Table 2.
Comparison of BioLLMNet, RLaffinity, and RSAPred (Pearson and MAE), where improvements for BioLLMNet are computed against the best baseline in each column and best values are shown in bold.
| Metric | Method | Aptamer | Repeats | Ribosomal | Riboswitch | Viral | miRNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson | BioLLMNet |
0.7713 ( 4.2%) |
0.9340 ( 2.6%) |
0.8933 ( 5.1%) |
0.9462 ( 2.3%) |
0.8004 ( 1.4%) |
0.8712 |
| RLaffinity | 0.7400 | 0.9100 | 0.8500 | 0.9250 | 0.7890 | 0.8750 | |
| RSAPred [31] | 0.7180 | 0.8940 | 0.8360 | 0.9090 | 0.7840 | 0.8810 | |
| MAE | BioLLMNet |
0.5726 ( 2.9%) |
0.3572 ( 1.6%) |
0.5743 ( 10.3%) |
0.5236 ( 1.2%) |
0.5582 ( 7.1%) |
0.3827 ( 4.3%) |
| RLaffinity | 0.5900 | 0.3630 | 0.6400 | 0.5300 | 0.6010 | 0.4000 | |
| RSAPred | 0.6070 | 0.3670 | 0.6870 | 0.5370 | 0.6070 | 0.4340 |