAs of a participant living in the sampled household (Figure A). Over a week, the SWB accumulated 0.9 μg/g (w/w), 5.5 μg/g (w/w), and 1.1 μg/g (w/w) of ∑PCAs-C10–13, ∑PCAs-C14–17, and ∑PCAs-C18–30, respectively. This results align with the ranges described by Yin et al. in SWBs that were worn by participants living in Belgium households.

3.

3

(A) PCA homologue group patterns in several matrices commonly used to assess human exposure, including IOF, indoor dust, SWB, meat, and vegetables. R 2 shows the GoPF between the measured and the reconstituted patterns. (B) The relative contribution of the standards to reconstitute the PCA homologue pattern in the sample and grouped into ∑PCAs-C10–13, ∑PCAs-C14–17, and ∑PCAs-C18–30, from top to bottom. Data were acquired from CPquant; the app also offers graphical displays equivalent to Figure , see Figure S4.

CPquant reconstituted the measured patterns in dust using several technical CP mixtures with an R 2 = 0.90 GoPF (Figure A). However, the GoPF value was lower for the reconstituted PCA patterns in the IOF and SWB at 0.50 and 0.40, respectively (Figure A). The lack of GoPF of the deconvoluted pattern was attributed to PCAs-C21–30, which were measured in the sample but not in the standards. Due to lab limitations, the SWB was quantified using the standard mixtures from Dr. Ehrenstorfer, which, as previously discussed, were seen to contain a poor contribution of PCAs-C21–30. Accordingly, the fitness between deconvoluted and observed PCA-C10–17 patterns in the SWB increased to 0.77 when PCAs-C18–30 were excluded from quantification. While the GoPF reflects the PCA homologue group match between the standards and the sample, the current results confirm the implementation of the nnls-based deconvolution algorithm from CPquant. This was demonstrated by the ability of CPquant to reliably reproduce measured PCA patterns under realistic conditions that account for sample matrix complexities.

The described capability of CPquant to provide the GoPF fit for the deconvoluted patterns offers a key advantage as it helps identify discrepancies between the standards and the sample. The app provides both R 2 values and a visual inspection tool (Figures B, S4), allowing users to assess how well the deconvoluted pattern matches the sample distribution. Bogdal et al. suggested that an R 2 value of 0.50 serves as a cutoff for meaningful quantification of PCAs-C10–13. They estimated that a R 2 of 0.50 could lead to a quantification error of approximately a factor of 4, comparable to differences between independent analytical methods. Brandsma et al. estimated that the difference between measured and expected concentrations was within a factor of 2 for GoPF values >0.5, while Zhou et al. reported a factor of 1.4 for total PCA concentrations under the same GoPF threshold. These findings support the use of this threshold as a pragmatic balance between accuracy and analytical feasibility, and thus reporting R 2 represents a significant factor in quality assurance. Another quality assurance feature of CPxplorer is the possibility to automatically correct the instrumental signal with an internal standard (IS) and calculate the IS-based recoveries. Many PCA analysts perform this task manually, whereas CPquant streamlines the process through automation.

Overall, CPxplorer proved useful in analyzing indoor dust and IOF patterns that also match those in the SWB. The ability of CPquant to provide quantified values is a major step in understanding exposure levels, aiding in risk reduction and setting exposure limits. Nevertheless, complementary analysis is needed to make the SWB a quantitative tool for assessing human exposure, including calculation of the sampling rate of the SWB and recording of the sampling conditions, such as humidity, temperature, direct contact with surfaces and materials, and more.

Food is another matrix that contributes to human exposure of PCAs through ingestion. Therefore, CPxplorer was applied to quantify PCAs in frequently consumed foods from the Swedish market. When comparing food items to indoor dust and IOF, a higher contribution of ∑PCAs-C10–13 and lower PCAs-C18–30 could be seen in both meat and vegetables, Figure A. These differences in PCA patterns may indicate different sources of contamination (e.g., plastic food packaging) for the groceries compared to the indoor matrices. This discrepancy could be helpful to identify the pathways driving human exposure when studying PCA uptake in matrices, such as human serum.

