Skip to main content
. 2025 Sep 17;104(9):4495–4503. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06437-4

Table 2.

Abnormalities identified on NGS in patients that had it performed at relapse

No Sex Age (years) FAB Karyotype Other NGS Time Significance Outcome
8 F 14,5 M0

46, X, -X, add(3)(q27), -5, del(11)(q23), +der(19)t(1;19)

(q23;p13),

+mar[cp11]//46XY [6]

No

SET::NUP214

ASXL1 mutation

PHP6 mutation

Relapse Rare– uncertain in AML Possible adverse prognostic Death in 2nd relapse, after 2nd HSCT
9 M 17,4 M2 46, XX [20] No NUP214– ABL1 Relapse Unknown 2nd remission, HSCT
10 M 6,8 M1 46,XY [18] No NUP98::NSD1 Relapse Poor prognosis 2nd remission HSCT
11 M 5,2 M2 47, XY, der(5)t(1;5)(q23;q35), + 6. del(10)(q23), t(11;19)(q23;p13)[11] / 46,XY [9] FISH: suggestive of 11q23 translocation

KMT2A::MLLT1

ABL2 mutation

Relapse Intermediate Death in relapse

N– Patient number; FAB– French American British morphologic classification; Other– Other molecular methods; NGS– Next-generation sequencing; Time– Time point when the NGS panel was performed; HSCT–hematopoietic stem cell transplant; FISH - fluorescence in situ hybridization; RT-PCR reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction