Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul 16;20(14):3657–3666. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.14.3657

graphic file with name cde359f6.jpg

Fig. 6. Silica gel 60 HPTLC analysis of the predominant promastigote glycolipids of L.mexicana in WT (lane 1), ΔGDPMP (lane 2) and ΔGDPMP + cRIBLmxGDPMP (lane 3) parasites. (A) Total lipids from 2 × 108 promastigotes visualized by orcinol/H2SO4 spraying. (B) Fluorography of total lipids from 2.5 × 107 [3H]Man-labeled promastigotes (∼100 000 c.p.m.). (C) Fluorography of total lipids from 5 × 106 [3H]GlcNH2-labeled promastigotes (∼100 000 c.p.m.). (D) Fluorography of total lipids from 5 × 106 [3H]myo-inositol-labeled promastigotes (∼100 000 c.p.m.). The positions of the abundant L.mexicana GIPLs (McConville et al., 1993) are indicated by the bars, and the start and front of the TLCs are marked by S and F, respectively. Asterisks mark new [3H]GlcNH2-labeled compounds accumulating in the ΔGDPMP mutant.