CPquant quantified the levels of PCAs in food items with a GoPF > 0.60 (Figure A). The results showed that PCA levels in food were an order of magnitude lower than in indoor dust, with ∑PCAs-C10–13 at 19 ng/g (w/w) and 7.5 ng/g (w/w), ∑PCAs-C14–17 at 16 ng/g (w/w) and 5.9 ng/g (w/w), and ∑PCAs-C18–30 at 7.8 ng/g (w/w) and 4.0 ng/g (w/w) for meat and vegetables, respectively. As previously mentioned, the content of PCAs in food were close to the quantification limits, where the method detection limit (MDL) of ∑PCAs-C10–13 was 17 and 6.5 ng/g, of ∑PCAs-C14–17 was 14 and 5.4 ng/g, and of ∑PCAs-C18–30 was 5.9 and 2.3 ng/g for meat and vegetables, respectively. These results align with the levels in the literature, , such as the concentrations reported by Ding et al. who measured in meat 7.6–78.1, 2.6–37.4, and 0.3–66.0 ng/g of ∑PCAs-C10–13, ∑PCAs-C14–17, and ∑PCAs-C18–30, respectively, and in vegetables <MDL–4.9, 1.4–50.7, and 0.2–199.5 ng/g of PCAs-C10–13, PCAs-C14–17, and PCAs-C18–30, respectively, providing a further confirmation to the CPxplorer workflow.

The quantification of Swedish food matrices, which have low PCA content and exhibit high blank contamination of PCAs-C10–17, is another showcase advantage of CPxplorer. , CPquant enabled blank subtraction for each batch analysis. Additionally, CPxplorer proved highly effective for understanding blank contamination since CPquant applies the deconvolution method , to quantify PCA levels in the blanks and the GoPF aids understanding if some homologue groups are not present in the blanks. For instance, the average ∑PCAs-C10–30 content in the blanks of the food samples batch was 10.2 ng/g, with an R 2 value of 0.67. The deviation from a perfect GoPF (R 2 = 1) was due to the absence of some homologue groups in the blanks compared to the standards. Complementarily, CPquant can also calculate method detection limit based on blank signals.

The swift data processing of CPxplorer enabled comprehensive analyses of multiple exposure sources, overcoming the challenges posed by the tedious nature of a large data set in some PCA investigations. Moreover, applying CPxplorer across a broad range of matrices demonstrated its capacity to overcome interference from other organic compounds, a key challenge in accurate PCA identification and quantification. By streamlining PCA quantification across diverse sample types, CPxplorer demonstrates its value as a practical and accessible tool for laboratories working with this complex contaminant group.

3.2.2. PCA-Related Analogues

To gain a comprehensive understanding of human exposure to CP mixtures, it is essential to evaluate other halogenated compounds present in technical mixtures alongside PCAs. , CPxplorer has demonstrated its effectiveness as a reliable tool for assessing the presence of PCOs in NIST-SRM-2585 indoor dust. The relative distribution based on the GC-NCI-Orbitrap instrumental signals revealed the highest presence of PCAs and PCOs with C12Cl7, as depicted in Figure S6. Both PCA and PCO patterns were predominantly composed of compounds containing C11–C14 and Cl6–Cl8. Notably, PCOs-Cl6 were detected more frequently than PCAs-Cl6, while PCOs with nine chlorines were less common than their PCA equivalents, particularly for those containing 11 and 12 carbons. Contrarily, the PCA/PCO pattern measured in NIST-SRM-2585 by LC-APCI-Orbitrap did not show significant discrepancies in chlorination patterns for PCAs-C10–17 and PCOs-C10–17 (Figure S7).

The capability of CPxplorer to accurately differentiate between interfering PCA and PCO ions helps to minimize the risk of “false positives”, as mentioned by Mendo Diaz et al. This issue arises from the near-complete overlap of isotopic clusters of PCA and PCO homologues with identical carbon chains and chlorine atoms , (Figure ). CPxplorer can partly overcome this challenge by removing problematic m/z values in CPions from the target list and ensuring that these ions are not considered for PCA identification in Skyline. This process was further validated by confirming well-defined profile MS data, isotopic distributions consistent with the standard, and adherence to strict mass error criteria. Additionally, our results were in good agreement with CP-Seeker, which identifies the interferences by comparing the whole experimental and theoretical isotopic patterns.

4.

