Table 5.
Characteristics of simulated ancient metagenomic datasets representing three distinct environments: bone, dental calculus, and gut
| Sample | # Taxa | Coverage | # Reads (merged) | Total length | GC content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone | 34 | 3× | 13,481,538 | 689,950,613 | 57.62 |
| Bone | 34 | 5× | 22,469,438 | 1,149,702,991 | 57.62 |
| Bone | 34 | 10× | 44,938,811 | 2,299,239,612 | 57.62 |
| Dental Calculus | 59 | 3× | 8,169,233 | 417,738,204 | 43.77 |
| Dental Calculus | 59 | 5× | 13,615,501 | 696,358,011 | 43.76 |
| Dental Calculus | 59 | 10× | 27,231,047 | 1,392,706,548 | 43.77 |
| Gut | 116 | 3× | 25,583,926 | 1,308,958,512 | 42.45 |
| Gut | 116 | 5× | 42,640,124 | 2,181,743,052 | 42.45 |
| Gut | 116 | 10× | 85,279,973 | 4,363,114,755 | 42.45 |
The table summarizes the number of taxa, average coverage depth, number of sequences, total sequence length, and GC content (%) for representative datasets simulated with short fragments and moderate damage