Skip to main content
. 2025 Oct 23;13:e20084. doi: 10.7717/peerj.20084

Table 2. Characteristics of the resistive sprint training programs.

Study Group Training programme Agility or COD test (s)
Training modality Load Session
volume
Total volume Length (weeks) frequency (per week) Total sessions (n) Session duration (min)
Carlos-Vivas et al. (2020) HRS vs.
VRS vs.
CRS vs.
URS
1080 Sprint™, weighted vest 10–20% BM 400 m 6,400 m 8 2 16 30 Zig-zag 20-m test
De Hoyo et al. (2016) HRS vs.
RT vs.
URP / PT
Sled towing 12.6% BM
40–60% 1RM
0%
HRS: 20 m × 6–10 reps, 120–200 m
RT: 4–8 reps ×2-3 sets
PT: 2–3 reps × 1–3 sets
2,680 m 8 1–2 16 60
30
30
Zig-zag 20-m test
McMorrow, Ditroilo & Egan (2019) HRS vs. URS Sled towing 30% BM
0%
100–180 m 800 m 6 1 8 45 S180° test
Sal-de-Rellan et al. (2024) CRS vs. FT Sled + weighted vest 13% BM 120–300 m 2,520 m 6 2 12 15 Arrowhead COD test, 15m-AG-B, Zig-zag-B, T-test, Illinois agility test, NMAT
Grazioli et al. (2023) HRS-M vs. HRS-H Sled 15% VL
40% VL
4–6 reps × 1-4 sets 4,765.2 ± 514.1 m,
4,924.9 ± 204.7 m
8 1–2 8–16 15 Zig-zag 20-m test
Shalfawi et al. (2013) HRAS vs. SQ Resistance band Variable 160–200 m 1,840 m 10 2 20 60 S180° agility test
Gil et al. (2018) HRS vs. URS Elastic cords and sheaves 10% VL
0%
NR 800 m 6 2 12 60 Zig-zag 20-m test
Otero-Esquina et al. (2017) HRS vs. CG Sled towing 20% BM 20 m × 3–5 reps, 60–100 m 560 m 7 1–2 7–14 60–90 V-cut test
Pareja-Blanco, Asian-Clemente & Saez de Villarreal (2021) HRS-H vs. HRS-L vs.
SQ vs. SQ + HRS-H vs. SQ + HRS-L vs. CG
Sled towing 12.5% BM
80% BM
40–55% 1RM
HRS: 20 m × 4–7 reps, 120–200 m
SQ: 4–8 reps ×3 sets
880 m 8 1 8 30–45 20-m sprint with a 180° COD test
Rodriguez-Osorio, Gonzalo-Skok & Pareja-Blanco (2019) VRCOD-M vs. VRCOD-L vs. URCOD Weighted vest 12.5% BM
50% BM
V-cut training × 3–5 reps NR 6 2 12 20 V-cut test, L-run test
Loturco et al. (2017) HRS vs.
URP / PT
Sled towing 5%, 12.5%, 20% BM
OPL
20–30 m × 6–8 reps, 150–180 m
6 reps × 6–8 sets, 36–48 reps (50% HJ+50% CMJ)
1,920 m
504 reps
5 2–3 12 60 Zig-zag 20-m test
Raya-González et al. (2017) VRS vs. RT Weighted vest 15–50% BM LS: 3 reps × 2–4 sets CODS: 15 reps × 3 sets RT: 6-8 reps × 4 sets NR 6 2 12 Various 90° COD
Simpson et al. (2020) VRS vs. CG Weighted vest ∼8% BM 8 h NR 6 3 18 NR T-test

Notes.

NR
not reported
CG
control group
RCT
randomized controlled trial
HRS
horizontally resisted sprint
VRS
vertically resisted sprint
CRS
combined horizontally and vertically resisted sprint
HRAS
horizontally resisted agility and sprint
URS
unresisted sprint training
RT
resistance training
CRT
combined resistance training
FT
functional training
URP/PT
unresisted plyometric training
Load: L
Light-load
M
Moderate-load
H
Heavy-load
1080 Sprint
1080 Sprint™ device
WV
weighted vest
BM
body mass
1RM
one repetition maximum
BW
body weight
VL
velocity loss
reps
repetitions
S180° test
sprint 9-3-6-39 m with 180° turns test
15m-AG-B
Agility test 15-m ball dribbling
Zig-zag-B
Zig-zag agility tests with ball
NMAT
New multi-change of direction agility
URCOD
unresisted change of direction and sprint training
VRCOD
vertically resisted change of direction and sprint training