4

Selected interferences of [M + Cl] adducts of PCA-Cl5, BCAs, and PCOs calculated by CPions. The axis shows the parent formula and the m/z values of the interfering ions, and the dots refer the ions that overlap with each other at 20 000 resolution power. The [PCA + Cl] ions correspond to the 35Cl6 isotopologues, the [BCA + Cl]+4 ions correspond to the 35Cl2 37Cl2 79Br and 35Cl3 37Cl81Br isotopologues, and the [PCO + Cl]+2 ions correspond to the 35Cl5 37Cl isotopologues. Note: The LC-qToF used for data acquisition had a resolving power of 20 000; therefore, interferences were assessed at this resolution. General molecular formulas and examples of BCAs and PCOs can be found in Table S4.

Although PCAs can be distinguished from some PCOs, potential interferences must be considered. Specifically, in chlorine-enhanced methods where the in-source fragment [PCA + Cl–HCl] shares the same chemical formula as the [PCO + Cl] adduct of the PCO containing one chlorine less. Conversely, when targeting [M – Cl] and [M – H] fragments, the [PCA – H – HCl] fragment has the exact same m/z value as [PCO – Cl] of the PCO containing the same number of carbons and chlorines. Given the wide retention time ranges and variable fragmentation efficiencies of numerous PCA and PCO congeners, their peaks often differ significantly in shape. Therefore, distinguishing PCA in-source fragments from PCO-related ions based on peak shape or alignment with other PCA fragments/adducts is unreliable. CPxplorer is flexible for peak integration, so the user can account for the described potential interference and remove or reintegrate the peaks in Skyline if needed.

Moreover, PCAs are also found in other technical mixtures containing different polyhalogenated alkanes (PXAs). The presence of PXAs also hinders the mass spectral separation and signal assignment of PCAs. Indeed, BCAs that have one carbon less, two chlorines fewer, and one bromine more than PCAs lead to “false positives” (Figure ). The CPions feature enabled the identification of potential “false positives” arising from BCAs and ensured their exclusion from the ion target list. This facilitated the accurate identification of PCAs and confirmed the absence of BCAs in the analyzed samples, which were also investigated in the dust samples but not detected.

To gain a deeper understanding of the fate of PCAs, it is crucial to also investigate their transformation products; see Table S4 for the general molecular formula and examples of PCA transformation products. CPxplorer was able to identify some of the phase I metabolites reported by Chen et al. in rice plant roots (Oryza sativa Japonica cv. Nipponbare) previously exposed to 1,2,5,6,9,10-C10H16Cl6. The metabolites included C10Cl5 and C10Cl6 hydroxy-PCAs, C10Cl5 and C10Cl6 oxo-PCAs, C10Cl6 PCAs-H + SO4H, and C10Cl4, C10Cl5, C11Cl5, C12Cl5, and C12Cl6 carboxy-PCAs. These results highlighted the need for efficient chromatographic separation as some oxo-PCAs, carboxyl-PCAs, and acetyl-PCAs share an identical molecular formula, making differentiation by only mass spectrometry impossible. For instance, as shown in Figure S8, the carboxy-PCA-C12Cl5O2 extracted ion chromatogram suggests that more than one compound is coeluting. However, mass spectral data alone cannot clarify this, emphasizing the critical need for manual data verification. Skyline has an advantage that it enables users to empirically adjust, exclude, and correct automated data integration.

3.3. Environmental Implications

The widespread presence of PCAs across a broad range of environmental matrices and their PBT properties are of significant concern. Industrial production of CP mixtures has been ongoing since the 1930s, with some estimates on current global output exceeding 1 million tonnes per year. , However, these contaminants remain poorly understood and their analysis continues to be challenging. CPxplorer aims to bridge this gap by simplifying CP mixture data analysis and fostering harmonization across laboratories. This will encourage more laboratories to quantify PCAs in environmental matrices, leading to more consistent results and improving risk assessment.

As an open source and freely available tool, CPxplorer features user-friendly interactive GUIs (Figures S2–S4) with comprehensive manuals, ensuring accessibility and ease of use. This is particularly important since PCAs-C10–13 and PCAs-C14–17 have been added to the Stockholm Convention. As these compounds are globally regulated, more laboratories will need to implement PCA analysis, a process that is complex and time-consuming. Therefore, the intuitive design of CPxplorer makes it easy to adopt this workflow, enhancing the efficiency of PCA analysis implementation for research and commercial laboratories.

In future developments, CPxplorer can also be used for the quantification of BCAs, PCOs, and other byproducts present in CP mixtures and environmental samples when standards become available. , CPxplorer is a customizable framework that makes new implementation feasible, such as more QA/QC features and multivariate analysis. Additionally, it allows for the inclusion of additional adduct/fragment ions upon request, and the code source is openly available the GitHub repository: https://github.com/WBS-TW/CPxplorer.

Supplementary Material

es5c04928_si_001.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Lu Bai and Dazhou Ren for the kind assistance during method development, as well as Alex Javelle for supporting the sample preparation. The project received financial support from the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning (FORMAS, 2020-01163, 2020-01067), the Carl Trygger Foundation (CTS 24:3351), the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (219-23-004), and the National Science Foundation of China (W2411007).

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c04928.

  • Detailed description of sample preparation and analysis of NIST-SRM-2585, ERM-CE100, IOF, indoor dust, SWB, meat and vegetables, and rice plant exposure; overview table of sample preparation; identification of mass spectral interferences and target ion list generation using CPions; signal elucidation and peak integration using Skyline; deconvolution and quantification of homologue groups using CPquant; quantification approach used by CPquant; quantification results for NIST-SRM-2585 and matrices used to address human exposure; overview on the formulas and ions of polychlorinated alkanes (PCAs), transformation products derived from PCAs, polychlorinated olefins (PCOs), and bromochloro alkanes (BCAs); GUI display of interfering ion results from CPions, Skyline analysis, and CPquant quantification; relative distribution of PCAs-C10–17 and PCOs-C10–17 measured in NIST-SRM-2585; extracted ion chromatogram of C12H19Cl5O2 [M + Cl]; peak area for PCA-C10–13 homologue groups from two replicates of NIST-SRM-2585 indoor dust (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Fernandes A. R.. et al. Recommended terms and abbreviations for polychlorinated alkanes (PCAs) as the predominant component of chlorinated paraffins (CPs) TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2023;169:117363. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117363. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guida Y., Capella R., Weber R.. Chlorinated paraffins in the technosphere: A review of available information and data gaps demonstrating the need to support the Stockholm Convention implementation. Emerg. Contam. 2020;6:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.emcon.2020.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen C.. et al. Global Historical Production, Use, In-Use Stocks, and Emissions of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56:7895. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. UNEP . Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its twelfth meeting. Risk management evaluation on short-chain chlorinated paraffins, 2016.
  5. UNEP . Report of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs), Annex A, 2025. https://www.pops.int/TheConvention/ThePOPs/AllPOPs/tabid/2509/Default.aspx (accessed 2025-08-05).
  6. Vetter W., Sprengel J., Krätschmer K.. Chlorinated paraffins – A historical consideration including remarks on their complexity. Chemosphere. 2022;287:132032. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tomy G. T., Stern G. A., Muir D. C. G., Fisk A. T., Cymbalisty C. D., Westmore J. B.. Quantifying C 10-C 13 Polychloroalkanes in Environmental Samples by High-Resolution Gas Chromatography/Electron Capture Negative Ion High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1997;69:2762. doi: 10.1021/ac961244y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tomy G. T., Stern G. A.. Analysis of C14-C17 polychloro-n-alkanes in environmental matrixes by accelerated solvent extraction-high-resolution gas chromatography/electron capture negative ion high-resolution mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1999;71:4860–4865. doi: 10.1021/ac990458n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Amoura C., Larvor F., Marchand P., Bizec B. L., Cariou R., Bichon E.. Quantification of chlorinated paraffins by chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry – Part A: Influence of gas chromatography and ionisation source parameters. Chemosphere. 2024;352:141401. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Amoura C., Larvor F., Marchand P., Bizec B. L., Cariou R., Bichon E.. Quantification of chlorinated paraffins by chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry – Part B: Influence of liquid chromatography separation. Chemosphere. 2024;352:141401. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bogdal C., Alsberg T., Diefenbacher P. S., Macleod M., Berger U.. Fast quantification of chlorinated paraffins in environmental samples by direct injection high-resolution mass spectrometry with pattern deconvolution. Anal. Chem. 2015;87:2852–2860. doi: 10.1021/ac504444d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fernandes A. R., Vetter W., Dirks C., van Mourik L., Cariou R., Sprengel J., Heeb N., Lentjes A., Kratschmer K.. Determination of chlorinated paraffins (CPs): Analytical conundrums and the pressing need for reliable and relevant standards. Chemosphere. 2022;286:131878. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yuan B.. et al. Chlorines Are Not Evenly Substituted in Chlorinated Paraffins: A Predicted NMR Pattern Matching Framework for Isomeric Discrimination in Complex Contaminant Mixtures. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020;7:496–503. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yuan B.. et al. Quantifying Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffin Congener Groups. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51:10633–10641. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Reth M., Zencak Z., Oehme M.. New quantification procedure for the analysis of chlorinated paraffins using electron capture negative ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2005;1081:225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.05.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Krätschmer K., Schächtele A.. Interlaboratory studies on chlorinated paraffins: Evaluation of different methods for food matrices. Chemosphere. 2019;234:252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. van Mourik L. M., van der Veen I., Crum S., de Boer J.. Developments and interlaboratory study of the analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2018;102:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. McGrath T. J.. et al. Detection of Bromochloro Alkanes in Indoor Dust Using a Novel CP-Seeker Data Integration Tool. Anal. Chem. 2024;96:4942. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mendo Diaz O.. et al. A Quasi Real-Time Evaluation of High-Resolution Mass Spectra of Complex Chlorinated Paraffin Mixtures and Their Transformation Products. Anal. Chem. 2024 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Perkons I., Pasecnaja E., Zacs D.. The impact of baking on chlorinated paraffins: Characterization of C10–C17 chlorinated paraffins in oven-baked pastry products and unprocessed pastry dough by HPLC–ESI–Q–TOF–MS. Food Chem. 2019;298:125100. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Adams K. J.. et al. Skyline for Small Molecules: A Unifying Software Package for Quantitative Metabolomics. J. Proteome Res. 2020;19:1447–1458. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shang H., Fan X., Kubwabo C., Rasmussen P. E.. Short-chain and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in Canadian house dust and NIST SRM 2585. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019;26:7453–7462. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-04073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ricci M., de Boer J., Johansen J. E., Liu H., Dumas P., Warner N. A., Perkons I., McGrath T. J., Røsrud Borgen A., Bjørneby S. M., Tomasko J., Steer H., Lentjes A., van Velzen M., van Mourik L.. Stepping-up accurate quantification of chlorinated paraffins: Successful certification of the first matrix reference material. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2024;1315:342757. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2024.342757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Swedish Market Basket Study 2022. Zenodo, 2024. https://zenodo.org/records/14671093.
  25. Chen W.. et al. Biotic and Abiotic Transformation Pathways of a Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffin Congener, 1,2,5,6,9,10-C10H16Cl6, in a Rice Seedling Hydroponic Exposure System. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56:9486–9496. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c01119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Loos M., Gerber C., Corona F., Hollender J., Singer H.. Accelerated isotope fine structure calculation using pruned transition trees. Anal. Chem. 2015;87:5738–5744. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schilling B.. et al. Platform-independent and label-free quantitation of proteomic data using MS1 extracted ion chromatograms in skyline: Application to protein acetylation and phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2012;11:202–214. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.017707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yuan B., Muir D., MacLeod M.. Methods for trace analysis of short-, medium-, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins: Critical review and recommendations. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2019;1074:16–32. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Brits M., de Boer J., Rohwer E. R., De Vos J., Weiss J. M., Brandsma S. H.. Short-, medium-, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in South African indoor dust and cat hair. Chemosphere. 2020;238:124643. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Spaan K. M., Yuan B., Plassmann M. M., Benskin J. P., de Wit C. A.. Characterizing the Organohalogen Iceberg: Extractable, Multihalogen Mass Balance Determination in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57:9309–9320. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Brandsma S. H.. et al. Chlorinated Paraffins in Car Tires Recycled to Rubber Granulates and Playground Tiles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:7595–7603. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meziere M., Cariou R., Larvor F., Bichon E., Guitton Y., Marchand P., Dervilly G., Le Bizec B.. Optimized characterization of short-, medium, and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2020;1619:460927. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.460927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schinkel L.. et al. Dealing with strong mass interferences of chlorinated paraffins and their transformation products: An analytical guide. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2018;106:116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Endo S.. Refinement and extension of COSMO-RS-trained fragment contribution models for predicting the partition properties of C10–20chlorinated paraffin congeners. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 2021;23:831–843. doi: 10.1039/D1EM00123J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schinkel L.. et al. Analysis of Medium-Chain and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins: The Urgent Need for More Specific Analytical Standards. Environmental Science and Technology Letters. 2018;5:708–717. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yuan B.. et al. Polychlorinated alkanes in paired blood serum and breast milk in a Swedish cohort study: Matrix dependent partitioning differences compared to legacy POPs. Environ. Int. 2024;183:108440. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sprengel J., Vetter W.. Synthesis and characterization of eight single chain length chlorinated paraffin standards and their use for quantification. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2019;33:49–56. doi: 10.1002/rcm.8310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Brandsma S. H.. et al. Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (CPs) Dominate in Australian Sewage Sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51:3364–3372. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhou Y., de Wit C. A., Yin G., Du X., Yuan B.. Shorter than short-chain: Very short-chain chlorinated paraffins (vSCCPs) found in wildlife from the Yangtze River Delta. Environ. Int. 2019;130:104955. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Chibwe L.. et al. C12–30 α-Bromo-Chloro ‘alkenes’: Characterization of a Poorly Identified Flame Retardant and Potential Environmental Implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:10835–10844. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fang K., Sun Y.-b., He R.-m., Qian J.-k., Gu W., Lu Y.-f., Dong Z.-m., Wan Y., Wang C., Tang S.. A critical review of human internal exposure to short-chain chlorinated paraffins and its concerning health risks. Environ. Res. 2025;272:121179. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.121179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Bai L., Lv K., Li J., Gao W., Liao C., Wang Y., Jiang G.. Evaluating the dynamic distribution process and potential exposure risk of chlorinated paraffins in indoor environments of Beijing, China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023;441:129907. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wong F.. et al. Dioxin-like activities, halogenated flame retardants, organophosphate esters and chlorinated paraffins in dust from Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, Sweden and China. Chemosphere. 2017;168:1248–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yin S., McGrath T. J., Cseresznye A., Bombeke J., Poma G., Covaci A.. Assessment of silicone wristbands for monitoring personal exposure to chlorinated paraffins (C8–36): A pilot study. Environ. Res. 2023;224:115526. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stokvis E., Rosing H., Beijnen J. H.. Stable isotopically labeled internal standards in quantitative bioanalysis using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry: Necessity or not? Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005;19:401–407. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yuan B.. et al. Dietary Intake Contributed the Most to Chlorinated Paraffin Body Burden in a Norwegian Cohort. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56:17080–17089. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang C.. et al. Migration of chlorinated paraffins from plastic food packaging into food simulants: Concentrations and differences in congener profiles. Chemosphere. 2019;225:557–564. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee S., Choo G., Ekpe O. D., Kim J., Oh J. E.. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins in various foods from Republic of Korea: Levels, congener patterns, and human dietary exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2020;263:114520. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wu X.. et al. Chlorinated paraffins in takeout food and its packaging in Beijing, China and dietary exposure risk. Environ. Res. 2024;252:118768. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ding L.. et al. Overlooked long-chain chlorinated paraffin (LCCP) contamination in foodstuff from China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;801:149775. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li T., Wan Y., Gao S., Wang B., Hu J.. High-Throughput Determination and Characterization of Short-, Medium-, and Long-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Human Blood. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51:3346–3354. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schinkel L.. et al. Deconvolution of Mass Spectral Interferences of Chlorinated Alkanes and Their Thermal Degradation Products: Chlorinated Alkenes. Anal. Chem. 2017;89:5923–5931. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yuan B., Benskin J. P., Chen C. E. L., Bergman Å.. Determination of Chlorinated Paraffins by Bromide-Anion Attachment Atmospheric-Pressure Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018;5:348–353. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tomy, G. T. Analysis of Chlorinated Paraffins in Environmental Matrices: The Ultimate Challenge for the Analytical Chemist. In Chlorinated Paraffins; The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 10; Springer, 2009; pp 83–106. 10.1007/698_2009_39. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. He C.. et al. Semiquantitative Characterization of Bromo-chloro Paraffins and Olefins in the Australian Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56:12452–12459. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

es5c04928_si_001.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)

Articles from Environmental Science & Technology are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES